"The WTC2 COLLAPSE IMAGE-FAMILY"
No special photographic skills are required to assess the utter phoniness of the 9/11 IMAGE POOL: all what's needed is a healthy dose of common sense and a sound, rational mind. Now, whether the most glaring absurdities of this image pool were meant to be exposed - or if it was just caused by laziness/ sloppiness/ or over-confidence on the part of the perps - is a subject open for debate. Are the goons behind all this plain stupid? Foolhardy? Are they gauging the depth of the public's apathy? It matters little: The bottom line is, quite simply, that THIS IS WHAT WE HAVE. To debate just WHY this is the case may be an interesting exercise - but no such intellectual disquisitions could possibly help justify the absurd nature of these shots. Here follows a study of a (growing) 'family' of images published over the years, depicting the collapse of WTC2.
Up to a few years ago, this family had 'only' three members: I compiled them one by one - as I pursued my comprehensive scrutiny of all the available 9/11 STILL IMAGERY published by the news media. This photo-trio is officially credited to three different news media photographers:
- Thomas Nilsson (of the Norwegian populist tabloid "VG")
- Gulnara Samoilova (photo-retoucher for the Associated Press)
- Amy Sancetta (veteran photographer for the Associated Press)
We are asked to believe that all three of them captured the below three still photos of the WTC2. In addition to these images' remarkably similar viewing angles we can see that, by observing the smoke patterns, all three are clearly meant to have been snapped at the exact same split second in time. Imagine that! (Moreover, one may legitimately wonder why the blue Millenium Hotel is entirely missing in image 1 and 2):
But it gets sillier still. In 2010, a huge batch of never-seen-before, higher-quality 9/11 imagery suddenly emerged on the scene. The official explanation - get this - was that ABC (yes, the TV network!) had filed a FOIA to force NIST to release heaps of imagery that they had, allegedly, used for their investigations - and kept under wraps for all of 9 years!...
Well, most of this never-seen-before imagery comes in the form of short video clips (allegedly shot by "amateur videographers") which depict the crucial events of the day. At close inspection, most are nothing but rehashed/ re-rendered material which I was quite familiar with - having examined the 9/11 imagery for over half a decade now. But some of it is indeed brand new - and provides even further clues and confirmations as to how "the 9/11 IMAGE FAKERY FACTORY" operates. I have expounded about this in depth elsewhere, so let me just show you here what can be found in these "brand new amateur videos":
Here I compare AMY SANCETTA'S world famous still photo with a frame credited to one "ALFIE ALVARADO":
So, we are now asked to believe that four cameras captured the exact same moment in time, from extraordinarily (if not impossibly) similar viewing angles/vantage points - AND zoom ratios. One only needs to calculate the odds of this occuring in the real world.
But there's more: Here is another threesome of alleged "amateur" shots to be found in NIST's "new releases":
So can it get sillier than this?
Yes, it can - as demonstrated by our Cluesforum member & master archivist Equinox - who has now compiled the below parade :
Could it get EVEN MORE ABSURD than this? YES !
As you have seen in all the above shots, the ROOFTOP of WTC2 is seen tilting at a steep angle as it tumbles down. Well, here is a frame from another "new amateur video" released by NIST. It appears to be shot from the same side as the other shots (from a more distant location). You will only need your eyesight and common sense to realize that something is TERRIBLY wrong here. To be sure, we are looking at the very first seconds of the (proposed) WTC2 collapse - instants before the rooftop gets engulfed in smoke:
Source video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iIeYKJyfFfU
Just for the sake of comparison:
The 9/11 imagery was created with the extensive use of digital technology, much like a Hollywood production. The news media top brass was 100% complicit and knowingly aired artificial imagery on 9/11 - in order to simulate a "terror attack" - for the profit of everyone involved in the hoax. The WTC complex was of course demolished - but there exists no visual record of just how the towers were brought down. Moreover, and most importantly, the towers were empty and no one perished that day - as killing 3000 'Wall Street people" was certainly no part of the plan (and would have caused massive aggravation for the perps). But that's another entangled sham - and it's all being picked apart, here at Cluesforum.
Note: Any questions as to the chain of custody of the above imagery should be submitted to NIST, the Associated Press and the Norwegian news outlet "VG". As a honest and law-abiding person, I will not tolerate any further insinuations (such as can be found circulating around the web) that I, Simon Shack, have in any way tampered with or manipulated this imagery to pursue some non-descript, sinister agenda.