reel.deal wrote:Richard Drew, photographer of 'The Falling Man'
"...i like to think of him sort of, as sort of he's the unknown soldier, he's like; let him represent everyone thats sort of, thats, that was their fate that day. I look at the picture now, er, ah, from the 9/11 picture, falling man, in hoping that 10 years on people will be able to look at it now, and to be able to, they; they were SHUNDING (?!?) bu, before, and they can look at it now, and to a, to accept it as part of what happened that..... day. And, and we, we see pictures of the rescuers, we saw pictures of the airplaneS hitting the buildinG, we saw there were ri; the, the recovery effort, and... and, er, now there we can also try to accept that, as part of what really happened that day."
couldnt have put it better myself.
has he been drinking ?
if anyone can translate this into American-English that would be great !
cuz i'm English & i aint got a clue what the fuck he's going on about !
I transcribed it, but i still cant understand a freekin' word of it...
Richard Drew states.
"...i like to think of him "sort of, as sort of" he’s the unknown soldier, "he's like; let" him represent everyone "that’s sort of, that’s, that" was their fate that day. I look at the picture now, " err, ah," from the 9/11 picture, falling man, in hoping that 10 years on people will be able to look at it now, and to be able to, they; they were "SHUNDING (?!?) bu," before, and they can look at it now, and "to a, to" accept it as part of what happened that..... day. "And, and" "we, we " see pictures of the rescuers, we saw pictures of the airplaneS hitting the buildinG, we saw there were "ri; the," the recovery effort, and... "and, er," now there we can also try to accept that, as part of what really happened that (pause) day."
Richard Drew states.
So “eehh, errr,” I was photographing the towers on fire,“and on of the” (pause)… “the w.w.w.w.w.”woman from amt standing next to me said to me, said “you know”
(Pause) Look look, and she pointed up and I sort of took the camera away from my eye and after I started seeing the people coming out of the building. So I proceeded to photograph “aahhhh Oh id say”…. 7 or 8 people maybe“m. m. m. m. ..That “ I photograph “graphed”… people who had.. (pause) of people who were falling from the world trade centre.
Fidgeting
Fidgeting is the most obvious giveaway. Watch for hands and legs that are shaky.
He seems very much edge.
Pausing
Forced to make up a story on the spot, most speakers will take a beat or two to collect their thoughts. Lies require a quick mental review of what they have told others to avoid inconsistency and to make up new details as needed.
*what really happened that (pause) day."
*said to me, said “you know”
*(Pause) Look look,
*people who had.. (pause) of people
Stuttering
Stumbling over words without natural fluency.
*everyone "that’s sort of, that’s, that" was their
*and "to a, to" accept it
*day. "And, and" "we, we " see picture
*“the w.w.w.w.w.”woman from amt
*7 or 8 people maybe“m. m. m. m. ..That “ I photograph “graphed”…
Ah’s Um’s Er’s
People using um, ah, hmm, before answering questions are trying to think of an answer, that more times than not, is going to be a lie.
*the picture now, " err, ah," from
*So “eehh, errr,” I was photographing the
*photograph “aahhhh Oh id say”….
Justification
Attempting to justify every detail with lengthy explanations.
He does that a lot
Unusually Longer Response
Unusually much longer responses or too many details may tip you off to their desperation to get you to believe them... suggesting a scripted speech rather than natural conversation. If a liar gets time to make a story up, most of them tend to be just _too_ perfect. In most cases, the story will have far too many details to be true.
Liars’ stories often lack detail. Push for particulars. The more specific details that a liar has to provide, the more likely he is to slip up.
Yes he does much longer details, big time. He carries on about what he had for breakfast, and the rest of the day. And has very little to say about the actual shooting of the fallen man.
pov603 wrote:At 1.16 he says he '...photographed about seven or eight people...' jumping from the tower.
Has he ever shown these other photos?
If so which ones are they because surely if one is representative of peoples' fate that day then surely all of them were equally valid?
If he caught the 'falling man' so well then he must have been able to photo(shop) the others equally as well, wouldn't he?
Complete and utter pish!
Richard Drew states.
To photograph “aahhhh Oh id say”…. 7 or 8 people maybe “m. m. m. m. ..that “
He can’t verify the number of people he took a photo of in the single most spectacular shot in the history of the world. He is showing physical and audible aspects of someone who is lying.
West street fiction.
Richard Drew states…
“I made my way over to West Street. Which is probably the most west street of Manhattan? So I was photographing the towers on fire. “
West St was the scene where allegedly up to about 25 shots were filming the attack.
A handful of the alleged west st filmers. All professional mainstream s
CBS,WNBC, ABC7, (WABC) ABC, BBC, CNBC, FNN, Japan, FOX, ITN/Reuters, NBC, New York1, Unknown, Unknown 1,Unknown 2, Unknown 3, Camera Planet,
Where are all these 200 or so jumpers in the other shots? Not one jumper in the literally hours of combined West street footage.
Richard Drew with all of his camera equipment standing on an open vantage point on West Street we should be able to to be scene at least once in one of the other shot. But is no where to be seen. In fact in all of the footage to look at from there there is no other cameraman in any of the other shots. (I came across 1 for like 3 seconds but its fake.)
We live in an Orwellian society alright. Just because someone says they were there on 9/11 why should anyone believe them? Can we see any of the other shooters in any of the other footage? No real luck at all there.
What about the people holding up like 2 or 3 of the same 9/11 victims photos and claiming they have lost a family member. , can any of them produce at least 50 pics of them. Like most families would have?
Can anyone of them show a home video them? 3000 allegedly dead… and we do not have ANY proper down to earth, homily, family videos? Not anywhere?