Maat wrote:CC, I’m not sure why you think it must be a different “angle” of the same bogus scene when it only appears to be a wider version — the background building missing from similar images seems more pertinent.
However, whatever you wish to demonstrate will always have more credibility if presented without annoying soundtracks, typos and distracting references to insult-trading personal feuds with opposing Youtube clowns. Not exactly an objective analysis, is it?
All that does is promote them, compromise the research and taint your motives — especially since I thought you had realized why reacting to shill bait is only playing their game. I really don’t appreciate this forum being associated with that kind of nonsense.
I frankly don’t give a rat's rectum what any YT goons believe or claim, because anyone capable of seeing through them and interested enough in real research can obviously find us here. The fact that the 3rd-person feud-promoter who attacked this forum (for daring to question his peculiar behavior patterns) is now one of your fanboys should also be a sign.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests