Equinox wrote:The clever folks on the web’s more popular conspiracy forums

have uncovered the name “Sandy Hook” on a map of Gotham City seen in the film Batman: Dark Knight Rises – the film that was shown as a man claiming to be the Joker shot and killed 12 people while injuring 58 others in a movie theatre in Aurora, Colorado, earlier this year.
I posted about this
a few pages back, but the post was probably invisible due to the thread moving to the next page right after. So I'm posting the post back, sorry for the repeat to the few that might have read it, but it is a part of the discussion that can be interesting due to the direct connection to Hollywood:
As already mentioned in this thread, "The Dark Knight Rises" had references to "Aurora" and "Sandy Hook". And it is really outrageous to see the arrogance of these Hollywood types who think it nothing to put references to these psyop events into their movies.
This would be the map featured in the movie:
From http://batmangothamcity.net/gotham-city ... ght-rises/
with "Sandy Hook" pretty visible there. As Resolution showed
here with another map, the original name of that area in the fictitious maps of Gotham city is supposed to be "South Hinkley", not "Sandy Hook". Same initials, but someone decided to make a change during the production of this movie.
Here is the screenshot at the 1:58:43 mark (I took this myself from the actual movie):
Now I am going to state the obvious by remarking how wrong it is (yet predictable) that these "conspiracy" clues are being used by all the known "conspiracy" websites to declare that
the massacre really happened, and by the hand of the "illuminati", or some other secret elite that would be coordinating all these events (Infowars among many:
http://www.infowars.com/confirmed-secti ... t-release/), placing hints into movies
out of some mysterious ritual and subliminal operation they only know about. The conspiracy people are going
nowhere with this and they know it.
The most logical conclusion that can be drawn from these staggering clues peppered into movies is thoroughly avoided:
that these things are hinted at in movies and the like because they are not serious at all. Because they are fakes, they are scams. And nobody risks the chair for a scam or for staging an event and disturbing the peace. So why not be a bit cocky about it?
The reason why the perpetrators of these events are so cocky as to drop hints into movies and such, is that
the real territory of intervention for them is the media itself. This innocent, ethereal thing that has no consistency and is not geographically identifiable on any map.
As to the nauseating references to the "illuminati" that seem so obligatory these days. We keep seeing all the time Hollywood and the newsmedia being blatant instruments of these events.
Even if you really need to believe that the events are real, still they entirely revolve around the reduction and representation the media makes of them.
Thus.
Isn't it time to put aside, at least pending further investigations, these secret, impenetrable cabals nobody knows anything about and start focusing on the evil thing in itself that the media are? Do we really want to find culprits and perpetrators? Let's go to Los Angeles, walk into any studio, find the producers, the writers, the actors, and all the shills and agents that work alongside them.
They're the idiotic, dangerous maniacs who serve the mightiest part in all these tragedies of deceit.