This was not "shown" either. The entire broadcast was a combination of prerecorded imagery and digital effects, all compiled in advance, but aired as "Live".
I doubt they want anyone thinking their lies can be revealed. Some of us have been able to re-examine the video content with critical eyes and spot the flaws and inconsistencies. This is a minor inconvenience for them that they likely perceive as a "cost of business" potentiality. No real threat until a critical mass of the population sees the charade for what it is, which is a ways down the road.
I get that the imagery is fabricated from start to finish. SC does an excellent job of showing that.
What I meant was that the intent by faking it so that it looks like a controlled demolition is so that people like us see that and fall into the 911truth honeypot.
If Clues Forum is your first foray into researching the media matrix, congratulations, you have taken a less meandering road than many. A number of us arrived here after visiting diversionary traps set by the same creators of the official narrative and designed to ensnare those with whom the official accounts did not resonate. There is a tremendous volume of research on archive here devoted to examining the historical narrative as most people know it and the often fraudulent imagery and fictional story lines used to support it.
The unraveling of history can be alarming initially but is ultimately liberating, as it allows one to begin to live authentically, as opposed to being a character in a story line created by someone else.
I've been researching on the Internet since 1993. But 9/11 and other conspiracy theories went over my head until about a year ago. I agree. I felt bad for a while but now I feel better than ever. This is the way the world works whether I know about it or not. But I much prefer to know.