LONDON 7/7 FAKE TERROR

Discussing the most relevant "sequels" or "reminders" of 9/11. The so-called "War On Terror" is a global scam finalized to manipulate this world's population with crass fear-mongering tactics designed to scare you shitless.

Re: LONDON 7/7 FAKE TERROR

Postby reichstag fireman on May 22nd, 2012, 1:38 pm

Equinox wrote:Watch @ 9.59 onwards… in the above video there is a dude in Montreal who really serves it up.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IgfoM2ZnJ8s#t=9m55s

Image


But is this besuited '911 Troofer' really there at that public meeting? Or is this just another video fake?

It is rare to be allowed to speak for so long and on such a controversial topic at a public meeting.

To my untrained eye, it looks like a spliced fake video.

Issues with this video:

Why is the footage recorded from a screen, a la NASA and its fake lunar images?

The zoom-in on the TV screen raises further suspicions.

It is all too convenient that the filmer was ready with his camera. Ready but not quite ready with his focus.

Hmm...

Image

The zoom-in on the TV screen is used to stress that the video is a 'CAMRip'
The CAMRip sets the stage that this is footage being broadcast on live TV. A Big Lie. It was not broadcast live.
The CAMRip also provides an excuse for the poor video quality.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IgfoM2ZnJ8s#t=9m58s (9m58s)

As is often the case, there is a terrible wobble to the camerawork. Wobbles and jitters disguise a 'multitude of sins'.

The engineered wobble is a useful technique for deterring video analysis. Camera wobbles make temporal domain comparisons more difficult. Video fraud detection software that uses object segmentation through frame differencing is also foiled by 'optic flow'.

Also, why does the cameraman zoom in on 'the dude's head at 11m13s? We could already see 'the dude' quite clearly enough. Is there something in the wider picture that we were not meant to see, hence the crop?

Image

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IgfoM2ZnJ8s#t=11m13s (11m13s)

The chair of the meeting - (what meeting was this?) - seems strangely unperturbed by the red-hot topic raised by 'the dude' - his insistence that 9/11 and 7/7 were staged terror events. The chairman didn't even bat an eyelid.

As such, it looks very much like a splice. In reality, "the dude" was never at the public meeting.

Issues with the audio:

A superfluous soundtrack of human noise is evident throughout the video. That soundtrack contains a heavy echo effect to suit a large hall venue. The soundtrack has been superimposed across the spliced video work.

The soundtrack creates a false audial continuity. It is used to artificially link the genuine recording of some meeting, and the fake footage of the "911 truther" supposedly addressing that meeting.

The superimposed sound track is also far too loud. Since 'the dude' supposedly speaks directly into a professional microphone, the background noise should not be there.

Another video fake, imvho, Equinox. This time, a fake purportedly from the 'good side', but serving to poison the well.
reichstag fireman
Member
 
Posts: 466
Joined: May 16th, 2012, 2:09 am

Re: LONDON 7/7 FAKE TERROR

Postby Equinox on May 23rd, 2012, 3:45 pm

Make what you want of it.

And with all due respect.. your preaching to the choir...

Of course I know that the bombers could be fake I realised this years ago... But if they were real... there is a very good possibility that they could have been duped patsies.
Why was the Luton station bombers photo-- shopped?
Is it because it was overlooked the actual train they were supposed to catch was actually cancelled??
And they couldn't be seen in motion on the Luton Station CCTV??
Image

Is the train cancellation fake?
Is the timetable fake?
Are the bombers fake?
Is the dude in the speech fake?

Possibly! I never said they were not
:lol:

Possibly yes. I don't spend to much time on this 7/7 stuff and usually takes a week or so to get a response.
As far as Im concerned it takes me from 9/11....and the photo shopped Luton station photo... and also Simon shacks John Howard 52 victim announcement... is the icing on the cake for the 7/7 proof.
I suggest have a look at ALL of the videos on the bombers from the so called confess videos... to anything you can find...( its not a really hard task when you know what to look for ) Typically though from what I see Vicsims never have ANY moving videos of them..

Do some work on it fireman... Prove it's fake! B)

Throw any videos you find of them on this thread for reference/source... and I will see if I can lend a hand if I get a chance. Good luck :)

Talk soon
EQ
Equinox
Member
 
Posts: 549
Joined: October 14th, 2010, 9:45 am

Re: LONDON 7/7 FAKE TERROR

Postby reichstag fireman on May 23rd, 2012, 11:03 pm

Below is a resized, resynced and montaged GIF video conversion.

The frames were excerpted from two different copies of the "Farewell Video" of "Mohammad Siddique Khan", the alleged mastermind of the July 7 2005 attacks.

Linked below are three online copies of the Khan Farewell Video, from The Sun newspaper, the Guardian and the BBC. None of the three Farewell Videos is the same.

Analysis of the Khan Farewell footage:
  • Different techniques for facial obscuration are used in the online copies of the video.
  • In the Sun and the Guardian footage, polygonal pixellation is used to hide the face of "the child".
  • In the BBC footage, a floating grey ellipse is used instead.
  • The grey ellipse in the BBC footage may actually be over the top of earlier pixellation - to hide a flaw in it.
  • The pixellation is expertly applied. Extraordinary care has been taken not to pixellate Khan's face.
  • The pixellation is done so neatly, it is possible that 'Khan' was actually added afterwards
  • The BBC video has a rolling digital timestamp in the lower left corner.
  • The timestamp bears a date of 25/4/2004.
  • Yet there is no timestamp in the Farewell videos from either the Sun or the Guardian.
  • The timestamp in the BBC footage must have been added later. Strange to say the least.
Image

The footage was sold through the state and corporate medias back in April 2008.
It was cited as proof of the "suicide bombers" and of their evil intent.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/video/2008 ... ddiquekhan
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/vi ... Video.html
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-12619025
Last edited by reichstag fireman on July 2nd, 2012, 9:16 pm, edited 2 times in total.
reichstag fireman
Member
 
Posts: 466
Joined: May 16th, 2012, 2:09 am

Re: Miami Zombie

Postby reichstag fireman on June 7th, 2012, 10:53 pm

simonshack wrote:
upstream wrote:Now, may I ask what our take is on this image from London 7/7 (ostensibly featuring a "TAVISTOCK" sign) ?

Image


Hehe!

A hitherto undiscovered Tradesman's Entrance to BMA House?!

Or else yet another image composition fake!
reichstag fireman
Member
 
Posts: 466
Joined: May 16th, 2012, 2:09 am

Re: Miami Zombie

Postby whatsgoingon on June 7th, 2012, 11:35 pm

a
Last edited by whatsgoingon on May 24th, 2013, 10:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
whatsgoingon
DELETED THEIR OWN POSTS :(
 
Posts: 577
Joined: October 13th, 2011, 8:56 pm

Postby reichstag fireman on June 8th, 2012, 6:09 am

Image

EDIT:

It did seem all a bit too easy :wacko: It looks like the signage on Entrance 'C' to BMA (Tavistock) House has been swapped at some point in time. (see posts below). So what looks like a composite image (and probably still is) cannot be proved so easily through the inconsistent door signs..
Last edited by reichstag fireman on June 8th, 2012, 8:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
reichstag fireman
Member
 
Posts: 466
Joined: May 16th, 2012, 2:09 am

Re: LONDON 7/7 FAKE TERROR

Postby pov603 on June 8th, 2012, 11:15 am

And also, a doorway opposite an oncoming street if the two cars to the right are indicative of being parked on the side of the road.
pov603
Member
 
Posts: 767
Joined: June 30th, 2011, 9:02 pm

Re: LONDON 7/7 FAKE TERROR

Postby brianv on June 8th, 2012, 1:38 pm

pov603 wrote:And also, a doorway opposite an oncoming street if the two cars to the right are indicative of being parked on the side of the road.


Image

Like this?
brianv
Member
 
Posts: 3959
Joined: October 18th, 2009, 11:19 pm

Re: LONDON 7/7 FAKE TERROR

Postby Maat on June 8th, 2012, 2:48 pm

brianv wrote:Like this?

And...

BMA Building, Tavistock Square
Image
@ http://www.flickr.com/photos/tims/186541190/
Large: http://farm1.staticflickr.com/53/186541 ... e6cc_b.jpg

BMA Building from Tavistock Square
Image
@ http://www.flickr.com/photos/stevecadman/419771706/
Full size original (3264 x 2448): http://farm1.staticflickr.com/166/41977 ... 843f_o.jpg
Maat
Moderator
 
Posts: 1422
Joined: September 9th, 2010, 2:14 am

Re: LONDON 7/7 FAKE TERROR

Postby simonshack on June 8th, 2012, 4:08 pm

Maat, just to point out:

The first flickr pic you posted above is dated "7 July 2006"

The second flickr pic you posted is dated "7 March 2007"

in any case, that's what the flickr photo descriptions say.



****************************************************
The funny thing is that in your second picture, the Tavistock sign says : "TAVISTOCK SOUTH ENTRANCE C"

Whereas in Reichstag's picture in his above post (5th from top) shows his "A" entrance with a sign that says: "TAVISTOCK NORTH ENTRANCE A"

I'm a bit confused - since both should depict the same entrance (the one which got blood-splattered). Am I missin' something? :huh:
simonshack
Administrator
 
Posts: 6519
Joined: October 18th, 2009, 9:09 pm
Location: italy

Re: LONDON 7/7 FAKE TERROR

Postby Maat on June 8th, 2012, 5:01 pm

Well, I only posted those as clearer views of the façade facing Tavistock Square and the apparent street depicted in the "7/7" image. Even though they are post-2005 pics, I didn't think the building architecture re actual positions of doors & windows could have been changed :huh: (Wouldn't Londoners notice? :unsure:)
Maat
Moderator
 
Posts: 1422
Joined: September 9th, 2010, 2:14 am

Re: LONDON 7/7 FAKE TERROR

Postby reichstag fireman on June 8th, 2012, 5:36 pm

simonshack wrote:Maat, just to point out:

The first flickr pic you posted above is dated "7 July 2006"

The second flickr pic you posted is dated "7 March 2007"

in any case, that's what the flickr photo descriptions say.

****************************************************
The funny thing is that in your second picture, the Tavistock sign says : "TAVISTOCK SOUTH ENTRANCE C"

Whereas in Reichstag's picture in his above post (5th from top) shows his "A" entrance with a sign that says: "TAVISTOCK NORTH ENTRANCE A"

I'm a bit confused - since both should depict the same entrance (the one which got blood-splattered). Am I missin' something? :huh:


Maat has unearthed a problem in what was posted above..

The sign on the left of entrance 'C' of BMA (Tavistock) House - that's the first door to the south of the vehicular gateway to the courtyard - has been swapped at some point.

In image http://www.flickr.com/photos/camdencoun ... 824317455/ the sign on entrance "C" reads "BRITISH MEDICAL ASSOCIATION MAIN ENTRANCE" (exif timestamp 2008:06:18 11:39:15)

In image http://www.flickr.com/photos/stevecadman/419771706/ (exif timestamp 2007:03:07 12:16:39), the sign on entrance "C" reads "TAVISTOCK HOUSE SOUTH ENTRANCE C"

In image http://www.flickr.com/photos/redvers/51 ... otostream/ the sign on entrance "C" reads "TAVISTOCK HOUSE..[illegible]" (no exif timestamp but the owner, whose real passion is photographing war graves...annotates his image with the words "Photographed in early 2005.")

In image http://www.flickr.com/photos/tims/18654 ... 194233477/ the sign on entrance "C" reads "TAVISTOCK HOUSE SOUTH ENTRANCE C" (all exif data has been stripped from the 1024x768 image, and easy downloading has been disabled, but the Flickr annotation for the image reads "Taken on July 7, 2006 using a Sony DSC-P200" - a 7.2megapixel camera.)

July 7, 2006 would appear to be the date of a ceremony where a plaque to the 7/7 Tavistock Square vicsims was unveiled.

From http://planningonline.camden.gov.uk/MUL ... 006/2469/P

Image

As for swapping the sign to Entrance 'C' - the immediate explanation would probably be on the grounds of public decency - it was so spattered in (fake) blood it had to be replaced.. :puke:

Interesting that the Applicant requesting Planning Permission to erect the 7/7 memorial plaque was the BMA itself.
reichstag fireman
Member
 
Posts: 466
Joined: May 16th, 2012, 2:09 am

Re: LONDON 7/7 FAKE TERROR

Postby reichstag fireman on July 2nd, 2012, 9:31 pm

There is an hour-long dose of 7/7 propaganda screening right now on BBC2, a TV channel of the British state broadcaster. Even by the BBC's standards it is a very poor show.

Since the revival of the 7/7 Myth is the theme of today, a set of photographs from 7/7/2006 discovered by Maat should be re-examined:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/tims/sets/ ... 77/detail/

7/7/2006 was the first anniversary of the fake terror non-event in London that claimed the lives of 52 non-existent vicsims.

The Apparatus behind the media hoax held the anniversary Memorial Service in Tavistock Square, to keep the 7/7 Myth alive.

One of the photographs purportedly of that Memorial Service has got me curious:

Image

What was the screening used for?

To shield from prying eyes, maybe? While re-enacting scenes from the original Hoax?
Fake footage for later documentaries on the Hoax, perhaps? :rolleyes:

P.S. Spot the cameraman on the balcony of BMA House. Lot of trouble for a few shots of a Memorial Service, no?
reichstag fireman
Member
 
Posts: 466
Joined: May 16th, 2012, 2:09 am

Re: LONDON 7/7 FAKE TERROR

Postby simonshack on July 2nd, 2012, 10:36 pm

reichstag fireman wrote:What was the screening used for?

To shield from prying eyes, maybe? While re-enacting scenes from the original Hoax?
Fake footage for later documentaries on the Hoax, perhaps? :rolleyes:


To be sure, (and for our forum's newbies) those 2006 black screens are placed precisely at/around the very spot where the bombed bus was pictured on 7/7, 2005. What could possibly be the purpose of THAT? Any suggestions, folks? Oh well, it must have been someone's idea to commemorate the alleged 13 victims of the bus - right?

Image
Image
simonshack
Administrator
 
Posts: 6519
Joined: October 18th, 2009, 9:09 pm
Location: italy

Re: LONDON 7/7 FAKE TERROR

Postby antipodean on July 2nd, 2012, 11:20 pm

To be sure, (and for our forum's newbies) those 2006 black screens are placed precisely at/around the very spot where the bombed bus was pictured on 7/7, 2005. What could possibly be the purpose of THAT? Any suggestions, folks? Oh well, it must have been someone's idea to commemorate the alleged 13 victims of the bus - right?

Obviously trying to hide something, below is a video taken from inside the BMA building when the no. 30 bus passed by.



About a year ago I thought maybe Peter Power's Visor exercise was the bus bombing itself, & he may have tried to hide this with his comments about his exercises being carried out at the same Railway Stations as the bombings.
viewtopic.php?p=2350092#p2350092

Reed Elsevier the company who Power was carrying out the exercises for, do have a cosy relationship with the BMA.

http://www.reedelsevier.com/mediacentre ... nners.aspx

http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases ... 07989.html
antipodean
Member
 
Posts: 595
Joined: October 20th, 2009, 2:53 am

PreviousNext

Return to London, Madrid, Oslo and other faked terror events: the psyops are everywhere

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests