Perhaps you can have your buddy Rich make a video for you - proving that the vicsims are, in fact, just as real as vanilla sundae ?
A bon entendeur
Christopher Bollyn wrote : ( on his website: http://www.bollyn.com/understanding-the ... -of-wtc-6/ )
"I contacted the archives of CNN during the summer of 2002 to inquire about the precise time of their video footage of a huge dust cloud coming from a mysterious blast that appeared to have occurred at the U.S. Customs House (WTC 6) at about 9:03 a.m. -- the same minute that the second plane struck the South Tower on 9-11. The raw video material has precise time markings, which they provided."
"The mysterious explosion at the U.S. Customs House (WTC 6) occurred at 9:04 a.m. on 9-11, at exactly the same time as the second plane crashed into the South Tower."
So here we have all of THREE "prominent 9/11 researchers" - all apparently independent and unassociated - promoting a totally bogus - and easily debunkable - photo analysis of the 9/11 "LIVE" TV imagery. If the three of them are not shills, they are at best piss-poor researchers and represent a dire liability to the crucial scrutiny/exposure of the fake 9/11 imagery.
Wow! Great find. They all made the same "error", very interesting! How?
WXTV-DT channel 41
"WXTV-DT channel 41 is a Univisión flagship television station for the East Coast, licensed to Paterson, New Jersey and serving the New York metropolitan area. WXTV's studios are located in Teaneck, New Jersey, and its transmitter is on the Empire State Building in Manhattan."
"The September 11, 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center did not affect WXTV's [channel 41]over-the-air signal, as WXTV's transmitter has always been at the Empire State Building. WXTV 41 and WCBS-TV, who had a full-powered backup transmitter at the Empire State Building, were the only major New York City stations whose over-the-air signals weren't lost. In fact, channel 41's news anchors gave information and updates in English as well as Spanish on the attacks for the benefit of viewers without cable that lost access to the stations with transmitters at the WTC."
repentantandy wrote:Brianv, you amaze me. After nearly eleven years you imply you are unaware of any Israeli-connected aspects of 9/11?
And your claims of British culpability (which I don't doubt) very much echo a main talking-point of the very researcher you just called "slimy," Webster Tarpley!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests