"FALLING MAN" - the phony jumpers

The notion of 'thousands of victims' was crucial to generate universal public outrage. However, having 3000 angry families breathing down their necks was never part of the perps' demented plan. Our ongoing analyses and investigations suggest that NO one died on 9/11.
simonshack
Administrator
Posts: 7094
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: italy
Contact:

Re: "FALLING MAN" - the phony jumpers

Unread post by simonshack » Tue Jan 15, 2019 9:24 pm

*

THE WTC MIDGET MAN

Alright, folks...

I presume some of you are still "on the fence" regarding my longstanding claims that ALL the 9/11 imagery of "people jumping out of the WTC" was ENTIRELY created in a studio. There are a number of videos of aspiring debunkers of my "King Kong Man" demonstration to be found on Youtube - such as this :


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=az4mxJo4Y7s

Here's what is claimed in the description of the above "King Kong Man debunking video" :
This video shows that the seemingly 'giant people' leaning out of the World Trade Center windows in fact have perfectly normal heights. The body height of these people is distorted relative to the windows heights because of the steep camera angle, and because the people are leaning towards the camera.

Thus the conspiracy theories claiming that the 'giant people size' in the videos of the WTC attacks 'irrefutably prove' that these videos (if not the entire attacks) were fabricated using CGI, are debunked.


Well, ladies and gents, it so happens that - back in 1993 when a bomb supposedly exploded in the WTC garages, allegedly killing six people - the below image was aired on ABC TV (commented by ABC TV's top anchor at the time, Peter Jennings) :

Image
source: at 1:14 into this short ABC TV newsclip : https://twitter.com/ABC/status/968186008046129153

Of course, one firstly has to wonder how this shot of our "Midget Man peeking out of a smashed WTC window" could possibly have been filmed from ground level. Secondly, should we just accept that the angle of this rare shot of a man standing in a WTC window (aired on TV in 1993) being practically identical to the angle of the "King Kong Man" shot (aired on TV in 2001) as a matter of "coincidental happenstance"? Thirdly, why are these images of Midget Man so incredibly "whitewashed" (i.e. abnormally "overexposed")? It's not like video cameras back in 1993 where ALL THAT crappy. Please go watch that video - and replay the few seconds (from 1:14 onwards) which show this Midget Man standing in a WTC window - and then, watch closely when the "camera shot zooms out". It's hilarious.

Now - and to settle this matter once and for all - compare the above Midget Man above (aired on ABC TV in 1993) with my King Kong Man (aired on ABC TV in 2001):

Image

I'm afraid it's game over for all the aspiring debunkers of my "King Kong Man": we now have definitive proof that these images (purportedly depicting people standing in the WTC windows in 1993 AND 2001) were completely computer-generated and thus, do not represent reality.

End of story. Definitive end of story, that is: ALL the imagery of 9/11 aired on TV was nothing but a prefabricated "Hollywood movie" - as comprehensively proven here at Cluesforum with more than ten years of additional research following my 2007 September Clues documentary.

simonshack
Administrator
Posts: 7094
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: italy
Contact:

Re: FALLING MAN

Unread post by simonshack » Mon Jul 26, 2021 6:37 pm

*

And just to finish off this extensive analysis of the supposed "jumpers" of 9/11, here is what I would love to call 'the monster evidence'. Of course, we have by now exposed the absurd "9/11 jumper imagery" in every imaginable way - and reached the conclusion that ALL of this imagery was forged by digital means. However, there can never be 'too much' evidence to expose the massive 9/11 scam - so here we go:


THE KING KONG MAN

"PEOPLE FALLING FROM THE WORLD TRADE CENTER": http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JzKI9TBR-XQ

At one stage in the above-linked video, we see a man stepping out of a WTC window. Now, we know that ALL of the World Trade Center windows were approximately 7.25 feet (or 221cm) tall. [ WTC window dimensions reference ]: https://collection.911memorial.org/Detail/objects/6980

So, the question is...

Image

Well, he appears to be about 13 feet tall (or 4 meters tall). Since we don't have any records of human beings reaching such heights/dimensions, we can definitively conclude that this video is a crass forgery. Beyond any shadow of doubt.


*************************************************picture insert at right shows REAL dimensions of the WTC façade
Image


NOTE: The "KING KONG MAN" was first aired on ABC on September 11, around 1PM:
http://archive.org/details/abc200109111241-1323 (at around 19:40 into the archive clip).

"KING KONG MAN" was also featured in the official TV 'documentary' "102 Minutes That Changed America":

- as aired on the History Channel and all over the world, translated in several languages:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pl ... nU#t=2461s




****************************
Now, for the fun part: Phil Jayhan (the founder of Letsrollforums) actually observed these absurd proportions back in 2010 and made this fantastically warped and hilarious, leap-of-logic conclusion:


"THE TOWERS WERE RECONFIGURED"

Yes, believe it or not, but Phil Jayhan actually put forth the notion that the WTC towers' external aspect had somehow been "reconfigured", that is, the windows/spandrel heights had been stealthily shrunk/modified at some stage in time - and THIS is why we see these giant people leaning out of the windows... :lol: :rolleyes:

In other words: Phil Jayhan works very hard to uphold/protect the notion that the 9/11 imagery is REAL AND LEGIT.

Read it to believe it:
http://letsrollforums.com/reconfigurati ... 23544.html

Post Reply