*
THE 9/11 SMOKESCREEN
Was WTC7 possibly the day's 'smoke generator'?
As my readers will know, I have long theorized that - in order to pull
of the 9/11 hoax in bright daylight (and fooling all onlookers) -
a dense military-grade smokescreen was raised around the WTC area
BEFORE the towers were brought down (with safe / 100% reliable conventional demo explosives). Now, theories are all good, but they are better if they can be supported by plausible & feasible explanations as to how exactly this smokescreen may have been technically / logistically achieved. So allow me to submit
a little illustrated essay which, hopefully, will make sound sense to everyone.
If you wonder what
a military smoke generator is,
here's for instance what was available ... back in 1943:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jWq8LDIafqg
Now, the official story claims that WTC7 (the 47-story building which was located right in front / North
of the twin towers) caught fire due to falling debris. I remember reading somewhere that WTC7 (allegedly) had
"a large, autonomous power plant driven by diesel fuel" - and that these large diesel tanks were ignited and caused all that smoke gushing out from the back (South side)
of the WTC7 building - FOR THE ENTIRE DAY... (Well, if you can buy that - you can buy my crappy, old little Fiat car for $500.000!). So, let's get real now: WHY was this bizarre "burning WTC7" story included in the 9/11 script? And why was WTC7 demolished only in the late afternoon?
Knowing that the
very few WTC7 tenants included the US Secret Service and Mayor Giuliani's "New York City Office
of Emergency Management", I would suggest the following: surely, if (
a few dozen?) smoke generators were used to engulf LOWER MANHATTAN in
a 'fog
of war', WTC7 would have been an absolutely ideal place to ... place them!
Here are two animated gifs showing the smoke gushing out
of (
*and back into!
) the WTC7 (
as shown on TV):
*Yes, the History Channel actually ran that scene - above right - in reverse motion (with the smoke seemingly being 'sucked into' WTC7)...
Now - please understand: I am not saying that the above imagery is real. What I'm saying is that it was prefabricated (pre-planned by the 9/11 hoaxers) in order to depict something which would
look close enough to what ACTUALLY would take place that morning, IN REALITY - as per their plan. That is,
a bunch
of military smoke generators blasting smoke out
of the Southern façade
of the WTC7.
The below animated scene is extracted from the NAUDET's (entirely phony, Hollywood-produced)
feature movie "9/11" which,
of course, was presented to the public as
a REAL LIFE documentary.
Of course, the above NAUDET scene is absurd in itself : the smoke appears to seep out
of the VERY EDGE
of WTC7's North- East corner !... Perhaps just
a little slip up on the part
of the CGI crew - who was instructed to show (animate) smoke gushing out
of the
back of WTC7 ?
Here you can see more clearly the North-East corner
of WTC 7:
Now, think about it: would this not go to support the notion that the 9/11 master-plan was as simple as this? :
A- Activate smoke generators well before 9:59am (when TV viewers were shown the first tower collapse)
B- Pull down / demolish the now obscured-from-sight twin towers with conventional demo explosives
C- Pump out more smoke until late afternoon - so as to obscure Lower Manhattan until dusk / sundown
D- Pull down / demolish WTC7 in the late afternoon - (and with it,
of course, all the smoke generators)
Hope all this makes sense, folks.
°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°
Oh, and by the way, let me just clarify one thing: YES, I do believe Manhattan was enveloped in smoke until dusk. Lots, and lots
of smoke.
In fact, FAR, FAR TOO MUCH SMOKE to be possibly 'justified' by any sort
of building collapse - no matter how large those building were.
Any demolition job - however large - has the dust settling in the matter of minutes - NOT hours.
(And this is where Judy Wood's "dustification" theory comes handy for the perps: the idea that the "towers were pulverized by some secret / exotic military Super-Weapon" would 'help justifying' that GIGANTIC smoke cloud enveloping / and obscuring from view all of Lower Manhattan for the entire day.)
And if you should ask:
"Hey, what if some dude snapped a picture /or shot a video JUST as the smoke started emerging from WTC7 - and BEFORE the first, WTC2 collapse? Would this photo/videographer not have damning evidence to expose the hoax to the world?" Well, no.
A camera time stamp is totally worthless. There is NO way
of proving that your camera clock was set at the correct time.
Let us assume that the following two images are real / legit - and were snapped BEFORE 9:59 am (when WTC2 was seen collapsing on TV) :
No one saw with their own eyes the actual WTC collapses. 9/11 was
a simple - and crude - 'smoke in your eyes' magician's trick.
