9/11. Nicely spotted, HonestlyNow.HonestlyNow wrote:*
Check this out:
Paris - "Charlie Hebdo shooting" 07/01/2015
Re: Paris - Charlie Hebdo 07/01/2015
Last edited by Makkonen on Fri Jan 09, 2015 1:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Administrator
- Posts: 7345
- Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:09 pm
- Location: italy
- Contact:
Re: Paris - Charlie Hebdo 07/01/2015
Yes, I saw that too HonestlyNow. That is (1+8 / 6+5), ergo : 9 / 11 ...HonestlyNow wrote:*
Check this out:
They have been saying, repeatedly, on TV (here in Italy) that this French terror attack "is France's 9/11"...
I can only
Re: Paris - Charlie Hebdo 07/01/2015
Does every country get to have their "own" 9/11?
Re: Paris - Charlie Hebdo 07/01/2015
Perhaps it's mandatory if you wish to borrow large sums of money from upstairs!Makkonen wrote:Does every country get to have their "own" 9/11?
-
- Member
- Posts: 209
- Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2012 11:33 am
Re: Paris - Charlie Hebdo 07/01/2015
Quite literally the SMOKING GUN of the "Charlie and the Chocolate Fakery Factory" event is the video of the AK47 head shot, using blanks.
Too much smoke and no muzzle flash.
No recoil (or more precisely ZERO RECOIL) of the weapon which would have been very obvious as the gun was held only in the hands.
If a head strike had been achieved, we would see "explosive" head impact, but there is none.
If the bullet hit the pavement, it would have blasted a chunk of concrete out, but there is only smoke.
full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sngK2zife8k
And below a link to a roof top view of the event. Note the Mini with the orange stripes on the hood - Very "twin towers-ish"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sfWYHQH ... 1420780988
This is RECOIL
Too much smoke and no muzzle flash.
No recoil (or more precisely ZERO RECOIL) of the weapon which would have been very obvious as the gun was held only in the hands.
If a head strike had been achieved, we would see "explosive" head impact, but there is none.
If the bullet hit the pavement, it would have blasted a chunk of concrete out, but there is only smoke.
full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sngK2zife8k
And below a link to a roof top view of the event. Note the Mini with the orange stripes on the hood - Very "twin towers-ish"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sfWYHQH ... 1420780988
This is RECOIL
Last edited by Starbucked on Fri Jan 09, 2015 10:49 am, edited 2 times in total.
Re: Paris - Charlie Hebdo 07/01/2015
Simon, the plural noun that goes with "On" as a subject in a sentence is "ses" the correct translation therefore is: "Wait! We still have until the end of January to present our wishes" or "Wait! One still has until the end of January to present its wishes".by simonshack on January 9th, 2015, 4:57 am
Let me translate this cartoon's captions for you:
"STILL NO [TERROR] ATTACKS IN FRANCE?
Wait! We still have time until the end of January to present their [?] wishes..."
It is appalling that following the "events" the focus is on the "freedom of speech" and not on the clear invitation to violence in the cartoon for which the magazine could be sued. The cartoon is clearly implying that if the terrorists want to live up to their reputation, they should hurry and target France sometime in January 2015 - or am I missing something?!
The French Embassy in Tokyo now has the "JE SUIS CHARLIE" logo on its website (!!!) and invite people to leave messages/comments/condolences on a special register. http://www.ambafrance-jp.org/ I checked some other French embassies websites: London, Singapore, Manilla,... same! So pathetic.
Re: Paris - Charlie Hebdo 07/01/2015
Ridiculous nonsense! Je suis un Charlie. You would have to be a proper Charlie to buy that bullshit. France, nil points!Starbucked wrote:
full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sngK2zife8k
full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aSuAPjw2Jgw
Re: Paris - Charlie Hebdo 07/01/2015
There is definitely something creepy about the complete non-spontaneity of the "public reaction" and the je suis blah blah blah campaign. I have also found plenty of the "mourning crowd" photos odd-looking, as if there was something "off" about them; I would imagine a lot of the public response imagery and whatnot can be created completely digitally nowadays, giving the illusion of some major (and spontaneous) partaking, because I haven't got slightest idea what the fucking point (no pun intended) is going out and holding a pen in the air. (Well, some dodgy behavior/social psychologist probably knows and was part of the "design team" for this wretched shitshow.)
This pen crap actually reminds me a bit of the Breivik hoax, where the public was asked to hold roses in the air for Jens Stoltenberg's criminal party's fallen sims. Why? Isn't this kind of (pseudo-)ritualistic hive-mind participation creepy as all fucking hell? Why do people (assuming some participate beyond digital fabrications) give the perps the opportunity to laugh so boisterously at them?
This pen crap actually reminds me a bit of the Breivik hoax, where the public was asked to hold roses in the air for Jens Stoltenberg's criminal party's fallen sims. Why? Isn't this kind of (pseudo-)ritualistic hive-mind participation creepy as all fucking hell? Why do people (assuming some participate beyond digital fabrications) give the perps the opportunity to laugh so boisterously at them?
Re: Paris - Charlie Hebdo 07/01/2015
This terrorism lark can be a real money spinner! And look where the backing is coming from.
In the wake of yesterday's tragic attack, the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo is planning its biggest print run ever. Hebdo's usual circulation is around 30,000, but the surviving staff are planning to print 1 million copies of next week's run, in a gesture that's equal parts defiance and grief.
To fund the unprecedented print run, Hebdo is getting help from some unexpected places. The Fund for Digital Innovation (funded by Google but controlled by an independent trade group) has donated 250,000 euro (nearly $300,000), while French newspapers have pledged an equal amount. A number of Hebdo's distribution partners have also agreed to work without charge. One of the magazine's writers described the situation on French television: "It’s very hard. We are all suffering, with grief, with fear, but we will do it anyway because stupidity will not win."
http://www.theverge.com/2015/1/8/751425 ... -with-help
In the wake of yesterday's tragic attack, the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo is planning its biggest print run ever. Hebdo's usual circulation is around 30,000, but the surviving staff are planning to print 1 million copies of next week's run, in a gesture that's equal parts defiance and grief.
To fund the unprecedented print run, Hebdo is getting help from some unexpected places. The Fund for Digital Innovation (funded by Google but controlled by an independent trade group) has donated 250,000 euro (nearly $300,000), while French newspapers have pledged an equal amount. A number of Hebdo's distribution partners have also agreed to work without charge. One of the magazine's writers described the situation on French television: "It’s very hard. We are all suffering, with grief, with fear, but we will do it anyway because stupidity will not win."
http://www.theverge.com/2015/1/8/751425 ... -with-help
-
- Member
- Posts: 209
- Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2012 11:33 am
Re: Paris - Charlie Hebdo 07/01/2015
"Oh non . . . Je think I may have missed"
Last edited by Starbucked on Fri Jan 09, 2015 1:42 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Re: Paris - Charlie Hebdo 07/01/2015
The Citroën the terrorists were using had to be abandoned after they supposedly crashed into a Volkwagen Touran, injuring the driver. But in the pictures of the car there is no damage to be seen. Only the suggestion that the back window is broken.
We are supposed to think the damage is on the left side, because the front and right are not damaged.
Here we can see 2 people taking photos from the left side. Some people would pay a lot of money for that photo. However, I can't find a single picture on the internet.
(Even if there was such a picture, that would not be hard to fake)
We are supposed to think the damage is on the left side, because the front and right are not damaged.
Here we can see 2 people taking photos from the left side. Some people would pay a lot of money for that photo. However, I can't find a single picture on the internet.
(Even if there was such a picture, that would not be hard to fake)
Re: Paris - Charlie Hebdo 07/01/2015
http://www.counterpunch.org/2015/01/07/ ... ng-to-say/simonshack wrote:*
So what sort of individuals were those cartoonists allegedly killed? Has the cartoon-world been co-opted by the CIA / M16/ MOSSAD as well? Well... think "Walt Disney"!
Charlie Hebdo was not in reality a model of freedom of speech. It has ended up, like so much of the “human rights left”, defending U.S.-led wars against “dictators”.
In 2002, Philippe Val, who was editor in chief at the time, denounced Noam Chomsky for anti-Americanism and excessive criticism of Israel and of mainstream media. In 2008, another of Charlie Hebdo’s famous cartoonists, Siné, wrote a short note citing a news item that President Sarkozy’s son Jean was going to convert to Judaism to marry the heiress of a prosperous appliance chain. Siné added the comment, “He’ll go far, this lad.” For that, Siné was fired by Philippe Val on grounds of “anti-Semitism”. Siné promptly founded a rival paper which stole a number of Charlie Hebdo readers, revolted by CH’s double standards.
In short, Charlie Hebdo was an extreme example of what is wrong with the “politically correct” line of the current French left. The irony is that the murderous attack by the apparently Islamist killers has suddenly sanctified this fading expression of extended adolescent revolt, which was losing its popular appeal, into the eternal banner of a Free Press and Liberty of Expression
Re: Paris - Charlie Hebdo 07/01/2015
A clue from Pope Francesco speech about "State terrorism".
http://www.primocanale.it/video/papa-fr ... 67260.html
http://www.primocanale.it/video/papa-fr ... 67260.html
Re: Paris - Charlie Hebdo 07/01/2015
Oh no! Not another hostage situation now.
Meanwhile, the suspects in Wednesday's massacre are holed up in a printing company in a town northeast of Paris, taking one male employee hostage, said Audrey Taupenas, a spokeswoman for Dammartin-en-Goele City Hall.
http://abcnews.go.com/International/ope ... d=28105639
French police revealed Friday that there was a "connection" between the fatal shooting of a policewoman in southern Paris and the massacre at Charlie Hebdo magazine in the heart of the French capital.
http://www.france24.com/en/20150109-par ... sm-france/
As a matter of interest the French policewoman was described as -
A French police officer shot and killed in the second horrifying gun attack on Paris's streets in less than 24 hours has been named as a 27-year-old rookie who 'DREAMED OF SERVING HER COUNTRY'.
The young policewoman who was gunned down as she attended a routine traffic accident in Montrouge at 8am today is called Clarissa Jean-Philippe, according to the French media.
She was unarmed and had only been in the job for 15 DAYS.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... unded.html
Meanwhile, the suspects in Wednesday's massacre are holed up in a printing company in a town northeast of Paris, taking one male employee hostage, said Audrey Taupenas, a spokeswoman for Dammartin-en-Goele City Hall.
http://abcnews.go.com/International/ope ... d=28105639
French police revealed Friday that there was a "connection" between the fatal shooting of a policewoman in southern Paris and the massacre at Charlie Hebdo magazine in the heart of the French capital.
http://www.france24.com/en/20150109-par ... sm-france/
As a matter of interest the French policewoman was described as -
A French police officer shot and killed in the second horrifying gun attack on Paris's streets in less than 24 hours has been named as a 27-year-old rookie who 'DREAMED OF SERVING HER COUNTRY'.
The young policewoman who was gunned down as she attended a routine traffic accident in Montrouge at 8am today is called Clarissa Jean-Philippe, according to the French media.
She was unarmed and had only been in the job for 15 DAYS.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... unded.html