Brussels Airport and Metro attack March 22 2016

Discussing the most relevant "sequels" or "reminders" of 9/11. The so-called "War On Terror" is a global scam finalized to manipulate this world's population with crass fear-mongering tactics designed to scare you shitless.

Re: Brussels Airport and Metro attack March 22 2016

Postby omaxsteve on April 4th, 2016, 7:59 pm

The more things change the more they stay the same.....

AS with the 9/11 faked event where the "plane" purportedly struck the exact part of the building that had just been renovated, it turns out that the Brussels airport had some recent renovations as well. Coincidentally, the "terrorists" happened to strike in the portion of the airport that had recently been completed.

Connector - designed by CTHM (Chapman Taylor – bureau Happold – MOSS) - allows passengers to walk straight from the check-in desk to their gate in pier A. In the opposite direction, the building provides the arriving passenger with a smooth and agreeable passage to the baggage reclaim hall and the exit.

The building includes a central platform for access and security screening as well as border control for travellers departing Pier A. Passengers departing from Pier B will use the platform as of 2016 (emphasis added). This considerably increase the efficiency of the screening process, as the peak hours for security in both piers are complementary. Moreover, the building offers plenty of space for a commercial area.


http://www.brusselsairport.be/en/corporate/connector/

Regards,

Steve O.
omaxsteve
Member
 
Posts: 179
Joined: March 29th, 2010, 1:44 am

Re: Brussels Airport and Metro attack March 22 2016

Postby Seneca on April 5th, 2016, 4:06 pm

No Steve, that is not the portion of the airport where the terrorists supposedly struck. It was in the departure hall, which are actually 2 buildings that are connected to each other. One was built in the 1950's and was renovated in 2010. This is were the first bomb supposedly struck. On the images you see rectangular columns. The other was built in 1994 and has circular columns. This is where the second bomb supposedly exploded. And probably also where the third "controlled explosion" took place.

According to the official website of Brussels Airport
The first, provisional investigation into the Brussels Airport's terminal did not indicate any stability issues related to the terminal building.

Yet 3 days later it was announced that the entire departure hall will be rebuilt "until the last stone"
According to CEO Arnaud Feist everything will be paid by the insurance company, including the €10 million that the airport is losing each day until it can regain its former capacity. The rules for public tendering that had always applied because the company is 25% state-owned are swept aside.

The reason that is given for this gigantic reconstruction? "We want to prevent that at the time of the reopening there will be anything left to remind people of the attacks"

WTF? So suppose I have a 70-year old house and there is a terrible fire that doesn't do any structural damage. Is the insurance company going to pay for a new house because I don't want to remember that?? Without looking at the building or the renovation plans??

So this renovation was probably planned all along. The work will be done by corrupt building companies at premium prices, all paid for by the insurance company. And they will make sure that people don't forget.
Seneca
Member
 
Posts: 422
Joined: October 21st, 2009, 3:36 pm

Re: Brussels Airport and Metro attack March 22 2016

Postby omaxsteve on April 5th, 2016, 4:42 pm

Thanks, for clarifying, Seneca. I assumed that the connector building was the location of the faked bombing due to this
allows passengers to walk straight from the check-in desk to their gate in pier A
and this
Passengers departing from Pier B will use the platform as of 2016 (emphasis added).


In any case your find regarding the insurance payoff is a gem... as the best detectives (and researchers say) ..... follow the money!

regards,

Steve O.
omaxsteve
Member
 
Posts: 179
Joined: March 29th, 2010, 1:44 am

Re: Brussels Airport and Metro attack March 22 2016

Postby ChristopherMarlowe on April 6th, 2016, 8:55 pm

Here is a video making a strong case that the departure terminal was closed due to construction at the time of the bombing hoax:

full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Bw5lFAaxYs
ChristopherMarlowe
Newbie
 
Posts: 3
Joined: January 4th, 2013, 6:37 pm

Re: Brussels Airport and Metro attack March 22 2016

Postby hoi.polloi on April 7th, 2016, 3:47 am

ChristopherMarlowe, the post is appreciated.

But would you mind, please, summarizing the video's strong points for those without fast Internet connections or who otherwise are avoiding YouTube? Would you like to post at least a comment of your own, please? Our forum is for posting original resource interpretations and research rather than merely being a platform for fandom. Thank you so much for your patient understanding of this. :)

There are other reasons we do this, as well, such as the frequent problem of videos and other resources disappearing over time. Our site is meant to be archival.
hoi.polloi
Administrator
 
Posts: 4810
Joined: November 14th, 2010, 8:24 pm

Re: Brussels Airport and Metro attack March 22 2016

Postby Seneca on April 7th, 2016, 8:21 am

hoi.polloi wrote:ChristopherMarlowe, the post is appreciated.

But would you mind, please, summarizing the video's strong points for those without fast Internet connections or who otherwise are avoiding YouTube? Would you like to post at least a comment of your own, please? Our forum is for posting original resource interpretations and research rather than merely being a platform for fandom. Thank you so much for your patient understanding of this. :)

There are other reasons we do this, as well, such as the frequent problem of videos and other resources disappearing over time. Our site is meant to be archival.

Here is the article that most of the information in the video is based upon: Brussels Airport shifts the Belgian border to Connector
On 17 March, Brussels Airport will open the link between Pier B and the Connector building allowing non-Schengen passengers to go to their gate via Connector. From then on, all passengers will pass through the security screening in Connector, and non-Schengen passengers will then proceed to the new border control gates in Connector. This means that, in the night of 16 to 17 March, the Belgian border at Brussels Airport will literally be shifted.

All security and border controls for non-Schengen passengers will in future take place at the start of their passage through the airport. They first go to the screening platform in Connector and then to passport control. Anybody with a Belgian identity card or a European passport can use the automated border control gates. The new itinerary makes everything easily comprehensible for passengers. The new set-up also allows passengers to go through security and border control faster, so they can look forward to the departure of their flight in a relaxed frame of mind.

Additional staff will be on duty in the days ahead to guide the passenger through these changes.

150 employees lay out the new itinerary in just 1 night
The operational changes involved with the opening of Connector to Pier B are enormous. The equipment of the old screening platform and of the border control booths in the departures hall have to be taken apart. The border control in the departure hall will be closed off. All equipment must be reinstalled and tested in the new environment. The signage in the departure hall must be adapted and all places must be thoroughly cleaned after the removal operation.

The walk-through duty-free area of Pier B will be located beyond the security screening which means that its status changes to that of ‘secure zone’. In order to be able to declare the zone secure, all shops, restaurants and other places in this zone undergo a security check. This check is undertaken by the security staff of Brussels Airport Company and the federal police.
All changes and checks must take place during the night when no passengers are in the airport. This operational tour de force demands a strict planning and meticulous execution by each employee.

In the video the question is asked who hired these 150 employees. It could be coincidence or not:
Facilicom service group claimed it had 150 employees working at the time of the attacks.
source: http://www.madeinantwerpen.be/nieuws/fa ... -zaventem/
De Facilicom Services Group is op Zaventem aanwezig met Gom Cleaning, het bewakingsbedrijf Trigion en Axxicom. In totaal gaat het om zowat 150 personeelsleden. Die hebben uiteraard allemaal geleden onder de gevolgen van de terreuraanslagen

Translation:
"The Facilicom Services Group is present at Zaventem with Gom Cleaning, the security firm Trigion and Axxicom. In total we are talking about aroubd 150 employees. Off course they all suffered under the consequences of the attacks"

Axxicom is/has a temporal employment agency
http://nl.axxicom.be/axxicom-selection- ... n-selectie

Assuming these 150 employees were newly hired, as the video suggests:
If these people were indeed hired for the things that are mentioned in the article what where they still doing there 6 days later? It the timing is correct, most of the work should have been finished in the night of 16-17 March.
Even if they were not hired by that company, the question has to be addressed. Belgian law doesn't allow people to be employed for less than a week. Don't forget there are supposed to be thorough screenings to be able to work at the airport.

Edit:the problem with my theory, that 150 new people where brought in by Facilicom and helped to orchestrate the attacks, is that they had already 150 people working at the airport in 2002, just for Axxicom alone. http://www.profacility.be/mag/33_fr/pfy033frfull.pdf
So they should have more than 150 people working on march 22.
Seneca
Member
 
Posts: 422
Joined: October 21st, 2009, 3:36 pm

Re: Brussels Airport and Metro attack March 22 2016

Postby Seneca on April 8th, 2016, 7:56 pm

Ataraxia wrote:
clank wrote:
Image


Personally, I find the most damning part of this photo to be the face and head of the lady on the left. It appears to me that her face might even be at a lower resolution than the rest of the image and it has that 'floating' effect of a generally poor photoshop which hasn't been merged adequately enough into the scene around it. Her face has a very computer-game look, vacant and emotionless (which is especially odd when you factor in her surroundings, her expected shock, and the lady next to her.) Her face has no real texture to it either, when compared to her red scarf, her jeans, the bench and the bags both on the right side and her bag at her feet, which all have very sharp colors, outlines and textures. Look at how naturally detailed the dangly bits of her shawl are, and then how blurry and plain her face is.

This close-up of her face also seems to show the obvious fakery:

Image

There's a white outline running down the whole left side of her face, between her hand and her face. The white line probably marks the area where her face is supposed to completely fill. Look at how thick her eyelashes are as they protrude out beyond her head, like one solid clump, thick enough to cover over part of her finger. Also her lips seem to have no actual physicality or shape to them, you'd expect them to interact with the outline of her face. Her features seem flat. Not to mention the eyes are completely empty and the bits of white in her hair just seem to be painted in.

In the close-up image, also compare the detail of her shawl and all the little dangly ends to how formless and untextured her hair is. The shawl seems to have real physical texture, and you can see the physical strands and how they realistically interact with each other and the main portion of the shawl. Whereas her hair has no texture at all and blends completely into her forehead and the sides of her head. Honestly, her whole face seems to be just a cartoon, likely drawn overtop a real face from a real common-place image.


Great analysis Ataraxia. Tineye.com found this similar image. It is somewhat better quality, thought it might help.
Image
Seneca
Member
 
Posts: 422
Joined: October 21st, 2009, 3:36 pm

Re: Brussels Airport and Metro attack March 22 2016

Postby omaxsteve on April 11th, 2016, 9:34 pm

Here is an excellent you tube clip detailing the precise locations of the blasts as well as the precise locations of all the "iconic" photos of the aftermath.

The poster has exposed the basketball player as a liar and , in my opinion, proven beyond any doubt that the entire event was staged after the terminal was evacuated (except for the crisis actors).



full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gnl7o2UKX9Y

regards,

Steve O.
omaxsteve
Member
 
Posts: 179
Joined: March 29th, 2010, 1:44 am

Re: Brussels Airport and Metro attack March 22 2016

Postby CluedIn on April 12th, 2016, 5:06 pm

Excellent video Steve O! Very good tracking by the guy who made this video. I'm not good with maps and layouts, but he did it in a very comprehensible way. I enjoyed his absolute, undeniable proof, at the end of the video, that the basketball player is a liar. I still cannot comprehend how supposedly normal people can live with themselves after participating in something like this.
CluedIn
Member
 
Posts: 241
Joined: December 1st, 2015, 1:15 pm

Re: Brussels Airport and Metro attack March 22 2016

Postby kickstones on April 13th, 2016, 1:45 pm

CluedIn wrote: I still cannot comprehend how supposedly normal people can live with themselves after participating in something like this.




More than likely they (participants) think it's for a good cause because they are probably told that by participating in the staged event they are aiding national security by helping to prevent an actual terrorist act in the future.
kickstones
Member
 
Posts: 137
Joined: January 16th, 2013, 2:15 pm

Re: Brussels Airport and Metro attack March 22 2016

Postby brianv on April 13th, 2016, 2:07 pm

kickstones wrote:
CluedIn wrote: I still cannot comprehend how supposedly normal people can live with themselves after participating in something like this.


