Some issues concerning the promoting of facts.
Personally I like when things are short, clear and precise.
1. This picture have been altered because, here and here and so on.
2. This movie is fakery because so and so. (Like the arguments about the "2nd plane" hit the towers). There it is obvious that a 2nd plane never hit the towers. It is clearly proved that it was TV-Fakery. The short clip about the 1st plane is also easy to see is fake.
3. This person claiming to be surviver or dead in the attack is the same person as this and so on, as proved in the Vicsim category.
I very quickly jump away from a topic when there are to many assumptions or when getting to much into funny stuff.
1. This person have the same hair as used in this movie or x-factor or whatever.
2. These symbols have also been seen elsewhere, even no really connection to the facts.
3. There was an evil head in the smoke from 911.
4. 7/7 or 911 is the number of a goddess in greek mythology, who is said to be in family with Obama Bush Laden that made BJ on the red dressed Simpsons from Big Brother.
Also these issues can not be used in court if it comes so far.
Many people also leave the topic if it comes into all these so called spooky things. No matter if there is some to it or not.
The fact is that symbols and so on are used by people and have been used for ages. Like the star, 666, Eye, triangle, eagle etc etc....
When looking into those symbols they itself represent nothing. It comes from peoples mind and from having been indoctrinated into other peoples mind, and then comes associations to certain stuff etc etc. It is people who gives those symbols value, not the symbols itself.
When looking at all the stuff on the issues about 911, 7/7, Madrid, Cartoons, then only few of the stuff out there really hold the key to the truth and only fewer things can really be used for exposing the truth.
Many of the 911 truther groups bring up some issues that have value, but leave out or get other issues wrong, that only confuse people in a way that they still do not get the full picture of what happened.
Or it bring in stuff some easy push people away, or scare them, or assumptions that can not be used and only make people leave the things even it holds some few points.
The few videos of Jean-Marie Bigard I have seen is good in the sense that he does the things in a funny way. He doesn't really conclude anything, but expose how ridicously the claim is about some issues.
Even less capable people get the points.
The movie septemberclues are very precise and clear in most stuff. It's presented in a good way and easy to understand, though hard to comprehend for many, as it raises many other questions in most peoples mind.
If those questions only can be answered by some other groups, that not really hold the entire truth.........the people get confused and kind of leave the things.
It takes a lot of man-power and resources to make additional movies and stuff to septemberclues. Hopefully more and more serious people will get into it, and be willing to spend time and energy on the issue as we are all affected by what happened on 911 and what followed.
Some intro to septemberclues could be good to make......like some very obvious small clips.......some clips where every one can see the fakery. Some PDF files, or pages at a website that clear and precise and no one can be mistaken what is going on.
Those then lead into the more complex and bigger movies like the full septemberclues and further again to the Vicsim issue.
The Vicsim issue will be hard for many to get. There are some of the stuff there where I can see nothing of the things you see.
So on those things, you really have to be sure......100% sure before you claim it to be a fact. Else the whole issue will fall to the ground and people will loose faith.
Another idea I had in mind was if someone was able to make some sketchy clip that are similar to some of the TV-fakery, and then put it up as a comparirson to the actual CNN TV-fakery clip. That will make people see how it is possible to do the things and see forthemselves that it is not that difficult to make TV-Fakery.
(By sketchy I mean something funny, like the clip http://existenz.se/out.php?id=21511
and best if it a short movie clip rather than few frames in flash. Also show it in slow motion as an example.
Well...........just few ideas and thoughts from here.