*LARRY KING ... knows.
We have oft asked ourselves whether any (or how many) TV anchors are in on the 9/11 psyop - as in "entirely aware of the imagery-based hoax." Now, as we have amply / conclusively demonstrated in this "FAKING THE RUBBLE" thread, we now know that even the available rubble imagery from Ground Zero has been fabricated with modern digital imaging techniques. It logically follows that anyone claiming to have been filmed walking around in that area ( i.e. anyone having been "green-screened into" Ground Zero sceneries ) must be aware of the Big Lie. Well, here's a video titled "9/11 Larry King at Ground Zero CNN Special October 6, 2001":
Please watch at least part of it - before reading on: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-voZbC2FQKk
In that CNN video, we see Larry King discussing the 'horror of it all" with NY Fire Commissioner Thomas Von Essen. As Larry asks "where are we?", Von Essen duly points his finger in various directions, indicating where Larry should aim his eyes (much like the Weather-Forecaster on TV). In reality, the two of them are likely just walking around some steel junkyard in Detroit, or any movie set /TV studio ANYWHERE else. The surrounding "Manhattan buildings" have been digitally added in the backdrop. But can we actually prove
that this is the case - and that this contention isn't just some "figment of our vivid conspiracy-theorists' imagination"?
Well, what we CAN do, is to compare the imagery featured in that CNN video - with the imagery credited to the most famous, prominent and prolific (alleged) Ground Zero photographer of all - JOEL MEYEROWITZ
. Let me remind you all about Mr Meyerowitz's unique place in "Ground Zero Imagery History" - due to his claimed "exclusive access to the area":
Following the tragic terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, the rubble of the World Trade Center was designated a crime scene by U.S. authorities and access denied to everyone except law enforcement and rescue workers. At the time, the press was prohibited from the site. New York artist, Joel Meyerowitz, became the only photographer granted the right of entry to Ground Zero.
Meyerowitz's historical archive of the aftermath of the tragedy, photographed day and night during a nine month period
, grew to include over 8,000 images of what became known as "The Pile."http://blogs.miaminewtimes.com/cultist/ ... chives.php
Here's Meyerowitz (portrayed in front of one his famous GZ images) - and his books: "AFTERMATH" - and "NINE MONTHS AT GROUND ZERO":
Now, here's that famous GZ image which Meyerowitz is portrayed against.
As we can see, it depicts a big (rusty-red)
steel rubble pile - with the two WFC (World FINANCIAL Center) buildings in the backdrop :Image credited to: Joel Meyerowitz
Here is now an image extracted from "Larry King's visit to Ground Zero on October 6, 2001"
. As we can see, it depicts the very same rubble pile - apparently still smoldering / fuming, and being water-hosed by firefighters. This 'CNN pile' is certainly not rusty-red
, so we must assume that this image predates
the above Meyerowitz famous image (and that Meyerowitz snapped his image of this "WTC rubble pile" at some later stage of his claimed 9-month-long efforts photographing Ground Zero...)Image credit: CNN
An animated gif I made from that CNN Larry King clip:
Here's the problem: I have highlighted in green
a section of (what is meant to be) part of the still-standing WTC steel structure. That section of steel beams is clearly entirely missing
in the CNN video. How is this possible - if Meyerowitz took his picture when the rubble pile had long stopped fuming - and become all rusty?
Now, to round this off: even if one would argue that Meyerowitz snapped his shot BEFORE october 6, 2001 - one has to wonder:
would the Ground Zero engineers have opted to 'saw' that section off - while this remaining WTC steel structure was still standing??
Well - it sure seems like a most unlikely proposition!
I rest my case: the extant Ground Zero rubble imagery is as 'authentic' as a three-dollar bill. And Larry King is a complicit, 9/11 hoax clown.