More than likely they (participants) think it's for a good cause because they are probably told that by participating in the staged event they are aiding national security by helping to prevent an actual terrorist act in the future.


Mortgage assistance for anti-social media types most likely, perhaps some are "refugees" awaiting "green-cards" as "state" chattel.

On a more abstract level - Money and/or Status.
brianv
Member
 
Posts: 3861
Joined: October 18th, 2009, 11:19 pm

Re: Brussels Airport and Metro attack March 22 2016

Postby Seneca on April 14th, 2016, 1:12 pm

omaxsteve wrote:Here is an excellent you tube clip detailing the precise locations of the blasts as well as the precise locations of all the "iconic" photos of the aftermath.

The poster has exposed the basketball player as a liar and , in my opinion, proven beyond any doubt that the entire event was staged after the terminal was evacuated (except for the crisis actors).



full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gnl7o2UKX9Y

regards,

Steve O.

Yes that is an excellent video Steve. He really did a good job, especially for locating much of the imagery. I am also convinced this event was staged. I still wonder how they did it.
I don't find it likely that they would have been able to prevent non-actors from entering the departure hall before the event. (but it could be possible). So the terminal had to be evacuated and people had to be prevented from (re)entering. One obvious method would have been to convince the people present that there had been a terrorist attack. Perhaps they used small explosions or other means to generate smoke and noise. Perhaps some actors would pretend they were wounded.
This would have been followed by a large presence of authority figures (police, airport security, arm, doctors) that quickly escorted the public towards an exit. The other actors could have been waiting in parts that were closed to the public, for example in the part of the building that had been closed off one week before. The entrance would be where the red arrow is on the map above, which is conveniently close to where the second bomb supposedly was. Near the site of the first bomb we have the police station (nr 49) and 2 large unmarked areas. "The tower" is also a possible entrance. It gives access to the train station. Actors could have been brought in by train, by plane...
Off course, the actors could have been present earlier, mixed with normal people. But that could have made the evacuation more difficult. Once the stage was prepared, did they let non-actors pass trough there to witness the fakery? Possible, but I don't think so. Because 1 it is not necessary, people believe it without seeing it with their own eyes. 2 This would not give them much time to prepare the scene. 3 This would be very risky because people could see it is fake and become real witnesses.
(The imagery could have been made in advance)
How can we explain the damage to the windows? It could be CGI but then they did an exceptional good job. My best guess is that they used small explosives. It would be either before or after the evacuation. If they did it before they would risk hurting people. If they did it afterwards, they would risk people noticing that. My guess is that they did it before the evacuation. So it is possible that there were real victims, wounded by flying glass.

Please let me know if you have other plausible explanations.
From the people I know here in Belgium, I heard about a few people that would have been present at the airport. They all can be either actors or witnesses. One of them I knew about 20 years ago, so I am going to contact her. I am writing this to get some help for the best questions to ask. I will probably only have one chance. I am not going to tell that I think it is staged, just that I am investigating it.
Here are some possible questions I have written with the presumption that she is an innocent witness. At least I haven't seen her anywhere in the media. (unlike this actress Tatyana Beloy and this radio presentator Eva Daeleman)

How did you first noticed that there was something happening?
Where where you at that time?
What did you do?
How much time went on before you saw any uniformed people (security, police, doctors..)
From which direction do these persons came?
Did any of them speak to you, did anyone give you instructions by talking to you or shouting, waving or via the intercom
Were you allowed to take pictures, did you see anyone doing that?
What route did you took to get out?
When you were getting out, did you see emergency personnel going in the other direction? (suspicious if this isn't the case)
Did you see non-uniformed people going in the opposite directions (suspicious if this is the case)
What did you see in the building?
Did you see floor tiles on the ground?
Did you see if the doors or the windows were broken?
Did you see smoke?
Did you see wounded people in the building?
Did you hear an explosion. At what time?
Did you hear or see anything suspicious before the event?

In case I notice that she is lying I will have to change my approach.
Please let me know if you think of better questions. Remember that for me the most important question I want answered is not if it is fake (enough evidence already) but how they faked it.
Seneca
Member
 
Posts: 422
Joined: October 21st, 2009, 3:36 pm

Re: Brussels Airport and Metro attack March 22 2016

Postby ICfreely on April 18th, 2016, 4:35 am

The following article touches on hoi’s recent ‘How "Terrorism" is "Financed"’ post (http://cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=25&t=1879) as well as Apache’s insightful post concerning the devolution of her hometown (http://cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=27&t=1832&start=375#p2398487).


U.S., Some European Nations, Israel, Turkey, Qatar, And Saudi Arabia Must Accept Historical Responsibility For The Ideological Radicalization of Muslims Worldwide

MARCH 23, 2016

An excerpt from, "Brussels attacks: How Saudi Arabia's influence and a deal to get oil contracts sowed seeds of radicalism in Belgium" By Leo Cendrowicz, The Independent, March 23, 2016:

There are many reasons why Belgium has become a hotbed of radical Islamism. Some of the answers may lie in the implanting of Saudi Salafist preachers in the country from the 1960s.

Keen to secure oil contracts, Belgium’s King Baudouin made an offer to Saudi King Faisal, who had visited Brussels in 1967: Belgium would set up a mosque in the capital, and hire Gulf-trained clerics.

Although the mosque was treated as the official voice of Muslims in Belgium, its radical Salafist teachings came from a very different tradition to the Islam of the new immigrants. Today, there are around 600,000 people of Moroccan and Turkish origin in Belgium, a country of 11 million.

“The Moroccan community comes from mountainous regions and rift valleys, not the desert. They come from the Maliki school of Islam, and are a lot more tolerant and open than the Muslims from other regions like Saudi Arabia,” says George Dallemagne, a Belgian member of parliament for the centre-right CDH, an opposition party. “However, many of them were re-Islamified by the Salafist clerics and teachers from the Great Mosque. Some Moroccans were even given scholarships to study in Medina, in Saudi Arabia.”

An excerpt from, "The American hand" By Saleem Farrukh, The International News, December 6, 2015:

By 1993, a mere eight years before 9/11, Osama bin Laden had become a hero of the western media. On December 6, 1993, The Independent, a British national morning newspaper, featured a large photo of Osama bin Laden along with an extremely favorable report.

In 1998, Eqbal Ahmad, the late political scientist and historian, gave a speech at the University of Colorado. He said, “In Islamic history, jihad as an international violent phenomenon had disappeared in the last 400 years, for all practical purposes. It was revived suddenly with American help in the 1980s.”

The CIA is estimated to have pumped in $20 billion into Brzezinski’s strategy to ‘foster an international movement’. Osama bin Laden’s Maktab al-Khidamat, the CIA-allied entity that recruited, financed and trained fighters, later became Al-Qaeda.

History stands witness that the CIA financed the University of Nebraska to produce violent textbooks for Afghan children with math questions like: ‘If out of 10 atheists, 5 are killed by 1 Muslim, how many atheists would be left?’
An excerpt from, "WikiLeaks: "Israel actively supported Hamas"" By Yael Klein, Jerusalem Online, August 4, 2014:

During Operation "Protective Edge", news leaks website WikiLeaks exposes secret documents which were passed between American diplomats in the 1980's. These documents allegedly show that Israel was interested in enabling Hamas activity in its beginning, intending to weaken the Palestine Liberation Organization and ending the first Intifada.

Did Israel take part in enabling Hamas to reach its current dimensions and abilities? Documents from the 1980's belonging to the leaking website WikiLeaks show that Israel enabled Hamas to act in the first Intifada in order to enable it to strengthen, thus to cause a splitting of the Palestinian nation – in order to weaken the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) which was responsible for the Intifada.

