I have a context though, darling. The context is: All the 9/11 morning broadcasts were fake. You're my guest for breakfast ! Eggs and bacon? <_<idschmyd 4 Aug 8 2010, 03:53 AM wrote: But for those not aware of the context, I don't think this piece of TV magic signals a war crime. Not on its own.
"DEBUNK A SEPTEMBER CLUE!"
-
simonshack
- Administrator
- Posts: 7345
- Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:09 pm
- Location: italy
- Contact:
http://www.septemberclues.org
Eggs and bacon will be perfect. Breakfast about 2:30, vale? G' night!simonshack @ Aug 8 2010, 05:02 AM wrote:I have a context though, darling. The context is: All the 9/11 morning broadcasts were fake. You're my guest for breakfast ! Eggs and bacon? <_<idschmyd 4 Aug 8 2010, 03:53 AM wrote: But for those not aware of the context, I don't think this piece of TV magic signals a war crime. Not on its own.
simonshack 4 Aug 6 2010, 04:36 PM wrote:
But there's more...
It appears unlikely that the different angles of these shots may account for
the total absence of PAT on German TV. Did the Germans shoot PAT out of the sky?
So today's challenge (N°12) is...
Give a plausible explanation for PAT not being invited on German TV.
A little known fact: Germany News systems uses an automated filter for external feeds that wash out ‘pixel blotches’. ‘Pat’, from a distance, was identified as such by this filter. Simple as that. Nothing nefarious going on here.
Would that also explain why there is a fair amount of the "smoke" missing above WTC 1 also?arvo @ Aug 8 2010, 07:59 AM wrote:simonshack 4 Aug 6 2010, 04:36 PM wrote:
But there's more...
It appears unlikely that the different angles of these shots may account for
the total absence of PAT on German TV. Did the Germans shoot PAT out of the sky?
So today's challenge (N*12) is...
Give a plausible explanation for PAT not being invited on German TV.
A little known fact: Germany News systems uses an automated filter for external feeds that wash out ‘pixel blotches’. ‘Pat’, from a distance, was identified as such by this filter. Simple as that. Nothing nefarious going on here.
Seems the pilot/cameraman is really trying to avoid his own landing gear in that one.simonshack @ Aug 8 2010, 04:20 AM wrote: *
Oh well...You might prefer this one ...It all depends on your state of mind :lol: :lol: :lol:
I do think that anyone who has studied the 9/11 images and still think they were REAL has some severe cognitive issues.
Try switching off that TV set - it should help.
I can imagine him spinning and spinning to get it out of the shot, eventually getting dizzy and crashing.
-
simonshack
- Administrator
- Posts: 7345
- Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:09 pm
- Location: italy
- Contact:
Ahh - the smoke, yes... Today's "Debunk-a-September-Clues is respectfully dedicated to His Holiness OzzyBinOswald - a.k.a. "the All-seeing Eye" ;)Postal44 4 Aug 8 2010, 07:29 AM wrote:
Would that also explain why there is a fair amount of the "smoke" missing above WTC 1 also?
*******************************************************************
**********Win a free ride on the next NASA mission to planet Mars**********
"DEBUNK A SEPTEMBER CLUE !"
And today's clue for allcomers to debunk is... :
THE 9/11 SELF-CLONING SMOKE
I have to admit I was long a smoke-hugger - in the sense that I didn't see quite clearly how the smoke animations were replicated, as some 'kooky conspiracy theorists' would have it... :P That is, until Ozzy came up with this image found on none other than the official site of the "9/11 MEMORIAL AND MUSEUM"... Thanks, Oz - you cleared the smoke in my eyes.
I have superimposed the horses to aid the understanding of this 'phenomena'. It should be clear that not only the smoke is replicated
- but entire sections of the picture including some ugly black crows.
So today's challenge (N°14) is...
At your next barbecue party, try capturing two similar smoke sections oozing from your steaks. Then submit them here on this forum.
http://www.septemberclues.org
-
simonshack
- Administrator
- Posts: 7345
- Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:09 pm
- Location: italy
- Contact:
**********Win a free ride on the next NASA mission to planet Mars**********
"DEBUNK A SEPTEMBER CLUE !"
And today's clue for allcomers to debunk is... :
THE BLACK STEALTH CHOPPER
This is a 3-second clip extracted - just as you see it - from the "LIVE ITV" 9/11 broadcasts in Great Britain. It was posted on Youtube by an Englishman who recorded the entire morning on his VHS gear. First, we have a purple shot of Manhattan, then a yellow shot with a dramatic close-up of a black chopper.
Note that there is no mention - nor any reason for either of the shots being replays from some other moment in time.
So today's challenge (N°15) is...
Explain where the black chopper was hiding in the purple shot.
"DEBUNK A SEPTEMBER CLUE !"
And today's clue for allcomers to debunk is... :
THE BLACK STEALTH CHOPPER
This is a 3-second clip extracted - just as you see it - from the "LIVE ITV" 9/11 broadcasts in Great Britain. It was posted on Youtube by an Englishman who recorded the entire morning on his VHS gear. First, we have a purple shot of Manhattan, then a yellow shot with a dramatic close-up of a black chopper.
Note that there is no mention - nor any reason for either of the shots being replays from some other moment in time.
So today's challenge (N°15) is...
Explain where the black chopper was hiding in the purple shot.
http://www.septemberclues.org
-
simonshack
- Administrator
- Posts: 7345
- Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:09 pm
- Location: italy
- Contact:
*
Wow - this is a free debunker-game open to allcomers...and no one's playing?
Where is Anthony Lawson?
Where is Ace Baker? Where is Jeff Hill?
Or Alex Jones?
And my Genghis darling? :lol:
Ah - I guess they don't fancy taking the risk of travelling to Mars with the next NASA trip. They feel safer on this planet - in their protective corporate-bubble.
Anyways, it looks like debunking all this is impossible. A bit like an aluminum aircraft melding into a steel building - just like a ghost... So I knew it would come to this:
"Let's just ignore these guys - we own the media ! "
Wow - this is a free debunker-game open to allcomers...and no one's playing?
Where is Anthony Lawson?
Where is Ace Baker? Where is Jeff Hill?
Or Alex Jones?
And my Genghis darling? :lol:
Ah - I guess they don't fancy taking the risk of travelling to Mars with the next NASA trip. They feel safer on this planet - in their protective corporate-bubble.
Anyways, it looks like debunking all this is impossible. A bit like an aluminum aircraft melding into a steel building - just like a ghost... So I knew it would come to this:
"Let's just ignore these guys - we own the media ! "
http://www.septemberclues.org
-
simonshack
- Administrator
- Posts: 7345
- Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:09 pm
- Location: italy
- Contact:
**********Win a free ride on the next NASA mission to planet Mars**********
"DEBUNK A SEPTEMBER CLUE !"
THE SUN NEVER LIES
And today's clue for allcomers to debunk is... :
The sun is shining brightly in New York. That balcony projects a shadow. Now, try looking at the background scenery. What sides of the Manhattan buildings are in shade? That's right: the same sides as that sunlit, red building in the foreground. Woah - nature's wonders !....
So today's challenge (N°16) is...
Tell us how many suns habitually shine on New York City: 1? - 2? - 3?
"DEBUNK A SEPTEMBER CLUE !"
THE SUN NEVER LIES
And today's clue for allcomers to debunk is... :
The sun is shining brightly in New York. That balcony projects a shadow. Now, try looking at the background scenery. What sides of the Manhattan buildings are in shade? That's right: the same sides as that sunlit, red building in the foreground. Woah - nature's wonders !....
So today's challenge (N°16) is...
Tell us how many suns habitually shine on New York City: 1? - 2? - 3?
http://www.septemberclues.org
-
simonshack
- Administrator
- Posts: 7345
- Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:09 pm
- Location: italy
- Contact:
It hails, my friend, from the impressively professional work of "AMAN ZAFAR"...May Allah be with him for shining the truth on top of our hapless souls.idschmyd 4 Aug 11 2010, 12:46 AM wrote:
Whence hails this photo-like foolery?
http://www.amanzafar.com/WTC/index.shtm
http://www.septemberclues.org
The two suns effect is amazing, and since Aman used 'NO SPECIAL EFFECTS' I'm looking into divine intervention. Gonna start with the Bible.simonshack @ Aug 11 2010, 02:09 AM wrote:It hails, my friend, from the impressively professional work of "AMAN ZAFAR"...May Allah be with him for shining the truth on top of our hapless souls.idschmyd 4 Aug 11 2010, 12:46 AM wrote:
Whence hails this photo-like foolery?
http://www.amanzafar.com/WTC/index.shtm
I mailed Aman to see if he can help out. I'm thinking there might have been a big hand just off screen or something that only thousands of people in NY saw. Did Fred see a hand?
-
ozzybinoswald
- Banned
- Posts: 288
- Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 11:52 am
- Contact:
I don't intend to shine a bad light on that bright and lofty beacon but if Fred were able to document the 2nd sun in New York how would we here be able to certify that Fred hadn't simply doctored said documentation and there really was no 2nd sun?idschmyd 4 Aug 11 2010, 01:46 AM wrote:Doesn't Fred live in NY? He might know.simonshack 4 Aug 10 2010, 11:09 PM wrote:
So today's challenge (N?15) is...
Tell us how many suns habitually shine on New York City: 1? - 2? - 3?
Ozzy bin Oswald. Asking the hard questions. <_<
Hm, and if he didn't see the second sun then, well, he just didn't see it. Tricky. Anyway, Genesis...ozzybinoswald @ Aug 11 2010, 02:54 PM wrote: I don't intend to shine a bad light on that bright and lofty beacon but if Fred were able to document the 2nd sun in New York how would we here be able to certify that Fred hadn't simply doctored said documentation and there really was no 2nd sun?
Ozzy bin Oswald. Asking the hard questions. <_<