FUKUSHIMA nuke/tsunami scare 11-03-11

Anything on the news and elsewhere in the media with evidence of digital manipulation, bogus story-lines and propaganda

Re: FUKUSHIMA nuke/tsunami scare 11-03-11

Postby smj on February 9th, 2015, 12:46 pm

Jimmy Carter claims that he had radioactive piss for six months after a kindly old gentleman sent him up to Canada to dismantle the Chalk River reactor's core...

http://www.economist.com/blogs/banyan/2 ... r_clean-up
http://www.haaretz.com/news/features/th ... m-1.496587
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/pol ... cle614379/

It seems Jimmy was a young hot-shot lieutenant in the nuclear navy...
http://www.jimmycarterlibrary.gov/docum ... navy.phtml
Image

so why wouldn't Jimmy have a nuclear sub of his own?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Jimmy_ ... 8SSN-23%29

Image


and why wouldn't the kindly old gentleman have one as well?

http://www.navytimes.com/story/military ... /21508071/

It turns out that the Chalk River facility that Jimmy and his crew heroically saved is one of the 4 or 5 facilities world-wide that produce all of our medical radioisotopes. Not-so-curiously, sometimes some of these facilities will get shut down at the same time...

http://www.nature.com/polopoly_fs/1.143 ... 04202a.pdf
http://www.euronuclear.org/1-informatio ... crisis.htm

Remember the Calutron girls at Oak Ridge? That's where this medical isotope business got started...

https://www.y12.doe.gov/sites/default/f ... 5-0181.pdf
smj
Member
 
Posts: 68
Joined: September 10th, 2014, 11:29 pm

Re: FUKUSHIMA nuke/tsunami scare 11-03-11

Postby CTGal1011 on March 26th, 2015, 2:54 pm

Fear not, with Harper at the helm here in Santaland, all of your radioactive isotope dreams can come true.

http://www.torontosun.com/2015/02/06/medical-isotope-facility-to-stay-open-until-2018-feds

"The Canadian government will extend the life of the Chalk River, Ont. nuclear reactor until 2018, a news release from Minister of Natural Resources Greg Rickford said on Friday."

But then again, in 2012, they did some mock disaster training, "just in case".
http://www.thedailyobserver.ca/2012/11/24/mock-disaster-training

Maybe something will happen that will make it have to close sooner. <_<
CTGal1011
Member
 
Posts: 97
Joined: March 13th, 2012, 5:02 pm

Re: FUKUSHIMA nuke/tsunami scare 11-03-11

Postby o.catharnaigh on February 8th, 2016, 3:07 am

http://www.cfact.org/2013/10/12/physici ... -disaster/






****************************************************************

ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE (Critical Mass)


Just a friendly reminder o.catharnaigh... we shouldn't really drop links into threads without comment. I'm sure forum members & any neutral readers would like to know what you think of your link!

For those interested the link is of a 2013 article supposedly written by a 'Nuclear Physicist' who argues that the "Fukushima Nuclear Disaster" was nothing but media hysteria.

Thanks "Kelvin Kemm"... we kinda knew that.
o.catharnaigh
Member
 
Posts: 14
Joined: January 31st, 2016, 11:40 pm

Re: FUKUSHIMA nuke/tsunami scare 11-03-11

Postby animus on February 21st, 2016, 6:38 pm

I have some comments about the first 35sec of the following video that has been posted here before:


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hTeQt3KmpNA
yt-title: Unseen footage of Japan tsunami released

- How was that filmed, with a dash cam in a car that got stuck? Why is absolutely nothing in focus? Odd coloring too with those shiny whites as if hit by the sun, yet no shadows at all.
- Notice the constant gray water line below. You'd expect dirty water to be brown, not dark gray. And why is there absolutely no moving structure at all in the water, just a lot of gray.
- Do you see the spot which looks like a glitch but can be seen throughout the whole 35sec (look at right middle)?
- Most cars seem to be floating horizontally (as opposed to their front side pointing down) which is quite believable if you consider the beach(?) seen at 0:01 BUT what about the plane at 0:27 whose nose is completely under water? (Perhaps the water is deeper in the foreground. Would explain why it is floating so fast rather than be stuck in the sand, not sure.)
- Some cars have pitch black back windows. Is that normal in Japan?
- Is that the same red plane in 0:31 as in the following photo?
Image


I wanted to share this link that I stumbled upon a year ago. The author doesn't take media fakery into account but gives evidence that there could not have been a 9.0 quake triggering the tsunami.
He also shows that the United States Geological Survey (USGS) has manipulated data of the modified mercalli scale.

As for the reason what caused the tsunami in the first place he doesn't give a straight answer and leaves it open for speculation but only between these two possibilites:
As a result of the publication of the aforementioned study others have tried to link these anomalies in the ionosphere and atmosphere to HAARP-like installations that, according to them, triggered the seaquake deliberately.
[...]
Others speculate that the tsunami was triggered by “tsunami bombs” or (nuclear) explosives that were dropped on the seafloor prior to the 3/11 events.

He also goes a little bit into the drill happening at the same day and into stuxnet being the probably cause of failure at Fukushima. I recommend reading chapters 1, 3 and 6 of the article. (The page looks longer than it is due to the long radiation chart.)

Regarding the videos he provides as evidence for the flooding (see chapter 2) I found some things that bothered me a little, not 100% sure though:
Japan Earthquake My Experience March 11, 2011
- people in the arena seem very calm
- 3:44 something is off with the stones. They are very clean and dry. Also they don't quite fit into the sidwalk seen in 3:50. But she did say that the water came out of the cracks (not from a flood).

March 11, 2011, Tsunami Smashing Town in Japan but NO Earthquake Damage
- zoom ins & zoom outs at exciting locations at the right time, especially the crying child a milisecond before she began crying, what a coincedence.
- 1:24 compare the red of the helmet with that of the houses' roof. The smokescreen goes in every direction but doesn't seem to reach the people.

Japan's March 11, 2011, Tsunami, and Train but NO Earthquake Damage
- the water splash looks a little bit too much
- the people at 0:10 don't look too concerned about getting hit by that much water
- look at the calm water from 0:12 to 0:16. Not a single drop out of order that fell before the steady incoming splash.

Driver Films Japan's March 11, 2011, Tsunami but NO Earthquake Damage
- Too bad we can't see a reflection in 2:35 due to the pitch black, dull window.
- most cars dive in with front side first because of the heavy engine. Why not our filming car? In the end it appears to go down with the back side, see 3:55.

Video of Tsunami (Man-made Quake) ____ (NO Earthquake Damage, Japan March 11, 2011)
- this video has already been analysed here. I only want to point out the cut at 0:34. The reason for the cut can only be the calmly walking guy in 0:30 who must have been drowned inbetween those cuts.

Wahoo and Umbrella - Filmmaker recounts nuclear test
- The author of truthsector.net apparently isn't aware of the nuke hoax... notice the ship not moving an iota, 0:37.
animus
Member
 
Posts: 31
Joined: February 20th, 2016, 9:13 pm

Re: FUKUSHIMA nuke/tsunami scare 11-03-11

Postby hoi.polloi on April 8th, 2016, 4:10 am

Thanks for the update animus.

I want to bump this thread one more time, because K and I are doing issue 10 of The Clues Chronicle about this topic and this thread.

Anyone remember this, and have new reflections?

Please note that the first third to two-thirds of this topic cover some cursory speculations on:

  • reasons and technologies for mixing reality with fiction
  • technologies that may induce earthquakes and/or tsunamis
  • inconsistencies and contradictions in the official imagery
  • prediction technologies that may have alerted authorities to ecological events before they happen
  • political reasons for inducing this PsyOp (whether any reports of the events match reality or not)
  • locking down and evacuating the area using Japan's Self Defense Force
  • the viability or non-viability of "nuclear" power and in particular this Fukushima station

How does the present membership of the forum feel about this five-year-old topic today? Would you add anything or expand on what has been written as well? (We encourage members to read the full thread before posting)
hoi.polloi
Administrator
 
Posts: 4790
Joined: November 14th, 2010, 8:24 pm

Re: FUKUSHIMA nuke/tsunami scare 11-03-11

Postby fbenario on April 9th, 2016, 12:51 am

hoi.polloi wrote:How does the present membership of the forum feel about this five-year-old topic today? Would you add anything or expand on what has been written as well? (We encourage members to read the full thread before posting)

It might be worth mentioning in your intro that media fakery includes not just events supposedly caused by human action, but also natural disasters. Natural events might in fact be easier to fake since they don't initially involve people.
fbenario
Member
 
Posts: 2177
Joined: October 23rd, 2009, 2:49 am
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: FUKUSHIMA nuke/tsunami scare 11-03-11

Postby Seneca on April 9th, 2016, 7:55 am

hoi.polloi wrote:How does the present membership of the forum feel about this five-year-old topic today? Would you add anything or expand on what has been written as well? (We encourage members to read the full thread before posting)
Just the observation that, at least in Belgium, nuclear facilities are constantly being brought up in the news. Often the stories are connected to psyops like ISIS. The number of these incidents, whereby the facilities are sometimes shut down for long periods is very impressive. If you follow the links below you can see the amount of articles that feature just 2 of the facilities. The most important ingredient of these stories is fear.
Tihange nuclear facility
Doel nuclear facility (next to Belgium's 2nd biggest city and Europe's 2nd biggest harbour)
I suspect many if not most stories are invented. Like the incident at three miles island in 1979 that I suspect was a psyop.
This was mentioned in the current topic: http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.ph ... 5#p2351580
and in other topics, for example here:
viewtopic.php?p=2382597&sid=bf88d97eceff8670854c9c108c1b5cbb#p2382601
http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.ph ... a#p2396666

At the time of the Fukushia incident, the efforts to contain the situation at the nuclear facility looked really improvised as if they were unable to predict what would happen. For me this was an obvious illustration that they hadn't mastered the technology. Just like Disney's sorcerer's apprentice. Because of the secrecy and obvious corruption it didn't seem that that would improve. I thought the whole situation was a good illustration that the technology was just too dangerous.
Now I presume that is what they wanted wanted us to think. They want us to fear the technology and the governments that promote it. The different conspiracy theories that I was exposed to about the incident (caused by nuclear bomb, HAARP..) had a similar effect.
Seneca
Member
 
Posts: 420
Joined: October 21st, 2009, 3:36 pm

Re: FUKUSHIMA nuke/tsunami scare 11-03-11

Postby hoi.polloi on April 10th, 2016, 2:30 pm

Thank you.
hoi.polloi
Administrator
 
Posts: 4790
Joined: November 14th, 2010, 8:24 pm

Re: Japan Earthquake 11-03-11

Postby JLapage on April 11th, 2016, 2:05 am

reel.deal wrote:Image

AN "island" of debris from tsunami-hit Japan containing homes, ships, cars and BODIES is heading for the US.
The floating mass in the Pacific is 69 miles long and covers 2.2million square feet, experts said yesterday.


http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/3517694/Japanese-debris-swept-to-the-US.html
:unsure: :P

" Danger ... home floats on ocean "
:o


Another indication that they are lying can be found in the numbers. If we picture the shape of "the floating mass" to be a rectangle (for ease of calculation), we get approximately a 69 mile or 364230 feet long by 6 feet wide rectangle.
JLapage
Member
 
Posts: 115
Joined: April 23rd, 2013, 2:38 pm

Re: FUKUSHIMA nuke/tsunami scare 11-03-11

Postby UNreal on September 19th, 2016, 9:46 am

Striking two birds with one Paleolithic stone.

The "natural" events of the Fukushima disaster might have an additional link to archeology. Japanese archeologist Shinichi Fujimura was famous in Japan for proving human occupation in Japan dating back some 700.000 years. However, in November 2000 a Japanese newspaper (Mainichi Shimbun) installed hidden cameras on new site where Fujimura was filmed implanting ancient artifacts. Faced with video proof, Fujimura confessed his fraud of over 40 archaeological sites in Japan. The events caused an archeological 'Tsunami' with museums pulling artifacts on display and history textbooks having to be rewritten. Many or most of the archeological sites were "ruined" by the 2011 disaster.
-
Shinichi Fujimura
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shinichi_Fujimura
God's hands (well, Fujimura's hands)
http://www.withoutwax.org/Without_Wax/Blog/Entries/2008/12/10_Gods_Hands.html
Archaeological implications of the Great East Japan disaster three years on
http://www.dajf.org.uk/event/excavating-cultural-heritage-the-archaeological-implications-of-the-great-east-japan-disaster-three-years-on
The Great East Japan Earthquake and cultural heritage: towards an archaeology of disaster
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/antiquity/article/the-great-east-japan-earthquake-and-cultural-heritage-towards-an-archaeology-of-disaster/C03A03C0F8306719FCFBA9BE27718BBC
-
Image
UNreal
Member
 
Posts: 34
Joined: June 17th, 2014, 7:50 pm

Re: FUKUSHIMA nuke/tsunami scare 11-03-11

Postby hoi.polloi on September 20th, 2016, 12:51 am

This is a fascinating notion, one worth looking into. Thank you!
hoi.polloi
Administrator
 
Posts: 4790
Joined: November 14th, 2010, 8:24 pm

Re: FUKUSHIMA nuke/tsunami scare 11-03-11

Postby aa5 on September 20th, 2016, 7:12 pm

There also was talk ~2010 that if global warming was allegedly so scary, why don't the nations build nuclear power plants. Which according to those same nations, nuclear plants can produce near limitless amounts of electricity, without any greenhouse gas emissions at all.
aa5
Member
 
Posts: 179
Joined: April 15th, 2016, 4:03 am

Re: FUKUSHIMA nuke/tsunami scare 11-03-11

Postby Vera Obscurata on November 22nd, 2016, 12:57 am

Also linking to the "earthquake machine" thread, but maybe more relevant here. It is alleged a tsunami after a 7.4* magnitude earthquake is threatening Fukushima.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/11 ... fukushima/
Coastal residents in Japan were ordered to flee to higher ground on Tuesday after a strong earthquake with a magnitude of 7.4 struck off the coast of Fukushima prefecture.

The Japan Meteorological Agency issued a tsunami warning for waves of up to 3 metres in Fukushima and another prefecture, and a tsunami advisory for much of the rest of northeast Japan's Pacific coast. There were no immediate reports of damage or injury.

Tsunamis of 1.4 metres and 90 centimetres were reported in Sendai and Fukushima about an hour after the 6 am earthquake, and the tsunami warning area was widened later in the morning.


Needless to say I don't endorse or believe The Telegraph or anything, just reporting on the "news" of a new scare. A tsunami of 90 centimetres... be very afraid! :D

* After 11-03-11, now a 7.4 (=11) @ 22-11 (in Japan), for numerology lovers
Vera Obscurata
Member
 
Posts: 35
Joined: October 8th, 2016, 9:39 pm

Re: FUKUSHIMA nuke/tsunami scare 11-03-11

Postby bongostaple on November 22nd, 2016, 1:53 pm

Great stuff, UNreal, thank you for posting this. I just read the material you linked to, and it then reminded me of an album, 'N-Plants' by electronic music artist Biosphere ( https://biosphere.bandcamp.com/album/n-plants ). Mr Biosphere managed to make a whole album of music based on Japanese Nuclear Power Stations, wondering why they are built so close to earthquake and tsunami risk regions.

There is, of course, only one logical reason why nuclear plant is often located in such areas, and that is because there is no risk, in reality. I may go back into some research on nuclear powerplants at some point. A good friend is being educated in Nuclear Engineering at the moment, and has promised to try to explain how these things are meant to work, once said degree course is complete. I'm looking forward to that :)
bongostaple
Member
 
Posts: 57
Joined: October 4th, 2016, 12:53 pm

Previous

Return to Worldwide media deceptions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests