CGI collapse footage

It has taken less than 10 years to pry open the can of worms enshrouding the pathetic 9/11 scam. The central role of the major newsmedia corporations to pull off this sordid "terror" simulation has now been comprehensively exposed. Before joining this forum, please get familiar with the research at: http://www.septemberclues.info

Re: CGI Collapse footage.

Postby Anders on November 11th, 2016, 7:29 pm

reel.deal » April 1st, 2012, 11:38 pm wrote:Image

aswell as the see-through tower TM, 1 other thing also fUCt about this tape...

Millenium Hilton in Scott Myers view is closer to Myers than the Towers.
Millenium Hilton fireballs reflection explodes right > left ?!?!?!?
Millenium Hilton fireballs reflection explodes INWARDS; towards the WTC;
WorldTradeCenter Twin Tower2 explosion explodes OUTWARDS; away from WTC...
MILLENIUM HILTON FIREBALL MIRROR REFLECTION - EXPLOSION WRONG WAY ROUND !!!
no ?!?!?!?

:blink:

I think the plane is computer graphics fakery but that the fireball explosion was real. What in the quoted image indicates that the fireball is fakery?
Anders
Member
 
Posts: 84
Joined: November 7th, 2016, 9:20 am

Re: CGI Collapse footage.

Postby SacredCowSlayer on November 12th, 2016, 5:34 am

Anders » November 11th, 2016, 1:29 pm wrote:
reel.deal » April 1st, 2012, 11:38 pm wrote:Image

aswell as the see-through tower TM, 1 other thing also fUCt about this tape...

Millenium Hilton in Scott Myers view is closer to Myers than the Towers.
Millenium Hilton fireballs reflection explodes right > left ?!?!?!?
Millenium Hilton fireballs reflection explodes INWARDS; towards the WTC;
WorldTradeCenter Twin Tower2 explosion explodes OUTWARDS; away from WTC...
MILLENIUM HILTON FIREBALL MIRROR REFLECTION - EXPLOSION WRONG WAY ROUND !!!
no ?!?!?!?

:blink:

I think the plane is computer graphics fakery but that the fireball explosion was real. What in the quoted image indicates that the fireball is fakery?


So, what do you make of the following imagery?

Image

The footage is real, except for the ghost (digital) "people" inserted?

Come on now.

It's like you aren't familiar at all with the comprehensive research on this site, or you are trolling. It's not as if we are unfamiliar with half-ass attempts to save and/or excuse the media concerning its obvious (and significant) role in the 9/11 scam.

The timing is certainly curious with this Trump "election", along with jabber about "reopening" the 9/11 investigation.

I'm not trying to be hostile. Others here can verify that I go out of my way to extend the benefit of the doubt to new members. But I'm seriously hesitant to do that here.

Your posts thus far indicate an attempt to re-muddy the waters that have already been cleared up rather neatly over the years on this forum.
SacredCowSlayer
Member
 
Posts: 235
Joined: September 5th, 2015, 10:44 pm

Re: CGI Collapse footage.

Postby Vera Obscurata on November 12th, 2016, 5:53 am

SacredCowSlayer » November 11th, 2016, 10:34 pm wrote:So, what do you make of the following imagery?

Image


On top of the two arrows that certainly indicate impossibilities, I have two other observations:
1 - the 1 frame ghost shadow at the left of the blue box/container at the right, just after the "break" makes no sense
2 - the "helmet" that is indicated with the second arrow does not leave any shadow at the moment it is swung up and forwards

I'm not trying to be hostile. Others here can verify that I go out of my way to extend the benefit of the doubt to new members.


True.
Vera Obscurata
Member
 
Posts: 35
Joined: October 8th, 2016, 9:39 pm

Re: CGI Collapse footage.

Postby Anders on November 12th, 2016, 8:30 am

SacredCowSlayer » November 12th, 2016, 5:34 am wrote:
So, what do you make of the following imagery?

Image

The footage is real, except for the ghost (digital) "people" inserted?

The scene could have been made with green screen technology. At least the people are actors I believe.


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jOjpBKhiYZc

The dust cloud may be real though. I have an idea that they had stacked cement bags inside the facades of the twin towers so that when they came down, the powder cement turned into huge dust clouds.
Anders
Member
 
Posts: 84
Joined: November 7th, 2016, 9:20 am

Re: CGI collapse footage

Postby Kham on November 12th, 2016, 5:35 pm

Anders,

Do you have any examples of cement bags making hours of smoke in the air?

And how many bags of cement were laid around the Kingdome when it was demolished by CDI to make the giant dust loud?


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ZvvHlvj1hg

None. Does one need bags of heavy cement to make dust in a implosion? The implosion itself does quite a fantastic job of providing the dust. After 5 minutes all the dust would have settled. Any smoke/dust/obscurant left after 5 minutes must then be artificial.

Am I the only one getting tired of Anders throwing speculations out like fastballs, waiting for one of us to grab a bat and take a swing at it.
Kham
Member
 
Posts: 63
Joined: June 25th, 2015, 10:30 am

Re: CGI collapse footage

Postby CluedIn on November 12th, 2016, 6:04 pm

Kham » November 12th, 2016, 11:35 am wrote:
Am I the only one getting tired of Anders throwing speculations out like fastballs, waiting for one of us to grab a bat and take a swing at it.


Agreed, Kham. Ludicrous posts.
CluedIn
Member
 
Posts: 222
Joined: December 1st, 2015, 1:15 pm

Re: CGI collapse footage

Postby SacredCowSlayer on November 12th, 2016, 6:37 pm

Kham » November 12th, 2016, 11:35 am wrote:
Am I the only one getting tired of Anders throwing speculations out like fastballs, waiting for one of us to grab a bat and take a swing at it.


Certainly not. And fastballs? More like screwballs.

Frankly I enjoy watching Simon launch loonar lAnders into the vacuum. :lol:
Perhaps this one is on deck.
SacredCowSlayer
Member
 
Posts: 235
Joined: September 5th, 2015, 10:44 pm

Re: CGI collapse footage

Postby Anders on November 12th, 2016, 7:25 pm

Kham » November 12th, 2016, 5:35 pm wrote:Do you have any examples of cement bags making hours of smoke in the air?

Except for the WTC collapses that would be difficult to find I assume. Ok, you mean that the dust clouds were simulated somehow. It seems to me that all the dust cloud imagery shown is difficult to simulate.
Anders
Member
 
Posts: 84
Joined: November 7th, 2016, 9:20 am

Re: CGI collapse footage

Postby Kham on November 12th, 2016, 8:04 pm

Dearest Anders,

Ok, you mean that the dust clouds were simulated somehow.


No, I do not mean dust clouds were simulated, I never posted that. You are the one going in that direction.

It seems to me that all the dust cloud imagery shown is difficult to simulate.


And do you have any resources to back up this statement?
Kham
Member
 
Posts: 63
Joined: June 25th, 2015, 10:30 am

Re: CGI collapse footage

Postby Anders on November 12th, 2016, 8:48 pm

Kham » November 12th, 2016, 8:04 pm wrote:Dearest Anders,

Ok, you mean that the dust clouds were simulated somehow.


No, I do not mean dust clouds were simulated, I never posted that. You are the one going in that direction.

It seems to me that all the dust cloud imagery shown is difficult to simulate.


And do you have any resources to back up this statement?


For example, the dust in this video is difficult to simulate with computer graphics:


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dh4r-gHdyPU
Anders
Member
 
Posts: 84
Joined: November 7th, 2016, 9:20 am

Re: CGI collapse footage

Postby simonshack on November 12th, 2016, 10:24 pm

Anders » November 12th, 2016, 7:48 pm wrote:For example, the dust in this video is difficult to simulate with computer graphics:


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dh4r-gHdyPU


Anders,

the problem with that 'video' is that it was released only in 2010 - a full NINE years after September 11, 2001.

That's right: that 'video' was released in 2010 along with a huge, 4.7 giga batch (which I immediately downloaded for analysis) of short '9/11 video-clips' which, according to the official story, had been kept in a drawer in the NIST offices - for all of 9 friggin' years! As the story went, ABC (yes, ABC TV!) had filed a FOIA against NIST - asking them to release this batch of "never-before-seen-high-resolution imagery of 9/11." The dog-and-pony show doesn't get sillier than that: ABC TV is, of course, at the very forefront of the 9/11 TV imagery scam. For ABC TV to accuse NIST of hiding / sitting on some "never-seen-before" high-resolution footage of the event - is perhaps the most intelligence-insulting 9/11 bullshit tale of them all.
simonshack
Administrator
 
Posts: 6319
Joined: October 18th, 2009, 9:09 pm
Location: italy

Re: CGI collapse footage

Postby Anders on November 12th, 2016, 10:40 pm

simonshack » November 12th, 2016, 10:24 pm wrote:the problem with that 'video' is that it was released only in 2010 - a full NINE years after September 11, 2001.

But one fact is that both towers did come straight down into their own footprints. So I wonder, why the need for any fakery at all regarding the collapses of the towers? Lots of dust or little dust, it doesn't make much difference; two huge skyscrapers like that coming crashing down is surely terrifying enough.
Anders
Member
 
Posts: 84
Joined: November 7th, 2016, 9:20 am

Re: CGI collapse footage

Postby SacredCowSlayer on November 12th, 2016, 11:07 pm

Anders » November 12th, 2016, 4:40 pm wrote:
simonshack » November 12th, 2016, 10:24 pm wrote:the problem with that 'video' is that it was released only in 2010 - a full NINE years after September 11, 2001.

But one fact is that both towers did come straight down into their own footprints. So I wonder, why the need for any fakery at all regarding the collapses of the towers? Lots of dust or little dust, it doesn't make much difference; two huge skyscrapers like that coming crashing down is surely terrifying enough.


Okay I guess I'll need to say this again, but in another way.

Seriously, all this material has been covered extensively on this forum.

Perhaps you should go back to the VERY beginning (viewtopic.php?f=17&t=477), and come back AFTER you've at least become familiar with the basics. You obviously have NO grasp of this topic.

And that is a best case scenario, with me trying my best to give you some benefit of the doubt.

If you continue with this same garbage I'll just assume you're deliberately being obtuse.

See you in a couple of months. Happy reading.
SacredCowSlayer
Member
 
Posts: 235
Joined: September 5th, 2015, 10:44 pm

Re: CGI collapse footage

Postby simonshack on November 13th, 2016, 2:55 am

Anders wrote:But one fact is that both towers did come straight down into their own footprints.

So I wonder, why the need for any fakery at all regarding the collapses of the towers? .


You are severely misinformed, Anders:

It is a fact that as many as 9 buildings at the WTC complex were totally wiped off the map that day. The towers certainly did NOT collapse in their footprint - as shown on TV. This fact alone invalidates ALL of the available / purported 9/11 collapse imagery - which indeed show a neat (and surreal) top-down collapse of the towers into their own footprint - which could not possibly justify the total destruction of several other buildings of the WTC complex - or "severe damage to more than a dozen other adjacent structures".

Don't believe me? Well, here's from Wickypedia :

"The collapse of the Twin Towers destroyed the rest of the complex, and debris from the collapsing towers severely damaged or destroyed more than a dozen other adjacent and nearby structures."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collapse_ ... ade_Center


The "controlled" demolition of the Twin Towers was, most likely, a total disaster - since it damaged as many as 9 buildings beyond repair. What we see in the available 'collapse imagery', however, is in total conflict with such an outcome. There's no way that 9 buildings would have suffered complete destruction by the volatile, "pulverized matter" (i.e. the dusty 'mushroom / pyroclastic' cloud) depicted in the available Twin Towers' collapse "footage"(all of which we have thoroughly analyzed over the years - and conclusively shown / demonstrated to be CGI creations).
simonshack
Administrator
 
Posts: 6319
Joined: October 18th, 2009, 9:09 pm
Location: italy

Re: CGI collapse footage

Postby hoi.polloi on November 13th, 2016, 3:11 am

That is a good point, Simon.

If that is the case, it would definitely behoove us to know more about the buildings that were damaged and learn if their owners were warned ahead of time. Did we ever hear of the evacuation of the buildings surrounding the WTC block?
hoi.polloi
Administrator
 
Posts: 4720
Joined: November 14th, 2010, 8:24 pm

PreviousNext

Return to SEPTEMBER CLUES: the 9/11 psyop exposed: the media aired a "Made-for-TV Hollywood movie"

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests