LONDON 7/7 FAKE TERROR

Discussing the most relevant "sequels" or "reminders" of 9/11. The so-called "War On Terror" is a global scam finalized to manipulate this world's population with crass fear-mongering tactics designed to scare you shitless.
reichstag fireman
Member
Posts: 466
Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 1:09 am

Re: LONDON 7/7 FAKE TERROR

Unread post by reichstag fireman » Tue Jul 03, 2012 12:00 am

Image

resolution
Member
Posts: 162
Joined: Sat May 12, 2012 5:15 am

Re: LONDON 7/7 FAKE TERROR

Unread post by resolution » Thu Aug 02, 2012 12:49 am


hoi.polloi
Member
Posts: 5061
Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2010 7:24 pm

Re: LONDON 7/7 FAKE TERROR

Unread post by hoi.polloi » Fri Aug 03, 2012 3:29 am

Please no ads for your personal site. Post here your discussion of matters if you actually have anything to add besides your personal blog theory. Further unrelated links may be removed from your posts.

fbenario
Member
Posts: 2240
Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 1:49 am
Location: Atlanta, GA
Contact:

Re: LONDON 7/7 FAKE TERROR

Unread post by fbenario » Sat Aug 04, 2012 12:38 am

You foolish woman. That link leads off with the line:
Since the tragic event at Cinema 16 in Aurora, Colorado, I have been working like a woman possessed to document the evidence which connects this tragedy to the London Olympics.
What the hell's wrong with you? There was no tragic event in Aurora, just another mundane, by-the-numbers, entirely predictable psyop, that obviously fooled the stupid masses > including you. Why did you bother joining this forum if you haven't read a single word of any of it?

resolution
Member
Posts: 162
Joined: Sat May 12, 2012 5:15 am

Re: LONDON 7/7 FAKE TERROR

Unread post by resolution » Sat Aug 04, 2012 1:53 am

Hey FB. I'm not a she, and that's not my personal site. I did however find that particular image interesting as I saw it in the newspapers at the time, and just happened to stumble across it when looking for information about James Holmes. I don't know a lot about numerology, but it is evident that some of the members of this board are rather keen on it. Given that I haven't posted any information from that site in the Aurora shooting thread indicates that I don't necessarily think the site is a credible source of information. It is where I found the image though and so I did need to provide the source. Capiche?

Image
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/olympi ... n-bus.html
The image was recently republished. It's Usain Bolt (sprinter) in the photo and it was part of a photoshoot.
Image

reichstag fireman
Member
Posts: 466
Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 1:09 am

Re: LONDON 7/7 FAKE TERROR

Unread post by reichstag fireman » Sat Aug 04, 2012 10:49 pm

Image

resolution
Member
Posts: 162
Joined: Sat May 12, 2012 5:15 am

Re: LONDON 7/7 FAKE TERROR

Unread post by resolution » Sun Aug 05, 2012 12:58 am

I see your point, feel free to remove the post.

reichstag fireman
Member
Posts: 466
Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 1:09 am

Re: LONDON 7/7 FAKE TERROR

Unread post by reichstag fireman » Sun Aug 05, 2012 3:04 am

I dunno. Every post has its merits. All the rubbish I've believed over the years. Thankfully I never got sucked by the shape-shifting madness of David Icke et al. Numerology is a nasty one though, placed to trip-up the unwary. It's comfortable and lightweight. That's its danger. An easy trap to get snared on. Has anyone here studied the origins of numerology as a propaganda weapon? The black significance of numbers seems to transcend cultures. Feng Shui in the East, for example. Houses are discounted purely because of their street number. Maybe the Orient is the origin of Modern Numerology?

bostonterrierowner
Member
Posts: 853
Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 10:01 pm

Re: LONDON 7/7 FAKE TERROR

Unread post by bostonterrierowner » Sun Aug 05, 2012 8:26 am

Gematria is a part of Kabballah both originating from eastern schools of mysteries . Is numerology completely idiotic , derailing tactics ? Who knows ? Maybe the perps use these numbers to put some scale on their fake events like it is the case with earth quakes ? :)
Outright 9/11 means very high mind-fuck voltage leading to fairly immediate changes in world affairs , 7/7 is a less powerful event etc. :)

I doubt that PsyOpers of all nations are in direct contact with each other , sharing their intents and knowledge about these worldwide operations. Choosing specific dates , quantity of people "killed" , hiding numbers in car plates might be a way of communication between them .

We all know that these PsyOps are used by all governments throughout the world regardless of ideological "positions" and despite them being allegedly extremely hostile to each other, we never hear about media fakery whether one is an Iranian , US or Russian national .

Lets put it this way : When USA pulls off 9/11, folks in Russia know that some bombs will start to fall soon and it is probably the time to rearrange some positions in the stock markets of this world :)

What is sad is that they are the real bombs leading to the real misery ...

totalrecall
Member
Posts: 41
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 11:23 am

Re: LONDON 7/7 FAKE TERROR

Unread post by totalrecall » Sat Jan 12, 2013 12:17 am

I've grown more accustomed what to look for in fake photos. These people have been pasted into the bus. I mean a bomb has just blown the roof off and two schoolboys decide to have a cigarette!!! :lol: And they are unharmed and completely unfazed. Wow.

ImageImage

ImageImage

ImageImage

I've found faded edging some distance away from the pasted-in person is quite a common feature.

dollphin
Banned
Posts: 17
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2013 4:41 pm

Re: LONDON 7/7 FAKE TERROR

Unread post by dollphin » Wed Feb 06, 2013 8:44 pm

pdgalles wrote:Reply moved here from my British Pathé thread:
reichstag fireman wrote:As for 7/7, since most credible researchers agree that the 7/7 victims were created, it stands to reason that there were no 7/7 perpetrators either. The infamous "Mohammad Sidique Khan", lead 7/7 bomber, and his band of evil henchmen, just didn't exist. They were no more than perpsims.

We were subjected to that very unconvincing "suicide video" of Khan. Recall Khan's threatening gestures at the camera. Yet studied closely and Khan's hand, which waves menacingly at the viewer, doesn't seem connected to the rest of his body.

His script is frankly pathetic, too. "I.... am a warrior for Islam!", he warns his audience.

From applying the insight acquired through Simon's expertise, that 7/7 "suicide video" looks very CGI'ed as well.
Correct me if I'm wrong but I take it you are referring to this video, which is terrible quality and has led you to view Khan as a computer-generated sim:


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jHXLaio8G3I

However, view this video and you will see he is a human actor: Farewell home video by Mohammad Sidique Khan

Just because the victims are computer-generated still images, doesn't mean actors didn't play the role of the "terrorists" in the home videos.

"See, I just get blamed for everything. It's all my fault." ^_^

*

Missed this one from last year: MI5 criticised for 'dreadful' photographs of 7/7 bombers

Image
MI5 has been criticised by the coroner presiding over the 7/7 inquests for providing a potentially key supergrass with a poor quality photograph of one of the London suicide bombers when it possessed a clearer image.

[...]

The inquests heard that MI5 had two clear photographs of the men identified after the bombings as Khan and Tanweer. Yet early in 2004 it passed only a poorly cropped image of Tanweer, rendering him unrecognisable, to the US supergrass Mohammed Junaid Babar who might have been able to identify the future bomber.

Hallett described the badly cropped images of both men as "dreadful".

"I think one of my children could have done a better job of cropping out that photograph," Hugo Keith QC, the inquests' counsel, said. MI5 said better quality photographs were sent to Babar later on.
Hey, doesn't this explain the awful 9/11 vicsim photos? They were just mauled by inept intelligence operatives! :lol:

*

Watch from the 1:36:20 mark onwards; a fascinating mixture of exposé about the use of television to condition the public to fear Islamic terrorists prior to 7/7 and unquestioning acceptance of the reality of 7/7 itself, thus keeping those conspiracy waters muddied! :rolleyes:


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wFllLvhgYm8

"Top Off 3", ho, ho, ho. :rolleyes:

The TOPOFF 3 Full-Scale Exercise
The TOPOFF 3 Full Scale Exercise took place from April 4-8, 2005, and involved more than 10,000 participants representing more than 200 federal, state, local, tribal, private sector, and international agencies and organizations and volunteer groups.

[...]

Connecticut scenario: Simulated chemical attack in New London.

[...]

An internal Virtual News Network (VNN) and news website provided real-time reporting of the story like an actual TV network would. The mock media kept players up-to-date on unfolding events and enabled decision makers to face the challenge of dealing with the real world media.
A friend of mine used to live in Beeston. After the 7/7 event she told me she "knew" the Siddique Khan person and that his father owned a chip shop in Beeston.

By "knew" him she meant that she had seen him in the area because he lived there but did not know his name nor did she ever speak with him. So, it's like my neighbour who lives a few doors away, I see him about but don't know his name or anything about him. So now suppose my neighbour's photo appears on the news and a name is then allocated to him. As a sheeple, I would accept that that is his name and that the events that he is associated with are true.

Another thing, the farewell video of Siddique Khan with his baby, he says words to the effect of :
he wishes he could be part of the baby's life for the next few months but he is doing this for "OUR FUTURE and will be for the best (inshallah) in the long run"

So, it seems to me that he is basically admitting that he will not be around but only TEMPORARILY.

One last thing, you know how you have a different manner of speaking with family and friends, a different manner of speaking when taking an official phone call, a different manner of speaking when at work, etc...well imho this bloke seems to be using a combination of his telephone voice and his acting voice in the video. BTW I know the Yorkshire accent well, I have one.

brianv
Member
Posts: 3959
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 10:19 pm
Contact:

Re: LONDON 7/7 FAKE TERROR

Unread post by brianv » Wed Feb 06, 2013 10:37 pm

Why don't you pop around to Beeston for a Fish Supper and get the skinny first hand from his dad! And don't forget the gherkins.

PS Siddiqi's missus and kid should still be knocking about too, maybe you could have a chat with her!

dollphin
Banned
Posts: 17
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2013 4:41 pm

Re: LONDON 7/7 FAKE TERROR

Unread post by dollphin » Thu Feb 07, 2013 9:43 am

brianv wrote:Why don't you pop around to Beeston for a Fish Supper and get the skinny first hand from his dad! And don't forget the gherkins.

PS Siddiqi's missus and kid should still be knocking about too, maybe you could have a chat with her!


I dont really know in what vein you meant your comment. However, having lurked on this forum for a reasonable length of time (before joining) I am aware that the more established members have a tendency to get their knickers in a twist quite quickly. Is it the arrogance that comes with the delusion of being superior?

In 2007 I was still asleep so I accepted the goverment story about 7/7. I already explained that shortly after 7/7 my friend said she knew him ONLY because she had seen him around Beeston. She didn't mention that he had a wife or child. The only piece of information she was able to offer was "his dad's got a chip shop".

When i woke up in 2008, the information I accessed at the time convinced me that the 7/7 "bombers" were dupes and ended up being killed. I have not seen Khan's Farewell video before. From what Khan says in it, it makes me believe that he was a shill and was going to make some gain for the part that he played .He says he is doing it for "our future" to the baby. I also believe that the baby really is his. Why? Because he shows the baby genuine affection. He can't stop kissing the little baby. I have yet to witness a man showing another man's child any level of affection whatsoever. BTW the baby looks real TO ME, it's going through that stage in life where the brain is deciphering nerve connections. (Is the baby a boy or a girl? I have no idea.)

Brian, I have a young chiild and he is my priority and also my weakness. I certainly have no desire to go sniffing around Beeston in the quest for an opportunity to socialise with a "family" of shills who are also traitors to fellow brown skinned people and traitors to humanity as a whole. Tell you what though,, since you seem so keen on the idea, why dont you take a day trip to Beeston. It's not such a big place so there can't be many fish and chip shops in the locality. Eventually, I'm sure you'll stumble across Khan's dad. You can then get all the goosey joss yourself, straight from the horse's mouth!! What d'ya say??

PS Is your mind really so closed that you find it difficult to acccept that since Khan was purported to be from Beeston that the person who wore Khan's face had to be then seen in Beeston prior to the 7/7 event so that after the 7/7 event, people from the local area could confirm that he was a real person?

brianv
Member
Posts: 3959
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 10:19 pm
Contact:

Re: LONDON 7/7 FAKE TERROR

Unread post by brianv » Thu Feb 07, 2013 12:58 pm

I've been at this since the moment it happened I know the yarn well and I don't believe any of it!

I have seen no proof that any of these alleged people existed! Father, wife, child, chips shops.

If I had a fiver for the amount of times I have heard someone say that they knew "Khan", but didn't know him personally I'd be a rich man.

I don't live in the UK or maybe I would pay Yorkshire a visit.

I thought maybe instead of posting bullshit you could ask a few questions instead.

hoi.polloi
Member
Posts: 5061
Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2010 7:24 pm

Re: LONDON 7/7 FAKE TERROR

Unread post by hoi.polloi » Thu Feb 07, 2013 1:33 pm

dollphin wrote:Is it the arrogance that comes with the delusion of being superior?
No, it's the annoyance of dealing with shitheads, shills, trolls and people like you that get their own knickers in a twist when someone asks a pertinent question or happens to doubt something that an Internet user claims is true.

Arrogance would be embodied by your delusion that you deserve anything more than skepticism and doubt as a "long time lurker". Sorry if we don't greet everything you say with open arms and infectious laughter.

I am going to risk the idea of Simon reinstating you and just ban you for a while. Maybe if you return you can answer a question without bitching about the entire admin of the forum.

dollphin wrote:Brian, I have a young chiild and he is my priority and also my weakness.
How dare you bring the subject of your own "chiild" (whatever that is) into this forum! And as an excuse for your behavior, to boot! You should be banned for exploiting them or lying that you have a child. So it's come to this, has it? Our haters are using the excuse of children (or is it just "chiildren" so that makes it alright?) as an explanation of their behavior? How very Sandy Hook of you.

We don't need our most vehement anti-admin users constantly trying to puff up their own life story with anecdotes and snippets of a "personality" as if injecting our forum with humanity that is impossible to distinguish from backstopping. So a warning to all shills: stop it!

Post Reply