lux wrote:It seems Sandra
Bollocks Bullock has also become an ass-tro-not by studying fellow actor Cady Coleman!
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/spac ... llock.html
According to the article Sandra is already “tipped to win an Academy Award” even before her movie “Gravity” is released!
Well, I do agree that Sandra is every bit as much an ass-tro-not as Cady is.
Is this meant to be a real photograph?
Big Mike seems to have to stoop every time he needs to pay homage to the porcelain throne (owing for perspective, he just towers over the top of the door frame). According to one source (
http://www.aintitcool.com/node/49965), he's only 6'2. Little Miss Asstronaught, on the other hand, is 5'7. Now, the height difference is noticeable, to be sure, but allow me to postulate: this is meant to be a staged shot, perhaps for marketing the movie. Bollocks is dressed very fine, black dress, matching heels, perhaps? This ought to reduce the height difference substantially. Yet, Big Mike's mass absolutely dwarfs Bollocks.
The shadows are ridiculous. Big Mike's mug casts an half-oval umbra that hit the door frames and extends into the open room behind. Notice then the shadow Bollocks' left shoulder casts. Then avert your eyes to the shading Coleman's right arm creates. Are we working from two sources of light? Then there ought to be no shadow. Yet, one point of light, two different shadows perspectives. One source of light (camera flash) and no illumination on the picture behind save for from the fixture in the BATHROOM*. Is this possible in real life?
*This is a promo shot. For the latest Hollywood blockbuster. Taken with the integral players in their film. Shot in front of a hotel bathroom. Just keep that in mind.
Any tour of the sundry social media channels and you'll find people eating this stuff up. We can critique this junk, but the point is, they don't need to
try. The propaganda is so convincing as it is.