fubarfuthark wrote:I suppose I could sum up my thoughts by saying that I feel that we are unwilling participants in some massive occult ritual and that Space and the promotion thereof has played a big role in this.
Painterman wrote:fubarfuthark wrote:I suppose I could sum up my thoughts by saying that I feel that we are unwilling participants in some massive occult ritual and that Space and the promotion thereof has played a big role in this.
Greetings to you, Fubarfuthark.
I agree with your basic thought here. Yet, for the sake of precision, I would probably choose a different word than "ritual", because that connotes a more organized effort than what the evidence shows. In my opinion, the reason we observe a unified symbolic language across the board in space fakery, media fakery in general, propaganda in general, Hollywood junk culture, pop music junk culture, promoted junk science (both "mainstream" academic and "alternative" flatological), the myriad manufactured countercultures pushing 101 flavors of adolescent narcissism to the already marginalized "low hanging fruit" of society, etc. is that all such methods of psychosocial virtualization have a common, quite ancient origin in an undisclosed religio-political technology for colonizing, co-opting and transforming indigenous, traditional (i.e. "organic") societies into adulterated ("GMO" / "Frankenfood", as it were) products / components of the "transhumanist" (i.e. unisexed and otherwise dehumanized) New World Order whose controllers want to conquer the world for some reason.
Since this apparent original technology from which contemporary social engineering sprung is of ancient origin, there will of course be many etymological and other symbolic indicators of ancient culture. We see this in other fields as well, for example branches of math and philosophy which were formalized by the ancient Greeks and remain framed in terms of their words and symbols.
fubarfuthark wrote:To be honest, I dont know entirely what you are getting at here.
I suppose I could sum up my thoughts by saying that I feel that we are unwilling participants in some massive occult ritual and that Space and the promotion thereof has played a big role in this.
When you mention the perps promotion of hermaphroditism, do you mean that fake astrotheology is turning people into transvestites? Because if that is what you mean, I broadly agree with you. Hell, what is glam rock but space-age gender-bending with a frisson of the occult?
Gender neutrality or "gender transcendence" is part of the transhumanist concept of postgenderism.
Advocates of postgenderism argue that the presence of gender roles, social stratification, and cogno-physical disparities and differences are generally to the detriment of individuals and society. Given the radical potential for advanced assistive reproductive options, postgenderists believe that sex for reproductive purposes will either become obsolete, or that all post-gendered humans will have the ability, if they so choose, to both carry a pregnancy to term and father a child, which, postgenderists believe, would have the effect of eliminating the need for definite genders in such a society.
Postgenderism as a cultural phenomenon has roots in feminism, masculism, along with the androgyny, metrosexual/technosexual and transgender movements. However, it has been through the application of transhumanist philosophy that postgenderists have conceived the potential for actual morphological changes to the members of the human species and how future humans in a postgender society will reproduce. In this sense, it is an offshoot of transhumanism, posthumanism, and futurism.
One of the earliest expressions of postgenderism was Shulamith Firestone's The Dialectic of Sex. It argues,
"[The] end goal of feminist revolution must be, unlike that of the first feminist movement, not just the elimination of male privilege but of the sex distinction itself: genital differences between human beings would no longer matter culturally. (A reversion to an unobstructed pansexuality Freud's 'polymorphous perversity' - would probably supersede hetero/homo/bi-sexuality.) The reproduction of the species by one sex for the benefit of both would be replaced by (at least the option of) artificial reproduction: children would born to both sexes equally, or independently of. either, however one chooses to look at it; the dependence of the child on the mother (and vice versa) would give way to a greatly shortened dependence on a small group of others in general, and any remaining inferiority to adults in physical strength would be compensated for culturally."
fubarfuthark wrote:In a way I sort of see where you are going with this, Painterman. It is as if the production of the new gender is the resolution of the ultimate dialectic: man and woman. But to do this, man's nature must be overcome, whence all the nonsense about space, evolution et al. But this is just NWO nonsense.
Painterman wrote:Perhaps it is nonsense.
fubarfuthark wrote:To be honest, I dont know entirely what you are getting at here. You have just sort of turned everything into a kind of smooshy generalisation about some of the ancient origins of the NWO.
ICfreely wrote:ADMIN NOTICE (simon): Dear IC - do you really expect everyone to understand the meaning of things like "I love my niggas but nigga please!" ? Please understand that this is a forum with an international following - and that your 'hip dialect' is lost on many (if not all) readers here. Please stop requiring us to understand your "hip language". Thanks.
fubarfuthark wrote:Dear ICFreely, I think that Painterman's contributions here (and in general) should be let stand.
ICfreely wrote:Agreed, fubarfuthark! I don't advocate censoring him. Nor do I get what purpose he's serving. At this point I really don't care. To each his own.
simonshack wrote:Huh? You "don't advocate censoring him"? Lol ! Isn't this precisely what you've been (quite obsessively) 'advocating' for many weeks?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest