BP oil spill

Anything on the news and elsewhere in the media with evidence of digital manipulation, bogus story-lines and propaganda

BP oil spill

Postby hoi.polloi on May 3rd, 2010, 8:03 pm

I don't think British Petrol really belongs in the category of companies who are careless with their money. It seems to me a real environmental disaster is a perfect pretext for unprecedented government cooperation or underhanded exploitation of good-natured types.

We are officially cautioned against "fears" (whose fears, exactly?) that BP and the USA are unable to work together.

Why doesn't the USA just cut off ties with such an irresponsible company, and kick it out of the gulf? Does the UK have some special investment so close to the USA now? (Besides the Rothschild banks, etc.)
hoi.polloi
Administrator
 
Posts: 4866
Joined: November 14th, 2010, 8:24 pm

Postby fbenario on May 4th, 2010, 2:03 am

hoi.polloi 4 May 3 2010, 03:03 PM wrote:

Why doesn't the USA just cut off ties with such an irresponsible company, and kick it out of the gulf?


This could only happen if there were actual substantive differences between Congress and the oil companies - or the rest of the 20 biggest companies. Face it, every member of Congress is long since bought and paid for.

I think what we actually are burdened with is one fairly monolithic giant perp, so I don't think there is the remotest possibility of "the United States" (whatever that term actually refers to these days) taking any meaningful action against any oil company - or any other big company, for that matter.
fbenario
Member
 
Posts: 2183
Joined: October 23rd, 2009, 2:49 am
Location: Atlanta, GA

Postby JamedD on May 4th, 2010, 3:52 am

How can we be certain that the oil spill is real? If they can fake two towers being blown up in NYC this would be a walk in the park. The Rothschilds want oil drilling shut down in the Gulf so they sarcrificied one of their own oil rigs. BP is a Rothschild owned company. Goldman Sachs another Rothschild company had shortened the gulf of Mexico one day before the explosion.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/andy-boro ... 58774.html
JamedD
Member
 
Posts: 41
Joined: February 11th, 2010, 10:23 pm

Postby Rasta84 on May 4th, 2010, 4:09 am

JamedD @ May 4 2010, 03:52 AM wrote: How can we be certain that the oil spill is real? If they can fake two towers being blown up in NYC this would be a walk in the park. The Rothschilds want oil drilling shut down in the Gulf so they sarcrificied one of their own oil rigs. BP is a Rothschild owned company. Goldman Sachs another Rothschild company had shortened the gulf of Mexico one day before the explosion.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/andy-boro ... 58774.html


That was a joke
Rasta84
Member
 
Posts: 38
Joined: April 8th, 2010, 3:54 pm

Postby JamedD on May 4th, 2010, 4:31 am

Fooled Me, a strange kind of joke to be making over a disaster that allegedly cost eleven American lives (9/11 reference?). The best coverage on the BP oil spill is on this blog. http://zionistgoldreport.blogspot.com
JamedD
Member
 
Posts: 41
Joined: February 11th, 2010, 10:23 pm

Postby Heiwa on May 4th, 2010, 6:20 pm

Actually there is no oil spill at all!! What happens is that solid, liquid and gaseous hydrocarbons mixed with old water trapped with it, all at high temperature and pressure, leak from the bottom of the sea and that some of it (some solid, liquid parts!) is seen on the surface of the ocean. There is no oil leaking!
It seems BP was just drilling an underwater oil well through a BOP, Blow Out Preventer, or christmas tree fitted on the sea floor. The well was not producing any oil at all! It was not yet connected to any system receiving 'live crude' and killing it so parts of it could become oil.
Anyway, in my opinion most of the hydrocarbons of all types escaping from the bottom of the sea will just evaporate or be destroyed by biological processes. The little floating solids on the ocean surface will also disappear by itself fairly quickly due to air and sun. Gulf of Mexico is warm water accelerating break down. Spraying things on it will just make things worse and some people rich.

In two months time the whole incident will be forgotten. Let's wait until then!
Heiwa
Member
 
Posts: 1064
Joined: October 20th, 2009, 7:20 pm

Postby JamedD on May 11th, 2010, 4:38 pm

Coast Guard Rear Adm. Mary Landry says No Oil Leaking.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_UdNkvQY ... r_embedded
JamedD
Member
 
Posts: 41
Joined: February 11th, 2010, 10:23 pm

Postby D.Duck on May 11th, 2010, 6:20 pm

Heiwa,

You are on the money and I could not agree more with what you are saying.

In my opinion its a good sign Carl-Henric Svanberg don't say sh#t at the moment
(scared the sh#t out of people in the Ericsson days) and I know P.G. Gyllenhammar starts to get kind of tired of the banksters and as you know he very close to the big one.

I think it looks pretty promising cos if they piss those guys off, things might start to happen and who knows, maybe we can get that boat out of the water.


Best
D.Duck
D.Duck
Member
 
Posts: 295
Joined: October 18th, 2009, 9:08 pm

Postby MartinL on May 11th, 2010, 7:44 pm

JamedD @ May 11 2010, 04:38 PM wrote: Coast Guard Rear Adm. Mary Landry says No Oil Leaking.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_UdNkvQY ... r_embedded


This is the date your video is posted:

CBS -- 23. apr 2010 -- "Coast Guard Rear Adm. Mary Landry discussed the dim search for 11 missing oil rig workers and what environmental impact the sinking rig may have."

And here is from the 27. apr 2010: (BBC)

"The US Coast Guard says five times as much oil as previously thought could be leaking from a well beneath where a rig sank in the Gulf of Mexico last week.

Rear Admiral Mary Landry said 5,000 barrels (210,000 gallons) a day were now thought to be gushing into the sea 50 miles (80km) off Louisiana's coast.

A third leak had also been discovered at the site, Adm Landry said."

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8650620.stm
MartinL
Member
 
Posts: 319
Joined: October 19th, 2009, 11:08 am

Postby MartinL on May 11th, 2010, 8:05 pm

D.Duck @ May 11 2010, 06:20 PM wrote: Heiwa,

You are on the money and I could not agree more with what you are saying.

In my opinion its a good sign Carl-Henric Svanberg don't say sh#t at the moment
(scared the sh#t out of people in the Ericsson days) and I know P.G. Gyllenhammar starts to get kind of tired of the banksters and as you know he very close to the big one.

I think it looks pretty promising cos if they piss those guys off, things might start to happen and who knows, maybe we can get that boat out of the water.


Best
D.Duck


Interesting article about Svanbergs appointment:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/comm ... or-BP.html

P. G. Gyllenhammar took initiative to the European Roundtable of Industrialists in the 1980s according to Wiki the group contains people from:

Weapon manufacturer: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Tec ... orporation
and and British Petroleum: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_R ... strialists
and also several Bilderberg members (including norwegian Eivind Reiten of Hydro).

Sure Gyllenhammar is not one of them?
MartinL
Member
 
Posts: 319
Joined: October 19th, 2009, 11:08 am

Postby MartinL on May 11th, 2010, 8:06 pm

Heiwa @ May 4 2010, 06:20 PM wrote: Actually there is no oil spill at all!! What happens is that solid, liquid and gaseous hydrocarbons mixed with old water trapped with it, all at high temperature and pressure, leak from the bottom of the sea and that some of it (some solid, liquid parts!) is seen on the surface of the ocean. There is no oil leaking!
It seems BP was just drilling an underwater oil well through a BOP, Blow Out Preventer, or christmas tree fitted on the sea floor. The well was not producing any oil at all! It was not yet connected to any system receiving 'live crude' and killing it so parts of it could become oil.
Anyway, in my opinion most of the hydrocarbons of all types escaping from the bottom of the sea will just evaporate or be destroyed by biological processes. The little floating solids on the ocean surface will also disappear by itself fairly quickly due to air and sun. Gulf of Mexico is warm water accelerating break down. Spraying things on it will just make things worse and some people rich.

In two months time the whole incident will be forgotten. Let's wait until then!


Do you have any more info on this, sounds interesting and I wanna understand this better. Thanks.
MartinL
Member
 
Posts: 319
Joined: October 19th, 2009, 11:08 am

Postby D.Duck on May 11th, 2010, 9:20 pm

MartinL 4 May 11 2010, 07:05 PM wrote:
D.Duck 4 May 11 2010, 06:20 PM wrote: Heiwa,

You are on the money and I could not agree more with what you are saying.

In my opinion its a good sign Carl-Henric Svanberg don't say sh#t at the moment
(scared the sh#t out of people in the Ericsson days) and I know P.G. Gyllenhammar starts to get kind of tired of the banksters and as you know he very close to the big one.

I think it looks pretty promising cos if they piss those guys off, things might start to happen and who knows, maybe we can get that boat out of the water.


Best
D.Duck


Interesting article about Svanbergs appointment:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/comm ... or-BP.html

P. G. Gyllenhammar took initiative to the European Roundtable of Industrialists in the 1980s according to Wiki the group contains people from:

Weapon manufacturer: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Tec ... orporation
and and British Petroleum: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_R ... strialists
and also several Bilderberg members (including norwegian Eivind Reiten of Hydro).

Sure Gyllenhammar is not one of them?


Martin,

No, I am not 100% sure and you know who he works for.

Not all guys are in on it and Gyllenhammar was kicked out of Volvo in a foul play and that hurt him since he is Mr. Volvo and will always be.

The big guys can spot talent and he was sucked in at a vulnerable time in his life.

I cant say I know the guy but I have meet him a couple of times and he is in my opinion a good guy in the wrong place for many different reasons.

He is not a banker guy 100%, he is one of the most hardcore industrial guy there is to get and he has always had a big heart for the guy on the floor.

As always, I could be completely wrong and he fooled me big time.


D.Duck
D.Duck
Member
 
Posts: 295
Joined: October 18th, 2009, 9:08 pm

Postby MartinL on May 11th, 2010, 10:18 pm

United Technologies are closely tied to several of the major players on 9/11.
Does a guy of his caliber not know anything about anything that is happening in the world today? I find it hard to believe since he mingles with Bilderberg members and other treasonous individuals in his very own Roundtable group.

I do trust your perceptions though, and I can of course be mistaken. On the other hand, there are some pretty slick liars and thieves out there. ;)
MartinL
Member
 
Posts: 319
Joined: October 19th, 2009, 11:08 am

Postby Rasta84 on May 12th, 2010, 10:52 pm

The spill most likely happened cause BP is a greedy evil company and don't care about safety. Profit is their only motive and safety regulations cut into it: Big Oil Fought Off New Safety Rules Before Rig Explosion - http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/04/2 ... 52575.html
Rasta84
Member
 
Posts: 38
Joined: April 8th, 2010, 3:54 pm

Postby Rasta84 on May 12th, 2010, 10:54 pm

Heiwa @ May 4 2010, 06:20 PM wrote: Actually there is no oil spill at all!! What happens is that solid, liquid and gaseous hydrocarbons mixed with old water trapped with it, all at high temperature and pressure, leak from the bottom of the sea and that some of it (some solid, liquid parts!) is seen on the surface of the ocean. There is no oil leaking!
It seems BP was just drilling an underwater oil well through a BOP, Blow Out Preventer, or christmas tree fitted on the sea floor. The well was not producing any oil at all! It was not yet connected to any system receiving 'live crude' and killing it so parts of it could become oil.
Anyway, in my opinion most of the hydrocarbons of all types escaping from the bottom of the sea will just evaporate or be destroyed by biological processes. The little floating solids on the ocean surface will also disappear by itself fairly quickly due to air and sun. Gulf of Mexico is warm water accelerating break down. Spraying things on it will just make things worse and some people rich.

In two months time the whole incident will be forgotten. Let's wait until then!


I think you're 100 percent off on this
Rasta84
Member
 
Posts: 38
Joined: April 8th, 2010, 3:54 pm

Next

Return to Worldwide media deceptions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests