THE PLAIN PHONY 'PLANE' PATHScomparing the animated trajectories of "Flight 175"
The 'shock-&-awe' visuals of "FLIGHT 175 striking WTC2" were obviously a crucial part of the 9/11 hoax. As shown in September Clues, there are many ways to demonstrate that those visuals cannot represent reality - one of them being the absurdly conflcting trajectories of "FLIGHT 175". We can only guess whether these blunders occured due to flawed 3D imaging softwares - or the ineptness of their programmers and animation artists - or both. A case of whistleblowing? I doubt it.
There is, naturally, an ongoing damage-control effort to try and contain, ridicule, and distort the hard evidence exposing the piss-poor 9/11 computer imagery. The latest in line is "The Hologram Theory"
upheld by a merry lot of rather 'prominent, self-proclaimed 9/11 truthers' - wherein they attempt to demonstrate (using graphic computer models, no less!) that the various "FLIGHT 175" trajectories seen on TV are, after all, perfectly consistent with each other! In other words, they are implying that: "The news media aired absolutely real & legit imagery. The "airplane" they captured on film was, in actuality, a (quite authentic) hologram!"
But let us take another good
look at these "FLIGHT 175" trajectories, just to make sure that this part of the wider September Clues research isn't some sort of visual/optical illusion. For this, we will of course examine THE ACTUAL
9/11 imagery - and NOT some computer models /vector graphics attempting to re-simulate the simulation!... *rolleyes*
So please note: this study is only - and specifically - about the "FLIGHT 175" TRAJECTORIES.
The "International Shot"
(as I called it in SC) as aired LIVE on ABC is, undoubtedly, the 'visual imprint' that most people around the world would have of "FLIGHT 175". (Just a 2-second clip - so not of much interest for our trajectory study.)
Now, the only other LIVE shot showing the exact moment of impact was, of course, the infamous "NOSE-OUT" shot. Of course, that FOX clip doesn't show much of a trajectory either - since when rewinding the tape to 6 seconds before impact - there's just no plane to be seen at all !...
On LIVE 9/11 TV
, the first time we see a "plane", is 16 seconds before the strike
: the CBS "Divebomber" :"THE DIVEBOMBER SHOT" - as aired on CBS
In fact, the "Divebomber" was the very first image of "FLIGHT 175" the world ever saw. The "Divebomber" initiates the fascinating "16-SECOND MAGIC SEQUENCE" - which I have put together to show the SUM TOTAL of what the American people saw ON 'LIVE' TV that morning - on all combined TV networks. I call it "Magic", since it asks us to believe that these 4, seamlessly consecutive shots
, were captured by 4 different cameras - BY CHANCE
. Imagine/or compute the odds !"THE 16-SECOND MAGIC SEQUENCE"
So now that we have covered the sum total of LIVE IMAGES
aired on TV on 9/11, let us look at the other "FLIGHT 175" trajectories shown AFTER the Live TV Show. On the evening of 9/11
, NBC aired this other shot (at right): At left: the LIVE NBC shot_________________At right: the NBC evening news shotExpounded at 12:48 in my full September Clues documentary viewable here : http://www.septemberclues.info
The TV networks also aired (later in the day) this other trajectory (below left) which shows "FLIGHT 175" actually making a final ascent
. Of course, at NO POINT in time do we see, in the "Divebomber shot", the plane making a final ascent
!:FINAL ASCENT shot____________________________________________DIVEBOMBER shotExpounded at 1.04:44 in my full September Clues documentary viewable here : http://www.septemberclues.info"FINAL ASCENT shot " - as aired on the BBC:
Can anyone seriously argue/sustain that what we see here (an ascending path) is due to 'deceptive perspectives' ? The"LUIS ALONSO shot"
Now, in this alleged "amateur video" credited to one Luis Alonso, "FLIGHT 175" also seems to make a final ascent. However, just how
this final ascent is depicted appears to be a physically/aerodinamically impossible feat. I trust every honest airline pilot and aeronautical expert will agree with this claim. By all means, if you find fault with this analysis, please let me know :LUIS ALONSO SHOT (-8secs to -6secs before impact)________ LUIS ALONSO SHOT (-4secs to -2secs before impact)LUIS ALONSO SHOT - full sequence (last 8 seconds before impact)(Note: none of the three above gif loops are at original speed and are only meant to illustrate the LUIS ALONSO trajectories)
link to original LUIS ALONSO clip as aired on German TV: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FtzyGUd3VjA
So again, did "FLIGHT 175" make a final ascent? Well, no - not
according to that perfectly level approach purportedly filmed (according to the FBI) by some arabic jihadist from under the Brooklyn bridge (the so-called "AL-QAEDA shot")
the "AL-QAEDA shot" versus the "Divebomber" shot
So, was "FLIGHT 175's" trajectory ascending/ descending /or perfectly level in its last seconds of flight ? What's it gonna be ? Is all of this, as naysayers say, "only a matter of perspectives - and just a series of optical illusions?"
Can anyone really seriously claim that all the above trajectories are perfectly consistent with each other - thus credibly depicting the very same event as if captured by real cameras in the real world? You decide - but if your answer is "no", it should be transparently clear to you that the latest, fanciful "hologram theory"
is nothing but the last, desperate attempt by the perps to get the TV networks 'off the hook' (as in white-washing the media of any complicity in the 9/11 scam
). To be sure, the 'holo-huggers' core claim is that "FLIGHT 175 was fake (it was just a hologram projection) - but the 9/11 TV images were quite real and legit!"
Here's a short tinyurl link to this post - feel free to use it to link to this page: http://tinyurl.com/plainphonyplanepaths
( If you wish to post it on a Youtube comment section, you need to use this link : tinyurl . com /plainphonyplanepaths )