9/11 Money Grab

The most common objection people have to our research: "Too many people would have been involved to pull off such a massive hoax." Well, with trillions of taxpayers' dollars at hand, this operation could certainly afford contracting many individuals (under a gag order and on a need-to-know basis). Meet the real - and unreal - persons, companies & entities assigned to carry out this gigantic, media & military-assisted psyop.

9/11 Money Grab

Postby fbenario on November 21st, 2010, 3:07 am

Not only do these 'sick people' not have to prove they were actually injured on the pile of rubble, they may not even need to prove they exist as real people. Notice the U.S. is piling on with a proposal to pay an additional $7 billion to these sick people.

Further, common sense tells us there is no possibility at all that 10,000 people were hurt because of 9/11.
Most 9/11 responders settle suit over toxic dust

More than 10,000 ground zero workers involved in legal deal

More than 10,000 workers exposed to the tons of toxic dust that blanketed ground zero after the World Trade Center fell have ended their bruising legal fight with New York City and joined a settlement worth at least $625 million, officials said Friday.

The deal will resolve an overwhelming majority of the lawsuits over the city's failure to provide protective equipment to the army of construction workers, police officers and firefighters who spent months clearing and sifting rubble after Sept. 11.
...
The U.S. Senate is considering legislation, already passed in the House, that would authorize as much as $7.4 billion in medical care and payments to the sick.

Thousands of people believe they have illnesses caused by trade center dust. The lawsuits cited hundreds of different ailments, both serious and mundane, with the most common being a respiratory problem similar to asthma.

Under the deal, the plaintiffs will be spared the tough task of proving that their illnesses were related to their work at ground zero.
...
The hurdle of proving a cause loomed especially high for people with common illnesses such as cancer, which doctors have not connected to the dust.

Now, even people who are not sick at all but are worried they might become so in the future will qualify for a few thousand dollars. Some very ill people, or the relatives of people who have died, could get more than $1 million.

A group of court-appointed administrators will set the amount each plaintiff is to receive over the next few months.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/40276808/ns/us_news-life/

How sickening (one might say).
fbenario
Member
 
Posts: 2177
Joined: October 23rd, 2009, 2:49 am
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: 9/11 Money Grab

Postby hoi.polloi on November 22nd, 2010, 5:58 am

If I didn't suspect 9/11 were so thoroughly controlled, I might say something like 10,000 or more could conceivably get injured or sick from some kind of attack - fine.

But the fact that all of the imagery is clearly faked, which implies by its very nature that the event was completely controlled, I have to scratch my head or laugh when I see articles like this saying thousands of injured are seeking money.

Sure - we could all use "9/11 injury" money. We should all - every citizen subject to television imagery of 9/11 - get a "9/11 injury" tax cut for having to put up with such a debilitating amount of bullshit.
hoi.polloi
Administrator
 
Posts: 4811
Joined: November 14th, 2010, 8:24 pm

Re: 9/11 Money Grab

Postby fbenario on April 19th, 2011, 9:19 pm

Larry Silverstein just made another $1.2 billion.
Airlines and Airport Security Agree to Pay $1.2 Billion for 9/11 Property Damages

American Airlines and United Airlines along with two airport security firms will have to pay a $1.2 billion settlement for damage caused to property during the September 11, 2001, attacks on the World Trade Center.

Approved by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, the deal settles numerous property-damage lawsuits that were filed after the terrorist attacks involving American Airlines Flight 11 and United Air Lines Flight 175 struck Towers One and Two of the former World Trade Center.

The other two defendants in the case were Globe Airport Security, which screened passengers boarding American Flight 11 in Boston, and Huntleigh, which did the same for United Flight 175. Under the agreement, American Airlines and Globe will pay 60% of the damages and United and Huntleigh will pay the remaining 40%.

The plaintiffs in the case are the owners of the World Trade Center and numerous insurance companies. They had originally sought $4.4 billion from the airlines and security companies."

http://www.allgov.com/Where_is_the_Mone ... ges_110415
fbenario
Member
 
Posts: 2177
Joined: October 23rd, 2009, 2:49 am
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: 9/11 Money Grab

Postby warriorhun on April 19th, 2011, 10:57 pm

Dear All,

I am scratching my head a bit, too.

On one hand, this seems like a perfect organised scam to grab a bit of tax money by the perps using sick vicsims as alibi. I mean, which citizen would oppose to help out the heroes in their sickness with a bit of tax money? If the Government "refused" this, what a scandal that would be...

On the other hand, let's just think it over a bit.
We know the situation of the Naudet/Hanlon/Chief Pfeiffer-type "firefighters and first responders": insiders, perps, fakes.
Maybe I get it wrong, but in the case of such a main event-I am not talking about the faked imagery now, I am talking about every non-perp human believing it as an actual live main event-the real firefighters, real police, real ambulance, those without insider knowledge, would find it suspicious if no real NYC units were sent to the scene. Of course, I bet they should be held in reserve, their movement controlled, they should be told that other collegues are working on-site, wait patiently, then after a time just go home... But I can not imagine that it would not come out into the open sooner or later in these professions that no real units were sent to the proximity of the site. Or maybe all the real units have to keep their location on 9/11 as official secret or else? The real units all think the other real units were there, and the others just can not talk about it because of state secret and retribution threat, while in fact the real secret they are keeping from each other is that none of them were on-site?
What do you think? I'm trying to make up my mind, trying to figure out a possible scenario. The fake imagry will not tell us what happened, we have to speculate. Or do we have already something about this angle of 9/11 on our forum?
Because if non-insider real units were in the proximity of the site, then because of the asbesthos in the building, or whatever other shit was flying around they were exposed to, may cause health hazards. And how about the on-site perps themselves?
See, I am scratching my head.
What is your take on this?
warriorhun
Member
 
Posts: 514
Joined: January 10th, 2011, 10:26 pm

Re: 9/11 Money Grab

Postby fbenario on July 4th, 2011, 7:20 pm

Nice money-grab for all the 'hurt people' we ought to feel really, really sorry for.
9/11 Zadroga Health Care Law Goes Into Effect

The law provides $4.3 billion in guaranteed federal funding to cover health costs and financial compensation for emergency responders, recovery workers, volunteers, and residents who were affected by the attacks almost 10 years ago.

Rhonda Villamia, 56, of Sunnyside, volunteered at Ground Zero for nine months immediately following the attacks. Working with both the Red Cross and Salvation Army, she helped support the first responders by cooking meals and lending a hand wherever it was needed.

But all the time she spent down there caused her to develop respiratory and thyroid problems.

“I was down there to do what I thought was right,” Villamia said after the ceremony in between tears. “I didn’t think about any of the possible consequences after the dust literally settled.”

The Zadroga law – named for NYPD detective James Zadroga, who died of 9/11-related illnesses – will cover Villamia and tens of thousands of other responders. But with the funding set to expire in five years, she insists the fight isn’t over.

http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/dailyp ... nto-effect
fbenario
Member
 
Posts: 2177
Joined: October 23rd, 2009, 2:49 am
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: 9/11 Money Grab

Postby bostonterrierowner on July 4th, 2011, 9:58 pm

Just for the record , I was going to post it before but somehow it escaped my mind . "Zadroga" means too expensive in Polish - "za droga" :) What a coincidence :)

regards
bostonterrierowner
Member
 
Posts: 845
Joined: May 2nd, 2011, 11:01 pm

Re: 9/11 Money Grab

Postby pov603 on October 28th, 2011, 11:04 am

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/envoy/once- ... 35856.html

Apparently USD 6.6 billion went 'missing' in Iraq.
Maybe it did and has now turned up or been accounted for but how someone could misplace this in the first place should be answered.
A million USD in 100 dollar bills weighs 22 lb./10 kg therefore 6.6 billion would weigh 6,600,000,000/1,000,000 USD x 10 kg = 66,000 kg or 66 tonnes.
Presupposing that the denominations were in bills less than USD 100 say USD 50/20/10/5 etc you can see how much logistically they would have to shift.
How many people in the US are probably in jail for 'losing' far less than that either at work in the casinos or banks?
pov603
Member
 
Posts: 724
Joined: June 30th, 2011, 9:02 pm

Re: 9/11 Money Grab

Postby SmokingGunII on January 30th, 2012, 6:12 pm

pov603 wrote:http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/envoy/once-feared-lost-now-accounted-iraq-inspector-says-153935856.html

Apparently USD 6.6 billion went 'missing' in Iraq.
Maybe it did and has now turned up or been accounted for but how someone could misplace this in the first place should be answered.
A million USD in 100 dollar bills weighs 22 lb./10 kg therefore 6.6 billion would weigh 6,600,000,000/1,000,000 USD x 10 kg = 66,000 kg or 66 tonnes.
Presupposing that the denominations were in bills less than USD 100 say USD 50/20/10/5 etc you can see how much logistically they would have to shift.
How many people in the US are probably in jail for 'losing' far less than that either at work in the casinos or banks?



Pov - This is nothing new. During the first Iraq war, even more dollars went missing, under the stewardship of Paul Bremer.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L._Paul_Bremer

His Wickedpedia entry has certainly been "cleaned up". He was removed from Iraq after allegedly getting his female translator, with whom he was having an affair, pregnant.

Paul Bremer, for those that aren't aware, was CEO of Marsh McLellan on 9/11. They occupied floors directly hit by one of the "planes". ;) :P


EDIT: typed wrong corporation name!
Last edited by SmokingGunII on January 31st, 2012, 10:16 am, edited 1 time in total.
SmokingGunII
Member
 
Posts: 557
Joined: October 23rd, 2009, 10:34 am

Re: 9/11 Money Grab

Postby MrSinclair on January 31st, 2012, 4:52 am

I was not aware that Bremer was CEO of a corp "housed" at the WTC. This seems to be remarkably underplayed as is so often the case with followups to fake news. I wonder what his story is for where he was instead of his office? I wonder why he never published a book using this as the central theme. The more I examine the view espoused here the more I see the 9/11 story to be all veneer with no depth where a real event with real victims would have plenty.
I just spent time looking at tributes to AON victims, nothing rings true, it all seems hollow and ersatz.
MrSinclair
Member
 
Posts: 385
Joined: December 23rd, 2011, 2:29 am

Re: 9/11 Money Grab

Postby reel.deal on January 31st, 2012, 6:05 am

Donald Rumsfeld And Paul Bremmer 'Lose' $18.7 Billion In Iraq, Still Unaccounted For
"well, its regarded as the biggest ca$h transfer in history, and the largest theft..." B) :P


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4D3FD9qrwNM

Why L. Paul Bremer is a 9/11 Suspect


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wgGxmBGZwYU
:ph34r:
reel.deal
DELETED THEIR OWN POSTS :(
 
Posts: 1295
Joined: August 15th, 2010, 1:42 am

Re: 9/11 Money Grab

Postby reel.deal on January 31st, 2012, 8:55 am

Image
Image
Image
:ph34r:
reel.deal
DELETED THEIR OWN POSTS :(
 
Posts: 1295
Joined: August 15th, 2010, 1:42 am

Re: 9/11 Money Grab

Postby SmokingGunII on January 31st, 2012, 10:17 am

MrSinclair wrote:I was not aware that Bremer was CEO of a corp "housed" at the WTC. This seems to be remarkably underplayed as is so often the case with followups to fake news. I wonder what his story is for where he was instead of his office? I wonder why he never published a book using this as the central theme. The more I examine the view espoused here the more I see the 9/11 story to be all veneer with no depth where a real event with real victims would have plenty.
I just spent time looking at tributes to AON victims, nothing rings true, it all seems hollow and ersatz.


Apologies, MrSinclair - I typed AON in error. He was Chairman of Marsh McLellan, but the facts remain the same.
SmokingGunII
Member
 
Posts: 557
Joined: October 23rd, 2009, 10:34 am

Re: 9/11 Money Grab

Postby SmokingGunII on January 31st, 2012, 7:37 pm

Reel Deal - I like the diagram the guy has put together at the end of that 2nd video. It is something I always wanted to get off the ground on here and previously as I could see so many connections to these people throughout my early research.

The commentary mentioned Tridata, a company that was involved in the original 1993 investigation. Another member of this company was Dov Zahkeim (an Isreali) - responsible for overseeing the missing $2.3 trillion at the Pentagon, announced by Rumsfeld the day before 9/11. Zakheim also had ties to Boeing through a deal he brokered for 32 767's to Florida Macgill AFB.

In 2001,he was also CEO of SPS International, part of System Planning Corp, a defence contractor, specialising in electronic warfare including remote contolled plane systems and FTS (Flight termination system) which can romotely hijack planed and crash them. This fact alone led me up the "remote planes did it" garden path for too long.

Finally, he is another that signed up to PNAC in 2000.

Another name that is worth researching is Ezra Harel (another Isreali). He was CEO of a company, ICTS, that supplied security to Logan, Dulles and Newark airports. He reportedly died of a heart attack on his boat whilst the subject of criminal lawsuits (Robert Maxwell, anyone?).

http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/bu ... k-1.106796

They certainly had the right people in the right places to pull the whole fraud off.
SmokingGunII
Member
 
Posts: 557
Joined: October 23rd, 2009, 10:34 am

Re: 9/11 Money Grab

Postby simonshack on March 20th, 2014, 4:42 pm

*

Outrageous! US politician accused of selling 9/11 cartoons to little children : <_<


"Mike Huckabee accused of cashing in on 9/11 by selling educational videos for children"

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... ldren.html

simonshack
Administrator
 
Posts: 6376
Joined: October 18th, 2009, 9:09 pm
Location: italy

Re: 9/11 Money Grab

Postby brianv on March 20th, 2014, 5:17 pm

"US politician accused of selling 9/11 cartoons to little children"

But that's exactly what the media did, and have been doing for 13 years.
brianv
Member
 
Posts: 3862
Joined: October 18th, 2009, 11:19 pm

Next

Return to THE 9/11 HOAX infrastructure - and its operatives: too many people involved?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests