THE VACCINATION DECEIT

Anything on the news and elsewhere in the media with evidence of digital manipulation, bogus story-lines and propaganda
Post Reply
sharpstuff
Member
Posts: 210
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2015 1:31 pm

THE VACCINATION DECEIT

Unread post by sharpstuff » Sun Nov 15, 2020 6:48 am

.


THE VACCINATION DECEIT

The notion of ‘vaccination’ is anathema to our natural biological processes.
Nature does not (or cannot) destroy itself otherwise we would not be here in the first place as it would destroy itself.
Nature is not an ‘entity’, it is how we came to be whatever we might conclude, pretend or speculate otherwise.
The notion of preventing ‘dis-eases’ which are purely the displacement or disregard of natural processes and of maintaining a terrain that satisfies our longevity within Nature, is paramount to our survival within Nature.
Whatever ‘Nature’ is, we are born and aware in some way of it.
Peter K. Sharpen


However, there are some that believe that Nature somehow produces entities which are not good for us and need, in some way, to be eradicated.
Hence the nature of ‘germs’/‘viruses’ which, unaccountably small-enough (and thus not able to be observed directly or verified) are supposed to be responsible for our own irresponsibility (however determined by others than ourselves) and make us ILL!

We therefore must take the responsibility of our own health (i.e. terrain) (if we are allowed to) and safely place it upon influences outside ourselves and not rely, especially from the unidentified ‘germs’, ‘viruses’ and such-like and the perpetrators of those who claim that they exist without independent investigation by others.

Let us begin…

Definitions are a mine (as in explosive device) of discontent with only a way down to unintelligible reason. P.K. Sharpen

So we are led down the path to obtain a definition of ‘vaccination’.

According to: https://www.dictionary.com/browse/vaccine

Vaccine: any preparation used as a preventive inoculation to confer immunity against a specific disease, usually employing an innocuous form of the disease agent, as killed or weakened bacteria or viruses, to stimulate antibody production.

Wow!

We must immediately ask certain pertinent questions regarding this particular definition of the italicised words.

-preparation (used as a noun) of what, exactly?
-inoculation (a verb): the stabbing of individuals via a device to penetrate the biological body of a flora or fauna.
-immunity (noun): Question: Free from what, exactly?)
-innocuous form of the disease agent (What is 'innocuous'?)
-killed (!) how? or weakened (how?) bacteria or viruses (Do 'bacteria' or 'viruses' actually exist as entities we can cope with?)
-antibody (?) What exactly is that?

Unless these definitions, which would also require definitions can be safely held as real or actual, what exactly are we talking about?
So ‘vaccination/inoculation’ is supposed to counter the effect of ‘germs’, ‘viruses’, ‘bacteria’, none of which can be adequately observed to render them entities which can ‘harm’ a biological process either in the shape of flora or fauna, in any shape or being.
Without precise knowledge of these alleged entities, we are to assume that they can be countered by the injection (or oral supplementation) of substances which cannot be measured for their effects and their subsequent interference with life processes.
What I have been endeavouring to discover is what are the repercussions of ‘vaccination’, especially in regard to the real-life problems of those flora and fauna that have been damaged, in some way by these so-called ‘vaccinations’.
My main thrust is with the compromisation of individual humans, especially young bodies less likely to be able to cope with whatever the injected material might contain.
As a researcher and teacher of ‘students with disabilities’ as these dear souls are termed, I was looking into the proliferation of so-called ‘Special’ schools for the education of these children.
The information is dearth on the Internet upon this issue, so I beg if anyone can find any material on this matter, I would be grateful, since my ‘theory’ needs accurate substance (as they all should, of course).

To begin:

Here is an article from Guardian Newspaper (U.K.) (2018?)

Quote:

‘Special needs pupils being failed by system 'on verge of crisis'
This article is more than 2 years old.

‘Rising demand puts councils in England at risk of bankruptcy, Guardian investigation reveals.

Children with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) are being failed by a system “on the verge of crisis” as demand for specialist support soars and threatens to bankrupt local authorities, a Guardian investigation has revealed.’

Source:

https://www.theguardian.com/education/2 ... rge-crisis

*********************************************
My research, after much looking for further information, found the following .pdf below:

Warning! It is a very large book but one should read at least the first few pages which describe how it may be navigated (if interested).

http://www.chiropractic.org/wp-content/ ... 15-19.pdf
*****************************************

This is partly why I am so passionately dedicated to exposing the deceit of 'germs', 'viruses', ‘bacteria’ and especially with my 25-odd years working with students with 'disabilities'.
It is all very well poo-pooing these issues as many people do because these nonsenses are so entrenched in the 'common' (no disrespect intended but the opposite) mind. I beg a little indulgence if you will.

I will give you a little back-ground because what I am saying is 'from a horse's mouth’.

When I graduated as a mature student (at 32), I was first relegated to becoming a Supply Teacher, which means that I was not ‘permanent’ until I acquired a full-time teacher position. I was qualified as an English/Art teacher. I spent nearly two years at various schools before being sent to a ‘Special’ school at Chadwell Heath, Essex (U.K.).
I immediately took to the work and the teacher for whom I was standing in, decided to work elsewhere (another ‘Special’ school just up the road).
The headmaster at the time asked me if I would like to stay full-time and I took the opportunity and spent over six years there before I decided to go to Australia for the second time. I had also taken a two-year successful night-school qualification in Special Education in the meantime and having succeeded in a rise in rank and for two years voted a teacher-governor.
It was evident before I left that the school was expanding and as far as I can see from recent aerial photographs, expanded considerably even before I left.
When I returned to Western Australia (1989), I also managed to become involved with the local (Rockingham) Senior High-school as a substitute teacher which had a Special Education Unit, which comprised of two class-rooms located in different areas of the school. It was here that I continued my previous work in the U.K., especially with work-experience and practical subjects for over eight years before I was replaced (to great shock from all the teachers in the school) with a ‘permanent’ teacher given that the ‘system’ is different from that of the U.K.
During that time, I was also involved with a school in Malibu for severe learning difficulties which have to be seen and felt to be believed.
I was later (after two years elsewhere) re-instated at Rockingham when it became an Education Support Centre (it was much larger). I was there for many years but again supplanted by a ‘Permanent’ teacher. However, this teacher was not a ‘well’ lady and I continued for a long time there.
Since that time, I note that also, the preponderance of the building of new premises for those children afflicted by ‘learning difficulties’ has expanded enormously at Rockingham (as well as at Chadwell Heath) judging by aerial photographs of the site.
For other reasons, I returned to the U.K. but was by then near retirement and the rest is of no interest to this forum.

My thrust in this instance comprises of several interesting questions:

1. Does the rise in the proliferation of these ‘Special’ units have any relationship with the increase in ‘vaccinations’? The rate of vaccinations has increased to such an extent that here in France (at least), children are required to have 11 vaccinations (and more to come!) before they are allowed into a classroom!
2. Aside: When staff (without myself, as I have an aversion to being stabbed with anything) were invited to take the ‘flu’ jab invariably ended up with the ‘flu’ symptoms after the vaccination, why was that?
3. I ask: Does the increase in the number of vaccinations lead to an increase in the need for ‘Special Education’ to cater for those who cannot reject the material (whatever it is) and suffer damage to their natural bodily systems?
4. If so, why the proliferation of ‘Special’ Units to attempt to ‘educate’ them?
Where is there any irrefutable independent evidence that injecting un-natural fluids into a living creature is of any benefit, whatever the reason (?) to do so?

Conclusion

Please ask:

1. If indeed there are ‘germs’ or ‘viruses’, ‘bacteria’ where is the irrefutable evidence that they exist from independent studies which we can understand as mere mortals?
2. Where is the irrefutable evidence that whatever is that a ‘vaccine’ is capable of negating the effect of the alleged ‘germ or ’viruses’, bacteria’ should they exist?
3. If these fiends (‘germs’, ‘viruses’, ‘bacteria’) do not exist without this irrefutable evidence, then vaccination is of no use but absolutely dangerous to any bio-form.

Given the notion of ‘mandatory’ vaccination (if it actually feasible to enforce it on the whole planet!) is doing the rounds, it would be pertinent to consider the notion of such things as:
a. Assault with a deadly (or potentially deadly) weapon (as in stabbing).
b. Grievous bodily harm.
c. Invasion of privacy.

One is welcome to add to this list.

Anyway,
Stay well.
Sharpstuff

pov603
Member
Posts: 849
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2011 8:02 pm

Re: THE VACCINATION DECEIT

Unread post by pov603 » Mon Nov 16, 2020 4:25 am

Following on from your article sharpstuff, and wIth the impending possibility of forced/ coerced mandatory vaccination I had come across a webcast where the Doctor was explaining that because of “war crimes” in the 2nd WW, enforced medical procedures were “banned” under international law.
I will try and find link.
In the meantime:
In 1975, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in O'Connor v. Donaldson that involuntary hospitalization and/or treatment violates an individual's civil rights. The individual must be exhibiting behavior that is a danger to themselves or others and a court order must be received for more than a short (e.g. 72-hour) detention. The treatment must take place in the least restrictive setting possible. This ruling has since been watered down through jurisprudence in some respects and strengthened in other respects. Long term "warehousing", through de-institutionalization, declined in the following years, though the number of people receiving involuntary treatment has increased more recently.[when?] The statutes vary somewhat from state to state.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Involuntary_treatment

nokidding
Member
Posts: 26
Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2019 11:30 am

Re: THE VACCINATION DECEIT

Unread post by nokidding » Mon Nov 16, 2020 5:41 am

Thank you for the interesting post. I have seen that low paid casual work looking after young adult severely autistic people has become common now (in WA). In 1992 when I did post graduate teacher training (junior school, UK) autism was not even mentioned once. I had problems in teaching practice with a boy who could not remain in his seat and I got into trouble for it. In fact I walked out in disgust after they surprised me with a kangaroo court (and never went back). Children had Special Needs, but there was no concept of autism and I was not aware of special schools, there were special needs teachers who came in and taught them one to one. One of the obvious questions often asked is if Autism is genetic, where are all the old people with it?

The question that interests me is the low end of the spectrum. We are now familiar with mid range Autism. Severe Autism is mostly out of sight in institutions and unfortunate family homes.

However I suspect that there are many many more who have been 'mildly' damaged such that their relationships are difficult or non-existent. This effects their school life, work life and love life. It is never identified as such. No one wants to say their children are mildly damaged people, not least to their own children.

The idea is now that we are all on the autism spectrum. Autism is normal. Or it is upbringing of course. Kids and society like to blame the parents. But we know that you can have an atrocious upbringing and be a normal person. Maybe with problems, we all have them, but not autism which is specifically an inability to relate.

The lockdown regime seems almost to create an autistic environment, one where relationship is minimised.

Not much help I know but I share your concern. I expect you have read all the books I have on virology and vaccines. The impression you get is you can mess about with cellular generation, but they do not know what they are doing, and as usual the science has been hijacked.

What we do to animals in all of this needs to be at the forefront, I am not an activist or even a strict vegetarian but I am appalled and sickened by the medical research industry. This links directly to being unable to see what is being done to children and the adults they become.

I had TB at age 15 / 16 and was cured so I cannot completely take up the position on germs. Nor even on social distancing, I got it next door, perhaps the English doorstep was always a way of avoiding too intimate contact. Nobody who had an STD would question germ transition. Not all disease is the same...my sister had polio in the 1950s, she had her tonsils out and the vaccination which maybe caused it...

I also got badly sick after a flu injection and never had another. I have never been ill since. It was about 5 years ago, before that I was down with flu several times a year. Maybe it was airplanes etc and school aged kids at home but what then is the flu jab for if not to protect you from that?

nokidding

sharpstuff
Member
Posts: 210
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2015 1:31 pm

Re: THE VACCINATION DECEIT

Unread post by sharpstuff » Tue Nov 17, 2020 4:47 pm

I am citing Polio here as representative of virtually all (if not all) so-called 'diseases', as they come under the same banner.

Here is one take on polio:

https://holisticlifemama.com/2016/01/31 ... out-polio/

Video

https://holisticlifemama.com/2016/01/31 ... out-polio/

(<8 mins.)

I know this lady mentions viruses and I am not au fait with that and if you listen, it is pretty obvious that they are not required to explain everything given whatever was in the injection.

She does say that monkey cells are used in the mix. Now come on! Monkey cells are not human cells. On their own, they would not be injected into people because they are not conducive to human cells. The very notion is, in my view at least, appalling.

Watching the video seems to me to represent a similar procedure to what is presently happening. What do they say: There is nothing new in the Universe...

As far as 'diseases' are concerned, I append a short video I made about 6 years ago.


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3qZgQkppoz8

Be safe and well.
Sharpstuff

simonshack
Administrator
Posts: 6983
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: italy
Contact:

Re: THE VACCINATION DECEIT

Unread post by simonshack » Wed Nov 18, 2020 1:41 am

*

My goodness, dear Sharpstuff!

I vaguely remember wiewing that text-video of yours some years ago and, in all honesty, didn't make much / or grasp much of it at the time...

Today though, I can fully appreciate the profound wisdom - and almost "prophetic" nature of its contents. The terrain, the terrain!

patrix
Member
Posts: 616
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2016 10:24 am

Re: THE VACCINATION DECEIT

Unread post by patrix » Wed Nov 18, 2020 8:26 am

Indeed. I have now realized that todays medicine is stuck in a completely false paradigm and that the correct one is the one you describe Sharpstuff. Disease is the manifestation of our bodies attempts to heal itself.

sharpstuff
Member
Posts: 210
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2015 1:31 pm

Re: THE VACCINATION DECEIT

Unread post by sharpstuff » Fri Nov 20, 2020 10:24 am

Why vaccines 'work'

Firstly, invent a 'virus' or 'germ' or 'bacteria'.

Secondly, invent a 'test' for the invented 'virus or 'germ' or 'bacteria'.

Thirdly, apply as many tests as possible, (having convinced the 'masses', in their ignorance of their efficacy) who will, under a fake threat of these invisible enemies, willingly, or unwillingly, take them.

Since the so-called 'tests' do not work (i.e. cannot 'work') because there is no 'virus or 'germ' or 'bacteria' they can give only false positives.

(The notion of a 'negative' response is written into the narrative for the sake of a possible response to add flavour to the notion that the 'tests' work in detecting a possible 'virus or 'germ' or 'bacteria' in the first place in the main).

Therefore, the more tests, the more positives.

The 'negatives' go home 'knowing' they do (might) not have the 'virus or 'germ' or 'bacteria' (yet) and are therefore safe and sound so long as they 'stick by the rules' (whatever they are).

The 'positives' go home (lock-down, incarceration, denounced as 'unclean' etc.) but still unsure, perhaps, of awaiting impending death or destruction from the fake 'virus or 'germ' or 'bacteria'.

If they then give enough 'vaccines' they can stop testing. Thus by stopping the tests, there must be far less false positives.

Therefore, less people get the alleged 'disease' because they were 'vaccinated'.

Ergo, they can say that vaccines work!

Be well.
Sharpstuff

SacredCowSlayer
Administrator
Posts: 775
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2015 9:44 pm

Re: THE VACCINATION DECEIT

Unread post by SacredCowSlayer » Fri Nov 20, 2020 10:06 pm

sharpstuff wrote:
Fri Nov 20, 2020 10:24 am
Why vaccines 'work'

Firstly, invent a 'virus' or 'germ' or 'bacteria'.

Secondly, invent a 'test' for the invented 'virus or 'germ' or 'bacteria'.

Thirdly, apply as many tests as possible, (having convinced the 'masses', in their ignorance of their efficacy) who will, under a fake threat of these invisible enemies, willingly, or unwillingly, take them.

Since the so-called 'tests' do not work (i.e. cannot 'work') because there is no 'virus or 'germ' or 'bacteria' they can give only false positives.

(The notion of a 'negative' response is written into the narrative for the sake of a possible response to add flavour to the notion that the 'tests' work in detecting a possible 'virus or 'germ' or 'bacteria' in the first place in the main).

Therefore, the more tests, the more positives.

The 'negatives' go home 'knowing' they do (might) not have the 'virus or 'germ' or 'bacteria' (yet) and are therefore safe and sound so long as they 'stick by the rules' (whatever they are).

The 'positives' go home (lock-down, incarceration, denounced as 'unclean' etc.) but still unsure, perhaps, of awaiting impending death or destruction from the fake 'virus or 'germ' or 'bacteria'.

If they then give enough 'vaccines' they can stop testing. Thus by stopping the tests, there must be far less false positives.

Therefore, less people get the alleged 'disease' because they were 'vaccinated'.

Ergo, they can say that vaccines work!

Be well.
Sharpstuff
Dear Sharpstuff,

You’ve nailed it once again my friend. That does appear to be the precise formula for the beginning of a declared “pandemic”—all the way through to the eventual “eradication” of it. And of course, the cycle self-affirms for the next go-around, whenever that may be.

As our member ICfreely has written on this forum, the “higher-ups” in the medical institutions have been known to simply change the diagnostic criteria (of the targeted “virus” or disease) soon after the release of a “vaccination”—such that nobody would “test positive” for it again. It’s merely a sick and twisted magic trick, and people will (sadly) continue to fall for it as these institutions continue to gain in strength.

sharpstuff
Member
Posts: 210
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2015 1:31 pm

Re: THE VACCINATION DECEIT

Unread post by sharpstuff » Sun Nov 22, 2020 11:31 am

The Mandatory Vaccination Trick

I was already working on a refusal to vaccinate form (and researching, as usual) and came upon this article, well worth a read.

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2020/04/no_ ... mandatory/

However, I persisted with my own refusal form, which I append below. Whether it would have any effect is unknown.

1. Understand it
2. It would have any effect
3. However, it might give pause for thought.

This is a genuine concern, of course.

As usual, comments welcome.

******************************************************************

This is not paginated as I would like but I hope suffices.



REFUSAL FOR MANDATORY VACCINATION CERTIFICATE

Plea of refusal by the recipient:

I do not agree to be vaccinated according to my Right (given or otherwise) as a free person of Nature to have any substance injected or orally applied to my person by any means possible by an outside agency without my express and reasoned consent. My wishes are to be followed for all my family, especially children, pets or other living organisms.

Signed________________________Dated_________________

The following statement must be filled-in all sections
and must be signed and dated by the person/persons administering the vaccination and those responsible for that administration.


************************************************************

ATTESTATION BY VACCINATOR

According to the mandates of the Establishment for the implementation of this mandatory vaccine I affirm that I will be personally responsible for any adverse effects for which the subject and any others to whom he or she is responsible including family, livestock and flora of any kind.
Failure to conform to the wishes of the Plea by the respondent to the vaccine (mandatory of otherwise) will be entitled to punishment through Common Law for Common Assault, Assault and Battery, brandishing a weapon, Assault with a deadly or potentially deadly weapon or any other form of coercion.

Please fill in the following form (handwriting mandatory):

Date of writing:_______________________________

Reference: Mandatory Article No.:__________________________

Full name_______________________________
Qualifications (if any) ____________________________
Home Address____________________________
_______________________________
_______________________________

Full names of those responsible for applying mandatory measures such as vaccination.

Name_________________________________
Organisation____________________________
Qualifications (if any) and certified by independent professionals:
_____________________________________________________

Dated__________________________________

All or any others to be appended upon a separate sheet, Signed and dated to be attached.

Vaccinator:

I understand that I have read the initial Plea by the potential recipient of this vaccine and fully understand the implications.

Signature____________________________Date__________________

FURTHER

Statement/s from the person responsible for the injection/oral application.

I, the undersigned, in administrating the following vaccination and possible or probable coercion of the following individual/s agree to the injection of the required compound into the sovereign person named below.

I have understood the nature of the Plea and am willing to oppose it.

Name________________________________
Age_____________

Dated for the record, _____________________
During my training, I have been made aware that the vaccine is comprised of the following ingredients* and their evidential efficacy from independent laboratories or otherwise and that I, the undersigned, take full personal responsibility for any adverse effects upon the individual or individuals to which it is administered.
* (Please list all ingredients and all the laboratories (including independent laboratories) verifying the ingredients in the space below. If insufficient space, please attach a separate sheet signed, notarised and dated.)

All fields must be entered.

*1. List actual laboratories sanctioned by the 'authorities' regarding the ‘vaccine’, please append on a separate sheet signed and dated by the laboratories concerned.

Results from ingredients:

*2. List Independent laboratories:
Results and efficacy from ingredients:

Findings from *1 (Please list):

Findings from *2 (Please list):

Conclusions:

1. I affirm the findings for the vaccination on pain of death or destruction of my individual self that I vaccinate this/these individual/s despite contrary findings of vaccination efficacy to be my sole responsibility.

Signed_________________________Dated_____________________

2. I do not affirm the findings that vaccination is possible and have no wish to degrade my sense of humanity to spurious ends. I therefore decline to administer the vaccination.

Signed_________________________Dated_____________________

Signed and deputised by:

Administrator of the vaccine__________________Date__________

Deputy to Signed_________Date_________


***************************************************
Be well and safe,
Sharpstuff

sharpstuff
Member
Posts: 210
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2015 1:31 pm

Re: THE VACCINATION DECEIT

Unread post by sharpstuff » Wed Nov 25, 2020 8:39 am

THE 'IMMUNE' SYSTEM

I insist that I am never trying to be 'clever' here, or that I 'know' more than any-one else, merely trying to be logical.

I just wanted to have a word about the so-called 'immune' system since it seems to be a cornerstone of the 'germ', 'virus', 'bacteria', 'D.N.A./R.N.A.' theories about which I and others, have written many thousands of words.

The notion of the 'immune' system relies upon the belief in the first place of so-called pathogenic 'somethings' which 'attack' the body to make it ill.

If indeed no pathogens are part of Nature's 'arsenal' against all flora, fauna, soil and water, then why would we need an 'immune' system from them? It beggars belief.

The 'immune' system is only possible if one believes in pathogenic processes.

It seems that many dissenters of the (to be brief) 'germ' theory itself, are still convinced in some way, of this fabulous (as in 'fable') 'immune' system. They may believe there are no 'germs' etc. but seem to insist it is because of the 'immune' system. It does not compute!

There is hardly a point in believing half a lie, you are still only half there...

I will say this again: It is how you treat the terrain that produces an efficient crop for survival. It is our responsibility and that of caring for others who have difficulties.

There is a war against humanity that is unfolding. War is the back-bone of control one way or the other, whatever the reason. All wars are contrived, bar none.

As for 'medical' wars, I would refer you to this page (still extant) but no longer maintained. I believe I posted this before but I will repeat the message here.

https://sharpspeake.wordpress.com/2014 ... -medicine/

My apologies for repeating myself.

Be well,

Sharpstuff

Post Reply