"Hiding in Plain Sight: Reflections on an Open Conspiracy"

A place to relax and socialize - to muse, think aloud and suggest

Hiding in Plain Sight: Reflections on an Open Conspiracy

Postby simonshack on December 28th, 2015, 11:58 pm

*
I am unlocking this topic with the following thoughts and hopes trotting in my mind :

Firstly, to keep this thread locked just because it deals with a 'sensitive, highly controversial' subject is simply not an option. After all, this is Cluesforum - a place to discuss precisely such 'touchy' things. To be sure, this "Open Conspiracy Hiding in Plain Sight" or, to put it bluntly - "The 'Hidden' Jewish Role in Fucking Up this World" is simply too dire of an issue for any honest person to ignore or put on the back burner.

Of course, we're not talking about ALL the Jews in the world here (oh how very tiresome to have to specify this, time and again !...) - but only about the nastiest ones which I like to call the "JPM" (Jewish Power Maniacs). These self-anointed 'chosen people' (or, as some have it, the "Master Race" of this planet) have an ugly plan - let's henceforth call it the "CK-plan" - and you ALL ought to know about it : I urge anyone who've never heard of the Coudenhove-Kalergi Prize (which gets handed out on a yearly basis to our "World Leaders") to do so now :


THE COUDENHOVE-KALERGI "plan" viewtopic.php?p=2397490#p2397490 (Please DO read it!)


Hoping you have taken the time to read about the "CK plan", I trust you will more easily understand and appreciate my following opinions & concerns regarding this pesky subject-matter (and my heartfelt wishes as to how to 'deal with it' on this forum). But first, I may have to make very clear my personal views on being 'white' - which I am by birth, i.e. not because I have chosen so. I don't give a flying freckle about being white - nor do I think that whites have been among the 'nicer or better' folks throughout the ages. I simply don't feel like being part of any 'Big White Family' at all - or of any other 'Big Family' of any sort, for that matter. On the other hand, what I DO care about in this world (socially speaking), is to keep doing what I have oft been fortunate enough to do - that is, to meet / enjoy / befriend (and learn from) the widest possible range of people roaming this wonderfully diverse (and hence, exciting) planet of ours - the VAST MAJORITY of whom were good folks who've enriched my life. That's right - to me, diversity is true gold. Kill diversity - and you have the dullest planet imaginable. In fact - and make no mistake - the "CK plan" is not about 'genociding the white race' - it's about killing diversity (i.e. wiping out ALL existing 'colors' ... but one) and turn humanity into a grey, monolithic broth of 'human cattle' - more easily 'herdable' by the powers that be.

Two quotes from Coudenhove-Kalergi's insane "PRACTICAL IDEALISM" pamphlet :
"Here, too, proves the rule: the more mixed a people, the more dissimilar their representatives are to each other, the more impossible it is to construct unit types."
Get that: "construct unit types". :puke:

"The Eurasian-Negroid race of the future, outwardly similar to the ancient Egyptian, will replace the diversity of peoples with a variety of personalities."
"A variety of personalities?" Yeah, rrright. :angry:

At the end of the day, what we are dealing with here are mentally deranged folks in parasitic positions of power whose sick, demented plans need to be curtailed - asap and at all costs. It is not so much (or even not at all) about 'racial superiority or inferiority' - as it is about the mental (in)sanity of a bunch of 'fucking idiots' - as Critical Mass most aptly described them in this post of his yesterday.

That's it for now, folks - here's hoping this thread may start focusing on possible solutions to the problem at hand.
Will Cluesforum stop the JPM's from messing with this pretty world of ours? Doubtful. But we can at least give it a try !
simonshack
Administrator
 
Posts: 6428
Joined: October 18th, 2009, 9:09 pm
Location: italy

Re: "Hiding in Plain Sight: Reflections on an Open Conspirac

Postby jumpy64 on December 30th, 2015, 8:30 pm

Dear Simon,

I’m glad you unlocked this thread for the good reasons you’ve specified. And I agree with you that we should focus on possible solutions to the problem at hand. Actually, that’s what interests me the most and what I’ve been trying to do at least since my first post on “What to do” a month ago on p. 23 of this thread, closely followed by a second on the same page, while a third is still in the making.

On the whole, I’ve received more explicit criticism than explicit support. I’m not complaining, I’m just stating a fact. I accept criticism, but I think that, to be really useful, it should be followed by alternative solutions or at least alternative perspectives on how to face the problem, and I don’t remember reading any such things from anybody here. Including you, Simon, I’m afraid.

Well, at least you’ve asked the right questions, not only here but also in a previous post on page 26, when you wrote:

Let’s keep this tread on track, guys. Its title is: “Hiding in Plain Sight: Reflections on an Open Conspiracy, and it’s about the JPMs wishing to control our world (and about folks not realizing this fact). Can this be denied – yes or no?


Only ICfreely and myself answered directly to your question, both with a resounding "NO!"

It seems to me that now you’ve answered your original question yourself by saying that "’The 'Hidden' Jewish Role in Fucking Up this World’ is simply too dire of an issue for any honest person to ignore or put on the back burner”, and by directing once again our attention to the infamous “CK Plan” you had already uncovered for us in another thread.

Now you’re asking CF members to try and focus on possible solutions, and I hope that someone, possibly after the pleasant “distractions” of the holiday season, will answer this request. But maybe, since you seem to appreciate the problem, you could try and provide at least a tentative answer yourself. Hopefully it will inspire more people than the answers I’ve tried to give.

It will certainly inspire me, at least.

Thank you and happy new year to you and to all members and readers of this forum.
jumpy64
Member
 
Posts: 288
Joined: June 27th, 2013, 1:44 pm

Re: "Hiding in Plain Sight: Reflections on an Open Conspirac

Postby jumpy64 on January 8th, 2016, 6:51 pm

Recently I’ve had an interesting exchange of private messages with another member of this forum, Seneca. It was about the “racial issues” that led to the locking of this thread.

I don’t mean to rekindle the fire in any way, but I’ve decided to post parts of this private exchange also because Seneca himself encouraged me to explain my point of view better, in case it’s been misunderstood, and because he gave me permission to quote him publicly. I would have done this earlier, but I couldn’t for personal reasons. Anyway, this thread hasn’t progressed lately, so we are still at the same point we were when Seneca and I exchanged our PMs a few days ago.

jumpy64 wrote:
Seneca wrote:I agree with you that it is wrong to deny that races exist. I agree people should be free to discriminate. But I think there are much more useful groups to discriminate than races, and that except for the Jewish race, looking at a person’s race is probably not useful. But maybe you have some facts to back up your claims such as: “We can freely acknowledge that there are some good blacks, Muslims, and Jews. There just aren’t enough of them for our tastes”.

By the way you quoted this you made clear you agreed with it. But I still can't understand how you can come to this conclusion. Except for the part about Jews. Maybe it is because you use other definitions than me?

Earlier you wrote: “In fact I'm actually including in my ‘white people’ definition all really integrated and civil people of any race, color and creed”.

If you count all good blacks, Muslims and Jews as "white" and not as black, Muslim, Jewish... the quote is obviously true ; but this is not what Greg Johnson is saying.


You're right, Johnson was saying something more radical, and I thought it could have been a useful "provocation", if you will. But what I really think was expressed by my inclusive definition of all really integrated, civil people of any race, color and creed.

But to make sure that these people are really integrated, I think there should be severe politics to punish and even repatriate people who don't respect our rules and values, as anybody with some pride and common sense would do with someone who, after being accepted as a guest in their house, disrespected it. […]

I think that "multiculturalism" and the invasion of Europe under the guise of "humanitarian crises" (and we know better than anybody else how fake or at least manipulated these "crises" are) should be stopped ASAP. Actually, these things have already gone too far. We are letting JPMs "suicide" us.

To tell you the truth, I don't think we can really have racially homogeneous societies anymore, and this is not necessarily a bad thing, as long as, as I said before, people who want to come in our societies do that with the real intention of integrating in them. If they do, they could even enrich them, and we have demonstrated more than enough opennes to accept them as our own. But if they come to attack and destroy us, they should be treated as enemies, not naively welcomed as "poor refugees". I can accept and even welcome you in my house if you ask for hospitality and you're grateful with me for granting it to you. Otherwise, if you don't like my house or how it's run, you should go back to yours and run that as you like, not mine.

To do this, we need first of all to regain our moral strenght by refusing to feel guilty for all the evils of the world, as Jews go out of their way to make us feel with their propaganda. In my posts I have underscored the best qualities of the white race to counteract this nefarious propaganda, but if not superior we should at least feel not inferior to any other race, and fight for our right to have homelands in which our values and our rules are to be respected by outsiders. And anybody can become part of of our societies if they do respect them, of course.

And if we want to fight also for the rights of other ethnic or cultural groups, as we have demonstrated to be able to do even against our best interests sometimes, I think we should do it by helping oppressed people in their own countries.

But of course, before doing that, we must first free ourselves from the lethal influence of the ethnic group that's oppressing us in our own countries.


To this, Seneca replied in another PM:

jumpy64 wrote:
Seneca wrote:OK I am glad you cleared this up. I don't think many people understood that you used this as a provocation. I really had to look for that definition because I really wanted to inderstand what you meant. But others won't bother and I can't blame them.

As I said, the way you introduced the quote and put it in bold could only be interpreted as your complete agreement with it so maybe you would want that cleared up on the forum.

If you wanted to provoke people you have definately succeeded but I don't see what good you expected out of it. I agree that smj overreacted.

I agree with your solutions, and especially with your first step (free ourself from the lethal influence of the ethnic group that's oppressing us in our own countries). And I am very grateful for what you already accomplished on this forum.


Thank you, Seneca, but it still seems to me that, although a lot of people keep reading the thread (even while it was blocked), most members are still somewhat afraid to speak out on its subject. I probably scared them even more with my unsuccessful and evidently misguided "provocation", aimed at stimulating some pride in white people, but as I promised I won't do that again. I'm not interested in fighting with other members. I just want to find effective forms of collaboration, if possible.


I hope I’ve actually managed to explain myself better with this, thanks to Seneca’s input. But now, to go forward a little bit, I’d like to add something.

I realize that most Western people – myself included, at least to a certain extent – like to play what I would define the “individualistic game”.

This means that we try to overcome our prejudices and to judge individual people based on their personal merits, and not according to the race or group they belong to.

I agree that this is the best and most moral thing to do. It’s the highest kind of “game” human beings can play together, no doubt about that.

But it is also a delicate game, that is easily disrupted if somebody just pretends to play it, while actually following other, less advanced values, like the affiliation to a particular group or race.

This is what I think is being done in the West primarily by Jews, whose culture places a much higher value on the affiliation to their group than to individual qualities of people belonging to other groups. What I see happening then is that Jews in particular exploit Western people’s willingness to play the individual game and encourage it, while they just pretend to play it themselves and, in reality, keep favoring members of their own group. This way the game is irreparably rigged, and that I think explains how a minuscule group can be so disproportionately represented in positions of power.

So I wonder: why on earth should we let them continue to play the “individualistic game” in such a fraudulent way at our expenses?

Why should we be forced to continue to play as individuals while surrounded by groups of people who organize themselves as teams? Especially the Jews, of course, but also other groups like Blacks, Muslims or Chinese play as teams at least sometimes.

So why can’t we have our own team and play on the same level as others when necessary? That’s all I ask.

A possible answer came in 2012 from Rabbi Baruch Efrati, who said to Ynetnews.com at http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340 ... 73,00.html:

"Jews should rejoice at the fact that Christian Europe is losing its identity as a punishment for what it did to us for the hundreds of years were in exile there," the rabbi explained as the ethical reason for favoring Muslims, quoting shocking descriptions from the Rishonim literature (written by leading rabbis who lived during the 11th to 15th centuries) about pogroms and mass murders committed by Christians against Jews.

"We will never forgive Europe's Christians for slaughtering millions of our children, women and elderly… Not just in the recent Holocaust, but throughout the generations, in a consistent manner which characterizes all factions of hypocritical Christianity…

And now Europe is losing its identity in favor of another people and another religion, and there will be no remnants and survivors from the impurity of Christianity, which shed a lot of blood it won't be able to atone for."


Do we agree with this explanation?

It seems to me that most western people do, consciously or not.

Personally, I don’t, and I don’t care if someone calls me a “racist” or a "white supremacist" for this.
jumpy64
Member
 
Posts: 288
Joined: June 27th, 2013, 1:44 pm

Re: "Hiding in Plain Sight: Reflections on an Open Conspirac

Postby Apache on January 9th, 2016, 10:31 am

I apologise for interrupting your post Jumpy, which I do not intend to derail. I hope you don't mind my now posting the following research about Amitai Etzioni, the promoter and Guru of the "Third Way" doctrine known as communitarianism. I also apologise for its length, but there was no way to edit it down any further than I did.

The philosophy of communitarianism can be found in the UN's Agenda 21 "sustainable development" policies. The link between Agenda 21, communitarianism and Amitai Etzioni was first put forward by Niki Raapana (nikiraapana.blogspot.co.uk) in 2003, but the following is my own research into the subject, with a few quotes from her later on.

Rather than copy and paste too much text from the usual bio from Wiki I'll simply give the link and then post edited details:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amitai_Etzioni

Basic details are he was born in Germany but grew up in Palestine in the late 1930s on a kibbutz because his parents had to flee the Nazis. He changes his first name from Werner to Amitai (due to Hebrew school) and then his last name from Falk to Etzioni when he joins the illegal underground group the Palmach, the elite commando force of the Haganah. He dropped out of high school to do so. He fought against the British and the Arabs, blah blah. Apparently his name translates to 'truth tree of zion' or some such twaddle.

Following the war, Etzioni spent a year studying at an institute established by Martin Buber. In 1951 he enrolled in the Hebrew University of Jerusalem where he completed both BA (1954) and MA (1956) degrees for his studies in classical and contemporary works in sociology. In 1957 he went to the United States to study at the University of California, Berkeley, and was a research assistant to Seymour Martin Lipset. He received his PhD in sociology in 1958, completing the degree in the record time of 18 months.[4] Etzioni then remained in the United States to pursue an academic career.


Etzioni's PhD thesis is called "The organizational structure of the kibbutz". http://www.worldcat.org/title/organizat ... c/21736549

To obtain a modern day PhD in Sociology, at Harvard University, it takes at least 5 years.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Buber

In 1946 he published his work Paths in Utopia,[21] in which he detailed his communitarian socialist views and his theory of the "dialogical community" founded upon interpersonal "dialogical relationships".

Buber was a scholar, interpreter, and translator of Hasidic lore. He viewed Hasidism as a source of cultural renewal for Judaism, frequently citing examples from the Hasidic tradition that emphasized community, interpersonal life, and meaning in common activities (e.g., a worker's relation to his tools).

Buber's interpretation of the Hasidic tradition, however, has been criticized by scholars such as Chaim Potok for its romanticization. In the introduction to Buber's Tales of the Hasidim, Potok notes that Buber overlooked Hasidism's "charlatanism, obscurantism, internecine quarrels, its heavy freight of folk superstition and pietistic excesses, its tzadik worship, its vulgarized and attenuated reading of Lurianic Kabbalah." Even more severe is the criticism that Buber deemphasized the importance of the Jewish Law in Hasidism.


According to Etzioni's book, My Brother's Keeper, Buber offered full room and board and free tuition to Etzioni, with no high school diploma required, which was lucky for Etzioni as he didn't have one. Etzioni also confirms in his book that it was Buber who introduced him to communitarian philosophy.

More evidence that kibbutzism is communitarianism:

http://www.tikkun.org/fmd/files/Nieli_f ... or_Web.pdf

Brith Shalom members were often enthusiastic supporters of the communal values of the Kibbutz movement and other forms of communitarian socialism


http://www.jpost.com/printarticle.aspx?id=131746

JP: What is an example, then, of a community that actually fits your definition?
Etzioni: That's easy: the kibbutzim.


So, Etzioni grew up on a kibbutz, which is a form of communitarian socialism, wrote his Phd thesis on the kibbutz communitarian system and then spent the rest of his life promoting communitarianism in the USA.

There can be no doubt that modern communitarian socialism is a wholly Jewish philosophy promoted almost exclusively by Amitai Etzioni who has written hundreds of articles in the media on US foreign policy, US security, the Israel/Palestine conflict and every other topic he can poke his nose into. He has been so busy since the 1950s that I doubt he ever had the time to actually teach sociology at the University of Columbia.

As noted Etzioni was also a research assistant under Seymour Lipset in the USA.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seymour_Martin_Lipset

Lipset was a strong supporter of the state of Israel, and was President of the American Professors for Peace in the Middle East, chair of the National B'nai B'rith Hillel Commission and the Faculty Advisory Cabinet of the United Jewish Appeal, and co-chair of the Executive Committee of the International Center for Peace in the Middle East. He worked for years on seeking solution for the Israeli–Palestinian conflict[10] as part of his larger project of research on the factors that allow societies to sustain stable and peaceful democracies.


Here's a run down of some of the more interesting past associations of Mr Etzioni:

Member of: The American Jewish Congress; Council on Foreign Relations; The Tavistock Institute of Human Relations.

Guest scholar: Brookings Institute.

Consultant to: United States Office of Education; Office of Economic Opportunity; National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities; Arms Control Disarmament Agency; President's Commission on the Causes and Prevention of Violence; Commission on Education for Health Administration; National Center for Health Services Research and Development (Health Care Technology Division); Urban Affairs, Canadian Government; National Institute of Mental Health, Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Administration (ADAMHA); General Services Administration (GAO).

Some of the more interesting names who reviewed or endorsed one of Etzioni's books, From Empire to Community:

Lee H. Hamilton, Vice Chair of the 9-11 Commission
Rabbi Professor Jonathan Sacks, Chief Rabbi of the United Hebrew Congregations of the Commonwealth
Zbigniew Brzezinski
Leon Fuerth, former National Security Advisor to Vice President Al Gore

Leon writes:
This book is not about dogma: it is about the hopeful possibility that an evolving and expanding sense of common need among peoples and nations can with luck and vision, bring about a knitting together of a form of global governance that would permit humankind to address its most urgent issues more effectively: with less sovereign authority for national states as we have known them, but greater freedom, combined with enhanced responsibility for people as individuals and as communities.


Of the list of Etzioni's past speaking engagements the one that really stood out was:

Thursday, August 23, 2007 @ 10:00AM, The RAND Corporation, Center on Global Risk and Security, 1776 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA 90401. Amitai Etzioni will speak about Security First foreign policy.

Amitai Etzoni is now 86 years old but he's been hiding in plain sight since he created the Institute for Communitarian Policy Studies at George Washington University in 1980, where he has been busily pushing and promoting his ideas into the political, educational and environmental arena ever since. Has the communitarian message had any success? Yes, according to Wiki.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communitarianism

The philosophy of communitarianism originated in the 20th century, but the term “communitarian” was coined in 1841, by John Goodwyn Barmby, a leader of the British Chartist movement, who used it in referring to utopian socialists, and other idealists, who experimented with communal styles of life. However, it was not until the 1980s that the term “communitarianism” gained currency through association with the work of a small group of political philosophers, mostly American. Their application of the label “communitarian” was controversial, even among communitarians, because, in the West, the term “communitarian” evokes associations with the ideologies of socialism and collectivism; so, public leaders—and some of the academics who champion this school of thought—usually avoid the term “communitarian”, while still advocating and advancing the ideas of communitarianism.

Although communitarianism is a small philosophical school, it has had considerable influence on public dialogues and politics. There are strong similarities between communitarian thinking and the Third Way, the political thinking of centrist Democrats in the United States, and the Neue Mitte in Germany. Communitarianism played a key role in Tony Blair’s remaking of the British socialist Labour Party into “New Labour” and a smaller role in President Bill Clinton’s campaigns. Other politicians have echoed key communitarian themes, such as Hillary Clinton, who has long held that to raise a child takes not just parents, family, friends and neighbors, but a whole village.[12]

President Barack Obama gave voice to communitarian ideas and ideals in his book The Audacity of Hope,[13] and during the 2008 presidential election campaign he repeatedly called upon Americans to “ground our politics in the notion of a common good,” for an “age of responsibility,” and for foregoing identity politics in favor of community-wide unity building. However, for many in the West, the term communitarian conjures up authoritarian and collectivist associations, so many public leaders – and even several academics considered champions of this school – avoid the term while embracing and advancing its ideas.


I will now finally quote from the researcher who first linked Etzioni to Agenda 21. Here's what Niki Raapana has to say about Etzioni.

http://www.truedemocracy.net/hj32/17.html

He spends a lot of time on the road being interviewed and lecturing abroad and at US law schools about his "moral dialogue" to governments, bureaucrats, lawyers, judges and (of course) students. He promotes his ideology in a way that makes perfect sense to his elitist admirers, and confuses everyone else. His ancient collectivist platform and his innovative ways to remove us from "cultural relativism" are all designed to teach us to be more "responsive community members." He insists the U.S. Bill of Rights must be innovatively balanced and that the world's democratic governments are "evolving."

Etzioni's critics call his brand of communitarianism "fascist." Etzioni has never responded to the American social scientists who criticized him during his 1995 presidency of the American Sociological Association, but his position as the former ASA president is touted frequently during his lecture tours (without any reference whatsoever to the controversy surrounding his Libertarian-Fabian-communitarian propaganda).

Amitai Etzioni, at his very core, is a paradox. After studying his dissertation, his early internationally published works, and his philosophical musings, we compared his early works to his later published communitarian works. It is the ACL's opinion that Etzioni does not write everything he claims, (styles are too varied and conflicting) and we can not understand why his position as a leading Zionist influence in the White House is never mentioned by the American Press.


Unfortunately, as good as Raapana's research has been into this issue, she has clearly not understood which group influences the American press. She also has no idea about fakery.

In conclusion, Amitai Etzioni is yet another jewish change agent who has taken a very old Talmudic idea, repackaged it and sold it to the policy wonks as something new. As Niki Raapana repeatedly points out on her blog and in her book, communitarianism is a system designed to convert individual assets into "community property" under the guise of "the common good" (theft, in other words). Etzioni is simply doing his bit in achieving that outcome for the nutwork. :(
Apache
Member
 
Posts: 168
Joined: October 22nd, 2015, 12:02 pm

Re: "Hiding in Plain Sight: Reflections on an Open Conspirac

Postby jumpy64 on January 9th, 2016, 11:05 am

Apache wrote:I apologise for interrupting your post Jumpy, which I do not intend to derail. I hope you don't mind my now posting the following research about Amitai Etzioni, the promoter and Guru of the "Third Way" doctrine known as communitarianism. I also apologise for its length, but there was no way to edit it down any further than I did.


No need for apologies, Apache, I don't see your post as an interruption or a "derailment" at all.

On the contrary, it is a very interesting and well constructed post, which reveals once more the "ethnic core" of our beloved "nutwork".

