Human wrote:"It doesn't make sense to me why he would talk about so much revealing information exposing TBTB"
And still receives massive funding from ABC and other shill companies without ever so much as a slap on the wrist for "exposing" the perps! He is allowed to "expose" the things he does because it plays into the perps agenda which is to pollute the airwaves with all sorts of half truths, truths and complete bullshit, all the while staying clear of the more damaging evidence and info such as what is researched here. He is a slight of hand and misdirection type of shill, funded and run behind the scenes by those who orchestrated 9/11 and many other psyops. His flamboyant ego and wide eyed style of radio is his assigned "character" to draw in those people who wish to be told what is going on instead of doing there own personal research. His many interviews on ABC, CBS, FOX and Geraldo along with many perp "guests" on his radio show clearly show his "membership" in the cabal.
I think it's dangerous to assume membership ... then you're proposing a much larger infrastructure to accomplish the same thing as a much smaller infrastructure could do, with less errors. I'm not saying Alex isn't serving certain interests here, what I'm saying is, he may very well not realize it. A guy like Alex is like a bull ... all they've got to do is wave a red flag and they can have him moving in any direction they want to. In the right context and coming from the right source Alex could be wholeheartedly convinced of just about anything you wanted. You just have to get the presentation right, get the context right, and Alex would gulp it right down without a second thought. It'd be easy to convince him, for instance, that September Clues is a CIA front. Really easy.
It wouldn't be hard, from that point, to get Alex to not talk about it. Maybe you wouldn't even have to do anything, or maybe you'd have to give him a small nudge: "I wouldn't give this bunch any attention, that's what they're after." So easy!
I think we have to be cautious about assuming complicity just because people take these positions and then defend them ... look at how people defend unreasonable positions in their politics simply because they're invested in that worldview ... they kind of know, at some level, that something's wrong, but they defend it anyway, using anything they can find to say. They're not complicit in anything, they're just ... co-opted. They tell themselves they'll figure it out later, and save face for now. So, now, think about someone who isn't being indirectly molded by the media, but their worldview is being more specifically shaped and designed for that particular individual, you could get them to defend specific stuff without really knowing what they're talking about ... maybe even suspecting that something isn't quite right but just to save face. The ego comes in handy here and Alex has a gargantuan one.
It's like with some of the media fakery, I have long suspected that not all of it is produced by someone who is actually "in the know" ... all you would have to do is light the fire, so to speak. In New York you've got a lot of photojournalists and we know
for a fact that sometimes, when they're fairly certain about what's going on, they'll fake pictures they can't actually get. They get caught occasionally doing this. So they're watching the biggest scoop of the century right on their TV and they can't actually get downtown and for some weird reason their stupid camera was on the blink that day ... goddamit they deserved
to get that shot so what's the harm? And they know Bob did it, you can tell just looking at that shot, and he got freaking awards for it, what the hell, let's cut ourselves in ... and so you see how this stuff can happen, and I find it easier to account for all this without a huge "cast" because it wouldn't be necessary and why bring in more people than you have to?
So there might be a guy somewhere who "runs" Alex, it might be a friend or it might be someone he doesn't even know directly ... the guy in the know might even "run" people who are just as clueless but serve to get Alex moving in the desired directions, saying the right things, all they've got to do is expose him the same way Alex exposes his listeners. For that matter it may be even more efficient than that, maybe they just pump out signals and they know that several thousand Alex's will emerge and it's just a matter of selecting the right one and being sure he meets the right people, maybe a small nudge here and there but not much.
Who are his Hollywood connections? That, I think, is the kind of thing we should be looking at.