**********Win a free ride on the next NASA mission to planet Mars**********
"DEBUNK A SEPTEMBER CLUE !"
And today's clue for allcomers to debunk is... :P :
THE MAGIC 16-SECOND SEQUENCE
This the sum total of shots of alleged "FLIGHT175" shown on LIVE TV ON 9/11.
Four sequential chunks of 'the hijacked airliner's' approach were aired in seamless succession, none of the 4 'camera shots' overlapping the other.
This is how the approach breaks down between the TV networks:
-16sec to -15sec : "DIVEBOMBER"(cbs)
-15sec to -7sec : "THE BALL"(nbc)
-6sec to -4sec : "THE WINGTIP"(cbs)
-3sec to 0sec : "INTERNATIONAL SHOT"(abc)
Note that all 4 show a "plane" entering the edge of the screen then disappearing behind either smoke or the towers...like 4 tv commercials :P
(Your kids' Playstation would beat this childish animation anytime)
So today's challenge (N°6) is...
If you are among those who believe this is a real video sequence portraying a real hijacked Boeing 767, a remote-controlled-modified-military 767, a drone of any type or perhaps Baron Von Richthofen (a.k.a. The Red Baron) in a cloaked version of his WW1 Fokker combat plane, please provide a compelling explanation to account for the following questions/observations:
- How did the producers of CBS, NBC an ABC coordinate their respective cameramen so that - at no time - no two of them filmed the 'aircraft' at the same instants in time/space?
- If you assert that this was just a happenstance/coincidence, please provide (on a scale from 1million to 10trillions) a calculation of the statistical probabilities for this occurence.
- Considering the 3 TV feeds are accurately synchronized (+/- 0,2secs) why does CBS show WTC2 exploding at least 1 second before ABC?
For reference, here are the first 11 minutes of the 9/11 broadcasts :
"SYNCHED OUT" http://tinyurl.com/SYNCHEDOUT
(My take on the issue - seriously:
http://z6.invisionfree.com/Reality_Shac ... &p=2055659 )