Why they didn't use planes

It has taken less than 10 years to pry open the can of worms enshrouding the pathetic 9/11 scam. The central role of the major newsmedia corporations to pull off this sordid "terror" simulation has now been comprehensively exposed. Before joining this forum, please get familiar with the research at: http://www.septemberclues.info

Re: Why they didn't use planes

Postby reel.deal on March 28th, 2012, 11:04 am


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gS0xZCgIWsU

full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RgusXzo6omU

full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p7rpxf2Nx8Y

full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b1ijLu2HzvI

the sights & sounds of the 'flat-out' '550mph' @ sea-level planes of 9/11...
;)
reel.deal
DELETED THEIR OWN POSTS :(
 
Posts: 1295
Joined: August 15th, 2010, 1:42 am

Re: Why they didn't use planes

Postby reel.deal on March 28th, 2012, 11:09 am


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UyU9OLqQ8XA

full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HkyuRmGzL94

wow! ...looks & sounds just exactly like 9/11 !!!
:P
reel.deal
DELETED THEIR OWN POSTS :(
 
Posts: 1295
Joined: August 15th, 2010, 1:42 am

Re: 9/11 Memorial Scams, Vicsims, Etc

Postby burlington on May 13th, 2012, 12:17 am

Plane Lands In Cleveland; Bomb Feared Aboard
Reported by: 9News Staff
Web produced by: Liz Foreman
9/11/01 11:43:57 AM
A Boeing 767 out of Boston made an emergency landing Tuesday at Cleveland Hopkins International Airport due to concerns that it may have a bomb aboard, said Mayor Michael R. White.
White said the plane had been moved to a secure area of the airport, and was evacuated.
United identified the plane as Flight 93. The airline did say how many people were aboard the flight.
[/quote]

Has anyone here looked at library newspaper archives to try to find this?
burlington
Member
 
Posts: 18
Joined: May 12th, 2012, 10:03 pm

Re: 9/11 Memorial Scams, Vicsims, Etc

Postby fbenario on May 13th, 2012, 12:55 am

burlington wrote:Plane Lands In Cleveland; Bomb Feared Aboard
Reported by: 9News Staff
Web produced by: Liz Foreman
9/11/01 11:43:57 AM
A Boeing 767 out of Boston made an emergency landing Tuesday at Cleveland Hopkins International Airport due to concerns that it may have a bomb aboard, said Mayor Michael R. White.
White said the plane had been moved to a secure area of the airport, and was evacuated.
United identified the plane as Flight 93. The airline did say how many people were aboard the flight.


Has anyone here looked at library newspaper archives to try to find this?[/quote]
It's discussed in the Loose Change limited-hangout-silliness movies.
fbenario
Member
 
Posts: 2180
Joined: October 23rd, 2009, 2:49 am
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: 9/11 Memorial Scams, Vicsims, Etc

Postby nonhocapito on May 14th, 2012, 9:42 am

fbenario wrote:Has anyone here looked at library newspaper archives to try to find this?
It's discussed in the Loose Change limited-hangout-silliness movies.


In fact it is one of those puzzling rumors generated early by those official conspiracy theorists... I believe it was expunged from the following version of that movie... it is a completely idiotic and unprovable idea and it isn't worth a minute of our time. There were no planes, hence no passengers to take care of. The rest is deliberate confusion, manipulative, planted contradictions.

Burlington, please try to familiarize yourself with our research a little better. You won't need to worry about these fake stories then.
nonhocapito
Administrator
 
Posts: 2503
Joined: July 10th, 2010, 6:38 am
Location: Italy

Re: Why they didn't use planes

Postby reel.deal on May 29th, 2012, 9:22 pm

d'ya know what? ...in this mini 'heatwave' we having in the UK:
i'm driving down to work everyday past the airport & seeing all
these planes landing & taking off... and they all got this one
thing in common, in the clear blue skies... they all 'glinting':
refracting light off their fuselage, every plane flickering
sunlight like its a mirror off the sun, twinkling dazzling
sun-rays straight to my eyes... find me me one single 9/11
'plane' video that shows sunlight bouncing off the 'plane'...
you can't....
to me... this is the kicker... the '2nd hit' last minute banking
looks like a flat 2D graphic BECAUSE the sun does not bounce off
its chasssis AT ALL, like it could/should/would, if it was 4 REAL...
in ANY video/photo.
EVERY PLANE I SEE FOR REAL REFLECTS SUNLIGHT,
NO 9/11 PLANE VIDEO DOES...

find & post me a 9/11 clip of a plane reflecting sunlight,
take the challenge, prove me wrong...
;)
reel.deal
DELETED THEIR OWN POSTS :(
 
Posts: 1295
Joined: August 15th, 2010, 1:42 am

Re: Why they didn't use planes

Postby reel.deal on May 29th, 2012, 9:59 pm

Image
http://www.911research.dsl.pipex.com/ggua175/foreman/

Park Foreman is my favourite, black silhouette 'under the smoke',
then 'sees the light' & 'lightens up', right before 'smackdown'...
<_<


Image
http://www.911research.dsl.pipex.com/ggua175/unknown/ :huh:


Image
Image
http://www.911research.dsl.pipex.com/ggua175/fairbanks/
:blink:

'smoke rises' - sure... but 'ejected flying jet-engines trajectorys' ?!? :blink:
reel.deal
DELETED THEIR OWN POSTS :(
 
Posts: 1295
Joined: August 15th, 2010, 1:42 am

Re: Why they didn't use planes

Postby reel.deal on May 30th, 2012, 9:59 am

Image
Image

i drive near the airport all the time, everytime i'm under a planes flightpath, landing or taking off,
those things are big, noisy, & glinting reflecting sunlight...



so, uh... how big does a flying 767 look, video'd from approx a mile away ? :huh:

is it this size ? ...

Image
(perceptive scale still over a mile after camera zoom)

or, this size ? ...
Image
;)
reel.deal
DELETED THEIR OWN POSTS :(
 
Posts: 1295
Joined: August 15th, 2010, 1:42 am

Re: Why they didn't use planes

Postby Heiwa on May 30th, 2012, 12:45 pm

I like people like reel.deal using their eyes and brains when observing things at different distances and explaining how things get smaller when getting further away from the observer, etc. :wub:
Heiwa
Member
 
Posts: 1064
Joined: October 20th, 2009, 7:20 pm

Postby diagonal2 on June 29th, 2012, 4:59 pm

Here is a REAL video showing how fragile planes really are.

full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S7pXjQ16f5c
diagonal2
Member
 
Posts: 104
Joined: June 22nd, 2012, 5:46 pm

Re: Why they didn't use planes

Postby diagonal2 on June 29th, 2012, 5:29 pm

Birds completely wrecking a plane... (edit: MANY PLANES! B) )


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Olsp9JcIzn4
Last edited by diagonal2 on June 30th, 2012, 3:05 am, edited 2 times in total.
diagonal2
Member
 
Posts: 104
Joined: June 22nd, 2012, 5:46 pm

Re: Why they didn't use planes

Postby MrSinclair on June 30th, 2012, 3:00 am

diagonal2 wrote:Birds completely wrecking a plane...


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Olsp9JcIzn4


So let me get this straight, a plane hits a pelican and the plane is massively damaged and the windshield shatters? On the other hand a plane hits the WTC and it effortlessly pierces the exterior?
Hey, I've got it, rebuild the WTC out of birds and it will be safe from plane attacks. :D
MrSinclair
Member
 
Posts: 389
Joined: December 23rd, 2011, 2:29 am

Re: Why they didn't use planes

Postby diagonal2 on June 30th, 2012, 3:15 am

Heiwa wrote:I like people like reel.deal using their eyes and brains when observing things at different distances and explaining how things get smaller when getting further away from the observer, etc. :wub:


It is those small details that escapes people, and to be completely honest... I didn't notice that at first, but now that you've said it, I see the fakery in that animation.
diagonal2
Member
 
Posts: 104
Joined: June 22nd, 2012, 5:46 pm

Why they didn't use planes

Postby diagonal2 on July 17th, 2012, 4:12 am

I just found this interesting blog, the writer says they've been using drone missile planes to hit "targets" in afgan.

http://stateofthenation2012.com/?p=106

Perhaps these where the weapons they used to stage the 9/11 attack? This is not pure speculation either! This
tech was invented long before 2001!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_At ... 1_Predator

Edit: This is not to invalidate the no-plane theory, but a continuation as to what was used to stage the initial attack on the towers, and the pentagon including the alleged "plane" crash (no bodies or plane parts).
diagonal2
Member
 
Posts: 104
Joined: June 22nd, 2012, 5:46 pm

Why they didn't use planes

Postby lux on July 17th, 2012, 5:16 am

Maybe they used chocolate Easter Bunny planes with white frosting and creamy nougat centers.
lux
Member
 
Posts: 1914
Joined: October 1st, 2011, 11:46 pm

PreviousNext

Return to SEPTEMBER CLUES: the 9/11 psyop exposed: the media aired a "Made-for-TV Hollywood movie"

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests