MORE "New" IMAGES (released in 2010!)

It has taken less than 10 years to pry open the can of worms enshrouding the pathetic 9/11 scam. The central role of the major newsmedia corporations to pull off this sordid "terror" simulation has now been comprehensively exposed. Before joining this forum, please get familiar with the research at: http://www.septemberclues.info

Re: MORE "New" IMAGES (released in 2010!)

Postby burlington on May 15th, 2012, 4:05 am

Thank you, that explains a lot. Still, in 2001 there must have been many people who had not yet gone electronic / digital. I still use my 1979 Minolta, a mechanical / manual camera. I wonder if any people had their camera films 'lost' by the developers. Or could unexposed camera film be disrupted in a similar manner as the videotapes? (Sorry, I'm a techno-dummy. :blink: )
burlington
Member
 
Posts: 18
Joined: May 12th, 2012, 10:03 pm

Re: MORE "New" IMAGES (released in 2010!)

Postby brianv on May 15th, 2012, 4:19 am

burlington wrote:I don't know where to put this comment -- none of the topics refer to it. I'd like to know where all the amateur photography is. Almost everyone had a camera by 2001; digital point-and-shoots, old film cameras, camera phones, camcorders... There should be literally thousands of REAL videos and photographs of the towers from that day.

I am particularly curious about the ferry boat which can be seen passing the towers as the JPEG plane glides into the second tower. It is a good bet that most of the passengers were tourists, and tourists would likely have been looking at the twin towers and most likely many of them would have had cameras pointed at them. They would be ideal witnesses to confirm (for those who need to hear it from witnesses) that there was no plane. Where are they, and where are their photos and videos... :huh:


Not quite correct! Cell phones were slow on the uptake in the USA apparently, pagers were still all the rage in 2001. Nobody had camera phones, they hadn't been invented yet!

You have to remember too the topography of New York, a city of canyons! Walk round the block you see nothing except the street you are on! How can you photograph something you can't see! That includes the smokescreen that went up prior to the first demolition charges going off, if indeed they did use demolition charges!
brianv
Member
 
Posts: 3922
Joined: October 18th, 2009, 11:19 pm

Re: MORE "New" IMAGES (released in 2010!)

Postby really.dude on May 18th, 2012, 5:09 pm

Hello Simon&Crew

i recently saw September Clues on YT, by mere accident, and it rang a long time silenced bell from when i saw the 9/11 events live on tv, back in 2001, in Romania. I', a romanian, now working in constructions in Germany, so please excuse my not so good english. I always beleived the whole thing is veeeeery fishy but i haven't really thought about it much since it happened.
But now you created a brand new hobby for me: photo-detective! :-)) So, attashed here is my first try, with a photo i saw here in this thread and wich immediately struck my eyes with its failures :-).
Note: i'm don't have anything to do with this kind of work-media, photography, editing etc etc- so i hope you'll excuse my poor skills on this one, i've done it all in Paint, because Paint is understandable and usuable for me :)))

For a better view, i think, you have to zoom in into the picture to see what i wrote there.

Hm, how do I upload/attach a photo here? i drew/wrote on the photo in Paint so it's not the same anymore as it appears on it's website...please help and sorry again, i don't know this kind of stuff.
really.dude
Newbie
 
Posts: 1
Joined: May 18th, 2012, 4:47 pm

Re: MORE "New" IMAGES (released in 2010!)

Postby nonhocapito on May 21st, 2012, 7:08 am

really.dude wrote:Hello Simon&Crew

i recently saw September Clues on YT, by mere accident, and it rang a long time silenced bell from when i saw the 9/11 events live on tv, back in 2001, in Romania. I', a romanian, now working in constructions in Germany, so please excuse my not so good english. I always beleived the whole thing is veeeeery fishy but i haven't really thought about it much since it happened.
But now you created a brand new hobby for me: photo-detective! :-)) So, attashed here is my first try, with a photo i saw here in this thread and wich immediately struck my eyes with its failures :-).
Note: i'm don't have anything to do with this kind of work-media, photography, editing etc etc- so i hope you'll excuse my poor skills on this one, i've done it all in Paint, because Paint is understandable and usuable for me :)))

For a better view, i think, you have to zoom in into the picture to see what i wrote there.

Hm, how do I upload/attach a photo here? i drew/wrote on the photo in Paint so it's not the same anymore as it appears on it's website...please help and sorry again, i don't know this kind of stuff.


1) Check your spelling before posting. See here: viewtopic.php?p=2369240#p2369240
2) Introduce yourself properly: viewtopic.php?p=2369240#p2369240
3) You cannot upload or attach a picture, but you can embed one, just like you can embed videos. Read FAQs here: faq.php#f3r3 and our tips and guidelines here: viewforum.php?f=32
nonhocapito
Administrator
 
Posts: 2503
Joined: July 10th, 2010, 6:38 am
Location: Italy

Re:

Postby Seth on September 8th, 2012, 12:58 am

fakers911 wrote:Very interesting stuff here guys:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GLs8Fa7b ... re=related

See the rest of the new video's posted in September 11th 2001 WNYW Dub2 sequence aswell.


@ 1:09 when "interview" switches to bald man in blue who says "I saw it all"

Notice behind him there is a fireman standing in the street, and another fireman passing by the stationary fireman and coming towards (and in back of, from camera point of view) the bald man being interviewed.

In the next few seconds 4 fireman are seen passing behind the right shoulder of this guy.
Seth
Member
 
Posts: 24
Joined: September 3rd, 2012, 2:26 pm

Re: MORE "New" IMAGES (released in 2010!)

Postby tak47 on October 8th, 2012, 12:50 pm

i just discovered the following clip:


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W6CSYgfd65A

there are (as usual) pretty weird shadows in it.

At 0:37 the shadows of the 2 guys cast in the exact opposite direction. one would assume that shadow 2 could be a reflection shadow, but it oddly is as "thick" as shadow 1. the CGI software possibly didn't differentiate between 'direct' shadows and reflected ones.

screenshot:

Image

what do you think?
tak47
Member
 
Posts: 43
Joined: October 5th, 2012, 9:27 am

Re: MORE "New" IMAGES (released in 2010!)

Postby Heiwa on October 8th, 2012, 7:07 pm


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3em5QJukqrg
Video Link - http://youtu.be/3em5QJukqrg
is another strange creation popping up on Youtube suggesting that fireworks went off up top somewhere (video doesn't pan up) or in the intact wall creating a rain of bright, glittering stuff. I have a feeling this footage is 100% fake and published to confuse people.
Heiwa
Member
 
Posts: 1064
Joined: October 20th, 2009, 7:20 pm

Re: MORE "New" IMAGES (released in 2010!)

Postby simonshack on October 8th, 2012, 9:31 pm

tak47 wrote:At 0:37 the shadows of the 2 guys cast in the exact opposite direction. one would assume that shadow 2 could be a reflection shadow, but it oddly is as "thick" as shadow 1. the CGI software possibly didn't differentiate between 'direct' shadows and reflected ones.

what do you think?


I think it's an excellent find, tak47. It goes to corroborate similar findings I have made in other purported "9/11 videos" set in the same general area, EAST of the towers. I have added a link to your above post in my UNDEBUNKABLE SEPCLUES thread:
viewtopic.php?p=2354010#p2354010

To be sure, I have never observed any such "reflected light" shadows in my entire lifetime. If some Joe would argue that the "SHADOW 2" that you pointed out is due to some sort of "reflected light from buildings across the street", the onus is on this Joe to prove - empirically - that light can bounce from buildings and produce such 'reverse-to sunlight' shadows (as sharp and long as that "SHADOW 2") behind a man standing in a shaded area across the street.

In fact, even the very (in)famous NAUDET BROTHERS' video of "flight 11" striking WTC1 has similar shadow problems. Here's an old post of mine regarding this topic:

viewtopic.php?p=2372348#p2372348

How can this fireman have a shadow in a shaded area...unless there were 2 suns shining in New York that day ?
Image

Now, some have argued that this shadow is possible: as the argument goes, the pink Post Office buiding across the street reflects / bounces off enough light to produce that shadow. Now, just to get a better view of the Lispenard st/Church st intersection, here are two Google Earth images - evidently captured on a sunny Manhattan morning (reasonably similar to the morning of September 11, 2001) :
Image

Now, does this girl project a shadow - in her shaded area? ( "X" is the location of the fireman in the Naudet video)
Image


The sun never lies. <_<
simonshack
Administrator
 
Posts: 6428
Joined: October 18th, 2009, 9:09 pm
Location: italy

Re: MORE "New" IMAGES (released in 2010!)

Postby LightCone on October 9th, 2012, 2:20 am

tak47 wrote:i just discovered the following clip:


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W6CSYgfd65A


Something else of peculiar note:

At 2:35 the man in the white shirt starts talking to the man in the blue shirt but nothing can be heard.

In fact, all of the voices heard in the video seem to be disembodied. Somehow, these voices are heard over the ubiquitous sirens but the man's voice at 2:35 isn't.
LightCone
Member
 
Posts: 154
Joined: July 13th, 2011, 7:07 am

Re: MORE "New" IMAGES (released in 2010!)

Postby Haze on October 9th, 2012, 6:58 am

I don't undersand the background of the Naudet movie :
Image

I explain :

This is a picture from this movie : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=urbuxH1B89k
Image
We can see 2 buildings : one white and one red, like a google street view.

Now a picture from naudet movie :
Image
How can we see all the white building ?
Haze
Member
 
Posts: 54
Joined: September 24th, 2012, 8:44 pm

Re: MORE "New" IMAGES (released in 2010!)

Postby hoi.polloi on October 9th, 2012, 4:07 pm

Wow, that is a really jerky, weird video. It's hard to say which one is more fake looking, that or the Naudet picture.

What do you make of this jerky video, Haze? Could they have built another building there since 2001?
hoi.polloi
Administrator
 
Posts: 4866
Joined: November 14th, 2010, 8:24 pm

Re: MORE "New" IMAGES (released in 2010!)

Postby Game_Over on October 11th, 2012, 2:22 am

The street light in the Naudet video only has 2 lights. The google street view map clearly displays 3 on the traffic light. I am not saying they didn't change the light after 2001. I am merely noting that they are different.
Game_Over
Member
 
Posts: 22
Joined: March 26th, 2010, 9:45 pm

Re: MORE "New" IMAGES (released in 2010!)

Postby resolution on October 11th, 2012, 5:39 am

I would have thought all road traffic lights would require a red, orange and green light. Just having two doesn't work unless it's for staggering traffic on a motorway onramp in countries where people seem to have lost the ability to merge like a zip...
resolution
Member
 
Posts: 163
Joined: May 12th, 2012, 6:15 am

Re: MORE "New" IMAGES (released in 2010!)

Postby Seth on October 16th, 2012, 11:11 pm

tak47 wrote:i just discovered the following clip:


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W6CSYgfd65A

there are (as usual) pretty weird shadows in it.

At 0:37 the shadows of the 2 guys cast in the exact opposite direction. one would assume that shadow 2 could be a reflection shadow, but it oddly is as "thick" as shadow 1. the CGI software possibly didn't differentiate between 'direct' shadows and reflected ones.

screenshot:

Image

what do you think?


The shadows don't make sense at all...even "preacher man's" shadow - when he's giving his quick interview - the sun is behind him, in the camera view - then when he walks across the street his shadow is towards the direction of the sun.

There's something else I'd like someone to comment on - it looks like a screen color or rendering glitch, it's between

0:34-0:35 - part of the street goes from grey to white and if you pause it at this point it looks like it was an overlay that was somewhat poorly filled in. (Comes into view from right of picture as camera pans right)
Seth
Member
 
Posts: 24
Joined: September 3rd, 2012, 2:26 pm

Re: MORE "New" IMAGES

Postby agraposo on October 27th, 2012, 11:46 pm

agraposo wrote:
SmokingGunII wrote:Great news. Can someone keep an eye on the "viewed" stats? The likes & dislikes should be interesting, too.


The video was uploaded by TheRangersLegend on 02/13/2011, and has 45276 views.


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWl8mUSDIwU

After one year, the counter has increased to 180000.
agraposo
Member
 
Posts: 266
Joined: June 10th, 2011, 10:48 pm

PreviousNext

Return to SEPTEMBER CLUES: the 9/11 psyop exposed: the media aired a "Made-for-TV Hollywood movie"

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests