I'm sorry but that those thick black plumes of smoke don't look natural, it's just continually pouring outrevolutionphase1 wrote:Here is someone who filmed the entire collapse of both towers. If the collapse is fake as you say, then this video is fake. Are they perhaps looking at a green screen the entire time? Its very possible. Whatever the case, watch this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SAxMcJ4j ... plpp_video
Thanks for pointing out this umpteenth, never-seen-before 'amateur video', revolutionphase1 !revolutionphase1 wrote:Here is someone who filmed the entire collapse of both towers. If the collapse is fake as you say, then this video is fake. Are they perhaps looking at a green screen the entire time? Its very possible. Whatever the case, watch this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SAxMcJ4j ... plpp_video
Wow, talk about the perps yet again thoroughly busted. Great work, as per always, Simon.simonshack wrote:*
Fun with Perspectives:
I have just marked four buildings in this comparison: A and B - and C and D. Consider the bridge and vegetation seen in foreground - and all the other buildings' relative placement. See if all this adds up - from your personal perspective:
Perhaps buildings A,B,C,D still exist, in the Manhattan skyline? If so, do we have a friendly photographer in NYC who can try and replicate the two views above (minus Twin Towers, of course)?
Brutal Metal wrote:I surely bet the PERPS figured Nobody would go to the extremes of analyzation like the members here have done with video,audio and still pictures as well as all the BS flight logs, firemen and victims death lists etc..
How many times did the perps want to re-use the same “matrix” Single original cutting room floor WTC/2 Collapse angle?simonshack wrote:Thanks for pointing out this umpteenth, never-seen-before 'amateur video', revolutionphase1 !revolutionphase1 wrote:Here is someone who filmed the entire collapse of both towers. If the collapse is fake as you say, then this video is fake. Are they perhaps looking at a green screen the entire time? Its very possible. Whatever the case, watch this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SAxMcJ4j ... plpp_video
But there are a lot more problems with that hour-long 'video' uploaded by (aptly-named) YT user "911allcausticcamera" in January 2011. I suppose the perps figured they had to finally upload a continuous, 1-hour amateur footage in high(er) definition then the old Camera Planet crap. Well, once again, they failed pretty miserably:
Haha - nice compilation, Equinox - well done!Equinox wrote:
How many times did the perps want to re-use the same “matrix” Single original cutting room floor WTC/2 Collapse angle?
… By the way Ill put in the ‘donazie’ to contribute towards the webcosts shortly. As Ill be doing a lot of posts over the next month or two… haha! 
Equinox wrote: The twin towers were NOT a flat featureless surface, nor were WTC-7 Blue grey and featureless.
) and other fine contributions.
simonshack wrote:
Just one thing you should know, though : that blue building is supposed to be the Millenium Hilton Hotel (not WTC7).
Another 2 videos to do the comparison with.simonshack wrote:Also, I will remind everyone that (in the below Youtube video animation - released in March 2011!) the inept Photoshop student dropout completely forgot about the alarming tilt angle the rooftop was supposed to be at - seconds after collapse initiation. I can almost hear the loud, painful spanking the sorry idiot is being treated to, down at perp central!
This is what we see in a bunch of stills (I mean, CGI composites) - supposedly depicting the same event...
No worries... If you read back a couple of posts I only just discovered what the building was, when simon pointed out it was NOT wtc7 as I stated before in a post! It was in fact what is supposed to be the blue Millenium Hilton Hotel!Human wrote:Equinox
Excellent job putting these CGI shots in there rightful place...simply fake! Thank you very much.
