9/11 SIMCITY

It has taken less than 10 years to pry open the can of worms enshrouding the pathetic 9/11 scam. The central role of the major newsmedia corporations to pull off this sordid "terror" simulation has now been comprehensively exposed. Before joining this forum, please get familiar with the research at: http://www.septemberclues.info

Re: 9/11 SIMCITY

Postby brianv on December 28th, 2012, 12:53 pm

Quantam mechanics sounded outlandish to Einstein,


Is that anything like Quantum Mechanics?
brianv
Member
 
Posts: 3861
Joined: October 18th, 2009, 11:19 pm

Re: 9/11 SIMCITY

Postby Equinox on December 28th, 2012, 8:09 pm

Well, Well, Well… :lol:


The WABC7 chopper footage has even more holes than Swiss cheese.
I was checking out the jumper (probably the only one to appear in the live, lame-stream media footage)

Jump link- http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pl ... Llo#t=425s

Image


Let’s call him Felix (after my hero the red bull stratos jumper)

And as you check out Felix’s shadow in the original footage… WABC7 Footage you will see that it is not a shadow at all both Felix and his shadow are just CGI clones of each other. Here I will demonstrate. Here is Felix tumbling down after a red bull.

Notice his “jet stream shadow” is a complete clone of him??

Here, I applied a sharpener.
Image


It’s clear as broad day light.
Image



And they didn’t even re-render the shadow correctly in the Nist ABC DUB`
Jump link- http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pl ... Ixg#t=506s
Image



Or the Jim Hortisie crap.
Jump link- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wZJXNdhk ... age#t=550s
Image


The masking lines are terrible….

Image




full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F8D9dNCCLlo


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L3UlAxwpIxg



full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wZJXNdhkhCY
Equinox
Member
 
Posts: 549
Joined: October 14th, 2010, 9:45 am

Re: 9/11 SIMCITY

Postby Equinox on December 28th, 2012, 10:47 pm

To sum it up….

The jumpers shadow on the NTH tower that was shown live here on TV.
Image

Is not the same as what appears in the other footage synched in the same time.
The other footage is
A-
NIST FOIA: Jim Huibregtse Clips 01-14A
November 2010

Image

And B-
NIST FOIA: ABC Dub1 Clips 01-04
Uploaded on Nov 1, 2010
The supposed actual footage, which was re-released in November 2010.
Obviously re- rendered to hide the Muddy CGI.

Image


BOTH OF THE ABOVE SHOTS SYNCHED ALL IN TIME.
Both feature a very basic blotch for a shadow of the supposed jumper.


But the WABC 7 LIVE SHOT (from that day) This was shown “Live” on WABC 7 NY. It features a tail behind the jumper, which also casts a shadow. When you watch the mentioned section over, and over again, you can see that the jumper and tail, and shadow and tail are the EXACT same animation. Clones! which are identical in appearance and also direction they travel.

In three easy steps I demonstrate
A- The Nist shot with its shadow (without the tail )
B- The Abc shot with its tail and shadow
C- The ABC shot again with some filters on it to highlight the abnormalities.

Image

Mad props to Simon Shack and scooby clues crew, I never could upload a photo on my computer till I watched September Clues. I’m quite pleased with how much I have learned from him and the cool researchers on this forum. B)
Equinox
Member
 
Posts: 549
Joined: October 14th, 2010, 9:45 am

Re: 9/11 SIMCITY

Postby Equinox on January 6th, 2013, 10:17 am

OH MY!! Can someone head on down to MATT@ http://www.911conspiracy.tv/index.html

And ask if he is feeling alright??
He stumbled across another BS 9/11 Photo (released 12 years later)

The blog where he found it at says..
Link- http://dave-hogan.blogspot.com.au/2012/ ... -real.html


Is this real?

I have no idea. I was told that this came from a scanned picture taken on 9/11 by someone who sent it to someone who just put a link to it. I cropped it slightly, but I've never seen this angle before. I don't know if it's real, but if it is...

Wow.


Matt has posted it here http://www.911conspiracy.tv/2nd_hit_photos.html#Unknown on his site and gone on to say---

To answer the blog's question: Yes, in my opinion it is a real shot from 9/11/2001 at 9:02:59 am EDT. Exact point of perspective: not yet mapped below.




Image


And these are supposed to be the expert debunkers!!! bahahhaaa.. This is to easy. The 9/11 footage is fake. And Matt supposed credibilty has just gone out the window.
Equinox
Member
 
Posts: 549
Joined: October 14th, 2010, 9:45 am

Re: 9/11 SIMCITY

Postby Viterbi on January 7th, 2013, 10:11 pm

According to the EXIF data of the picture, the camera model that took the photo was a LG Electronics VS910 4G.

Image

And the digital data of the picture was originally generated on 10/15/2011 at 12:20:53.

That's the bizarre explanation of the blogger about the origins of the picture:

As I was told, it was emailed, printed, saved for about 7 years, while the original digital copy was lost, then scanned back in by someone who had printed a copy and mentioned it to me. I asked to see it and asked if they cared if I posted it. All that was cropped was the border of the print out.
Viterbi
Member
 
Posts: 39
Joined: May 1st, 2012, 5:24 pm

Re: 9/11 SIMCITY

Postby totalrecall on January 8th, 2013, 11:55 am

Simon, I don't know if anyone has pointed this whopper out yet from one of your early photos on page 1:

Image

Notice the white slopped-roof building in front of "X". In the top left photo it has an extension on that building's left side! (viewer's right side). This is missing from the bottom right photo. :lol:
totalrecall
Member
 
Posts: 41
Joined: January 4th, 2013, 12:23 pm

Re: 9/11 SIMCITY

Postby SmokingGunII on February 8th, 2013, 3:14 pm

Just a quick reminder what a United Airlines undercarriage looked like back in 2001..

Image
SmokingGunII
Member
 
Posts: 557
Joined: October 23rd, 2009, 10:34 am

Re: 9/11 SIMCITY

Postby Equinox on February 11th, 2013, 8:09 am

Exposing the 9/11 Memorial/museum fakery.

Simon as you recall, there is a movie produced by the 9/11 Memorial/Nauseum,
911: stories of survival and loss
The movie featuring one-on-one interviews with victims' family members, and survivors of the attacks and first responders.


We had discovered some fakery in the video… And one day you and I both verified that the movie had been taken down from the 9/11 memorial website?
Here is the original link to the movie it still does not work-
http://www.911memorial.org/site/PageSer ... vivalvideo

I was on there the other day and it looks like they have placed it back up!
Here- http://www.911memorial.org/images-videos/video/films (New link for the movie)


Surely this fakery is right up there with best of them, like the faux five chopper footage.

Image

Image
Equinox
Member
 
Posts: 549
Joined: October 14th, 2010, 9:45 am

Re: 9/11 SIMCITY

Postby diagonal2 on February 21st, 2013, 4:26 pm


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y4ABHh3JBpc

Green screen magic at work. :)
diagonal2
Member
 
Posts: 104
Joined: June 22nd, 2012, 5:46 pm

Re: 9/11 SIMCITY

Postby westhammer on May 1st, 2013, 1:48 pm

hi,was having a debate over the photo that simon posted on page 13 one that's quoted good eyes gary.

the talking point is the far lamp,they say it's camera angles,or a shift in perspective,as to why the far lamp is missing from the bottom photo..

doe's anyone know the street or junction these were filmed.

i found the location......https://maps.google.com/?ll=40.716737,- ... 3,,0,-1.58

now the person i was having a debate with said this is why its missing.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2033376/911/WAT.jpg

sorry for not putting the pics up,as i don;t know how to put them on here.
westhammer
Member
 
Posts: 16
Joined: July 20th, 2012, 9:31 pm

Re: 9/11 SIMCITY

Postby simonshack on May 14th, 2013, 1:04 pm

*

Here's a question you surely must have often asked yourselves, folks: :rolleyes:


"WHAT WOULD MANHATTAN LOOK LIKE ON OTHER PLANETS?"


Well, thanks to an illustrator and a NASA scientist we can finally lay this tormenting question to rest...

NYC In Space: Nickolay Lamm's Wild Illustrations Show Big Apple On Other Planets

"What would Manhattan's iconic skyline look like if NYC were suddenly beamed to another planet? Seven fantastical illustrations by Pittsburgh-based artist Nickolay Lamm suggest it would look, well, pretty different -- and not necessarily in the ways you might imagine.

The illustrations, put together with help from ex-NASA astrobiologist Dr. M. Browning Vogel, show what the Big Apple might look like on each of the other planets in our solar system."
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/1 ... ref=topbar


ON MARS
Image

ON SATURN
Image

ON NEPTUNE (No liberties allowed on Neptune)
Image

ON VENUS
Image

ON EARTH - (on September 11, 2001 only <_< )
Image
simonshack
Administrator
 
Posts: 6361
Joined: October 18th, 2009, 9:09 pm
Location: italy

Re: 9/11 SIMCITY

Postby sunshine05 on May 14th, 2013, 3:04 pm

Excellent, Simon!
sunshine05
Member
 
Posts: 296
Joined: January 28th, 2013, 7:00 pm

Re: 9/11 SIMCITY

Postby simonshack on December 14th, 2013, 2:47 pm

*

The below frame (large image) is extracted from a most dramatic clip featuring a TV reporter standing right below the towers, on the shaded west side - "just as WTC2 collapses".

link to dramatic clip : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IE7fWV2qUVU

It seems that some feeble attempt was made (by the animation team) to depict a few, dim office lights (in WTC1). Those 'office lights' just don't seem very convincing to me - considering this is meant to have been recorded by a professional broadcasting camera. To be sure, this 'washed-out' quality / resolution is an absurd, pervasive feature of the available 9/11 imagery.

Image

That TV reporter was a mighty lucky fellow...
... and a pretty fast runner too (if NIST's figure of "9 seconds" - official collapse time of WTC2 - is true) ! :P

Does anyone know who this reporter is ? I haven't been able to find out yet.
An interview with this fellow should be in order. Maybe on Fakeologist radio? ;)
simonshack
Administrator
 
Posts: 6361
Joined: October 18th, 2009, 9:09 pm
Location: italy

Re: 9/11 SIMCITY

Postby mnew9 on December 15th, 2013, 8:10 am

Image

The reporters name is Newton Jones Burkett III, known as N.J. Burkett a correspondent for WABC-TV.

Not a great deal of information on the guy considering that he is supposed to have been awarded "many prestigious honors".
He is also President of the National Academy of Television Arts and Sciences, New York and a Trustee of the National Academy. :rolleyes:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N._J._Burkett
mnew9
Member
 
Posts: 102
Joined: September 11th, 2010, 6:57 am

Re: 9/11 SIMCITY

Postby simonshack on December 15th, 2013, 1:28 pm

Thanks a lot, mnew9 ! So Burkett's principal "claim to fame" is his coverage of 9/11? Fantastic. <_<

********************************************************************************************************************************************
NOTE: A pen pal of mine has advised me to rethink my argument about the office lights. I can see / appreciate his point and have now removed my post and graphic about this issue which may have been ill-considered on my part and may only cause unnecessary controversy.
*********************************************************************************************************************************************



THE E-TEAM stunt of March 2001

You may wonder what the below image is about.

ImageImage

The E-TEAM stunt of March 29, 2001: http://www.guerrilla-innovation.com/arc ... 000675.php


"A few months before the senseless events on 9/11, the performance-group eteam took part in the LMCC artist in residence program that had studios on the 91st and 92nd floor of the North Tower of the World Trade Center. On the night of March 29 2001, the eteam created a temporary light-sculpture using illuminated windows in the North Tower to spell their name in capital letters. To create the letters, they needed 279 'dark' and 127 'light' windows on 7 floors (from 89th to 95nd). The event was carried out in collaboration with 12 offices located on the respective floors."


On their website, the E-team explains how they needed "7 floors" to create the E-TEAM word (floors 89 to 95). What a remarkable coincidence that, according to Wickedpedia, exactly 7 floors (93 to 99) were affected by "the impact of Flight 11"...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_te ... ade_Center

:rolleyes:

A few pictures of interest (from inside the WTC) courtesy of the E-TEAM's website:

ImageImage

ImageImage

Why are they interesting? Well - because of "KING KONG MAN", of course: http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.ph ... 8#p2374833

Image

Image

Image

The sloppy 9/11 animation team didn't even get the scale / proportions of the WTC building right !
What we were shown on TV on 9/11 was truly a SIMCITY. This has now been proven beyond any reasonable doubt.
simonshack
Administrator
 
Posts: 6361
Joined: October 18th, 2009, 9:09 pm
Location: italy

PreviousNext

Return to SEPTEMBER CLUES: the 9/11 psyop exposed: the media aired a "Made-for-TV Hollywood movie"

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests