jlsumme wrote:... but when it comes to building 7 we steadfastly back that video as the real deal...
jlsumme wrote:I believe that a building (wtc #7) under the somewhat weak stress observed should not have fallen as it did, but with all of the fakery could the perfect collapse be fake? Here goes the Dr. Judy Woods thing.....Don't hit me yet (covering head).What if that building was taken down by HARP or some other unknown weapon and they had to make it look like a standard demolition to keep prying eyes away from the actual truth with the fake video. If we dismiss the primary videos we must question the building 7 video and not take it as the truth either.
repentantandy wrote:Building Seven's still-essential-to-the-overall-scheme demise
fbenario wrote:repentantandy wrote:Building Seven's still-essential-to-the-overall-scheme demise
Sorry, but I don't buy it. If there were no WTC 7 'story' at all, it wouldn't change anything about the sheeple's understanding of the 'events' of that day. There would STILL be no increase in peoples' willingness to think for themselves. And why do you still assume WTC 7 came down 'later' in the day? There is no evidence for that time-line whatsoever, since you can't base any conclusion at all on the faked images/videos.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests