9/11 SIMCITY

It has taken less than 10 years to pry open the can of worms enshrouding the pathetic 9/11 scam. The central role of the major newsmedia corporations to pull off this sordid "terror" simulation has now been comprehensively exposed. Before joining this forum, please get familiar with the research at: http://www.septemberclues.info

Re: 9/11 SIMCITY

Postby simonshack on October 16th, 2012, 11:24 pm

simonshack
Administrator
 
Posts: 6313
Joined: October 18th, 2009, 9:09 pm
Location: italy

Re: 9/11 SIMCITY

Postby I, Gestalta on October 17th, 2012, 12:41 am

Agh, I probably wasn't clear in what I meant, because I was referring to the video source. I couldn't find the shot with both pillars of the Verrazano Bridge in the footage hosted on http://archive.org/details/sept_11_tv_archive, because ABC kept switching "cameras" at the tail-end of the zoom-out. I needed the "raw" footage (for a rebuttal to a hilarious argument), which, fortunately, I found a short while ago.
I, Gestalta
Member
 
Posts: 149
Joined: July 25th, 2012, 10:00 pm

Re: 9/11 SIMCITY

Postby Seth on October 21st, 2012, 1:58 am

Quick question about this gif:

Image

I've looked I don't know how many times and I can't see "the man in the black box", it just appears to be slightly blurred tree greenery - what am I failing to see and can it be highlighted?
Seth
Member
 
Posts: 24
Joined: September 3rd, 2012, 2:26 pm

Re: 9/11 SIMCITY

Postby simonshack on October 22nd, 2012, 10:55 am

Seth wrote:
I've looked I don't know how many times and I can't see "the man in the black box", it just appears to be slightly blurred tree greenery - what am I failing to see and can it be highlighted?


Yeah, I quite agree that the "man in black box" point wasn't much of a point...I actually meant to remove it from the SC website some time ago - and forgot about it. Have done so today, though.- so thanks for reminding me, Seth! :)

More about this at my SYNTHETIC CROWDS page on the SC website:
http://septemberclues.info/synthetic_crowds.htm

Image
simonshack
Administrator
 
Posts: 6313
Joined: October 18th, 2009, 9:09 pm
Location: italy

Re: 9/11 SIMCITY

Postby Equinox on October 23rd, 2012, 12:32 pm

Memories.... :wub:


TWO OF A KIND (1)

photos credited to William Nunez (director/writer/producer) http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0638035/
source of image: http://rvision.daydreamlabs.com/user/50 ... 6778578227

Some "9/11 eyewitness" apparently captured this wonderful, lucky shot. He snapped a pic JUST as "Flight 175" emerged from that building. That's Poolitzer Prize material, folks!

This other shot also depicts "Flight 175 - as it explodes". Hence, it is evidently (and supposedly) immediately successive to the shot.


Image


This "William Nunez" claims he snapped these pictures with a $15 disposable Kodak camera.)
Image

This claim is completely unbelievable. This claim is offensive to any photographer's intelligence.


Image

Image

SOURCE—
Plane photo-- http://rvision.daydreamlabs.com/user/50 ... 6778578227
Explosion Photo-- -- http://www.911conspiracy.tv/images/2nd- ... -south.jpg


More info--
Bond analyst Will Nuñez had gone to his corner newsstand and bought a $14.99 disposable Kodak, hoping to record the smoking tower out his office window "for history's sake," he says. "I remembered an incident back in the thirties when a plane had hit the Empire State Building, and I was always impressed by photos in encyclopedias." Instead, from his perch on the thirty-second floor of One State Street Plaza, he captured the plane's breathtaking blur out his office window, quite unintentionally. In his shot, a colleague, standing before a vast picture window, looks on in silhouette, next to an innocuous baseball trophy, its tiny batter poised on a two-handled loving cup. The plane had streaked by with such speed, Nuñez had not even realized he had caught it on film until he finally got around to developing the roll a week or two later.
- David Friend, Watching the World Change: The Stories Behind the Images of 9/11, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York, p. 13.
Equinox
Member
 
Posts: 549
Joined: October 14th, 2010, 9:45 am

Re: 9/11 SIMCITY

Postby Equinox on October 23rd, 2012, 1:59 pm


CRASH PHYSICS

Hereby, I challenge any engineer specialized in crash physics to explain what we see in the 4 below videos.
How does this aluminum airliner penetrate the steel structure of the WTC without a single part shearing off?
PLEASE VIEW GIFS HERE--

SHOT 1: Credited to "Michael Hezarkhani"--- Image

SHOT 2: Credited to "Luc Courchesne"--- Image

SHOT 3: Credited to "Evan Fairbanks"---Image

SHOT 4: Credited to "Jennifer Spell"--- Image

To be sure, this is a still completely unresolved issue to this day. NOT ONE individual contending that these are REAL videos has ever tackled this basic issue in any sort of scientific, peer-reviewed manner. Peer-reviewed? Yes well, that is a common requirement for any thesis/analysis to be deemed valid by our planet's scientific community.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Image


Evan Fairbanks -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=udVbDzN9Cgc#t=6m2s

Jenifer Spell - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6cUfTOaUGw


Luc Courchesne- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rMzmFaifzh0

Michael Hezarkhani- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sPeNkZz4mmU&fmt=22
Equinox
Member
 
Posts: 549
Joined: October 14th, 2010, 9:45 am

Re: 9/11 SIMCITY

Postby Equinox on November 3rd, 2012, 9:27 am

I mentioned the other day how huge the research is, and from now on I want to post on a level that reflects that. Enjoy- :)

CNN BACKGROUND ERASED


SOURCED- 9/11 Television Archives.
CNN- 29.10 mins - http://archive.org/details/cnn200109110 ... art=1739.5
(hyper link straight too footage)



Image
Image
Image
Image
Equinox
Member
 
Posts: 549
Joined: October 14th, 2010, 9:45 am

Re: 9/11 SIMCITY

Postby Heiwa on November 3rd, 2012, 1:58 pm

I like this fake, photoshopped, CGI photo rubbish a lot:
Image
A plane has apparenly penetrated the south face of WTC2 and stopped and exploded inside WTC2 producing a FIREBALL penetrating the east/right face of WTC2 and also backwards through the already damaged south face. Doesn't it look terrible. OMG!
We cannot see if the FIREBALL also penetrated the WTC2 west/left face of WTC2 (facing NJ) or the WTC2 north/opposite the south face (facing uptown).
So I asked Google images/photos to show me some early close up pictures/photos/images of these faces after the alleged plane landing.
Result?
ZERO!
The stupid terrorist photoshoppers, CGI-makers forgot to make them.
:P
Heiwa
Member
 
Posts: 1064
Joined: October 20th, 2009, 7:20 pm

Re: 9/11 SIMCITY

Postby Equinox on November 3rd, 2012, 7:15 pm

Heiwa wrote:I like this fake, photoshopped, CGI photo rubbish a lot:



I hear you and feel the same. You made a good point in regards to the buildings. I have never seen them before. :D :lol:

SYNCHRONISED LIVE.


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2p4VH7SmIZg

Using the above video as a reference.
Here is where the mainstream media were running the same footage on “rival” networks.
Max props for the research Simon, It's gold. B)

ABC AND CBS 1.21-
Image
ABC- 23.37- http://archive.org/details/abc200109110 ... art=1379.5
CBS-23.47- http://archive.org/details/cbs200109110 ... art=1379.5


ABC AND CBS AND NBC - 2.03
Image
ABC- 25.07 - http://archive.org/details/abc200109110 ... art=1499.5
CBS-25- 17 - http://archive.org/details/cbs200109110 ... art=1499.5
NBC- 25.17 - http://archive.org/details/nbc200109110 ... art=1499.5



ABC AND CBS AND NBC- 2.24
Image
ABC- 25.49- http://archive.org/details/abc200109110 ... art=1499.5
CBS-25- 59 - http://archive.org/details/cbs200109110 ... art=1499.5
NBC- 25.59 - http://archive.org/details/nbc200109110 ... art=1499.5



ABC AND CBS AND FOX- 2.33
Image
ABC-26.01 - http://archive.org/details/abc200109110 ... art=1559.5
CBS- 26.11- http://archive.org/details/cbs200109110 ... art=1439.5
FOX- 26.04 - http://archive.org/details/fox520010911 ... art=1559.5

ABC AND FOX- 2.49
Image
ABC- 26.42- http://archive.org/details/abc200109110 ... art=1559.5
FOX- 26.47- http://archive.org/details/fox520010911 ... art=1559.5

ABC AND CBS AND FOX- 3.24
Image
ABC-27.46 – http://archive.org/details/abc200109110 ... art=1619.5
FOX 27..52- http://archive.org/details/fox520010911 ... art=1559.5
NBC- 28.20- http://archive.org/details/nbc200109110 ... art=1679.5


CBS AND NBC AND FOX – 3.34
Image
CBS- 28.14- http://archive.org/details/cbs200109110 ... art=1679.5
FOX- 28.13- http://archive.org/details/fox520010911 ... art=1679.5
NBC- 28.18- http://archive.org/details/nbc200109110 ... art=1679.5

FOX CBS AND NBC AND FOX 3.36
Image
ABC- 28.13 http://archive.org/details/abc200109110 ... art=1679.5
CBS- 28.16- http://archive.org/details/cbs200109110 ... art=1679.5
FOX- 28.15- http://archive.org/details/fox520010911 ... art=1679.5
NBC- 28.20- http://archive.org/details/nbc200109110 ... art=1679.5
Equinox
Member
 
Posts: 549
Joined: October 14th, 2010, 9:45 am

Re: 9/11 SIMCITY

Postby simonshack on November 11th, 2012, 7:16 pm

*
AN OSCARM NOMINEE
for "most ridiculous clip of 9/11"


This is what was (supposedly) aired on New York Tv station "NY1" on 9/11:


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=919UzVAfCuI

Here is another cropped/enlarged version of it, posted on the Youtube channel of that "CTV911" planehugger-cum- 9/11-imagery-archivist, who once actually registered here to troll around (can't remember the screen name he used on the forum). He calls the clip "2nd plane in view for 25 seconds" :rolleyes:

I feel almost silly to even analyze this painfully poor CGI - but here we go. All I've done is to enlarge (equally) two frames (separated by 9 seconds) extracted from the clip - and applied some contrast - in order to somewhat better distinguish the "airplane pixels" from the "sky pixels". I will spare you any further comments ...

Image

Image


And remember, THIS is what was shown on CNN that day...
Image
simonshack
Administrator
 
Posts: 6313
Joined: October 18th, 2009, 9:09 pm
Location: italy

Re: 9/11 SIMCITY

Postby Equinox on November 12th, 2012, 3:00 am

Plane hugging archivists are a dime a dozen! and waste a lot of time gaining the footage, yet still spend no time finding any real evidence.
They have nothing on this humble no-planer archivist. Hahaaha :lol:

These hyper-links are the best, with them you can just jump straight to the point in the 9/11 TV archives where the fraud is. B)


ARCHIVED

CNN- 29.00 - http://archive.org/details/cnn200109110 ... start=1739
Image
Equinox
Member
 
Posts: 549
Joined: October 14th, 2010, 9:45 am

Re: 9/11 SIMCITY

Postby Seth on November 12th, 2012, 4:04 am

I don't currently have the ability to us "grab it" software to graphically show something (windows update/software problems) - but I came across something I think is interesting and if someone could

1) Tell which network is broadcasting it

2) Show graphically what is being represented (gifs or stills)

3) Show me if I have any errors.

Youtube video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=htAFmcYB ... re=related

Anomaly 1: Zoom out of 2 towers starts @ 2:20. In this zoom out there appears to be not 2, but 3 WTC towers. One in the middle, one to the left of it, and one in the background to the right. This can be seen again for a few seconds @ 5:04 and @ 9:05

Anomaly 2: @ 3:48 - Where is the Empire State Building?
Seth
Member
 
Posts: 24
Joined: September 3rd, 2012, 2:26 pm

Re: 9/11 SIMCITY

Postby simonshack on November 12th, 2012, 12:08 pm

Seth,

The broadcast you linked to is from NBC with Matt Lauer and Couric. No, we don't see 3 towers - the 'third tower' you refer to is just (meant to be) the West façade of WTC1, but given the piss-poor quality of these 9/11 broascasts I can understand why people sometimes 'get fooled' into seeing strange things here and there! I'd suggest you spend more time familiarizing yourself with the (horrid) 9/11 CGI imagery before submitting further erroneous / faulty observations.

However, I will gladly explain why the ESB (Empire State Building) isn't seen in that shot - as it gives me the opportunity to further illustrate once again the sheer silliness of the various 9/11 Manhattan "aerial views"(both on LIVE TV and in successively released, supposed "amateur imagery").

Here is the view from that NBC broadcast you linked to. It is supposedly a TV chopper shot, apparently from somewhere NW uptown.

Image

Now, here is a marvellous, supposed "amateur shot" purportedly captured by one "YURI FAKTOROVICH" who was, as the story goes, a Russian Cessna pilot who allegedly flew by Manhattan with his Cessna at around 9:03am - JUST as "Flight175" supposedly crashed into WTC2...
Image


Here's a real photo taken from the WTC, looking uptown. I have playfully inserted "Yuri's Cessna" and "NBC's chopper4" at the approximate locations they were meant to be filming from. As you see, the ESB would be out of their viewing range. So, the 9/11 image fakery team obviously worked with some 3D imaging software - and tried as best they could to make it all look as credible as possible (well, sort of! To be sure, there's NO WAY for them to explain away the horrid 9/11 LIVE TV image quality - or the countless other aberrations pointed out by our imagery analyses):

Image


The thing is - and as I've shown in the past - we are then asked to believe that NBC's "Chopper4" placed itself (and remained hovering there - for most of the morning, in fact) at the EXACT same aerial location where "YURI FAK(E)TOROVICH" snapped his marvellous Manhattan panorama !

Image

You are of course free to believe in such wondrous coincidences and to think that "this is no proof of anything"... I prefer to conclude that the 9/11 fakery team were just a rather lazy, uncreative lot - who were content to play around with a mere few digitized panoramas of the Manhattan scenery, slapping together both their TV imagery and their "amateur" imagery with the same bunch of templates.
simonshack
Administrator
 
Posts: 6313
Joined: October 18th, 2009, 9:09 pm
Location: italy

Re: 9/11 SIMCITY

Postby Heiwa on November 12th, 2012, 1:25 pm

Image
But shouldn't the Empire State Building be seen somewhere left of Penn Plaza and Z on above lousy pic of Manhattan? I understand the picture is CGI but how could they miss copy/paste the Empire State Building into the rubbish? :unsure:
Heiwa
Member
 
Posts: 1064
Joined: October 20th, 2009, 7:20 pm

Re: 9/11 SIMCITY

Postby simonshack on November 12th, 2012, 1:37 pm

Heiwa wrote:But shouldn't the Empire State Building be seen somewhere left of Penn Plaza and Z on above lousy pic of Manhattan? I understand the picture is CGI but how could they miss copy/paste the Empire State Building into the rubbish? :unsure:

Don't think so, Heiwa. The ESB is correctly not seen - as it stands just beyond the left edge of this canvas.
simonshack
Administrator
 
Posts: 6313
Joined: October 18th, 2009, 9:09 pm
Location: italy

PreviousNext

Return to SEPTEMBER CLUES: the 9/11 psyop exposed: the media aired a "Made-for-TV Hollywood movie"

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest