simonshack wrote:Rick Leventhal NEVER actually interviewed people FOR REAL on the streets of Manhattan on that morning.
hoi.polloi wrote:except actors paid to lie when they are told to.
Such as John Mollett, who I hope to post about at some point (he was also "interviewed" by Leventhal).
Some time ago Simon wrote the following and I repeat it here as a reminder:
For those that do not know, there is a simple legal principle named "false in one false in all"[try "googling" that phrase], whereby a judge may instruct a trial jury that should they find that any part of a witness/entities testimony to be false then they have the incontestable right to discount all "evidence" provided by that person/entity. Therefore, and according to that principle, should anyone find any one part of the government/media 911 story to be false, then it is perfectly acceptable for that person to then conclude that _all_ "evidence" supplied by the government/media and/or "witnesses", is either knowingly false, or simply to be distrusted, until definitively proven otherwise.
At the very least Mark Walsh misled the general public in his interview with Leventhal. I can't definitively prove that this was deliberate, but if there is sufficient doubt in the mind of any reasonable person as to the veracity of his "testimony", then it can be dismissed.