Dear Cluesforum members and readers,
Yes, we have long demonstrated - beyond reasonable doubt & in countless methods & manners - that the entire pool of extant 9/11 imagery is entirely phony and that the 9/11 hoax / "magic trick" was pulled off primarily thanks to the prefabricated "Made-for-TV-Hollywood-movie" (sold to this world's population) as "real / authentic news broadcasts". However, it appears that the debate is still raging (around the "truther interwebs"), what with many folks having (quite understandable) problems understanding HOW exactly this was achieved. Most people try to make sense out of the imagery which, itself, makes no sense at all - and that's why we see very little progress in waking up our fellow earthlings to the Grand 9/11 Hoax.
Now, please know that I was myself extremely skeptical of - and even irritated by - the early imagery analyses making the rounds on the internets regarding the WTC collapses. I thought they were just silly. Especially those which claimed that "evil faces had been drawn in the smokeplumes"
. I reasoned that (as most rational people would 'reason'): with enough fantasy, your mind can make out ANY pattern you like within a given / random smokeplume - much like anyone can "see" elephant-shapes (or whatnot) in cloud formations and such. Well, knowing what I know now - as to the psychopathic nature of the Nutwork ("our ruling class") I'm not so sure anymore about that. Here's something "my mind imagined" while looking again at a fairly high-resolution animation (released only in 2010
) of the "WTC1 collapse"- Please understand that all I have done here ("photoshopping-wise") is to slightly alter / or 'pinkify' the color levels
of some pixels contained in these frames - and little else. I will ask you all to make your minds up for yourselves - as to the possible (or not) 'random nature' of this drifting "WTC1 smokeplume":
As you can see, the 'laughing rabbi' makes his appearance for the Grand Finale of 9/11's morning events - i.e. the very last few seconds
of the WTC1 collapse - as shown on TV (and in later "HD" imagery released... in 2010!). I can almost hear him snigger as he hums "the joo-oke's on you-hooo!"
You are quite free to believe that I have gone mad - and that I'm just "seeing things" - due to my 'overly-vivid, artistic imagination'. It really is up to YOU. But if I ever meet you face-to-face, you'll have to explain to me WHY you think that - for instance - those 'teeth, noses and eyes'
we can see in the above "WTC1 smokeplume" are just a matter of coincidental happenstance.
From time to time I enjoy sitting down with friends and review the old 9/11 imagery - as aired on TV - (and
as successively uploaded on the internets by supposed "amateur videomakers / photographers"). I can assure you that it makes for some quite entertaining evenings - and we laugh a lot at the most dreadful / hilarious blunders and absurdities contained within the 9/11 media reports and assorted imagery. Now, being only one (normal) guy - graced with a limited amount of time on this earth - I cannot possibly keep posting / illustrating / explaining ALL of the innumerable clues which point to the fact that the 9/11 broadcasts were ALL fake - and were just part of what can only be called a "prefabricated, Hollywood-grade special fx movie"
. Whoever cannot see this by now (in 2016), simply hasn't seriously looked into it (but of course, that's only my humble, personal opinion. Uh, ok - it's as humble as it gets, given my years of dedication to the 'cause'!).
Having said that, I can still comprehend and 'sympathize' with persons who find it hard to wrap their heads around this. Some will need "scientific proof" - and others will need all sorts of other proof. Yet, I think we've pretty much covered all areas of proof & evidence here on this forum - in the seven years of its existence. I'm quite aware that the sheer amount of research material posted at Cluesforum is a daunting affair for anyone to sift through - but, if you think about it, that is also true for ANY encyclopedia of any kind !
Since today is my birthday - and I'm in a merry and feasty mood - I feel compelled to share with everyone another two findings of mine highlighting the fact that NONE of the existing imagery of the WTC tower collapses is real - and that ALL TV broadcasts of September 11 2001 were fake (i.e. created in a studio). Methinks you'll enjoy this - if you're a REAL person, that is! THE MICHELLE CHARLESWORTH 9/11 ABC CLIP http://www.skincancer.org/true-stories/ ... kiest-year (yep, Michelle is promoting 'cancer research'...)
Let's start with the (in)famous ABC newsclip featuring Michelle Charlesworth "reporting from Westside Highway". Please watch this short ABC clip featuring Michelle Charlesworth: https://youtu.be/a90mn-k-54A?t=273
Note that: Michelle is meant to be standing there on Westside Highway at around 9:55 am - on September 11. 2001. She says she's been there since 30 minutes (just hanging around?). She also says that "about 45 minutes ago the city shut down the southbound lanes of Westside Highway, so that emergency crews only, firetrucks, NYPD trucks, could get down here"
At 5:10 into the clip, she also says that "people have been walking around here with their hands over their mouths [WHA-A-ATT? WHY SO? BECAUSE OF THAT SMOKE GUSHING OUT OF THE TOP FLOORS OF THE WTC???] - and screaming each other [sic] to try and borrow their cellphones, but there's no way to get away from here - because the bridges and tunnels have been closed... and they've been asking me whether or not the Hudson... or whether there was any way to get out of the city... and of course there's some concern as to what could be IN the smoke... that's the question most people have been asking me...WHAT COULD POSSIBLY BE IN THE SMOKE? "
... etc etc.
Michelle's utterly senseless script is patently absurd - all by itself. Now, let's have a look at "Michelle's 9/11 imagery".
Michelle is obviously standing in a studio (as her audio's room-reverb / ambient quality indicates) in front of a 'greenscreen' projecting some pre-recorded Westside Highway imagery (with smoking WTC in the background). Now, you may ask - HOW can this be proved
Here's how: at some stage in Michelle's clip, two young guys walk by. Their shadows are far longer than themselves (by 60%):The sun never lies.
As it is (scientific fact!), on any September 11 morning (at 9:55am
) in New York, the sun angle is at ca. 45°of elevation - meaning that ANY shadow of ANY object should only be as long / tall / large as the object itself. Please verify this for yourself. And YES, this is firm, scientific proof of the fakeness of the 9/11 broadcasts. Don't let the word 'scientific' put you off: REAL science - by REAL folks - is your friend
. The sun is also your friend - and it NEVER lies.
***********************************MIKE HEATH - the "heroic medic who survived the WTC1 collapse - diving behind a car"
We then have the ridiculous video-tale featuring one "Mike Heath" - an alleged paramedic (and "amateur videographer") who supposedly filmed the WTC1 collapse at VERY
close range - while calmly 'rationalizing' about his dire situation (as heard in 'his' video's audio track): "I hope I'll live. I hope I'll live."
You really need to watch this short "MIKE HEATH" video to experience the sheer absurdity / silliness of it all : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s8mz09VQQ2M
To be sure, "Mike Heath" is supposed to be diving behind that car approximately 28secs after the start of the WTC1 collapse.
The thing is: "Mark Heath's" story is flatly contradicted by another alleged amateur 9/11 video, credited to one "Jim Kosior". You can view it (if you can bear watching another so-called 'crisis actor') here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFie7O02BWk
Now, here's the 'problem' : as WTC1 is seen collapsing in the KOSIOR video, we can clearly see the monstrous smokeplume completely engulfing - WITHIN 18 SECONDS -
the location (below the Verizon building) where "Mark Heath" was supposed to be filming his own video:
If you grasp the points I've been making here - I'll be glad. If you don't, I won't worry too much. I'm getting used to it.
It should be evident (to anyone TRULY AND HONESTLY pursuing the truth of 9/11) that the video-tales of Mark Heath, Jim Kosior and Michelle Charlesworth are pure bullshit. Now, I don't know if "pure bullshit" is a proper English expression - but I hope that you get my drift. I will now solemnly appeal to my freedom of speech to call anyone defending the 9/11 imagery (as being true and legit) by the name of 'bullshitters'.