SANDY HOOK Newtown,Ct School Shooting 14 dec 2012

Discussing the most relevant "sequels" or "reminders" of 9/11. The so-called "War On Terror" is a global scam finalized to manipulate this world's population with crass fear-mongering tactics designed to scare you shitless.

Re: Newtown, Connecticut School Shooting 14 dec. 2012

Postby Winston'sMyth on January 6th, 2013, 1:42 pm

Winston'sMyth
Member
 
Posts: 28
Joined: July 30th, 2012, 3:09 am

Re: Newtown, Connecticut School Shooting 14 dec. 2012

Postby Flabbergasted on January 6th, 2013, 3:44 pm

The two men behind the girls are the size of the incredible hulk!
Flabbergasted
Member
 
Posts: 685
Joined: November 12th, 2012, 1:19 am

Re: Newtown, Connecticut School Shooting 14 dec. 2012

Postby Flabbergasted on January 6th, 2013, 3:58 pm



My guess is we are looking at three layers:
1) the cemetery in the background
2) the Union Cemetery stone, grass and flag in the foreground
3) the two out-of-focus bushes on each side of the Union Cemetery stone and the overhanging branches

Maybe the shaded area in the middle was added to hide the transition.

Also, the pitch-black shaded side of the Union Cemetery stone does not match the shadows of the tombstones in the background.
Flabbergasted
Member
 
Posts: 685
Joined: November 12th, 2012, 1:19 am

Re: Newtown, Connecticut School Shooting 14 dec. 2012

Postby resolution on January 6th, 2013, 4:32 pm

Winston'sMyth wrote:The girls look especially pasted in, if not all of them. The ELA shows a rectangular Police badge.


The rectangular appearance of the badge is likely due to JPG processing. Nothing appears abnormal with this photo if you read the photoforensics tutorial http://fotoforensics.com/tutorial-ela.php.
resolution
Member
 
Posts: 163
Joined: May 12th, 2012, 6:15 am

Re: Newtown, Connecticut School Shooting 14 dec. 2012

Postby simonshack on January 6th, 2013, 5:38 pm

*
Dear resolution,

Interesting 'twin' images of Giffords visiting Sandy Hoax...

IMAGE 1: (exif data says this one is by "JEFF FOSS, Fox CT. Date/Time: 2013:01:06 - 16:00:25)

Image

IMAGE 2: (exif data says this one is by "MICHELLE MC LOUGHLIN, Reuters. Date/Time: 2013:01:06 - 16:00:35)

Image

Once again, we are asked to believe that:
- Two photographers, standing feet apart, snapped a pic at the exact same instant in time (NOT 10secs apart as of exif data).
- Both these 'twin' images were chosen for publication (out of the many photos all pros habitually snap away in such occasions). The odds of such things occuring in real life are, rationally speaking, pretty astronomical.

Furthermore: yes, the perspectives suggest that the two photoreporters were standing relatively close to each other (JIM more to the right, MICHELLE more to the left) - but NOT close enough to show a virtually identical angle of Giffords face:
Image

On the strength of all the above considerations, I personally find this conclusion a lot more plausible:

What we have here, are two digitally-crafted images, slightly rotated in a less-than-perfect "3D" imaging software program (similar to what was used on 9/11 to simulate multiple shots of near-identical sceneries).

Besides, was Gabby Gifford's coat BROWN - or BLACK?
Image

(ps: please, oh please everyone: Stop using the ELA 'photo-forensic tool' in such systematic fashion!)
simonshack
Administrator
 
Posts: 6428
Joined: October 18th, 2009, 9:09 pm
Location: italy

Re: Newtown, Connecticut School Shooting 14 dec. 2012

Postby Unleashed on January 6th, 2013, 5:46 pm

Apparently, the silver-haired lady with the fucsia scarf is faster than she looks.
How did she escape the other photographer's lens in a tenth of a second?
Unleashed
Member
 
Posts: 315
Joined: March 25th, 2011, 4:27 am

Re: Newtown, Connecticut School Shooting 14 dec. 2012

Postby simonshack on January 6th, 2013, 5:54 pm

resolution wrote:The rectangular appearance of the badge is likely due to JPG processing. Nothing appears abnormal with this photo if you read the photoforensics tutorial http://fotoforensics.com/tutorial-ela.php.


We really don't need ELA to tell us how wrong this image is - with those two King Kongs in the background. <_<

Image
simonshack
Administrator
 
Posts: 6428
Joined: October 18th, 2009, 9:09 pm
Location: italy

Re: Newtown, Connecticut School Shooting 14 dec. 2012

Postby icarusinbound on January 6th, 2013, 7:26 pm

Image

In both pictures, the shadow cast by Agent RedTie upon Gifford doesn't appear to change in height by more than a tiny amount, yet there's a big difference in the spacing between these depicted individuals. And look at the difference in the ray-trace angle. Can this be explained by a perspective difference from 'two' shots, or not??
icarusinbound
Member
 
Posts: 393
Joined: November 28th, 2011, 9:49 am

Re: Newtown, Connecticut School Shooting 14 dec. 2012

Postby Haze on January 6th, 2013, 9:01 pm

zested wrote:
lux wrote:Here is a large copy of the fake Soto on rock image (2000x1359):
http://bostonherald.com/sites/default/files/media/2012/12/15/121512shootingsc018.jpg


Notice how her hair is blowing in the wind but the strings on her scarf are leaning the opposite way o.O
/ Also the hair that comes from no where on her right boob


http://24.media.tumblr.com/b014c32caeef ... 1_1280.jpg
Maybe I'm paranoid but I can't see the end of her chain on this photo. It seems to me that it disappear ...
Haze
Member
 
Posts: 54
Joined: September 24th, 2012, 8:44 pm

Re: Newtown, Connecticut School Shooting 14 dec. 2012

Postby brianv on January 6th, 2013, 9:55 pm

simonshack wrote:
resolution wrote:The rectangular appearance of the badge is likely due to JPG processing. Nothing appears abnormal with this photo if you read the photoforensics tutorial http://fotoforensics.com/tutorial-ela.php.


We really don't need ELA to tell us how wrong this image is - with those two King Kongs in the background. <_<

Image


Police State propaganda if ever!
brianv
Member
 
Posts: 3922
Joined: October 18th, 2009, 11:19 pm

Re: Newtown, Connecticut School Shooting 14 dec. 2012

Postby simonshack on January 6th, 2013, 11:04 pm

icarusinbound wrote:Can this be explained by a perspective difference from 'two' shots, or not??


Dear Icarusinbound,

To be sure, perspective issues are among the most tricky and potentially deceptive aspects of photo analysis, but precisely because of this, I am glad that you bring them up. Let me try to illustrate my point regarding these Gifford images - but please understand that I remain cautious about all this, and that what follows is something I'll be happy to revise/retract if proven wrong - once I get the chance to test it empirically by myself (re-enacting it all with my own camera and a bunch of friends). Sorry to dwell over this - but I think it's a worthwhile effort towards understanding the possible, subtle flaws of the imaging software employed in these psyops.

So here goes: I have drawn two vector lines (A1 and B1) on the JEFF FOSS image - using that guy in the background as an 'eyesight/vantage point' reference:
Image

Here - on the MICHELLE MC LOUGHLIN image, I have drawn the two vector lines A2 and B2:
Image

Now, if you measure the two distances marked D1 and D2, you will see that D2 is actually TWICE as long as D1. That is a pretty significant perspective change, is it not?

So, does this almost imperceptible perspective change of Gabby Giffords' face make any sense?
Yes, she is the most centred object in both images - but is this really enough to explain all of this?
Image

*****
But hey: once again, let me ask this fundamental question - lest it gets lost in our logical reasoning process, as so often happens when focusing on lesser details: HOW LIKELY is it that two professional photoreporters of FOX and REUTERS both snapped this very same instant in time (well ok, the lady in yellow dress actually blinks in one of the two shots) - and that BOTH of these photoreporters' unique shots were selected for publication? Is it not far more likely that these two shots were created digitally? Think about it - please.
simonshack
Administrator
 
Posts: 6428
Joined: October 18th, 2009, 9:09 pm
Location: italy

Re: Newtown, Connecticut School Shooting 14 dec. 2012

Postby Lazlo on January 7th, 2013, 1:12 am

Image

Someone on YouTube pointed out that the blonde woman between Giffords and her husband looks like the DC Madam. I am not good at photo recognition but I thought it might be worth a look.
Image I posted this pic of Palfrey to cut to the chase for a quick comparison but his photo is better. Cue up video to minute 2:05. This is not an endorsement of his occultic or religious interpretation: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N2t5OMjANP0
Lazlo
Member
 
Posts: 220
Joined: February 14th, 2012, 5:13 pm

Re: Newtown, Connecticut School Shooting 14 dec. 2012

Postby lux on January 7th, 2013, 1:54 am

Winston'sMyth wrote:The girls look especially pasted in, if not all of them.
Image
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/connecticut-school-shooting-victoria-soto-1498326


Yes indeed. The above photo is a composite.

Notice the woman in yellow sweater and yellow scarf above supposedly emerging from the church just in front of the police man.

Below is the same woman actually emerging from the church:

Image

As seen in this video at 0:23:

full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=maKW70lm5s8

You can also see in the above video that there are steps going down as soon as one steps out through the door. So, the two guys in front (in the composite photo above) are either incredibly tall or they are floating above the steps (that is, they were obviously pasted into the photo).
lux
Member
 
Posts: 1914
Joined: October 1st, 2011, 11:46 pm

Re: Newtown, Connecticut School Shooting 14 dec. 2012

Postby anonjedi2 on January 7th, 2013, 5:49 am

The source for the following image is in the video at 1:40 on this page. I took a screengrab from it. If someone could find the actual image, I'm sure it would expose more details to pick apart.

http://www.ksl.com/?nid=148&sid=23494208

Image

1) Emilie (pronounced I'm A Lie) is again off to the right side, in the same strange way as the first Parker family photo. She looks out of place and pasted into the scenery.

2) Her head is too small in relation to those of her sisters. Since she is the oldest, it would stand to assume that her head should be the largest.

3) The transition/lighting/shadows between Robbie Parker's left arm and Emlie's right arm is unnatural and looks off.

I'm sure there's more but I'll let you guys pick it apart (I'm still new here). Anyone know where we can find a proper version of this photo?
anonjedi2
Member
 
Posts: 711
Joined: December 31st, 2012, 6:50 am

Re: Newtown, Connecticut School Shooting 14 dec. 2012

Postby zested on January 7th, 2013, 6:30 am

NOT TO MENTION THE NON EXISTENT GIRL IN GREEN IN THE VIDEO!!!! well none in the photo were in the video except the girl in yellow

never mind she is there but there is a weird cut in the scene right there that made me not notice her the first time

lux wrote:
Winston'sMyth wrote:The girls look especially pasted in, if not all of them.
Image
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/connecticut-school-shooting-victoria-soto-1498326


Yes indeed. The above photo is a composite.

Notice the woman in yellow sweater and yellow scarf above supposedly emerging from the church just in front of the police man.

Below is the same woman actually emerging from the church:

Image

As seen in this video at 0:23:

full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=maKW70lm5s8

You can also see in the above video that there are steps going down as soon as one steps out through the door. So, the two guys in front (in the composite photo above) are either incredibly tall or they are floating above the steps (that is, they were obviously pasted into the photo).
zested
Member
 
Posts: 22
Joined: December 17th, 2012, 6:55 am

PreviousNext

Return to London, Madrid, Oslo and other faked terror events: the psyops are everywhere

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests