Brussels Airport and Metro attack March 22 2016

Discussing the most relevant "sequels" or "reminders" of 9/11. The so-called "War On Terror" is a global scam finalized to manipulate this world's population with crass fear-mongering tactics designed to scare you shitless.

Re: Brussels Airport and Metro attack March 22 2016

Postby kickstones on May 11th, 2016, 1:27 pm

Thanks Seneca, a few years ago a TV character (Detective Lester Freamon) once stated:

"You follow drugs, you get drug addicts and drug dealers. But you start to follow the money, and you don't know where the fuck it's gonna take you"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Follow_the_money

However, these days, thanks to resources on the internet, we are getting a general idea in which direction its going to take us.

For example:

Brussels attacks: Protesters and police clash at shrine
Riot police disperse right-wing protesters at a temporary shrine honouring victims of the Brussels suicide bombings.

http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2016/03/r ... 10471.html


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P49gJtOwcVY

A new report by a global business intelligence firm informs us that:

“Over the past years, Europe witnessed an increase in extremist attacks, which has raised concerns among the law enforcement and defense industries to equip themselves with modern equipment and protect civilians from external threats. In 2015, the Paris attacks and the killing of journalists in France are some of the examples of growing terrorism in Europe.”

It also informs us:

The next five years will see the international market for ‘riot control systems’ boom to a value of more than $5 billion at an annual growth rate of 5%.

This increasing trend in instability promises billions of dollars of profits for global defence firms, concludes the report, published last month by Infiniti Research Ltd.

https://medium.com/insurge-intelligence ... .cia6do60j

Another report titled:

Riot Control System Market by Product (Offensive Weapons, Defensive Weapons, Personal Protective Equipment & Surveillance), Technology Type (Electromagnetic and Sonic Weapons, Chemical Agents, and Kinetic Impact Weapons) & End Users (Law Enforcement Agencies) Forecast & Analysis to 2014 - 2020

http://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market ... 26213.html

key finding was:

The riot control system market is expected to show a significant growth during the study period, with the increase in number of riots and protests leading to increase in and demand for riot control systems amongst the law enforcement agencies.

This finding was formulated by insights from the company analysis of key players including companies such as Raytheon Company (U.S.), BAE Systems (U.K.), LRAD Corporations (U.S), Eagle Industries (U.S) and Taser International (U.S).

The Raytheon Company is a major American defense contractor and industrial corporation with core manufacturing concentrations in weapons and military and commercial electronics. It was previously involved in corporate and special-mission aircraft until early 2007. Raytheon is the world's largest producer of guided missiles.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raytheon

One of Raytheon's more secretive subsidiaries is E-Systems, whose major clients have historically been the CIA and other spy agencies like the National Security Agency and the National Reconnaissance Office. An unnamed Congressional aide told the Washington Post once that the company was ''virtually indistinguishable'' from the agencies it serves. ''Congress will ask for a briefing from E- Systems and the (CIA) program manager shows up,'' the aide is quoted as saying. ''Sometimes he gives the briefing. They're interchangeable.''

http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?list=type&type=13

Raytheon was also a main player in 9/11.

Raytheon had a office in the WTC2.
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/background/tenants.html

Raytheon also 'lost' a few key staff:

"Gay lost her husband, Peter, 54, a vice president of Raytheon Co. on 9/11. Four years later, she still lives in Tewksbury, Mass., claiming as she did right after the tragic event, she is satisfied with her government's efforts at getting at the truth behind 9/11, satisfied with the money she received from the victim's compensation fund and satisfied with not pursuing her husband's death any further."
http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.ph ... &start=465

A few monetary transactions also involved Raytheon Co. prior to 9/11:

Purchases of call options contracts on Raytheon stock increased sixfold on September 10, 2001.

The price rose nearly 37 percent to $34.04 during the first week after post 9/11 trading.


http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=11456

Another instance of a hike in Raytheon stock was in 2013:

Raytheon stock nears all-time high amid news of possible cruise-missile strike in Syria

Stock shares of perennial defense contracting powerhouse Raytheon hit nearly $77 apiece Tuesday as news of a possible US strike in Syria intensified. The US has said if it strikes Syrian government targets for alleged use of chemical weapons.

http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/20 ... 48924.html

Who owns Raytheon stock?

Around that time peroid:

Top Institutional Holders
Holder Shares
Barrow, Hanley Mewhinney & Strauss, Inc. 22,166,071 6.87
Vanguard Group, Inc. (The) 15,859,331 4.92
State Street Corporation 13,852,846 4.30
Wellington Management Company, LLP 9,698,269 3.01
BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, N.A. 9,091,271

Top Mutual Fund Holders
Holder Shares
Vanguard/Windsor II 14,095,100
Vanguard/Wellington Fund Inc. 6,510,800
Blackrock Equity Dividend Fund 6,302,900
Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund 4,593,366
SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust 3,338,911
Vanguard 500 Index Fund 3,093,356
Vanguard Institutional Index Fund-Institutional Index Fund 3,058,064

viewtopic.php?f=29&t=1616&start=15

Who's involved with Vanguard Inc.?

Vanguard has a substantial share holding presence in Genie Energy Corporation.

Shares Value
Vanguard Group, Inc. (The) 483,314 $4,422,323

Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund 217,911 $2,017,855

Vanguard Extended Market Index Fund 147,785 $1,368,489

viewtopic.php?f=29&t=1616&start=15

Another company linked to the Vanguard Group is IDT Corporation (NYSE: IDT, IDT.C).

Genie Energy Corporation (Genie Energy), is a division of IDT Corporation.

November 15, 2010 -

Genie Energy Corporation (Genie Energy), a division of IDT Corporation (NYSE: IDT, IDT.C), today announced that Lord (Jacob) Rothschild and Rupert Murdoch have each purchased equity stakes in Genie Oil and Gas Inc. Jacob Rothschild will join Rupert Murdoch on Genie Energy's Strategic Advisory Board

Jacob Rothschild and Mr. Murdoch separately purchased equity positions equivalent to a cumulative 5.5% stake in Genie Oil and Gas Inc., which consists of IDT's interests in American Shale Oil, LLC (AMSO), and Israel Energy Initiatives, Ltd., (IEI), for a total of $11.0 million dollars.


viewtopic.php?f=29&t=1616&start=15

Rupert Murdoch is Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of News Corp.

Vanguard Group Inc held 85,939,439 shares on 12/31/2012 worth $2,192,315,109 in News Corp.

Dick Cheney, 46th Vice President of the United States. Former President and CEO of Halliburton Company, and U.S. Secretary of Defense, had close to $85 million invested in the Vanguard Group.

viewtopic.php?f=29&t=1616&start=15

Dick Cheney, chairman and CEO of oil-services company Halliburton between 1995 and 2000.

Halliburton was working on the Deepwater Horizon rig just before it blew up.

http://europe.newsweek.com/why-dick-che ... 3447?rm=eu

Vanguard was the biggest dumper of BP funds by volume by a long shot just weeks before the oil spill [Vanguard Windsor II Investor (-1,371,785)].

Among the top five dumping institutions of BP stock just prior to the spill include Goldman Sachs Asset Management, L.P. (-4,680,822)

Who controls Goldman Sachs?

Top Institutional Holders
Holder Shares
State Street Corporation 21,888,021
Vanguard Group, Inc. (The) 21,842,123

Top Mutual Fund Holders

Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund 7,038,847
Dodge & Cox Stock Fund 6,694,800
Vanguard 500 Index Fund 4,843,160

https://finance.yahoo.com/q/mh?s=GS+Major+Holders

Finally,returning to security issues mentioned earlier in the thread, a quick internet search reveals Vanguard Inc just happens to own Comverse Inc. whose subsidiary companies included Verint systems in charge of security at London Underground 7/7.

http://files.shareholder.com/downloads/ ... filing.pdf
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xura
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comverse_Technology

Coincidence? maybe not.
kickstones
Member
 
Posts: 136
Joined: January 16th, 2013, 2:15 pm

Re: Brussels Airport and Metro attack March 22 2016

Postby starfish prime on May 12th, 2016, 4:58 am

Nice work, kickstones!

kickstones wrote:Perhaps the decision was something to do with the earlier conviction (1996) of Menachem Atzmon (owner of Israeli security firm ICTS running security at Brussels airport ) and influence by his former partner Stephen L. Friedman


It might be worth mentioning that “anti-Zionist” disinformation agent Gilad Atzmon has acknowledged that he is related not only to Menachem, but also to Chairwoman of the Federal Reserve Janet Yellen, Mossad operative and former Israeli foreign minister Tzipi Livni (recently targeted in the Harvard “smelly Jew” anti-Semitism incident, which I can only assume was a hoax), and Nathan Yellin-Mor, a leader of the Zionist terrorist organization, Lehi (which was involved in the Deir Yassin massacre).
starfish prime
Member
 
Posts: 59
Joined: August 3rd, 2015, 5:36 am

Re: Brussels Airport and Metro attack March 22 2016

Postby Apache on May 12th, 2016, 12:27 pm

Fascinating research.

kickstones wrote:Raytheon had a office in the WTC2.


May I point out that a more accurate statement is "It is alleged that Raytheon had an office in WTC2"?

The information that Raytheon had an office in WTC2 comes from various dubious sources. 911research (a disinfo site), the FOIA that Phil Jayhan obtained, Raytheon themselves, the government "official story" and the lamestream media.

Indeed, it is claimed in the FOIA occupancy document that Raytheon had multiple "rooms" in WTC2.

Floor 79, room 135
Floor 80, room 136
Floor 81, room 137
Floor 82, room 138
Floor 83, room 139
Floor 90, suite 9000

Floors 79 to 83 were all, conveniently, in the "plane" impact zone.

Raytheon are indeed a dangerous Corporate entity, making mega-bucks out of death and destruction, but whether or not they had an office, or multiple rooms in the South Tower is debatable, especially considering the source of that information.

Cheers, (and sorry for interrupting). :D
Apache
Member
 
Posts: 168
Joined: October 22nd, 2015, 12:02 pm

Re: Brussels Airport and Metro attack March 22 2016

Postby Seneca on May 14th, 2016, 12:36 pm

Seneca wrote:This is good research and well referenced, kickstones. It deserves a topic of its own imho.

I see now there is an excellent topic where this is elaborated and where kickstones
made a big contribution : Who really owns the major companies in the world?

Since we are talking about security firms: some time ago I volunteered as a steward for a local festival with other members of our sports club, to earn some money for the club.
I really sucked at it and was "fired" the same night. I saw no problem in letting people from time to time out of the tent to take a pee. The professional security people were not amused. My point is that I think you can only be good at this job if you are good at dividing people in different groups. Your own group and the people that you have to "steward". You have to be able ignore the needs and sometimes the rights of the latter group. This is also the mindset that would allow you to deceive the public for some goal that you think is important (for example your paycheck). But I guess there are more jobs where this skill is important.

[ADMIN: Seneca, I modified your link, which was a direct link to your post's compostion-in-the-making, back to the actual topic/post in question. Let me know if I didn't get it right. -HP]
Seneca
Member
 
Posts: 422
Joined: October 21st, 2009, 3:36 pm

Re: Brussels Airport and Metro attack March 22 2016

Postby hoi.polloi on May 14th, 2016, 6:43 pm

Good digging, kickstones.

Yes, "security" is pretty much all about that very thing: prioritizing rights. There are cases where a good chunk — say, three quarters? Maybe less? — of the population would generally sort of turn into a security guard: for example, I think, at a birthday party of children in a public area. There are other areas where "security" is more about insecurity: the total impatience and intolerance of anyone at all doing anything within a zone.

What is never mentioned in newsy prose with language like this ...

kickstones wrote:
https://medium.com/insurge-intelligence/defence-industry-poised-for-billion-dollar-profits-from-global-riot-contagion-8fa38829348c#.y7kia97l6 [my bolds] wrote:“Over the past years, Europe witnessed an increase in extremist attacks, which has raised concerns among the law enforcement and defense industries to equip themselves with modern equipment and protect civilians from external threats. In 2015, the Paris attacks and the killing of journalists in France are some of the examples of growing terrorism in Europe.”


... is the notion that "civilians" want or need extra protection from so-called "external" threats. As if implying the polis itself is internal and innate to our existence, and nobody would ever want to join — say — an angry mob to burn down a totally corrupted Senate that would otherwise continue stuffing their pockets with bribes and satisfying the ultra-greedy as quickly as they can.

If someone gets violent, in general, determining the best way to quell them or the best way to hone them is the right of any individual within proximity of that violence, is it not?

Yet, we are told some violence by brainwashed human drones is simply going to be a mandatory part of our existence and if you try to suppress it you will be enveloped in it by force. That's obviously the decision of fat cats who rule the Senate and everything else by these cowardly methods.

If security forces were really about stopping violence rather than making it acceptable, wouldn't there be far different tools getting developed besides militarized security gear for G.I. Pigs? Prioritizing discussions, debates, translation, cultural exchange, the sharing of ideas, reorganization of politics around making time rather than designing and customizing pain?

If the rulers of "the West" are really so peaceful, why is it getting redesigned as one giant prison yard? Is someone(s) forcing their hand? Lightly pushing it? Are they doing it of their own free will, because technocratic fascism is the religion of the economic futurists?
hoi.polloi
Administrator
 
Posts: 4810
Joined: November 14th, 2010, 8:24 pm

Re: Brussels Airport and Metro attack March 22 2016

Postby hoi.polloi on May 14th, 2016, 8:47 pm

More on that article, written by crowdfunded (!) propagandist Nafeez Ahmed.

Nafeez has also written and reported for The Independent, Sydney Morning Herald, The Age, The Scotsman, Foreign Policy, The Atlantic, Quartz, Prospect, New Statesman, Le Monde diplomatique, New Internationalist, The Ecologist, Alternet, Counterpunch, Truthout, among others.

He is a Visiting Research Fellow at the Faculty of Science and Technology at Anglia Ruskin University, where he is researching the link between global systemic crises and civil unrest for Springer Energy Briefs.

Nafeez is the author of A User’s Guide to the Crisis of Civilization: And How to Save It (2010), and the scifi thriller novel ZERO POINT, among other books. His work on the root causes and covert operations linked to international terrorism officially contributed to the 9/11 Commission and the 7/7 Coroner’s Inquest.


So did they borrow and twist the work of the author in a dozen officially sanctioned "lefty" publications, or is he a willing scammer ineffectually critiquing the State? Or perhaps, like many people at the self-styled "top" he is just cynically playing a "practical joke" on people and helping catalyze the studies of human behavior for use in the technofascist war against us.

Since he/it/they is/are ostensibly writing for Springer Energy Briefs, their lefty articles are probably a deep cover for the agent named Nafeez Ahmed, hired to do field work for nuclear scams and get into and exploit peace movements for intelligence groups.
hoi.polloi
Administrator
 
Posts: 4810
Joined: November 14th, 2010, 8:24 pm

Re: Brussels Airport and Metro attack March 22 2016

Postby kickstones on May 17th, 2016, 1:42 pm

Apache wrote:Fascinating research.

kickstones wrote:Raytheon had a office in the WTC2.


May I point out that a more accurate statement is "It is alleged that Raytheon had an office in WTC2"?

Raytheon are indeed a dangerous Corporate entity, making mega-bucks out of death and destruction, but whether or not they had an office, or multiple rooms in the South Tower is debatable, especially considering the source of that information.

Cheers, (and sorry for interrupting). :D


No problem, Apache, that you or anyone takes time to read my posts and comment encourages me to continue researching this topic.

I am of the opinion that 'whether or not Raytheon had an office or multiple rooms in the South Tower' is in the main insignificant, it is suffice that they were part of the script. Not being party to the intelligence service's (CIA / Mossad) actual script for the 9/11 and other stories it's hard to pinpoint every factual aspect of these teleplays.

The point at hand is that by identifying high levels of corruption and monetary gain of those in a position to directly influence these so called 'terrorist' events it gives motive for an orchestrated media hoax to be carried out.

It is my line of thought that to help convince folk media fakery is at hand, as the OP requested...

'With what I know, it obviously looks completely fake. However, I could use some help to find evidence to convince my countrymen.'

...an understanding of motive lowers the resistance, by mental thought, to acceptance that a false reality is being constructed by the media on behalf of those who stand to benefit the most.

With this in mind the below video compiled by We See then becomes more comprehensible. Having said that I do question how the footage of the running oriental guy at the begining of the clip came to be released in the first place?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fi0aSei24jU


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fi0aSei24jU

The We See account has been removed twice from Youtube, is there anyway videos can be saved on posts? I say that because 2 videos posted earlier (P.4) of apparent ceiling explosions at the airport have been removed from Youtube.
kickstones
Member
 
Posts: 136
Joined: January 16th, 2013, 2:15 pm

Re: Brussels Airport and Metro attack March 22 2016

Postby kickstones on May 18th, 2016, 12:25 pm

hoi.polloi wrote:More on that article, written by crowdfunded (!) propagandist Nafeez Ahmed.

So did they borrow and twist the work of the author in a dozen officially sanctioned "lefty" publications, or is he a willing scammer ineffectually critiquing the State? Or perhaps, like many people at the self-styled "top" he is just cynically playing a "practical joke" on people and helping catalyze the studies of human behavior for use in the technofascist war against us.

Since he/it/they is/are ostensibly writing for Springer Energy Briefs, their lefty articles are probably a deep cover for the agent named Nafeez Ahmed, hired to do field work for nuclear scams and get into and exploit peace movements for intelligence groups.


Indeed Hoi, 'agent named Nafeez' appears to be doing some kind of balancing act with infomation he gives out, I suppose it's a case of sorting out the wheat from the chaff.

Here's an example how Ahmed changes tune, he posts this on his blog 2015 :

4 August 2015
9/11, conspiracy theory, and bullshit mongers

http://www.nafeezahmed.com/2015/08/911- ... lshit.html

Even if, and it's a big if indeed, it were proven beyond doubt that explosives were planted in the WTC, this in itself wouldn't prove that the US government perpetrated 9/11. There's a whole range of various scenarios consistent with this.

My position on 9/11 is pretty simple: I don't indulge in theory. I detest speculation. I particularly hate the very phrase "inside job," which is a meaningless bullshit euphemism for "I don't actually have cast iron proof of specifically who perpetrated this operation, or how it occurred, but IT WAS THE GOVERNMENT": a vague, amorphous cop-out typical of the conspiracy industry in general.

In 2006 in the House of Lords, I was launching my book, The London Bombings: An Independent Inquiry (Duckworth) with the support of 7/7 survivors Rachel North and Prof. John Tulloch. When former MI5 officer David Shayler stood up at the event and declared that "9/11 was an inside job" and then proceeded to say the same about 7/7, I was so angry I told him there and then to his face in front of everyone present that his careless pronouncements were a disgraceful affront to the 9/11 and 7/7 families. He was shocked, sat down, and shut up.

Indeed, my message to conspiracy theorists is simple: what happened to 'innocent til proven guilty'? Why is every tiny snippet of evidence identifying a govt role in something dastardly automatic super-proof of full-on govt control or everything? Why is the govt always guilty? Do you really even believe that mantra, 'innocent til proven guilty', or does it only apply to suspected extremists and terrorists?


However in 2002 he wrote in 'his' book...

*The War on Freedom: How and Why America was Attacked, September 11, 2001 Paperback – July 1, 2002
by Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed

The War on Freedom

Chapter 5

The Collapse of Standard Operating Procedures on 9-11

.........Stan Goff’s observations are very important, and should be duly noted. He testifies that, in his opinion as a U.S. military expert, the official version of events is not the reality, but rather a “story being constructed” by the government. He bases this conclusion on his in-depth understanding of the procedures and capabilities of the U.S. military.

The question that then remains is this: what is the government attempting to deflect attention from, by the construction of false “stories”? As this analysis has demonstrated with certainty, at every step during the escalating crisis on 11th September, clear rules governing the emergency response of U.S. air authorities were systematically broken........


.........Moreover, the damning implications of this sequence of events simply cannot be understood without considering that Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) were completely and inexplicably dropped on 11 th September—something that had never occurred before. The question then remains as to who was responsible for ensuring that routine emergency response rules were not adhered to, and why.

In the opinion of this author, the total lack of interest on the part of the Bush administration in the answer to this question, so as to locate the roots of the collapse of SOP on 11 th September, incriminates them further....


He also writes...

Canadian economist Michel Chossudovsky, in a scathing review of Bush’s new policies under the “war on terror,” recorded as early as 16th September 2001 that: “The ‘recession’ and ‘war’ buzzwords are being used to mould U.S. public opinion into accepting a massive redirection of the nation's resources towards the military industrial complex... the shift from civilian into military production pours wealth into the hands of defense contractors at the expense of civilian needs... behind the Bush Administration is the power of the ‘big five’ defense contractors (Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Raytheon et al), increasingly in partnership with the oil-energy giants... The Big Five defense contractors have been shifting staff and resources from ‘civilian’ into ‘military’ production lines.

The new direction of the U.S. economy, Chossudovsky continues, “will generate hundreds of billions of dollars of surplus profits, which will line the pockets of a handful of large corporations.

9-11: Who Benefits?

The 11th September attacks, in other words, came at an extremely fortuitous time for the Bush administration, the Pentagon, the CIA , the FBI, the weapons industry, and the oil industry, all of which have benefited immensely from this tragedy. In this connection, it is worth noting the acute observations of Canadian social philosopher Professor John McMurtry:

“To begin with, the forensic principle of ‘who most benefits from the crime?’ clearly points in the direction of the Bush administration. One would be naive to think the Bush Jr. faction and its oil, military-industrial and Wall Street backers who had stolen an election with its man rated in office by the majority of Americans as poor on the economy (a Netscape Poll taken off the screen when the planes hit the towers), and more deplored by the rest of the world as a deep danger to the global environment and the international rule of law, do not benefit astronomically from this mass-kill explosion.

The military, the CIA and every satellite armed security apparatus have more money and power than ever, and become as dominant as they can over civilians in ‘the whole new era’ already being declared by the White House.

….and Israel’s apartheid civil war is vindicated at the same time. Even the surgingly popular ‘anti world-trade’ movement is now associated with foreign terrorists blowing up the World Trade Centre. The more you review the connections and the sweeping lapse of security across so many co-ordinates, the more the lines point backwards.”
589

...Throughout the West and beyond, civil liberties, basic freedoms and human rights are being curtailed in the name of fighting terrorism….


Conclusions

“In examining any crime, a central question must be ‘who benefits?’

The principal beneficiaries of the destruction of the World Trade Center are in the United States: the Bush administration, the Pentagon, the CIA and FBI, the weapons industry, the oil industry. It is reasonable to ask whether those who have profited to such an extent from this tragedy contributed to bringing it about.” Investigative journalist Patrick Martin

As far as the facts on record are concerned, the best explanation of them, in the opinion of this author (Ahmed), is one that points directly to U.S. state responsibility for the events of 11th September 2001.


https://wikispooks.com/w/images/5/56/Th ... reedom.pdf

The book can be purchasee from $0:01 at the link below. I haven't read it in its entirety because in the words of one reviewer:

Information overload is what the reader will experience very quickly which cites well over 500 footnotes including articles, interviews, Senate committee hearing transcripts, FBI interviews, and other news sources.

Because of the gravity of the subject matter I believe the author has done this on purpose, realizing that any intelligent reader, will most likely discriminate between what they perceive to be a truly valid and vital source, and what could possibly be dismissed as speculation, or simply independent observation.


http://www.amazon.com/War-Freedom-Ameri ... 0930852400

*Although the subject matter of the book may well be under copyright restrictions I have posted a few snippets under the protection of the fair use doctrine, (e.g. educational purpose).
kickstones
Member
 
Posts: 136
Joined: January 16th, 2013, 2:15 pm

Re: Brussels Airport and Metro attack March 22 2016

Postby Apache on May 18th, 2016, 4:09 pm

kickstones wrote:I am of the opinion that 'whether or not Raytheon had an office or multiple rooms in the South Tower' is in the main insignificant, it is suffice that they were part of the script.


Oh yes, there's no doubt about that :D
Apache
Member
 
Posts: 168
Joined: October 22nd, 2015, 12:02 pm

Re: Brussels Airport and Metro attack March 22 2016

Postby UNreal on May 20th, 2016, 4:12 pm

Brother of the Brussels bomber kamikaze Najim Laachraoui just became Taekwondo champion of Europe.
Sports seem to be center stage in european terror events scripting.
Regarding Bruxelles, one of the first victims portrayed was basketball player Sebastien Bellin.

Kamikaze Najim Laachraoui :
Image
European Champion Mourad Laachraoui :
Image

Article :
Le Monde - le Belge Laachraoui, frère du kamikaze, sacré champion d’Europe
UNreal
Member
 
Posts: 34
Joined: June 17th, 2014, 7:50 pm

Re: Brussels Airport and Metro attack March 22 2016

Postby brianv on May 20th, 2016, 5:14 pm

The "BROTHER" of a "SUICIDE BOMBER" was ALLOWED into "ISRAEL" to compete in a "European" Taekwondo Competition. :lol: :lol:

Did you know "Israel" was part of "Europe"? It very soon will be!
brianv
Member
 
Posts: 3861
Joined: October 18th, 2009, 11:19 pm

Re: Brussels Airport and Metro attack March 22 2016

Postby kickstones on May 23rd, 2016, 2:03 pm

UNreal wrote:Sports seem to be center stage in european terror events scripting.


Indeed UNreal, football in particular. However, it goes beyond Europe:

A group of Islamic State terrorists armed with AK-47s attacked the headquarters of a Real Madrid supporters club - because 'they don't like football'.

Three gunmen opened fire around midnight at the Al Furat cafe in Balad, 50 miles north of the Iraqi capital Baghdad



Image


UNreal wrote:
Regarding Bruxelles, one of the first victims portrayed was basketball player Sebastien Bellin.


Here's a video clip from We See which helps demonstrate the absurdity of this (Brussels) script.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CKejlkOJqig


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CKejlkOJqig


And another showing the participating actors getting the script wrong.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zsvMNT-mjR8


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zsvMNT-mjR8


On a different note, there seems to be a few attacks of shill nature on We See's Youtube work from others, in particular somene called Paulstall Service.

Maybe We See is a shill or maybe isn't, however, that Paulstall Service criticised this site, stating Hoi and host SIMon, as he called him, were of the same person, leads me to beleive We See is irritating a few folk with his work.
kickstones
Member
 
Posts: 136
Joined: January 16th, 2013, 2:15 pm

Re: Brussels Airport and Metro attack March 22 2016

Postby brianv on May 23rd, 2016, 2:30 pm

^ Yes PS is a well known shill account Kickstones. A scumbag of the highest order.

And doesn't the guy in the bloody cafe look extremely like Taekwondo guy in the previous image?

edit:

I just listened to that Liar journalist/eyewitness in the the above crap from CNN, at first she sounds Irish, then swaps to a sort of North West English accent, my best guess Tinker/Gypsy clan. But she is Swedish??
brianv
Member
 
Posts: 3861
Joined: October 18th, 2009, 11:19 pm

Re: Brussels Airport and Metro attack March 22 2016

Postby kickstones on May 24th, 2016, 12:43 pm

Brian, the below video by Kearnsy74 just about sums it up.

Stick Ya Phoney Terror Up Ya Arse (Fake Terrorism Parody)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lKWfRi3qF2I


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lKWfRi3qF2I
kickstones
Member
 
Posts: 136
Joined: January 16th, 2013, 2:15 pm

Re: Brussels Airport and Metro attack March 22 2016

Postby Seneca on March 22nd, 2017, 4:40 pm

So today is the first anniversary of this hoax. In my daughters school the students had to observe a minute of silence. On the radio I heard some politician saying we have to remember this date just like 9/11,1914-1918, 1940-1945.

Keep this in mind when investigating what is happening in London.
Seneca
Member
 
Posts: 422
Joined: October 21st, 2009, 3:36 pm

Previous

Return to London, Madrid, Oslo and other faked terror events: the psyops are everywhere

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests