History Channel 911 Myths

It has taken less than 10 years to pry open the can of worms enshrouding the pathetic 9/11 scam. The central role of the major newsmedia corporations to pull off this sordid "terror" simulation has now been comprehensively exposed. Before joining this forum, please get familiar with the research at: http://www.septemberclues.info

History Channel 911 Myths

Postby SmokingGunII on September 18th, 2010, 7:15 pm

If a wing hit the floor you can bet that the heaviest and strongest part (engine) would have to, yet there is no debris or holes in the Pentagon wall. Apparently aluminium nose cones are stronger.

Personally, the most frustrating part of trying to educate friends with regards the 9/11 hoax is that many doubt any existence of planes at either Shanksville or the Pentagon, yet believe two planes hit the twin towers! Why, because they saw it on the TV!!

PS. What was PM's explanation, based on physics, that enables paper and red bandanas to survive infernos that vaporise seats and passengers? :P
SmokingGunII
Member
 
Posts: 557
Joined: October 23rd, 2009, 10:34 am

Postby Brutal Metal on September 19th, 2010, 5:15 am

So true Smoking GunII, what about the supposed drivers license (that was expired!) found in the rubble at Shanksville from one of the passengers? Yeah RIGHT!! I could melt one of those with some sunlight and a magnifying glass!
Got some swamp land down here in Florida to sell these Moronic experts!!
Brutal Metal
Member
 
Posts: 401
Joined: July 22nd, 2010, 4:58 am

Postby Terence.drew on September 20th, 2010, 1:25 am

Here is the still photography equivalent of the video footage shown on History Channel with the inhaling building and the firemen walking backwards.



Image

http://www.magnumphotos.com/CoreXDoc/MA ... C14148.jpg

Magnum photography. One of the best known photography 'houses' in the world. Why does this picture by Steve McCurry (Magnum) have a very obvious 'halo' around the buildings?

The halo effect is an artifact of 'masking' in photoshopped images...were for example one sky is replaced by another

..."In some cases you may see a halo effect around the tree branches and leaves or along the edges of buildings where the two images are blended. You can remove these using the Burn tool by painting over these areas with a low Exposure brush and with the Range set to Midtones or Shadows as necessary."

This is taken from a tutorial called "How to Replace a Sky in Photoshop"

http://www.digital-photography-school.c ... -photoshop


Magnum photographers?

http://inmotion.magnumphotos.com/essay/september11

Slide 4 in this intro to the Magnum Photos 911 Essay... the photographer says ..."by the time I got there, i couldn't get any access, it was all closed off"...yet later in the individual photographers' expositions they seem to be saying that they were mostly walking around willy nilly unimpeded. It is not surprising to see that a lot of the photos match the official 911 narrative of people gawking up at the buildings from every angle conceivable.

Some of the images from this top genius photo outfit are quite comical

here the grim reaper hits the remains of the WTC with a hammer for some reason..

Image

This next one has a gay fireman couple arguing over who is going to finish the ironing..

Image

Guiliani?

Image
Terence.drew
Member
 
Posts: 248
Joined: April 10th, 2010, 2:55 pm

Previous

Return to SEPTEMBER CLUES: the 9/11 psyop exposed: the media aired a "Made-for-TV Hollywood movie"

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests