I couldn't find this subject already proposed or developed, so I think it might be worth a new topic, because I see a huge elephant in the room here.
I salute many brilliant investigators in this forum, most of whom are intent in effectively dissecting the latest media hoaxes. That's great, but I think the most important thing would be trying to find out who's really behind the conspiracy to keep humanity in its present sorry state, and what, if anything, we can do about that. I mean, we can very effectively discover and denounce the media hoaxes here, but do we agree on who the "hoaxers" might be?
I think that's the most important thing, because they say you can’t fight an enemy if you haven't even identified it yet.
Many could say that it's what we're trying to do here too, but it's very difficult. Well, I don't know... Is it really so difficult? I used to think so, but I don't anymore. And I'll explain why here, so please bear with me.
Since I discovered that there is a giant conspiracy in the world, I've been trying to find out who rules the current state of civilization by looking in its darkest corners, trying to imagine who are the real people in power and where they could hide. But recently I've come to question this basic assumption. Are the "perpetrators", as they're often called in this forum, really hiding? Maybe, but do you remember E.A. Poe when he said – I think it was in "The Purloined Letter" – that the best way to hide something is "in plain sight"?
Allow me another, literal quote here: "To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize". It's attributed to Voltaire, although our beloved Wickedpedia considers it a "Voltaire misattribution" (of course!).
Let's try and apply it here anyway. Who are today the people we’re not allowed to criticize, to the point that you are heavily stigmatized and ostracized if you do?
I'm not going to respond to this question here, because I'm sure that everybody knows the answer. And also because even here mentioning a certain ethnic group makes people feel uncomfortable, including the administrators of this forum, who reasonably don't want it to be labeled in a certain way and lose its credibility.
So let’s not mention this group here. In a sense it's even useless to do it, because I'm positive that everybody here will understand who I'm referring to. And I think this is a very meaningful clue in itself... So I'll just talk about an "ethnic group" and use other generic terms, confident that you'll understand me anyway and hoping that you'll play along. It could also be an interesting experiment, no? Or maybe just a game, funny or not I don't know...
In fact, these people are so confident in their power and control of the media and of financial and political institutions that, while we should be afraid to mention them, they can even brag openly about what they're doing to the rest of the world. They say it plainly in countless books, newspapers and magazines (which they own, by the way), but also in public speeches in front of their own:"We rule Hollywood", "We control politics", "We own the banks", and so on. Anybody can verify this for themselves by doing a few web searches.
They even have a collective name for the rest of the world, talking about it as an inferior species even in their religious texts. Consider this: in a "multicultural" world where everybody is supposed to say "no to racism", they can be openly and often viciously racist (and act upon their racism in very concrete ways, not just theorize about it), and have people not noticing or justifying it.
And not only that. They're even considered "progressive freedom-fighters" by most people because in the last couple of centuries at least they've been actually leading organizations that fight for the rights of “oppressed minorities” and immigrants. Admirable, you might say. But the problem is that, in the most blatant case of "double standards", in their own state they do the exact opposite of what they preach in others, expanding their borders with terroristic violence and closing them to anybody who doesn't belong to their race (they even have DNA tests to insure that!). They want us to think that race is just a form of "cultural conditioning", while they do everything to preserve their own.
And isn't it significant that they're fighting their battles for the rights of minorities exclusively in the countries were the predominant race is still (but most probably not for long) the one their religious texts consider their worst enemy? They seem to be applying to the West the "divide and conquer" tactics that their sacred books, but also their religious and political leaders, often preach openly about. And they’re doing it to the point of taking us to the verge of what can be considered, to all effects and purposes, a genocide against the targeted race.
It seems pretty clear to me that there is only one ethnic group in the world who really stands to benefit from the havoc that "multiculturalism" and mass immigration (to mention just a couple of main problems of our times, but this group seems to be behind several others too, like the usury of banking systems, for example) is causing in the western world. It seems just reasonable to think it must be the same group that spreads these phenomena in the rest of the world while protecting itself from them.
And talking about protective measures, they have found the most effective of all. I won't say what it is, but I'll just ask this question: what is the only thing that in our current, relativistic society you cannot question, and you even risk being thrown to jail if you do? Really, you can question pretty much anything today: you can question, and even deny, God, love, religions, moral values. You can even question or deny, as we do here, the reality of gigantic hoaxes like 9 11 or the moon landings. Of course, if you do you can be ridiculed, sneered at, emotionally attacked, but at least you cannot be denounced or thrown in jail. Not yet.
No, really, what do you think is the strongest dogma in our current society? What is the only thing that you can't question without being defined a "negationist", as if just by questioning a specific event in history (as you're allowed to do with any other historical fact) you could be deemed capable of negating anything. How much more Orwellian can all this get?
So do we really need to look any further for the “perpetrators”? Aren’t they already in front of our eyes? Or maybe by denying this we can delude ourselves into thinking that if we did find them we could do something about it, but now we can’t because we don’t know them…
But after all, what could really be done? I honestly don’t know. If any of you does, I'm open to suggestions. We must concede to this ethnic group that they are incredibly resilient. They have resisted to thousands of years of harsh criticism, persecutions, expulsions and attempted exterminations. Maybe it’s because they’re programmed since birth to fight for their own against the rest of the world, even though mainly in a stealthy way. Being a small minority, they’ve learnt do defend themselves to survive. And wanting to rule the world, they have chosen the more effective method available: ruthless deceit. They can be considered “masters of lies”. They even have a “religious” rite to ask their God’s forgiveness not for the lies they’ve told (as they would want us to believe), but for the lies they already know they will tell in the year to come!
Here we say the media are “masters of lies”. But they admittedly own the media, so can we do the math?
Of course, they’ve also found other ways to exploit the weaknesses of human nature to their advantage. But now I want to question this: is it really an advantage to live as they do? Yes, they may be controlling the world, but at what price? They’re heavily traumatized practically at birth, when they are mutilated by a religious figure who even sucks their blood. Then they’re brainwashed to think that everybody else in the world is out to get them, so they live in fear and think they always have to defend themselves. And maybe to find the strength necessary to do this they have to consider themselves superior to everybody else, and entitled to lie continuously and to have no respect for what they consider lesser living beings, from animals they slaughter in a merciless way to other humans they treat at best with no respect. Would you want to live like this, even with all the power in the world? I wouldn’t. Would you?
So maybe, more than hated or feared, this people should ultimately be pitied, because I think it’s better to suffer evil than to do it. As an evangelist said a long time ago: “What good is it for someone to gain the whole world, yet lose their soul?”
Or maybe I’m just too conditioned by my Christian upbringing. Perhaps, as we say in Italian: “Sono troppo… gentile!”
Now let me just conclude this long vent with another quote. It’s by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, who denounced a true extermination of tens of millions of European, Christian people. Actually he inspired me to avoid naming the “perpetrators”, as he calls them too.
You must understand. The leading Bolsheviks who took over Russia were not Russians. They hated Russians. They hated Christians. Driven by ethnic hatred they tortured and slaughtered millions of Russians without a shred of human remorse.
The October revolution was not what you call in America the ‘Russian Revolution’.
It was an invasion and conquest over the Russian people.
More of my countrymen suffered horrific crimes at their bloodstained hands than any people or nation ever suffered in the entirety of human history.
It cannot be overstated. Bolshevism committed the greatest human slaughter of all time.
The fact that most of the world is ignorant and uncaring about this enormous crime is proof that the global media is in the hands of the perpetrators.