FUKUSHIMA nuke/tsunami scare 11-03-11

Anything on the news and elsewhere in the media with evidence of digital manipulation, bogus story-lines and propaganda

Re: Japan Earthquake 11-03-11

Postby simonshack on March 17th, 2013, 11:41 pm

sharing wrote:If the forum Administrators find my post irrelevant, please feel free to delete it.

Pas du tout! This was a most relevant post - with very interesting 'local' info - thanks for sharing! :)
simonshack
Administrator
 
Posts: 6355
Joined: October 18th, 2009, 9:09 pm
Location: italy

Re: Japan Earthquake 11-03-11

Postby TrutherInTX on March 18th, 2013, 4:02 am

I agree with Simon. Its very helpful to have someone in Japan giving us insights what it is really like there. Do you know anyone that has ventured to Sendai or other affected areas? Is the place flattened like they tell us on TV? Thank you for sharing what you know.
TrutherInTX
Member
 
Posts: 93
Joined: November 11th, 2011, 1:38 am

Re: Japan Earthquake 11-03-11

Postby sharing on March 18th, 2013, 5:53 pm

If I come across a reliable source of information, I will share it on this forum.
sharing
Member
 
Posts: 42
Joined: March 16th, 2013, 11:34 am

Re: Japan Earthquake 11-03-11

Postby sharing on March 21st, 2013, 3:55 am

I think that the comments on below link reflect accurately what I have heard around me here in Japan: (permission to reprint materials from this website is required so I cannot copy-paste the information) check out the 'Efforts by the Tohoku Tourism Promotion Organization' section that directly addresses the rumors fostered, at least to some extent, by foreign media following the disaster on this link: http://www.iist.or.jp/wf/magazine/0870/0870_E.html

And here is an excerpt of the 'Tohoku Travel Guide':
The Tohoku Region was hit by the earthquake and tsunami of March 11, 2011 and the ensuing nuclear accident. However, most areas of the Tohoku Region are now safe and welcoming tourists again. Of all the destinations in our travel guide, only Sendai, Matsushima, Iwaki and the Sanriku Coast suffered direct damage from the earthquake and tsunami, and even there most attractions reopened within a few weeks or months.

http://www.japan-guide.com/list/e1102.html
sharing
Member
 
Posts: 42
Joined: March 16th, 2013, 11:34 am

Re: Japan Earthquake 11-03-11

Postby sharing on March 21st, 2013, 4:18 am

And to keep us entertained, a new episode, courtesy of TEPCO; this time they found that a rat apparently gnawed on a switchboard or its wiring, causing a 30-hour power cutoff this week for the spent-fuel pool cooling systems at the Fukushima No. 1 plant. :blink:
http://www.japantimes.co.jp/text/nn20130321d2.html
sharing
Member
 
Posts: 42
Joined: March 16th, 2013, 11:34 am

Re: FUKUSHIMA nuke/tsunami scare 11-03-11

Postby simonshack on August 10th, 2014, 6:02 pm

*


"WE'RE ALL GONNA DIE - soon! " :lol:

Fuck-u-Shima mushroom cloud :
Image
Guardian caption: "A second explosion at the Fukushima Daiichi plant. Photograph: guardian.co.uk"
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/ ... wer?page=3


I have to laugh. This is a hysterically hilarious development.

I just listened to Dennis Cimino (Jim Fetzer's longtime collaborator) on the latest John Friend radio show. According to Cimino, humanity can start waving goodbye to life on Earth because, within a few years or so, we are all going to perish - due to the radiation released by the dreadful / universally-lethal Fuck-U-Shima "event". No kidding.

Cimino even kind of "wishes good luck" to those parents who are planning to make kids - since we're all destined to soon die horrible radiation-induced deaths. Yup, all of us. Apparently, and to back up his claims of impending doom, Cimino owns a sophisticated / top-range military Geiger counter - with which he walks around measuring radiation levels of food in American supermarkets. Our DNA, says Cimino, is going to get all fucked up - and we're all going to die. Soon. Very soon.

The "bizarre (but not unexpected) twist" of all this - as we can hear in that John Friend radio show - is that the soft-spoken Cimino totally & integrally espouses our 9/11 Cluesforum image-fakery research, including the fact that the WTC collapse imagery was nothing but CGI. He even takes the time to thank me personally for my efforts. Why he has failed to convince uncle Fetzer of this basic / yet all-important fact (that the 9/11 imagery was all fake) in all of these years - is anybody's guess...

Now, before calling out Cimino as yet another military asset pushing the nuke fearporn agenda, I am going to give him a 'second chance' and invite him to this forum to respond to the following questions.

*************

Mr Cimino,

Are you aware that the media has kept releasing a constant flow of blatantly photoshopped imagery of the Fukushima "event" - and even of the Fukushima plant itself? If not, and if we could prove / and convince you of this fact, what would you make of this? Would there be any need to photoshop any images of this "event" - if it happened as advertised in the media? Are you going to say that "the Japanese fabricated these images - in order to hide the reality of the extent of the disaster"? See, this very thread is chock-full of indisputable evidence of photo manipulation in the context of the purported Fukushima disaster. But to save you the time and effort to go through all of this thread, here's a brief demonstration of the photographic phoniness of the plant itself:

Here are two supposed "BEFORE & AFTER" images of the Fukushima plant - published in the international media:


BEFORE:
Image

AFTER:
Image

QUESTION N°1: Mr. Cimino, please focus your eyes and mind on that top section marked "Y" in the above two images. Note that, in the "BEFORE" image, the "Y" section is darker than the rest of the 'building'. Now, in the "AFTER" image, exactly that darker section appears to have been blown off - in a 'clean / horizontal' fashion. Can you give us a rational / no-nonsense explanation for this?

QUESTION N°2: Mr, Cimino, in the "BEFORE" image - we can see that the two A and B façades of those 'buildings' feature the exact same pattern of specks and blobs. (And if you look closely, so do the other two buildings further in the distance). Can you give us a rational / no-nonsense explanation for this?
Image

QUESTION N°3: Why would a "nuclear plant meltdown" produce a mushroom cloud ? (see first image above)

I will be hoping to see Dennis Cimino setting aside some of his time to join our forum (unlike uncle Fetzer has ever deigned to do) and honoring us with his answers to the above three, simple and straightforward questions. To be sure, Cimino believes that nuclear bombs exist - and has, apparently, some serious experience with military weapons:

"Prior to that I served as an Electronic Warfare / Electronic Signals Intelligence (EW ELINT) specialist in the U.S. Navy, with many 'first time' signal intercepts in the national (NSA) sigint database. Since I left the Navy in 1979, I have been heavily involved in DoD weapons system testing and certification. I have held high level clearances most of my career."
Dennis Cimino
http://www.patriotsquestion911.com/pilots.html


Here's a purported photograph of the damaged Fukushima plant - dated March 22, 2011.
source: "Pictures of the Day - Oregonlive.com : http://photos.oregonlive.com/photo-essa ... 2_201.html
Image

And here's a purported photograph of the damaged Fukushima plant - dated 2013 ... :rolleyes: source: http://www.thestar.com/news/world/2013/ ... japan.html
Image
simonshack
Administrator
 
Posts: 6355
Joined: October 18th, 2009, 9:09 pm
Location: italy

Re: FUKUSHIMA nuke/tsunami scare 11-03-11

Postby Makkonen on August 10th, 2014, 9:06 pm

Heh, that looks a bit like hanging tagliatelle. :P
Makkonen
Member
 
Posts: 575
Joined: March 29th, 2011, 10:21 pm

Re: FUKUSHIMA nuke/tsunami scare 11-03-11

Postby brianv on August 10th, 2014, 11:55 pm

Makkonen wrote:Heh, that looks a bit like hanging tagliatelle. :P


Tagliatelle Car-Bomb-ara?? Oh, never mind! <_<
brianv
Member
 
Posts: 3861
Joined: October 18th, 2009, 11:19 pm

Re: FUKUSHIMA nuke/tsunami scare 11-03-11

Postby ElSushi on August 12th, 2014, 10:01 am

Heh, that looks a bit like hanging tagliatelle.


LMAO, good one Makkonen.
Hyvää huomenta mitä kuuluu? :D
ElSushi
Member
 
Posts: 124
Joined: August 3rd, 2011, 9:53 am

Re: FUKUSHIMA nuke/tsunami scare 11-03-11

Postby Makkonen on August 12th, 2014, 1:56 pm

Thanks. ;)

Ihan hyvää kuuluu. B)
Makkonen
Member
 
Posts: 575
Joined: March 29th, 2011, 10:21 pm

Re: FUKUSHIMA nuke/tsunami scare 11-03-11

Postby simonshack on August 12th, 2014, 2:18 pm

*

THE EARLY FUKUSHIMA IMAGERY

Our longtime forum members may remember that the first imagery released in March 2011, soon after the reported Fukushima disaster, was of absurdly poor / grainy / blurry quality. This fact alone was, naturally, rather odd - given that the Japanese aren't exactly known to be short of high-quality cameras... Just as an example, here's an early image (diffused all over the world ) of what is meant to depict the damage to UNIT1 (one of the 4-unit Fukushima plant):

Image

But let us not dwell on this issue - even though it is worth noting, since it is consistent with virtually ALL other psyops we have studied over the years on this forum (to be sure, in the early hours / days of any given psyop, we are consistently presented with piss-poor imagery of the purported "news event" - only for gradually sharper imagery to start trickling out in the media - successively).

Now, here is a decent image of the Fukushima plant. It is a head-on shot of the entire Fukushima plant - with its four so-called 'reactors' / units. Let us assume this is a legit photo and observe that the UNITS 4,3 and 2 appear to be of equal dimensions - whereas UNIT1 is about 10% smaller:
Image

Here we see the plant from the other side (from inland). Of course, this image being shot at a certain angle, the widths of the 4 UNITS now appear different from each other - due to perspective. I have chosen UNIT 3 as my 100% 'yardstick' in order to assess the relative widths of the other units. Everything looks fine - and the measurements appear consistent (all perspectives considered) with the head-on shot above:
Image
Note: In this image, UNIT 4 appears to be 23% larger than UNIT1.

And just to make sure that UNIT 1 is (was) meant to be smaller (and slightly closer to the sea-shore) than the other 3 UNITS - here we have a Google Earth image of the Fukushima plant:
Image

Now, here's the problem: back in March 2011 (and as noticed by our member Jazza on March 13, only TWO days after the "event") Japanese TV aired THIS image of the Fukushima plant !
Image
Note: In this image, UNIT 4 appears to be 33% smaller than UNIT1 !!! source: http://www.naplesnews.com/news/world/da ... plosion-ja

As ever, the question is: if this event actually happened as advertised in the media, why would there exist ANY blatantly manipulated / doctored imagery of it? And in this case, even of the very FUK-U-SHIMA PLANT ITSELF !!??

More sources for the above image here.

But perhaps nuke expert Cimino will clear this up for us all - if and when he sets aside some of his time to respond to my questions ? ;)

QUESTION N°4: Mr Cimino, why do you think that Japanese TV aired the above, obviously unreal depiction of what is meant to be the "FUKUSHIMA NUCLEAR PLANT"?
simonshack
Administrator
 
Posts: 6355
Joined: October 18th, 2009, 9:09 pm
Location: italy

Re: FUKUSHIMA nuke/tsunami scare 11-03-11

Postby brianv on August 12th, 2014, 4:41 pm

"if and when he sets aside some of his time to respond to my questions "

Perhaps when he gets over having died horribly from nuclear radiation he will. Do you remember those clowns who used to walk around in the old days with placards declaring "Renounce Sinner","The End is Nigh"? Same shit different day!
brianv
Member
 
Posts: 3861
Joined: October 18th, 2009, 11:19 pm

Re: FUKUSHIMA nuke/tsunami scare 11-03-11

Postby simonshack on August 17th, 2014, 2:49 pm

*
Re: "feedback" from Dennis Cimino

For those who may care to know, Cimino actually did respond to my first three Fukushima questions (but still not to my fourth question above). Bizarrely enough, he did so 'via proxy' / i.e. over a private e-mail to another entity which then forwarded it to me (as explained below) so I did not feel it would be either correct nor, much less, 'my duty' to relay Cimino's replies 'publicly' to the Cluesforum readership.

However, since I am now being called a "fraud" and a "SHILL" (for not relaying Cimino's reply) by Cimino's ol' buddy, Professor Jim Fetzer, I am now reluctantly copy-pasting here this private e-mail that Cimino (for some unfathomable reason) wrote to the anonymous blogger "Jahilliya" - who then forwarded it to me. All I can say is that, if this is the way Cimino 'communicates' with people submitting questions to his "End-Of-The-World" theories, he isn't going to reach out and alert many people to his alarming 'predictions'! Fetzer clearly takes Cimino's "End-is-Nigh!" fearporn bullshite very seriously indeed : here's how he rates his latest chat with his buddy Cimino (on his "REAL DEAL" show): "I think this may be the most important interview that I have ever done."

Anyway, here's Cimino's (aka "WingMan") e-mail to "Jahilliya" - who then forwarded it to me :

----- Forwarded Message -----
From: WingMan <wingmann@myway.com>
To: jahilliya@yahoo.com
Sent: Monday, 11 August 2014, 2:13
Subject: Re: well it looks like Simon Shack has attacked me on his website re the FUKUSHIMA issues..

I think it's out of 'fear' that people react like this. My extensive knowledge from my past transcends that of the average citizen in that when you are both on board a nuclear powered vessel and also have had responsibilities as I have regarding the handling and the release authority of these things, that it also behooved me to get a handle on ionizing radiation because I no longer have a 'thyroid' due to my exposure.

Simon no longer is on my list of people who simply want answers. His position with what he published goes in the direction of both mocking me, and trying to defame me as someone who is unqualified to read a geiger meter. I don't think he can logically deduce that this problem we all face now is a fabrication as he seems to be alleging with his blog.

I began to answer his query about the stuff he had asked, and saw that at least two of the questions indicate either he has used the photography as a strawman to make it appear to be fakery when it's merely the way they painted these buildings for esthetics, and then secondarily, that he has no clue what 'spontaneous uncontrolled criticality' means. Had he done the requisite research and seen Arne Gunderson's work and explanation about that 'prompt criticality' meaning 'nuclear detonation' he would fully understand it.

when nuclear fuel melts into a blob, it can quickly achieve critical mass that way and though not as high yield as a precision machined and triggered warhead, it detonates as Unit 3 had done, ejecting TONS of plutonium and uranium up into the air miles above Unit 3 in that mushroom cloud.

the uniformity in the way the building tops is also an easy one. they are designed with blowout panels to prevent the types of explosions and steam releases you would otherwise see, from destroying the building totally, so the upper section is mostly blowout panels to preserve the building in the case of such a massive steam explosion. the buildings that are so blown away did exactly as they are designed, they are intentionally made to release pressure like that without building destruction.

Sadly, Simon has exposed himself as either a very scared and frightened man, or someone trying to debunk the TRUTH.

I think it's probably a mix of both...leaning more in the former than the latter, but attacking me won't make the peril to mankind and animals alike any lesser.

matter of fact, de-emphasis of the urgency in getting Fukushima fully encapsulated if that possibility even exists at this point in time, which is doubtful, is a huge huge disservice to all who inhabit this earth, be they human or animal or insect.

we are facing the extinction of all life on Earth due to this one severe accident. De-emphasis of that is criminally wrong and in fact, insane.

we need an international effort to try to mitigate here and he is steering that into the reeds with his very poorly thought out rebuttal.

I won't have anything further to do with Simon, and you can relay to him that asking questions is fine, but building a website to defame me is rather indicative of an ulterior motive therein.

best,


So, according to Cimino, I am doing a "huge huge disservice to all who inhabit this earth" - for not buying / diffusing his theories...

Let's hope that Cimino will stop communicating via proxy - and join our forum to advise us all about how we can best try and survive the deadly Fuk-U-Shima fallout... If he continues rejecting my invite (and if he's right about his imminent "Nuclear Armageddon scenario"), I'd say that he doesn't really care about humanity at all! :P

On a more serious note, I think it is high time for everyone to realize that the "Veterans Today" crowd (Fetzer/ Gordon Duff / Jim Dean /Dennis Cimino/ Ian Greenhalgh/ Don Fox / Kevin Barrett - etc ) is nothing but a crude - and transparently obvioUS - American military "cointelpro" operation - tasked with the gatekeeping for their all-important, military-controlled news media propaganda division - whose mass-control agenda heavily relies on fake imagery aired on TV - and on all other mainstream media outlets.
simonshack
Administrator
 
Posts: 6355
Joined: October 18th, 2009, 9:09 pm
Location: italy

Re: FUKUSHIMA nuke/tsunami scare 11-03-11

Postby ShaneG on August 18th, 2014, 3:35 am

Well said Simon, judging from his response he seems well and truly shook. Funny how he shouts "TONS" and "TRUTH" in a desperate attempt to sound convincing. Why not caps lock every word for emphasis Dennis, some of us cant hear you clear enough.
ShaneG
Member
 
Posts: 76
Joined: April 24th, 2013, 1:53 am

Re: FUKUSHIMA nuke/tsunami scare 11-03-11

Postby Critical Mass on August 18th, 2014, 6:28 am

Cimino wrote:*
we are facing the extinction of all life on Earth due to this one severe accident. De-emphasis of that is criminally wrong and in fact, insane.

This is such a well thought out & convincing argument that I'm going to buy myself a Geiger counter, some guns & about a kiloton worth of ammo.

I'd advise you all to do the same as, sooner rather than later, the government agents are going to attack our bunkers... possibly with space missiles loaded with bunker busting nano-nuke warheads. They'll obviously then hide their crimes with holograms and help themselves to our hidden gold.

PM me and I'll tell you all where, how & when to defend your own strongholds.

Anybody who disagrees with my stance on this... is a mentally ill thief.
Critical Mass
Member
 
Posts: 544
Joined: July 8th, 2014, 11:33 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Worldwide media deceptions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests