THE DERAILING ROOM

A place to relax and socialize - to muse, think aloud and suggest

Re: THE DERAILING ROOM

Postby hoi.polloi on December 20th, 2016, 10:45 pm

Perhaps you mean no harm, but yes indeed — we have had entirely too much fluff from shills pretending to be into the research and producing less themselves.

Sorry if you take vetting for "aggression". Still, I hope you keep in mind this site should not necessarily serve as any kind of replacement for making real community or friends. Instead, it should be considered as tools and information for you to bring home to your community.

I would challenge you to word just exactly what you typed as "chatty" in oral speech to your friends and family rather than us.

Why?

Because that's where real change happens. You might save generic musings for the CHATBOX or elsewhere but please keep threads as academic as you can muster. Thank you.

You might also consider going to Fakeologist.com for therapeutic audio chat, but be careful. Ab definitely does not spend much time vetting for agents or suspicious behavior.

Absolutely nothing personal is meant. Quite the opposite. You are probably a very great person. We just can't afford too much jibber jabber and even speculation when there are important proofs to show to the world. Thank you for understanding.
hoi.polloi
Administrator
 
Posts: 4867
Joined: November 14th, 2010, 8:24 pm

Re: THE DERAILING ROOM

Postby patrix on December 21st, 2016, 12:00 am

I hear you

I have actually asked to be on fakeologist. Looking forward to be "shill probed" if I'm invited -_-

It's a bit weird to have conversations like this and sometimes it feels like the shills are doing their deed without even being present making everyone suspicious. But its also understandable since the greatest lies ever conceived by humans are the subject matter. And the truth is what they fear most.

And I do speak in person to anyone who will listen about these things. I cannot think of anything more important.

Take care Hoi.polloi. I'll try not making any more shitposts -_- /Patrik
patrix
Member
 
Posts: 169
Joined: December 14th, 2016, 11:24 am

Re: THE DERAILING ROOM

Postby HonestlyNow on December 21st, 2016, 12:22 pm

patrix » December 20th, 2016, 2:54 pm wrote:Um

So

I'm not a native english speaker and may be a bit "chatty" (hope that's a correct use of that term) since there aren't many places to discuss these kind of topics. I also dont see that many posts so I thought Id post some comments. No harm meant OK?

But I guess you have had your share of shills just like on r/conspiracy at Reddit which has went totally useless latley.

Anyway I think you should consider being a little bit less passive aggressive on newcomers. Thank you... I'll shut up for now.

Using correct spelling on this site is important. I've highlighted in red three words that are spell-checked (underlined with a squiggly red line) in the reply box. Please make use of the spell-checker to correct misspellings. Spellcheck will also underline proper nouns (like names such as Reddit) which you can ignore if you know that the names are spelled correctly. (Correct spellings are English, don't, and lately.)

Thank you.
HonestlyNow
Member
 
Posts: 376
Joined: September 13th, 2011, 12:15 am

Re: Satellites : general discussion and musings

Postby HonestlyNow on December 22nd, 2016, 1:30 pm

patrix wrote:Cluesforum is not the only site analyzing space imagery and pointing out problems with it. See http://www.aulis.com/ for example.

I wonder why they have Judy Wood's book for sale at this site.
HonestlyNow
Member
 
Posts: 376
Joined: September 13th, 2011, 12:15 am

Re: Satellites : general discussion and musings

Postby patrix on December 22nd, 2016, 1:49 pm

HonestlyNow » December 22nd, 2016, 1:30 pm wrote:
patrix wrote:Cluesforum is not the only site analyzing space imagery and pointing out problems with it. See http://www.aulis.com/ for example.

I wonder why they have Judy Wood's book for sale at this site.


Because they're shills right? So which sites are not shills besides Cluesforum in your opinion? No wait. Don't tell me. I might be a... <_<
patrix
Member
 
Posts: 169
Joined: December 14th, 2016, 11:24 am

Re: Fakery in Orbit: THE I$$

Postby albatrosv14 on December 25th, 2016, 9:05 pm


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QvTmdIhYnes

Anyone want to analyze this? The video is pretty long and it shows various parts of ISS.
albatrosv14
Member
 
Posts: 13
Joined: August 17th, 2016, 10:20 am

Re: THE DERAILING ROOM

Postby hoi.polloi on December 25th, 2016, 9:56 pm

That's not how to use CluesForum. Posting shit and asking other people to analyze stuff. We don't do "post link and run" kind of things here. Alright?

Please people.

You are intelligent. You can see what's wrong with the video. You can help others see it by pointing it out.

Just posting without critique is tantamount to promoting the propaganda. Would you please use our forum?

We're not Facebook. Thank you!
hoi.polloi
Administrator
 
Posts: 4867
Joined: November 14th, 2010, 8:24 pm

Re: LaMia 2933 Flight Hoax - 28/29-11-2016

Postby theyBOUGHTit! on December 26th, 2016, 4:04 pm

http://imgur.com/r/conspiracy/IzdfI

Here's my first contribution. I'd like to see these images on this post, not just where to click. I'm new, I'll figure it out. I've been reading this wonderful forum for some 5 or 6 years. It is very interesting how I stubbled across cluesforum. I had already been doing a lot of "red pill" research for a year or 2, having detected the fake moon landings, and accepted them as what they are. I had checked off a list of topics covered in the forum already. It was when I suspected that ALL satellites are phony, and Sputnik sounds more like a type of potato than a real spacecraft.

When researching you-tube videos about fake satellites, I found the link to cluesforum. Jackpot! There really ARE other people that have a brain at all!

I found it most entertaining at that time searching through cluesforum topics I was not yet familiar with, such as the TITANIC story and the involvement of J.P. Morgan. I already suspected that ALL the topics in cluesforum are pretty much well researched, containing undeniable evidence to support claims.

When I would come across other topics I was not yet familiar with, I could already tell, there is a greater than 99% chance that without even reading the topic, this is yet another BOGUS piece of "history/information". OF COURSE-- I read all the topic at least until I was convinced, if not all of it. I can see that a number of people make submissions WITHOUT EVEN READING the topic!

I'm sure others have a similar story. Not to make such a long post, CHECK OUT THESE PHOTOS!! I can't believe cluesforum does not already have this most interesting photo comparison between La Mia flight 2933, and flight 93.

To me, these photos speak VOLUMES. It proves that the same perpetrators were responsible for both 9-11 AND this LaMia flight 2933.

EVEN BETTER!! I LIVE in Brasil half the time, so I have a particularly interesting perspective on the effects of NATIONAL PRIDE, and bullshit news :puke:

NATIONAL PRIDE is the number one problem when trying to get people to remove the head from the ass, and these days, people have their head SO far up, they are CHOKING on it!

People in Brasil all had a great laugh and a chuckle when they saw that TRUMP was THOROUGHLY predicted in the Simpson's cartoon in the year 2000, down to which state voted for Trump (which is totally impossible unless they had plans to make Trump president in the first place).

Ha Ha! Everyone in Brasil had a good laugh, and could see it CLEARLY that TRUMP was not elected, but rather it was in the plans a LONG time ago.

AND NOW?? This "plane crash" in Brasil that just happens to contain an ENTIRE FOOTBALL TEAM (not THAT!) was SO predicted in the Simpsons.... And let's review what was said: "We found an entire missing Brasilian soccer team WORKING in your reactor core!!".

What does Mr. Burns say in response? "That plane crashed in MY property!"

SO-- knowing that NUKES are fake, what did Mr. Burns REALLY just tell us? THE ENTIRE TEAM is WORKING in the FICTIONAL reactor CORE--- (the very CORE of it!), in other words, whatever passengers supposedly aboard this LaMia flight 2933 that WERE NOT "vic-sims" are PERFECTLY ALIVE AND WELL, and IN ON IT! KEEP IN MIND--- to WORK means that you get PAID!

I don't know at all if any of these people are dead or alive, BUT-- it seems like a logical pattern-- AFTER ALL--- the families are receiving donations to the tune of ENDLESS MILLIONS of Reais for having hit the most tragic chord you could think of-- A SOCCER TEAM DIES!! the WHOLE team!

The same (Brasilian) people who were just laughing about how TRUMP was predicted in the Simpsons suddenly change their tune to:

"HOW CAN YOU EVEN SAY THAT when all these people are DEAD?" Show them the SIMPSONS cartoon, and they seem to detect that SOMETHING is not the way it seems, BUT--- that NATIONAL PRIDE, well it "TRUMPS" (pardon my French...), well, REASON itself!
http://imgur.com/r/conspiracy/IzdfI

Cheers, cluesforum members!

ALSO-- I would JUST LOVE it if anyone that happens to DISAGREE with ANYTHING that I have to say, and also, in a civilized manner, offer counter evidence, or simply correction to something that I said that is incorrect (and obviously so, with evidence) Not to battle or make enemies, or even shake up the system (which I see as pointless). I simply have no other avenue of intelligent conversation.
Last edited by theyBOUGHTit! on December 26th, 2016, 8:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
theyBOUGHTit!
Member
 
Posts: 13
Joined: December 22nd, 2016, 12:45 am

Re: Satellites : general discussion and musings

Postby theyBOUGHTit! on December 26th, 2016, 4:39 pm

In response to "PATRIX".

I can see that you have taken a few "red pills". However, you are jumping a number of guns delving into what I consider to be an "advanced" topic (fake satellites, that is).

I have successfully pulled MANY heads from MANY asses, so I generally know what TO and NOT TO say to people when getting into these topics.

Satellites, like I said, is an ADVANCED TOPIC, and it is actually the one that lead me to this forum in the first place. You should ALWAYS avoid overwhelming people with the satellites topic before making sure that some 20 other red pills get eaten.

What led ME to suspect that all satellites must be fake? Well, for starters, HOW DID THEY GET THERE when all of the delivery vehicles were a figment of our imagination? First you need to thoroughly accept that the moon landings were faked in a studio, the "Saturn V" rocket is totally bogus, SPUTNIK is bogus. The story laid out in this forum, particularly the "inventors" of satellites is very telling.

And there is Aurthur C. Clarke, (when I was a kid, I read 2001).

REALITY ALARM!! How does a FICTION writer "INVENT the communications satellite?" You need to go back, and READ and UNDERSTAND everything in the satellites section, and I recommend the "does rocketry work in a vacuum" as well, even though I have my disagreements with that topic. I have a simple science experiment you could do at home I will write about later....

Another extremely telling piece of research is to simply make a google search for "IMAGES, or PHOTOS, of satellites" as everyone has pointed out! Have fun in cartoon land! BE SURE TO POINT OUT which satellite is the REAL satellite when you make this search!

D'OH!! We know, we know! It hurts your pride a bit, but until you FINALLY take THIS red pill, you really are not doing this forum much good.

It seems well known in this forum that SATELLITES and DOES ROCKETRY WORK IN A VACUUM are pretty much the premier topics (and the most advanced).

If you try to jump the natural sequence that you should use to attempt to educate people, and jump to SATELLITES, you are only going to wind up with "THAT LOOK." :puke:
theyBOUGHTit!
Member
 
Posts: 13
Joined: December 22nd, 2016, 12:45 am

Re: LaMia 2933 Flight Hoax - 28/29-11-2016

Postby CluedIn on December 26th, 2016, 4:58 pm

theyBOUGHTit! Where to begin!

First you claim that you have been reading this forum for 5 or 6 years, and yet you don't introduce yourself in the required thread for newcomers. 2nd, I find your use of capitalization very inconsistent and odd. Also, I found this paragraph rather disturbing with your use of the 5 or 6 and then the 2 (11 - 2 anyone?) Also, spelling is very important. It's what sets this forum apart, IMO.

"Here's my first contribution. I'd like to see these images on this post, not just where to click. I'm new, I'll figure it out. I've been reading this wonderful forum for some 5 or 6 years. It is very interesting how I stubbled across cluesforum. I had already been doing a lot of "red pill" research for a year or 2, having detected the fake moon landings, and accepted them as what they are. I had checked off a list of topics covered in the forum already. It was when I suspected that ALL satellites are phony, and Sputnik sounds more like a type of potato than a real spacecraft."

I really can't see what your point is between flight 93 and 2933 - 93 has no plane!

And you may want to tone it down being a new member, as we don't try to pick fights, but we certainly will stand behind our research and discuss our differences in a mature, open-minded manner.
CluedIn
Member
 
Posts: 259
Joined: December 1st, 2015, 1:15 pm

Re: LaMia 2933 Flight Hoax - 28/29-11-2016

Postby theyBOUGHTit! on December 26th, 2016, 5:06 pm

Doesn't it seem odd that these people are all dressed in perfectly clean white and yellow suits? where is the sense of urgency?

I'd say these photos speak for themselves.

I don't have any intention of "picking fights", just thought that this could be a worthy contribution to this section.

Doesn't the similarity alarm you at all?

CHEERS! the last thing I want is to piss people off in the forum.

Take the photos, or leave them. I've said my piece!
theyBOUGHTit!
Member
 
Posts: 13
Joined: December 22nd, 2016, 12:45 am

Re: LaMia 2933 Flight Hoax - 28/29-11-2016

Postby theyBOUGHTit! on December 26th, 2016, 6:03 pm

In response to "clued in".

I seem to recall, without checking on it, that I have agreed with a number of things that you have said. SO-- how are you, brother "clued in"?

I am not trying troll or shill, so I can't understand the vote of no-confidence so much. Fine, doubt how long I have been reading the forum. What's the point, and why would I have any motive to lie about that? I disagree with a number of things that people have posted in the forum, but unless you are CERTAIN that I am in fact lying about how long I've been reading the forum, why even suggest that, and what difference does it make if I was reading it for a month or 5 years? I am not precisely sure how long it's been, only that I started reading around the year 2012, or it could have been 2011.

I understand your point, how comparing flight 93 to LaMia 2933 where one has a plane in it, and and the other does not seems to be pointless, BUT--- it's just as pointless in the first place to suggest that there could even BE a plane crash without a plane!

But hey, I will try to listen to everyone with respect, and O.K., I am a CAPS HOUND, and I will chill out on that. Some people seem to think you are yelling when you use all caps, which seems weird to me, but I have noticed people perceive it that way.

Can we examine these photos for a minute, though? (I was under the impression that EVIDENCE was king here....)

#1 where are the engines from flight 2933? are we to believe that the crash was so forceful that the engines flew off, but there were survivors? The wing is also UPSIDE DOWN (OOPS! sorry for yelling!), and yet somehow placed as if it had just snapped off the plane. :lol:

#2 As cluesforum members, we should ALL know by now that the flight 93 photos are the least consistent with an actual plane crash of ANY of them! That makes flight 93 the mother of all fake plane crashes! No plane! SO-- unless you are suggesting that flight 93 actually happened according to the official story, then it's safe to say that the photos from flight 93 are fake or staged. Where does that leave us when a known fake crash is so very similar (and I ask you to spend 10 minutes examining the photos for anomilies, please!) to this supposedly real crash?

If I was in the same room as you, I'd shake your hand with all due respect, especially since I don't even know you! Please, I would ask the same!
theyBOUGHTit!
Member
 
Posts: 13
Joined: December 22nd, 2016, 12:45 am

Re: LaMia 2933 Flight Hoax - 28/29-11-2016

Postby Flabbergasted on December 26th, 2016, 7:15 pm

theyBOUGHTit! wrote:People in Brasil all had a great laugh and a chuckle when they saw that TRUMP was THOROUGHLY predicted in the Simpson's cartoon in the year 2000, down to which state voted for Trump (which is totally impossible unless they had plans to make Trump president in the first place).

Maybe you should do a little more homework before repeating some of the viral conspiracy baloney created for fun or to make "theorists" appear goofy. You know, sharpen your BS meter a bit.
viewtopic.php?f=26&t=1466&p=2399610#p2399610
Flabbergasted
Member
 
Posts: 687
Joined: November 12th, 2012, 1:19 am

Re: LaMia 2933 Flight Hoax - 28/29-11-2016

Postby theyBOUGHTit! on December 26th, 2016, 7:24 pm

Hello, Flabergasted. I have read a lot of your posts as well, and recall agreeing with a lot or all you have said. Can't remember seeing anything from you I didn't agree with.

Regardless of weather the Simpsons predicted anything or not, the national pride issue is quite something, and that was my point.

Cheers!
theyBOUGHTit!
Member
 
Posts: 13
Joined: December 22nd, 2016, 12:45 am

Re: LaMia 2933 Flight Hoax - 28/29-11-2016

Postby theyBOUGHTit! on December 26th, 2016, 8:06 pm

Holy cow, Clued in!

You just pointed it out to me! I had not seen the extremely interesting numerology in:

Flight 93, (and the second one, 2933! (2)93(3), and of course, the fact that the number 33 is cut off right at that number on the "wreckage".

I had zero intention of trying to do these numerology games myself, but I am new, and I understand why one would question newer members.

Hey, I'm mostly here to agree with what has already been posted, and I've seen people that are trying to disagree with it get chewed up because they have no evidence to offer. I may be new, but hey, when you catch me saying something like "the moon landings happened" then I can see questioning who I am and what I have to say.

Just discovering the numerology of flight 93 and 2933 was entertainment in itself! What are the odds?

Happy Holidays! B)
theyBOUGHTit!
Member
 
Posts: 13
Joined: December 22nd, 2016, 12:45 am

PreviousNext

Return to THE LIVING ROOM

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests