Game_Over wrote:Watch the fake piece of metal fall from the smoke cloud high ABOVE the tower, pass through (and disturb) the fake smoke, fall super fast to the ground with a tiny clang.
How big would that piece had to have been to be seen so clearly so high up?
omaxsteve wrote:Its not just game over , but game, set and match.
Was 9/11 a blue and sunshiny day or a gloomy and foggy, chocolate day?
simonshack wrote:reel.deal wrote:About the WTC-2 - when i went up it was winter, and the roof was shut in case of high winds. While the tower didnt perceptively sway in the 3/4 hour i was there, me & my mate definitely wondered aloud to each other if it would. [/i]
Dear Reel Deal - and Pov
When I was up on WTC2 with Kristan (the NY ballerina - at right - in the picture) it was fairly windy (funny though, can't see much hair flapping in the photo, but anyways...) and I clearly remember the tower's swaying rather alarmingly. For what it's worth, that's my recollection - from sometime in the mid-80's... It was certainly physically perceptible - a bit like the nauseating motion of a large cruise ship (for lack of a better parallel) .
Now, I wasn't up there on 9/11 - but "survivor JOE DITTMAR" apparently was...
Here's his fascinating story - that he keeps telling to enraptured audiences:
full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4lrJwfGaizI
This is interesting because where Joe Dittmar at 0:40 into his speech talks about a "concrete bunker of a stairwell":
http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.ph ... &start=300
simonshack wrote:Dear Deejay,
I hope you have appreciated my welcome to your joining this forum - by responding in some detail to a few of your queries. To be sure, I actually rather enjoyed rehashing some old stuff - and discovering some new stuff along the way! Now, don't get me wrong: I am perfectly conscious of the fact that our research can sound 'incredible, shocking and outrageous' to someone approaching it for the first time. I do my very best to maintain an attitude of openness towards whoever (legitimately and understandably so) simply needs to sink it in by verifying for HIM/HERself the validity and depth of the (now collective) September Clues/Cluesforum research.
However, I will now echo Brianv's legitimate question : "what part of this research don't you understand?". See, I very sincerely wish to see more people take in and assess our ongoing efforts (spanning now over half-decade) to pick apart the 9/11 hoax. I think we have done pretty well so far - and can now only hope that each of our new members will help us contribute positively/vigorously towards the diffusion of our findings. One could say that our quest is, due to the present sorry state of this world, a funny paradox: it's both idealistic and realistic. I don't think anyone here hopes to change the world from one day to the other. However, any self-respecting human being can realistically uphold the hope (however spectacularly unreasonable this world may have become) that reason will prevail.
Your last post with "Joe Dittmar" tells me that you are actually reading this forum's research material. Let me just tell you that I appreciate this very much.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests