Yankee451 user on YouTube

How the controlled opposition was designed to be part of the 9/11 hoax

Yankee451 user on YouTube

Postby daozen on December 17th, 2012, 1:57 am


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kn3a--hf7_s
daozen
Member
 
Posts: 179
Joined: September 13th, 2011, 5:12 pm

Postby simonshack on December 17th, 2012, 2:56 am

*

Oh dear...

That's Yankee 451 - who once called me a "lying goat-fucker"! :lol:

I call him "Dave Von Kleist v.2.0" <_<

viewtopic.php?p=2369098#p2369098
simonshack
Administrator
 
Posts: 6362
Joined: October 18th, 2009, 9:09 pm
Location: italy

Postby daozen on December 17th, 2012, 8:01 am

simonshack wrote:*

Oh dear...

That's Yankee 451 - who once called me a "lying goat-fucker"! :lol:

I call him "Dave Von Kleist v.2.0" <_<

viewtopic.php?p=2369098#p2369098


So what was the big deal about the gash, or damage pics being being real or not? Even if they were? what would that prove? Do you think he's a shill or what's the deal? what kind of shill tactic would that be! haha :lol:
daozen
Member
 
Posts: 179
Joined: September 13th, 2011, 5:12 pm

Postby simonshack on December 17th, 2012, 12:45 pm

*


Oh - I'm sooo excited! We will finally be able to prove scientifically and beyond resonable doubt that a plane wing crashing into a steel structure does not look like THIS...

Image

... but rather like THIS :

Image

What a joke. :rolleyes:
simonshack
Administrator
 
Posts: 6362
Joined: October 18th, 2009, 9:09 pm
Location: italy

Re: Yankee451 user on YouTube

Postby hoi.polloi on December 17th, 2012, 4:33 pm

I am renaming the topic to the subject at hand, as "Have you guys seen this?!" didn't seem to be very descriptive.

:lol:
hoi.polloi
Administrator
 
Posts: 4787
Joined: November 14th, 2010, 8:24 pm

Re: Yankee451 user on YouTube

Postby lux on December 17th, 2012, 6:21 pm

So, what is this guy's angle exactly? "No planes but the vicsim idea is crazy?" Is that his position?
lux
Member
 
Posts: 1914
Joined: October 1st, 2011, 11:46 pm

Re: Yankee451 user on YouTube

Postby daozen on December 17th, 2012, 8:56 pm

hoi.polloi wrote:I am renaming the topic to the subject at hand, as "Have you guys seen this?!" didn't seem to be very descriptive.

:lol:


sorry, thanks, very appropriate!
daozen
Member
 
Posts: 179
Joined: September 13th, 2011, 5:12 pm

Re: Yankee451 user on YouTube

Postby daozen on December 17th, 2012, 9:00 pm

lux wrote:So, what is this guy's angle exactly? "No planes but the vicsim idea is crazy?" Is that his position?


yeah, I spent a while looking at his posts yesterday, couldnt make much of it. :huh: but Simon's got a point, maybe we don't need to give him all of our moneys... :lol: I still find it would be interesting to see how the wing reacts in non-cgi life.
daozen
Member
 
Posts: 179
Joined: September 13th, 2011, 5:12 pm

Re: Yankee451 user on YouTube

Postby simonshack on December 18th, 2012, 7:22 pm

daozen wrote: ...but Simon's got a point, maybe we don't need to give him all of our moneys... :lol: I still find it would be interesting to see how the wing reacts in non-cgi life.


Well, daozen - I do hope you truly got my point.

Again, THIS is how the proposed "re-enactment of a 767-slamming-into-steel-skyscaper" is illustrated ...

Image

I sincerely hope you're not going to waste a cent on this farcical experiment which, I have good reasons to suspect, will end up being deemed 'inconclusive' - only to be used as a (stoopid) debunking argument by the plane-huggers...

Btw, here's how a 200mph aluminum projectile reacts when striking a speedway wall:


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JJPkbhx5LpI

Do you think that this Indycar chassis (undoubtedly stronger than a Boeing767) would have sliced right through the wall if it had been doing 500mph? And do you think it would have looked much different if it had struck THIS obstacle ? :

Image

Image

And of course, the one that struck my bathroom on September 11 2011 did NOT cause my house to collapse! :P
Image
simonshack
Administrator
 
Posts: 6362
Joined: October 18th, 2009, 9:09 pm
Location: italy

Re: Yankee451 user on YouTube

Postby daozen on December 19th, 2012, 2:30 am

simonshack wrote:
daozen wrote: ...but Simon's got a point, maybe we don't need to give him all of our moneys... :lol: I still find it would be interesting to see how the wing reacts in non-cgi life.


Well, daozen - I do hope you truly got my point.


Oops! :unsure: , I'm sorry I wasn't clear enough Simon! sometimes my sarcasm comes out a bit ambivalent. haha :P I really think you would have been better of making music with the ol' Social Service than prolonging this thread. Or better yet a new documentary that exposes some of our beloved media fakery ;)


Again, THIS is how the proposed "re-enactment of a 767-slamming-into-steel-skyscaper" is illustrated ...

Image

I sincerely hope you're not going to waste a cent on this farcical experiment which, I have good reasons to suspect, will end up being deemed 'inconclusive' - only to be used as a (stoopid) debunking argument by the plane-huggers...



I wasnt being sarcastic about my interest to see how that plane would have actually reacted though! Not that I think it would be too different to throwing a soda can into a concrete wall... <_< but yeah as for this particular fund-raising, I couldn't agree more thinking that whatever happens when they finally get their "tens of thousandths" :lol: it still would somehow not prove that planes dont melt into buildings. :huh:


Btw, here's how a 200mph aluminum projectile reacts when striking a speedway wall:


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JJPkbhx5LpI

Do you think that this Indycar chassis (undoubtedly stronger than a Boeing767) would have sliced right through the wall if it had been doing 500mph? And do you think it would have looked much different if it had struck THIS obstacle ? :

Image

Image



I actually mentioned an F1 car with my father a couple days ago! on my tenth attempt to explain the real 9/11 to him. Couldn't get past the "but it was going at 500 mph" and "but it's made differently" bullshit arguments... :(


And of course, the one that struck my bathroom on September 11 2011 did NOT cause my house to collapse! :P
Image


I'm still puzzled by this one though? :huh: Is it real? How come it didn't go all the way in? Ah!... wasn't going fast enough probably... B)
daozen
Member
 
Posts: 179
Joined: September 13th, 2011, 5:12 pm

Re: Yankee451 user on YouTube

Postby agraposo on December 19th, 2012, 12:24 pm

daozen wrote:
And of course, the one that struck my bathroom on September 11 2011 did NOT cause my house to collapse! :P
Image


Did the nose emerge from the other side? :P
agraposo
Member
 
Posts: 226
Joined: June 10th, 2011, 10:48 pm

Re: Yankee451 user on YouTube

Postby simonshack on February 7th, 2014, 8:50 pm

*

Can anyone explain to me why, when image-goo-gling "simon shack", the first picture / portrait to appear is one of Yankee451?


https://www.google.it/search?q=simon+sh ... 60&bih=613


:blink: :huh: :wacko:


As a matter of fact, Yankee451 is even BOASTING about this horrible google-glitch:

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthre ... 1061910541


Please check out the post above the one I linked to. Yankee451 actually states that :

"Simon Shack is a charlatan whose work helps protect the media."

In hindsight, I still think we did well to ban this Yankee451 clown from this forum. <_<
simonshack
Administrator
 
Posts: 6362
Joined: October 18th, 2009, 9:09 pm
Location: italy

Re: Yankee451 user on YouTube

Postby fbenario on February 8th, 2014, 2:31 am

simonshack wrote:*

Can anyone explain to me why, when image-goo-gling "simon shack", the first picture / portrait to appear is one of Yankee451?


https://www.google.it/search?q=simon+sh ... 60&bih=613


:blink: :huh: :wacko:


As a matter of fact, Yankee451 is even BOASTING about this horrible google-glitch:

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthre ... 1061910541


Please check out the post above the one I linked to. Yankee451 actually states that :

"Simon Shack is a charlatan whose work helps protect the media."

In hindsight, I still think we did well to ban this Yankee451 clown from this forum. <_<

What was synergetic67's username here before he was banned?
fbenario
Member
 
Posts: 2177
Joined: October 23rd, 2009, 2:49 am
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: Yankee451 user on YouTube

Postby simonshack on February 8th, 2014, 4:28 am

fbenario wrote:What was synergetic67's username here before he was banned?


Dear Fred Benario,

Hmm - I just wish he would e-mail me at simonshack@libero.it - (or call me on Skype - my Skype username is "simon.shack") as we certainly need to work this out. We all make mistakes - and if we've banned synergetic67, this seems to be one of them!

As for those snowed-in fear-mongers warning us all about posting our personal contacts on the internet, I say: to heck with that. Time has come for us to laugh away such silly warnings. We have nothing to fear - but fear itself (as someone once said).
simonshack
Administrator
 
Posts: 6362
Joined: October 18th, 2009, 9:09 pm
Location: italy

Re: Yankee451 user on YouTube

Postby simonshack on February 10th, 2014, 8:08 pm

If you'd be interested (but perhaps you wouldn't) I have - reluctantly - registered at the David Icke Forums - only to "defend myself" against Yankee451's silly accusations of me being some sort of disinformer/ shill/ agent/ whatever... <_< ... and, of course, to gracefully respond to all of his questions regarding the September Clues /Cluesforum research.

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthre ... 648&page=7




Yankee's droll multiple-missile theory: :lol: (our ol' "buddy" ozzybinoswald thinks that "it's cool"...)


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vd4CYAVfI8M


Image
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showpost ... stcount=33
simonshack
Administrator
 
Posts: 6362
Joined: October 18th, 2009, 9:09 pm
Location: italy

Next

Return to Truthers and shills

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests