THE DERAILING ROOM

[smj]

“It was only the beeping reality of Sputnik that suddenly made the threat of intercontinental atomic warfare with ballistic rockets more than a science fiction story.”
-william pickering
http://www.nzedge.com/legends/william-pickering/
viewtopic.php?f=23&t=1070&start=795#p2402484

satellites have got to be the hoaxiest shit ever, except for the nuke hustle of course. both hustles were built on the orbital hustle of course. neils bohr brought the quantum mechanics hustle to rutherford's cavendish atom with his discrete orbital bullpsience and kepler and newton gave us the celestial mechanics hustle using orbitals. it's just a coincidence of course that the platonic ideal of the atom is bohr's quantum mechanical nonsense; it's also a coincidence of course that the platonic ideal of the modern soccer ball is the telstar satellite. butwhatever, the propergander site has some good work on the subject...

http://www.aamorris.net/properganderatp ... satellites
http://abyss.uoregon.edu/~js/glossary/bohr_atom.html
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kepler_orbit
http://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/wp-conte ... Alamos.jpg

...loran and sonochemistry (the real chain reaction) were dreamed up by alfred loomis in his castle in tuxedo park. i'll be explicit this time for patrix, loomis invented the shit that kept you from getting lost on the ocean and the bullshit hustle that goes down at nuclear power plants. alfred loomis was henry stimson's first cousin and protégé. i repeat, alfred loomis was henry stimson's first cousin, please google monster henry stimson and the manhattan project fellow skeptics. and please google sonochemistry and the chain reaction fellow skeptics; then google cherenkov radiation and sonoluminescence, the hustle will become apparent. you'll realize how the reactors make steam and produce that pretty blue light. then look into the loomis family; i suggest starting with mahlon loomis, the first wireless telegrapher, and his f'ing kites.

https://www.smecc.org/mhlon_loomis.htm
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahlon_Loomis
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loomis_Gang

loomis' loran has been around since the early forties. lorana was accurate to the tens of miles while the modern loranc is accurate to about 10 meters we're told. perhaps it's even more accurate now and it's called gps or maybe the psichotic hustlers at nasa, darpa, rand, and a famous psience fiction writer invented "world traveling spaceships"...

https://www.rand.org/pubs/special_memor ... 11827.html

...if you're of the philosophical bent, bust out your occam razor fellow skeptics if need be; but please sharpen it first. we're also told gps confirmed einstein's relativity and lorentz'/minkowski's/poincare's transformative time dilation and mass contraction bullshit like a good narrative device should. butwhatever, that was psience and whatnot...

"In 1956, the German-American physicist Friedwardt Winterberg proposed a test of general relativity — detecting time slowing in a strong gravitational field using accurate atomic clocks placed in orbit inside artificial satellites.
Special and general relativity predict that the clocks on the GPS satellites would be seen by the Earth's observers to run 38 microseconds faster per day than the clocks on the Earth. The GPS calculated positions would quickly drift into error, accumulating to 10 kilometers per day. The relativistic time effect of the GPS clocksrunning faster than the clocks on earth was corrected for in the design of GPS."
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_ ... ing_System

...38 microseconds sounds about right; but i'm no psientist. and as for television signals let's recall that the spanish-american war was about laying submarine cable across the pacific; and cyrus west field had laid the first transatlantic cable all dafeckin' way back in 1858. but jfk, the son of a movie mogul, couldn't talk televised live to europe until 19fuckin'62 cause of clarke et al's spaceships. actually now that i think about it a dull occam razor ought a suffice to slice thru the spaceship bullpsience.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyrus_West_Field
https://www.cnet.com/news/when-telstar-met-jfk/

...and it's pure coincidence of course that ken feckin' feinberg is the long-time chairman of the board for the kennedy (jfk gave a speech that said we was going to the moon if i recall correctly) library and that his big sis', kick, married into the cavendish clan or that kennedy has the busiest performing arts (acting) center in the world named after him in the heart of d.c. that just so happened to be designed by the stanford research institute. the video of kennedy giving his famous speech to europe thru the telstar spaceship was shown to gullible apes across the world by pathé, another programming tool that was once owned by his dear old dad of course...

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/SRI_International
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_F. ... rming_Arts
https://www.jfklibrary.org/About-Us/JFK ... nberg.aspx
http://www.usvsst.com

...the fuckin' rooskies launched sputnik during the international geophysical year. the igy was dreamed up in dc at james van allen's house. he was the geiger(hans geiger teamed up with rutherford to make his famous counter) counter expert that worked with the disney actor, von braun, and the head of jack parson's lab, bill pickering, on 'murica's brave response to sputnick. the van allen belt is the reason many so called space psience experts say we haven't returned to the moon in half a century; how convenient for the narrative, no? their little beeping hustle response to the dastardly nuke wielding commies was called explorer one...


http://explorer.lib.uiowa.edu/mobile.html
http://people.uncw.edu/emslies/document ... hofIGY.pdf
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hans_Geiger

...some heroic fucks in the army documented the explorer one launch for posterity and it's hilarious. enjoy...

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ffjcQASp8Kg

...but anyways you seem like a pleasant enough chap so bienvenue dans notre réalité, patrix.

[patrix]

Honestly - To me you sound like people at work saying it's perfectly natural that a building cave into it's own footprint by office and jet fuel fires. To perform an experiment at home with some steel wire and gasoline would be utterly pointless. And likewise it's impossible to design some kind of experiment here on earth that could refute that rockets cannot work in the vacuum of space. What happens if NASA does a 180 and admits they've been lying all the time and that rockets actually don't work in space? Does that mean they have to work since the opposite of what they claim seems to be the only true source of truth?
And just to be clear so I don't get accused of slipping in any disinfo - I agree that most likely all imagery from 911 is fake.

[pov603]

[patrix]

FYI - maybe read thru a thread a little before replying to the last post.

I have, but did honestly not find much of interest which is not surprising at a forum where someone gets criticized and censored for using verifiable observations and high school physics to question some of the hypothesizes postulated.

[Flagged for unjustified complaints. See patrix's "verifiable observations" and "high school physics" in preceding posts. -HP]

I am however very grateful of and impressed by Simon, hoi.polloi and other forum members knowledge and work in image analysis and ability to apply that to understand the inner workings of the conspiracy we are confronted with.

And I agree that most diseases, especially the so called western ones (eg. obesity, diabetes, heart disease, cancer, dementia) are engineered, but I think the main culprit is the diet, and that the social engineering to accomplish this goes all the way back to the sixties when the free mason Walt Disney made animals our soulmates through his movies so that we would oppose eating them.

At the same time Rockefeller promoted Ancel Keys and his junk science that argued animal fat is unhealthy. The so called diet-heart hypothesis.

Animal fat is the most essential nutrient to humans. The liver needs it to produce cholesterol which is the raw material needed to repair cells, create hormones and keep the immune system working.

Less animal fat also means more carbohydrates which the body can only tolerate so much of before the hormone system gets disrupted and results in hyperinsulin/diabetes and obesity.

The best hypothesis regarding cancer in my view is that it's not really a disease but a natural mechanism the body uses when it's being poisoned. We actually all get cancer every day. Some cells transform and grow to a sponge like substance that absorbs and isolates the toxic substances from the rest of the body. When less poison is being added and/or the liver, kidneys and lymphatic system (that all detoxifies the body) resumes normal function the "tumour" naturally recesses.

I think this is confirmed by Thomas Seyfrieds work, but he doesn't dare to spell it out. The Nutwork keeps doctors and researches in a tight leach, and add some psyops involving murdered alternative doctors on top of it.

So what causes the poisoning that has given us the alarming numbers of cancer? The culprit is the diet and health advice the Nutwork promotes through their propaganda, psyops and social engineering. It is designed to weaken the immune system, clog up our lymphatic system and promote microbe growth that produces toxins. We are also conditioned to eat frequently and sleep less which makes it harder for the body to detox.

Vegetable oils or "unsaturated fat" as it is also called, should be avoided. It clogs up our lymphatic system and promotes insulin resistance.

Grain, starch and sugar should be consumed moderately since it promotes microbe growth that in turn results in toxic buildup and cancer.

Soy products, sunscreen oil, fluoride, artificial sweeteners and most additives and pesticide residues should be avoided since its highly toxic.

And the icing of the cake is of course the chemotherapy. When a patient goes into chemo the doctor often gives an estimate on how much time the patient has left. The ability to do so is because the toxins added by the chemotherapy usually pushes the cancer over the hilltop and kills the patient within the estimation.

My favorite vegetarian Hollywood psyop is the key scene in Silence of the lambs where Jodi Foster as Agent Starling gets traumatized for life by growing up on a farm and witnessing a lamb slaughter...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zeKqD2g9-ic

[hoi.polloi]

I have, but did honestly not find much of interest which is not surprising at a forum where someone gets criticized and censored for using verifiable observations and high school physics to question some of the hypothesizes postulated.

This is the kind of comment we get for putting up with your malarkey and your refusal to follow forum rules like reading the thread you're commenting in? Fuck that.

Patrix, you are rightly criticized for acting like you cannot understand when people don't accept your most ignorant assumptions without question. In what way have your most blase, stupidest and most petulant posts been censored? I moved them to the Derailing Room for everyone to see how you poorly reason, where they are archived as a testament to exactly the kinds of tiresome and lazy arguments that prevent reason from prevailing in our culture. Furthermore, we don't have time to deal with you if you're going to take every opportunity to complain about the very platform you are using for your opinions.

It's also true that I have seen animal fats, or other fats, be absolutely critical in helping people with poor diets recover to full and balanced health. I am skeptical that the "frugivore" method works for all. But that's not an excuse for you to tear into CluesForum's moderation.

As for censorship, it's called moderation. And for being a troll in threads that call for the highest civil discourse, you can leave now and simply start a blog all about your high school physics opinions and egotistical manner. Farewell.

[Robbow93]

full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GiiAW5ItPhI

The "Truth" is out! This girl says it definitely not fake

[brianv]

Given that both are similarly sized - if the "ISS" is visible from Earth then every football stadium in the UK (and there are hundreds) should be visible from the ISS correct? Greater London is barely a dot from 200 km, (like Hoi I also found the Google zoom) so where are the 20-30 Premier League London Stadiums?

The marker is at Manchester, please highlight Old Trafford Football Football Stadium, one of the biggest in Europe!



You will see in the bottom right that we are only at 200km!

[ObamaSimLaden]

At night with the lights on at the stadium only you could probably see the little dot...without other light pollution.

[Flabbergasted]

You will see in the bottom right that we are only at 200km!

Isn´t that a scale for distances on the surface? The illustration looks more like 3000 km altitude.

[ObamaSimLaden]

fun experiment


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3b9pK-O6cE

[brianv]

Given that both are similarly sized - if the "ISS" is visible from Earth then every football stadium in the UK (and there are hundreds) should be visible from the ISS correct? Greater London is barely a dot from 200 km, (like Hoi I also found the Google zoom) so where are the 20-30 Premier League London Stadiums?

The marker is at Manchester, please highlight Old Trafford Football Football Stadium, one of the biggest in Europe!



You will see in the bottom right that we are only at 200km!

Why was this post moved to the derailing room? Is there something wrong with it?

*****
ADMIN NOTICE (simon): Well, Brian - sorry but that "we are only at 200 km" quote of yours is just silly : that 200km ruler is not an altitude indicator: it's just a scale they put on Google maps to measure the distance between any point on the map.

[brianv]

Well if that's the case it was an error, not silliness, on my part. I zoomed into 20m on the satellite view then zoomed out to 200 km.

Will somebody post the correct image from 200 km please?

[hoi.polloi]

Hey, brianv, I think that could be a very good visual point — pun intended. I'm on board. The problem for me is I don't have a system that can use Google Earth view. But I searched the issue, and I think this is how it's done if you want to give it a try:


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YhkIpJT_iIg

[brianv]

Hey, brianv, I think that could be a very good visual point — pun intended. I'm on board. The problem for me is I don't have a system that can use Google Earth view. But I searched the issue, and I think this is how it's done if you want to give it a try:


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YhkIpJT_iIg

Sorry hoi, I'm not playing that video through my AdamA7Xs, audio is atrocious.

Yes I think someone had better because here is an image from NASA from 300 Km

Earth in daylight, from ISS in 2012. The U.S. Great Lakes shine in the sun.

You see that large boat going across Lake Ontario? No, but if it had a light on at night I'd see a little dot!

Well here's another taken from the ISS itself.



And maybe Simon can see his house from here? If only he'd left his light on in the bathroom damn. I see too that AC Milan are at home tonight!!



I'm still waiting for someone else NOT ME to post the correct images from google satellite view from 200km and tell me where I'm in error. Thank you!

You open google, Windows Key + PrtScr on the image (screen will dim for a second), you will find the image in your Pictures folder. Trim it in Gimp if you like, upload to Imgur and post here!

[Flabbergasted]

You say you've studied this issue in detail?

Sorry, I misread the post. Comment deleted.