I'm finding this "plane crash" very, very interesting.
My first exposure to this event was not long after it happened via a screenshot of the "moment of impact" on the top of The Daily Mail. I laughed out loud at the ridiculous-looking imagery and moved on. I wasn't surprised to see, later that day, that a number of channels I follow on YouTube were talking about this "crash" and calling it out as a hoax.
What did surprise me was YouTube user Free Radio Revolution's vitriolic rants against all channels calling this a fake plane crash. For those who may not be aware of this guy, he claims to be Numero Uno with "hoaxes" and has "broken down more hoaxes than anyone! Period!" Har har har! While he does seem to devote his life to making YouTube videos about media fakery, I don't recall him being around for Tucson, Oslo/Utoya, or Aurora... let alone 7/7 or 9/11. While I have followed this guy for the past eight months or so, I've noticed some worrying things about him and most of the more popular YouTube "hoax-busting" channels.
He claims that 9/11 was a "false flag" and that "people really died" and refuses to acknowledge the 9/11 VicSims. He very, very rarely (if ever) discusses the possibility of CGI, video layering, or Photoshop being used in these PsyOps. He views every video coming from the MSM to be "real, but staged" never being open to the idea of simulated realities. He's also often "fooled" by obvious disinfo such as the Grey State movie, which he promotes, and then comes out to "set the record straight." He also has never candidly talked about how he came to his current understanding ("being awake," as they like to call it) of the MSM's lies. I feel like all of us have a path to understanding that we had to go through, even if that path was mostly following in other investigators' footsteps. I find it questionable that he never discusses any forums such as this one where he gained some initial knowledge. I have a hard time believing that he discovered the phenomenon of VicSims on his own (and then also can't apply that knowledge to his understanding of 9/11... doh!).
This fake plane crash has caused a massive drama in the YouTube truth movement. This is, however, in reality just a manufactured falling out of different "investigators" to fracture and confuse the people who follow them. That was essentially the purpose of this story. I think that many of the people who have "awoke" over the last couple of years have mainly turned to YouTube for their further education on these matters, and TPTB know this all too well. I'll post here what I wrote in a comment section on YouTube regarding this situation:
It's worrisome that the result of this plane "crash" is that it has sparked a resentment toward those of us who point to evidence of CGI and Photoshop in examining these psy ops. The critical examination of the videos and photos presented in conjunction with these psy ops is absolutely crucial to presenting a bullet proof case against the mainstream narrative. In fact, the video and photo evidence is often the only hard evidence we have to declare these things hoaxes.
If it becomes taboo to question the authenticity of videos and photos, especially in this age where hyper-realistic CGI is a reality even in the private sector, the "truth movement" is absolutely doomed. The very likely reality is that the shadow government holds CGI technology that is basically indistinguishable from real life video, and the only way to distinguish the two is upon very close examination. And that process, my friend, is exactly what is being demonized right now... not by you, but by some very high profile people in this community who shall remain nameless.
This is all part of steering the "truth movement" in a certain direction--in this case, away
from research on CGI and video fakery. The sad reality is that many of the larger YouTube channels are wolves in sheep's clothing, and it's really not difficult to see that if you follow them for a while. Thank goodness there's still Cluesforum.