repentantandy wrote:So as the years roll by, each nexus of 9/11 sceptics continues to accuse the others of being either crazy or shills for the perps.
Repentantandy (aka Andy Tyme),
Thanks for your response
over at Fetzer's "REAL DEAL" blog.
At this point however, I have to wonder what motivates you, Andy. You have been around for a long, long time - profusely opining / gossiping about this and that - yet hardly ever submitting any research of your own - while incessantly lamenting about my (natural / instinctive / logical) refusal to engage in debates with blatant gatekeepers such as Fetzer and co.
In your last response (linked above) you complained, for instance, that some members of this forum have "repeatedly, rudely and angrily ridiculed and lampooned Dr. Fetzer, calling him the "flabby fibber," for instance, and depicting him via gross, cartoonish images"
Well, please know that we still live in a free-speech society (
) which allows people (and even professional journalists / satirists) to lampoon any public figure deemed as deserving to be lampooned. Your apparent outrage about this is quite bizarre and misplaced. Why you should spend more time lamenting about OUR critiques of Fetzer's antics (what with his exasperating, feigned aloofness - and FLAT OUT refusal to respond to ANY of my numerous questions to him over the years) rather than lamenting about Fetzer's own behavior - is quite beyond my comprehension. And what about Fetzer's gross / vulgar language thrown at us? Doesn't this merit your outrage? There was a time I used to think you were a level-minded, fair, intelligent and well-educated fellow (and somewhat on 'our side'), Andy - but not anymore.
And now you even propose that I engage in a radio debate with the whimsical Clare Kuehn character - who popped out of nowhere shortly after the Vicsim Report was published, and was interviewed on Fetzer's show - on the topic of fake 9/11 victims
- without her ever mentioning our Vicsim Report / website / forum and, quite frankly, sole / unique and pioneering vicsim research... Much in the same vein as Fetzer himself, who started writing long articles about the "no-plane" issue shortly following my first September Clues release in 2007 - without EVER mentioning my 90-minute movie on his blog. And much in the same vein as "Ace Baker" (another Fetzer 'production'), who - back in 2007 - popped out of nowhere asking me (in what looked like a genuine fan mail) if he could screen September Clues at Fetzer's Madison "Truth conference" (also attended by Judy Wood, btw) - and then made a "180°" stating that September Clues is 95% false
So why, Andy, do you have issues with OUR 'treatment' of Dr. Fetzer? What makes you still think that he's a 'good guy' worthy of anyone's time?