"Many in the West Bank believe that Israel actively supports Hamas, in its effort to split the Palestinian nation and weaken the Intifada", one of the secret leaked documents, from September 23, 1988 reads. "Shop owners in Jerusalem and Nablus claim that while PLO members are secretly distributing leaflets for fear of the Israeli security forces, Hamas distributes its leaflets openly".

"Moreover", the American government wrote on the document, "In spite of the many arrests, only a small number of Hamas leaders have been arrested. We believe that not only does Israel turn a blind eye on Hamas activity, but even supports it".
http://disquietreservations.blogspot.com/search?q=belgium+saudi


In 1933 America essentially declared ‘domestic bankruptcy’ when it confiscated (bought on the cheap) its citizen’s gold coins to set up Fort Knox to ostensibly protect the state. People were allowed to keep their jewelry and antique coins only. Moreover, Americans could no longer redeem gold with their (toilet) paper money. They still had the option of redeeming silver coins until 1964.

Foreign governments were still allowed to redeem gold for their dollar reserves until the so called Nixon Shock of 1971 when America basically declared ‘international bankruptcy.’

The Nixon shock was a series of economic measures undertaken by United States President Richard Nixon in 1971, the most significant of which was the unilateral cancellation of the direct convertibility of the United States dollar to gold.

While Nixon's actions did not formally abolish the existing Bretton Woods system of international financial exchange, the suspension of one of its key components effectively rendered the Bretton Woods system inoperative. While Nixon publicly stated his intention to resume direct convertibility of the dollar after reforms to the Bretton Woods system had been implemented, all attempts at reform proved unsuccessful. By 1973, the Bretton Woods system was replaced de facto by a regime based on freely floating fiat currencies that remains in place to the present day.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nixon_shock


Orthodox economic historians blame it all on Tricky Dick, not the Federal Reserve’s owners. Anyhow this led to the emergence of the petro-dollar. Seeing as (toilet) paper dollars were no longer backed by precious metals this new scheme basically forced all nations to maintain dollar reserves because petroleum could only be purchased & sold with dollars. This move allowed the Fed to expand its pyramid scheme.

The formation of OPEC marked a turning point toward national sovereignty over natural resources, and OPEC decisions have come to play a prominent role in the global oil market and international relations. The effect can be particularly strong when wars or civil disorders lead to extended interruptions in supply. In the 1970s, restrictions in oil production led to a dramatic rise in oil prices and OPEC revenue and wealth, with long-lasting and far-reaching consequences for the global economy. In the 1980s, OPEC started setting production targets for its member nations; and generally when the production targets are reduced, oil prices increase.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OPEC


Incidentally 1973 is the year that Iran began its descent into the lowest ring of hell. That’s when the mass media began to scapegoat the Shah of Iran with stories about him being one of the wealthiest people in the world – a complete joke! The Shah wasn’t even one of the richest men in Tehran let alone the world. At the same time SAVAK ramped up its war of terror against Iran’s citizenry just as Iran’s economy was getting flushed down the toilet. The OPEC nations raised the price of petroleum in order to keep their heads above water.

The above article gives the impression that Belgium’s King Baudouin was forced to capitulate to Saudi Arabia’s King Faisal in order to secure oil contracts and that Faisal used that opportunity to forcefully spread Islam in Europe. This narrative is the impetus to bringing an end to the Saudi Monarchy. Saudi Arabia will finally be ‘free’ (like Iran, Iraq, etc.).

I won’t be shedding any tears for the Saudi ‘royals’ when (not if) they get the boot. Having said that, as bad off as Saudi Arabia’s citizens are now, their economic situation won’t improve after the regime change. They will most likely not appreciate the ‘western’ culture that will be foisted upon them. When (not if) they respond negatively to it the mass media will spin it as “those backward ingrates who trained the 9/11 hijackers hate us for our free-dumb…”

Concurrently, Apache and Seneca’s countrymen, having dealt with the devolution of their towns and cities, will be more likely to support sending their troops to the Middle East to “combat ‘Islamic’ extremists." Further, the likelihood of ‘race wars’ breaking out within western countries will increase thanks to mass media fakery and provocation. It’s a shitty situation all the way around.


P.S.

Since the end of the Second World War, Brussels has been a major centre for international politics and has become the polyglot home of numerous international organizations, politicians, diplomats and civil servants.[13] Brussels is the de facto capital of the European Union as it hosts a number of principal EU institutions (the other administrative centres are Luxembourg and Strasbourg).[14][15][16] The secretariat of the Benelux and the headquarters of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) are also located in Brussels.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brussels



P.P.S.

The 'peak oil' scam is one of the many layers of deception that plays into the current Clash of Civilizations/War of Terrorism genocide. Constant chaos, divide & conquer, etc...
ICfreely
Member
 
Posts: 555
Joined: February 7th, 2015, 6:41 pm

Re: Brussels Airport and Metro attack March 22 2016

Postby omaxsteve on April 19th, 2016, 10:13 pm

While the Brussels event has already been proven to be just another staged media hoax, I found this video to be extremely well done. It is also good for a few laughs.

It is a video supposedly showing the EMTs triaging the "victims" of the subway bombing. What it really shows is how the media seems to care so little about the authenticity of the clips they broadcast. Its seems as if they know that they can get away with just about anything.

If you know anyone who is "on the fence" about whether to believe that there were real paramedics tending to actual victims, get them to watch this video.


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KySbLLEG9DQ

Enjoy!


Regards,

Steve O.
omaxsteve
Member
 
Posts: 179
Joined: March 29th, 2010, 1:44 am

Re: Brussels Airport and Metro attack March 22 2016

Postby kickstones on April 20th, 2016, 2:18 pm

Seneca wrote:

I don't find it likely that they would have been able to prevent non-actors from entering the departure hall before the event. (but it could be possible). So the terminal had to be evacuated and people had to be prevented from (re)entering. One obvious method would have been to convince the people present that there had been a terrorist attack. Perhaps they used small explosions or other means to generate smoke and noise. Perhaps some actors would pretend they were wounded.
This would have been followed by a large presence of authority figures (police, airport security, arm, doctors) that quickly escorted the public towards an exit. The other actors could have been waiting in parts that were closed to the public, for example in the part of the building that had been closed off one week before. The entrance would be where the red arrow is on the map above, which is conveniently close to where the second bomb supposedly was. Near the site of the first bomb we have the police station (nr 49) and 2 large unmarked areas. "The tower" is also a possible entrance. It gives access to the train station. Actors could have been brought in by train, by plane...
Off course, the actors could have been present earlier, mixed with normal people. But that could have made the evacuation more difficult. Once the stage was prepared, did they let non-actors pass trough there to witness the fakery? Possible, but I don't think so. Because 1 it is not necessary, people believe it without seeing it with their own eyes. 2 This would not give them much time to prepare the scene. 3 This would be very risky because people could see it is fake and become real witnesses.
(The imagery could have been made in advance)

Did any of them speak to you, did anyone give you instructions by talking to you or shouting, waving or via the intercom
Were you allowed to take pictures, did you see anyone doing that?
What route did you took to get out?
When you were getting out, did you see emergency personnel going in the other direction? (suspicious if this isn't the case)
Did you see non-uniformed people going in the opposite directions (suspicious if this is the case)
What did you see in the building?
Did you see floor tiles on the ground?



Seneca, the below video clip from euronews on youtube shows how people were instructed to leave. It also shows intrepid reporter Ketevan Kardava (around 1:19), mentioned earlier in the thread, in the so called thick of the action taking pictures, also, at the end of the video notice what appears to be a stack of tiles.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BP7YXNJtTPc


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BP7YXNJtTPc
kickstones
Member
 
Posts: 137
Joined: January 16th, 2013, 2:15 pm

PreviousNext

Return to London, Madrid, Oslo and other faked terror events: the psyops are everywhere

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests