MORE "New" IMAGES (released in 2010!)

It has taken less than 10 years to pry open the can of worms enshrouding the pathetic 9/11 scam. The central role of the major newsmedia corporations to pull off this sordid "terror" simulation has now been comprehensively exposed. Before joining this forum, please get familiar with the research at: http://www.septemberclues.info

Postby fakers911 on October 9th, 2010, 3:14 pm

Another really fake image from that flicker album:

Image

Look at the policecar and the officer... they look inserted. Check the back of the head of the guy standing on the right side...

They did a terrible job.. :D

This one:

Image

The woman with the hat looks to relaxed to me...
The guy who is about to get beamed up by the ray of light looks fake too. Check out his right leg en his tiny fist.

Source: http://www.imagebam.com/image/4f2ff597324178
fakers911
Member
 
Posts: 71
Joined: September 29th, 2010, 7:55 pm

Postby nonhocapito on October 9th, 2010, 5:18 pm

fakers911 4 Oct 9 2010, 03:14 PM wrote: The woman with the hat looks to relaxed to me...
The guy who is about to get beamed up by the ray of light looks fake too. Check out his right leg en his tiny fist.

Source: http://www.imagebam.com/image/4f2ff597324178


fakers911, how did you find out that imagebam gallery? it doesn't seem to be indexed from anywhere, google doesn't know it.
Could you trace for us how you stumbled into it? Otherwise it is not really a 'source'...

---

BTW, I did a tinEye search on one of the pictures of that imagebam gallery, and found a somewhat larger gallery hosting some of the same material. (tineye sometimes is amazing, I advise everyone to get the tineye addon for their browsers if you still haven't, it is quite useful)

here is the gallery:

http://www.pbase.com/peteburke73/september_11&page=all

it features lots of scenes with debris. The pictures "look" analog but in a fake way...
and check out the leaning/falling guy in the background of this one:

Image

here a cut-out and pasted woman crosses the road:

Image

judging from the comments on that pbase page this stuff have been around since 2002... hmm...

One final note: the author of these photos is one Pete Burke (a character from 'Planet of the apes' apparently). Lo and behold, he -- other than being right under WTC2 when the plane struck, and having "dodged falling debris in flames" -- also got access to the ceremonies with family members in 2005 and 2006. Sets of photos that include shots such as this one:

Image

...just a regular guy. You and I could have gone there and take the same pictures. It's just that people is so lazy... :P
nonhocapito
Administrator
 
Posts: 2502
Joined: July 10th, 2010, 6:38 am
Location: Italy

Postby fakers911 on October 9th, 2010, 7:11 pm

nonhocapito 4 Oct 9 2010, 06:18 PM wrote:
fakers911 4 Oct 9 2010, 03:14 PM wrote: The woman with the hat looks to relaxed to me...
The guy who is about to get beamed up by the ray of light looks fake too. Check out his right leg en his tiny fist.






Somebody gave me a link on a forum to that imagebam gallery. He wanted to make a statement that there were casualties by showing me these pictures.

EDIT: Great find on that guy btw. Next year I want to be part of that ceremony, since it seems to be that easy to access the site. I am wondering what all the New Yorkers are complaining about, it seems so easy to join :P
fakers911
Member
 
Posts: 71
Joined: September 29th, 2010, 7:55 pm

Postby fakers911 on October 9th, 2010, 11:36 pm

911fakeday @ Oct 9 2010, 03:46 PM wrote: I put these pictures together for you. I have a good understanding about looking for details in pictures. I’ve highlighted where I think repeated parts can be found. I think they are depictions of the same area, just slightly different lens.Image 1Image2


I am so happy with your analysis! You have made it impossible to say it is due to a different perspective or angle...

Despite this evidence... people are still trying to find an argument for those manholes which are missing.. how unbelievable is that? They are desperatly looking for a reason those manholes are missing..

Lighting came up... perspective came up... the debris was different... pfff... they come up with every non-argument you can ever think of..
fakers911
Member
 
Posts: 71
Joined: September 29th, 2010, 7:55 pm

Postby nonhocapito on October 10th, 2010, 12:05 am

fakers911 @ Oct 9 2010, 07:11 PM wrote: Somebody gave me a link on a forum to that imagebam gallery. He wanted to make a statement that there were casualties by showing me these pictures.


I know I am annoying, but you should point us to the forum page where this person gave you the link.
Not for anything, but every now and then intriguing pictures are dropped on the forum and attract a lot of attention, and we all should be clear on where they come from.
It is strange that they pointed you to that imagebam anonymous gallery when the real source is pete burke's gallery.
nonhocapito
Administrator
 
Posts: 2502
Joined: July 10th, 2010, 6:38 am
Location: Italy

Postby antipodean on October 10th, 2010, 12:20 am

Here's the latest laughable attempt at trying to debunk the research on this forum, listen to the fat bald know it all guy after 1 minute Doug Eisler, his website is linked below .

http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=TS ... &vq=medium

http://www.wilsonelser.com/m_douglas_eisler/

According to his firm's website, Doug was a handy witness to have, specialising in Aviation & deposing expert witnesses
antipodean
Member
 
Posts: 578
Joined: October 20th, 2009, 2:53 am

Postby reel.deal on October 10th, 2010, 1:05 am

fakers911 4 Oct 9 2010, 12:41 PM wrote:Hehe... compare these two... just for fun :)

Image

Image




"depictions of the same area, just slightly different..." Image 1 Image2

spot the difference!

2 photogaffes - 10 strides - 15 seconds?

black 4x4 jeep @ far left has dragged white bundle along into white paint can, then parked perfectly, without getting a puncture.

white car in front of limo has gone.

guy leaping ON white van in pic 1 is up on stairway? to the right on pic 2.

white van behind blue G.A.F. van, man leapt on, is gone.

DS&D blue van on right has lifted tail-gate & closed its shutters.

so the double bed mattress & bed base/ concrete block that appears across sidewalk, didnt come from open DS&D van,
as that was not in the van in pic 1.

ALL 9 guys in foreground have run off, replaced by some other 2 guys, who appear.

the white truck behind the guys with the red sticker on door in pic 1 has gone.
the white truck behind the 1st van has had stuff removed from top of windshield, or is a different van.

small white van appears in pic 2 that appears to be an open-top convertible, with no windscreen.. or roof..

guy BEHIND limo in pic 1 throws a match & starts a RAGING INFERNO for pic 2.

(which conveniently gives us the (usually!) correct chronology of which pic came 1st.)

& all thats just for starters...
without even looking much.

oh yeah, nearly forgot... manhole covers...
reel.deal
DELETED THEIR OWN POSTS :(
 
Posts: 1295
Joined: August 15th, 2010, 1:42 am

Postby fakers911 on October 10th, 2010, 10:56 am

nonhocapito @ Oct 10 2010, 01:05 AM wrote:
fakers911 4 Oct 9 2010, 07:11 PM wrote: Somebody gave me a link on a forum to that imagebam gallery. He wanted to make a statement that there were casualties by showing me these pictures.


I know I am annoying, but you should point us to the forum page where this person gave you the link.
Not for anything, but every now and then intriguing pictures are dropped on the forum and attract a lot of attention, and we all should be clear on where they come from.
It is strange that they pointed you to that imagebam anonymous gallery when the real source is pete burke's gallery.


No, that is not strange. This site linked to the imagebam gallery:

http://jaggle.nl/

(http://www.jaggle.nl/index.php/V2/comme ... sual_fotos)

The guy on the forum linked me to that site, so he did not link me directly tot that imagebam gallery.

I can direct you to that forum, but it is a Dutch spoken forum where they will not tolerate the English language, so unless you speak Dutch, I can't see the extra value in providing a link. ;)
fakers911
Member
 
Posts: 71
Joined: September 29th, 2010, 7:55 pm

Postby nonhocapito on October 10th, 2010, 12:48 pm

fakers911 4 Oct 10 2010, 10:56 AM wrote: I can direct you to that forum, but it is a Dutch spoken forum where they will not tolerate the English language, so unless you speak Dutch, I can't see the extra value in providing a link. ;)


I wouldn't need to write in dutch anything, only trace the source. So, not very convincing, but OK, thanks for the other link anyway.

It is interesting... Nobody credits Pete Burke, they say these images are "unusual" and "unseen", and yet most of the pictures come from his gallery (but not all: other sets are hosted on different imagebam galleries, and are not traceable to any source: what gives?)

Pete Burke's gallery has comments on it that go back to 2002. First comment, supposedly dated 26 of may 2002:

I wanted to be the first one to leave a comment on your gallery, since I'm sure you will get many. <_<


My guess is that this is a collection of old and new material that has been repackaged only recently, to support the new flood of imagery that is now happening. (But we won't be flooded, because we can swim in this current...)
nonhocapito
Administrator
 
Posts: 2502
Joined: July 10th, 2010, 6:38 am
Location: Italy

Postby idschmyd on October 10th, 2010, 1:05 pm

nonhocapito @ Oct 10 2010, 12:48 PM wrote: My guess is that this is a collection of old and new material that has been repackaged only recently, to support the new flood of imagery that is now happening. (But we won't be flooded, because we can swim in this current...)


[b]a Dutch spoken forum where they will not tolerate the English language[b]

What a bunch of... Dutch people can be so... isolationist, can't they?

Turning into a scene from Casino: 'well you know what, now I really want to know.' Push again, nonhocaptio, since at least someone around here must have a few words of Dutch, and the source for fake images is important, isn't it? I think your guess at the reason for their existence is valid.
idschmyd
Member
 
Posts: 270
Joined: October 19th, 2009, 10:33 pm

Postby fakers911 on October 10th, 2010, 1:08 pm

nonhocapito 4 Oct 10 2010, 01:48 PM wrote:I wouldn't need to write in dutch anything, only trace the source. So, not very convincing, but OK, thanks for the other link anyway.

It is interesting... Nobody credits Pete Burke, they say these images are "unusual" and "unseen", and yet most of the pictures come from his gallery (but not all: other sets are hosted on different imagebam galleries, and are not traceable to any source: what gives?)

Pete Burke's gallery has comments on it that go back to 2002. First comment, supposedly dated 26 of may 2002:

I wanted to be the first one to leave a comment on your gallery, since I'm sure you will get many. <_<


My guess is that this is a collection of old and new material that has been repackaged only recently, to support the new flood of imagery that is now happening. (But we won't be flooded, because we can swim in this current...)


You're welcome :)

Very interesting indeed. I also found this picture in his gallery:

http://www.pbase.com/peteburke73/september_11&page=3

The following comment was made by Pete Burke:

"The military presence was everywhere. There were checkpoints set up all over the city."

Does anyone have any info on these checkpoints? What were the locations and at what time were they set up?
fakers911
Member
 
Posts: 71
Joined: September 29th, 2010, 7:55 pm

Postby fakers911 on October 10th, 2010, 1:14 pm

idschmyd @ Oct 10 2010, 02:05 PM wrote: [b]a Dutch spoken forum where they will not tolerate the English language[b]

What a bunch of... Dutch people can be so... isolationist, can't they?

Turning into a scene from Casino: 'well you know what, now I really want to know.' Push again, nonhocaptio, since at least someone around here must have a few words of Dutch, and the source for fake images is important, isn't it? I think your guess at the reason for their existence is valid.


That is just a policy on the forum and has nothing to do with the Dutch nationality ;)

I am Dutch myself and if there is one country on the planet which has lots of multilingual people, then it is The Netherlands. Almost everybody speaks English... and everybody is willing to.

Other than that, I allready gave him a link to the source... ;)
fakers911
Member
 
Posts: 71
Joined: September 29th, 2010, 7:55 pm

Postby nonhocapito on October 10th, 2010, 1:16 pm

fakers911 4 Oct 10 2010, 01:14 PM wrote:Other than that, I allready gave him a link to the source... ;)


fakers911, I think idschmyd is right.

C'mon, you gotta give us the link to that page on the dutch forum.
Like, now.

The "extra value" in providing us with the link being that we would know you didn't make that up and we can all be friends :)

Also: don't forget (alas) to add your profile to this thread =>
http://z6.invisionfree.com/Reality_Shac ... wtopic=414
nonhocapito
Administrator
 
Posts: 2502
Joined: July 10th, 2010, 6:38 am
Location: Italy

Postby fakers911 on October 10th, 2010, 1:19 pm

nonhocapito @ Oct 10 2010, 02:16 PM wrote:
fakers911 4 Oct 10 2010, 01:14 PM wrote:Other than that, I allready gave him a link to the source... ;)


fakers911, I think idschmyd is right.

C'mon, you gotta give us the link to that page on the dutch forum.
Like, now.

Also: don't forget to add your profile to this thread =>
http://z6.invisionfree.com/Reality_Shac ... wtopic=414


What is up with this paranoid behaviour suddenly?

Here you go: http://forum.fok.nl/topic/1540222/5/25#87315533
fakers911
Member
 
Posts: 71
Joined: September 29th, 2010, 7:55 pm

Postby nonhocapito on October 10th, 2010, 1:22 pm

fakers911 4 Oct 10 2010, 01:19 PM wrote: What is up with this paranoid behaviour suddenly?


I don't know, it comes and goes like that. I hate it too.

Edit: now I traced the link. I am satisfied but... who are you on the forum fakers911? J0kkebr0k or Johnny Knoxville?
nonhocapito
Administrator
 
Posts: 2502
Joined: July 10th, 2010, 6:38 am
Location: Italy

PreviousNext

Return to SEPTEMBER CLUES: the 9/11 psyop exposed: the media aired a "Made-for-TV Hollywood movie"

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests