I've looked I don't know how many times and I can't see "the man in the black box", it just appears to be slightly blurred tree greenery - what am I failing to see and can it be highlighted?
photos credited to William Nunez (director/writer/producer) http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0638035/
source of image: http://rvision.daydreamlabs.com/user/50 ... 6778578227
Some "9/11 eyewitness" apparently captured this wonderful, lucky shot. He snapped a pic JUST as "Flight 175" emerged from that building. That's Poolitzer Prize material, folks!
This other shot also depicts "Flight 175 - as it explodes". Hence, it is evidently (and supposedly) immediately successive to the shot.
This "William Nunez" claims he snapped these pictures with a $15 disposable Kodak camera.)
This claim is completely unbelievable. This claim is offensive to any photographer's intelligence.
Bond analyst Will Nuñez had gone to his corner newsstand and bought a $14.99 disposable Kodak, hoping to record the smoking tower out his office window "for history's sake," he says. "I remembered an incident back in the thirties when a plane had hit the Empire State Building, and I was always impressed by photos in encyclopedias." Instead, from his perch on the thirty-second floor of One State Street Plaza, he captured the plane's breathtaking blur out his office window, quite unintentionally. In his shot, a colleague, standing before a vast picture window, looks on in silhouette, next to an innocuous baseball trophy, its tiny batter poised on a two-handled loving cup. The plane had streaked by with such speed, Nuñez had not even realized he had caught it on film until he finally got around to developing the roll a week or two later.
- David Friend, Watching the World Change: The Stories Behind the Images of 9/11, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York, p. 13.
Hereby, I challenge any engineer specialized in crash physics to explain what we see in the 4 below videos.
How does this aluminum airliner penetrate the steel structure of the WTC without a single part shearing off?
PLEASE VIEW GIFS HERE--
SHOT 1: Credited to "Michael Hezarkhani"---
SHOT 2: Credited to "Luc Courchesne"---
SHOT 3: Credited to "Evan Fairbanks"---
SHOT 4: Credited to "Jennifer Spell"---
To be sure, this is a still completely unresolved issue to this day. NOT ONE individual contending that these are REAL videos has ever tackled this basic issue in any sort of scientific, peer-reviewed manner. Peer-reviewed? Yes well, that is a common requirement for any thesis/analysis to be deemed valid by our planet's scientific community.
Heiwa wrote:I like this fake, photoshopped, CGI photo rubbish a lot:
Heiwa wrote:But shouldn't the Empire State Building be seen somewhere left of Penn Plaza and Z on above lousy pic of Manhattan? I understand the picture is CGI but how could they miss copy/paste the Empire State Building into the rubbish?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests