With that in mind, let’s consider the destruction of the Evil Galactic Empire’s moon-sized Death Star space station in Star Wars as a foreshadowing of the destruction of the giant Towers representing the power of the Financial Globalist Empire. The parallels with 9/11 have been brought up before; see this post under the topic of why they didn’t use planes, but I think one particular very detailed analysis linked to in that post deserves a relink under this topic. Notable is where the analysis comes from. It’s the “conspiracy theory debunkers” who noticed this parallel and provide it in the form of a parody in support of the official story. I guess the thought process goes, look, you could use similar logic to implicate the Evil Galactic Empire in the destruction of its own Death Star in Star Wars, but we all know what really happened in Star Wars — practically the same thing as the official 9/11 story — so you should believe the official 9/11 story too. Something like that. But you could just as well say, the 9/11 story was designed with Star Wars in mind, so we would more readily accept it. In that case, the posting by a “conspiracy theory debunkers” group could be understood as misdirection.
But no matter how you look at it, the following article is a fascinating litany of parallels between Star Wars and the official 9/11 story.
From the Debunking 911 Conspiracy Theories site: Uncomfortable Questions: Was the Death Star Attack an Inside Job?
We’ve all heard the “official conspiracy theory” of the Death Star attack. We all know about Luke Skywalker and his ragtag bunch of rebels, how they mounted a foolhardy attack on the most powerful, well-defended battle station ever built. And we’ve all seen the video over, and over, and over, of the one-in-a-million shot that resulted in a massive chain reaction that not just damaged, but completely obliterated that massive technological wonder.
Like many citizens of the Empire, I was fed this story when I was growing up. But as I watched the video, I began to realize that all was not as it seemed. And the more I questioned the official story, the deeper into the rabbit hole I went.
Note: here is what appears to be the original post, from 2007, so you can see how it evolved. It credits the “official science”-defending James Randi Educational Foundation (JREF) Forum for its material.
http://websurdity.com/uncomfortable-que ... nside-job/