This Etzioni guy makes me think of another very influential ideologist like Coudenhove-Kalergi. In fact, the latter is a "kosher" guy too...

But maybe it's just another big coincidence. They're just two separate individualistic individuals who happen to be Jewish, I guess...
jumpy64
Member
 
Posts: 288
Joined: June 27th, 2013, 1:44 pm

Re: "Hiding in Plain Sight: Reflections on an Open Conspirac

Postby jumpy64 on January 18th, 2016, 12:14 am

I just posted this article, with my comments, on the "Multicultural Agenda" thread, but it rightfully belongs here too.

You can find it at http://thoughtcatalog.com/emily-goldste ... te-people/, but I'll post it here without any comments. It can also speak for itself, I think.

As I said at the beginning of my thread, although I haven't always respected this principle, you just have to let the Jews talk to understand who they are and what they are about, even going as far as masking themselves as Whites. And I've never read anything more explicitely revolting than this. :puke:

Yes, Diversity Is About Getting Rid Of White People (And That’s A Good Thing)

by Emily Goldstein

One of the more common memes that I’ve seen white supremacists spread around recently has been “diversity is a code word for white genocide”. The concept here is that diversity is only promoted in white nations, and that the end goal is to eliminate white people altogether by flooding all white countries with non-white people until there are no white people left. Well, guess what, white supremacists? That’s exactly right. Diversity IS about getting rid of white people, and that’s a good thing.

First off, I am a white person myself, so allow me to get that out of the way. I’m extremely glad that the white race is dying, and you should be too. White people do not have a right to exist. Period. That may sound like a bold statement, but it’s entirely true. Any white person with even the faintest knowledge of history should curse themselves every single day for being white. Throughout all of recorded history, whites have engaged in oppression, genocide, colonialism, imperialism, and just plain evil on a massive scale. White people have denied every other race the right to exist, and have – at some point in history – oppressed every single race on the planet.

Why, then, should whites now be allowed to live in peace when whites have historically been the world’s #1 source of conflict and oppression? Whiteness is racism. Period. Whiteness is the source of all oppression in the world. Whiteness is racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, anti-Semitism, Islamophobia, and heteropatriarchal capitalism. Eliminate whiteness and you eliminate every single form of oppression that the world currently faces. No white people means no oppression. White people are like a cancer and oppression is a symptom of the cancer. Cut out the cancer altogether – with the cancer being white people – and you get rid of all of the oppression which white people cause.

I have dedicated my life to fighting racism, and I have determined – based on all available evidence – that the only way to really eliminate racism is to eliminate whiteness. Whiteness is the ocean from which racism flows. Get rid of whiteness and you get rid of racism. Despite what white supremacists often claim, white people do not have a “culture”. White “culture” consists of nothing more than oppression, genocide, and the disenfranchisement of minorities. White “culture” is racism and nothing more. When white supremacists talk about “white culture”, what they’re really talking about is racism. Over the course of history, white people have built a massive empire based entirely on the hard work of oppressed and disenfranchised minority groups. But guess what, white people? That empire is finally coming to an end now, and its demise is music to my hears. To quote the great anti-racist activist Tim Wise: “Do you hear it? The sound of your empire dying? Your nation, as you knew it, ending, permanently? Because I do, and the sound of its demise is beautiful.”

Descendants of Holocaust survivors can personally attest to the evil that white people are capable of when they hold the reins of power. Thankfully, whites won’t be holding the reins of power for much longer. When white people die out, so will racism, sexism, queerphobia, and all other forms of oppression. The only way to eliminate racism, white privilege, and white supremacy is to eliminate whiteness altogether. When I teach my students about human rights, critical race theory, and the role of whites in worldwide oppression, my white students often ask me how they can “atone” for the evils of whiteness and how they can make up for centuries of white oppression. And I tell them: you can do that by not having any children and ensuring that the white race does not live to oppress anyone ever again in the future.

Thankfully, white birthrates are indeed very low, while the birthrates of minorities are much, MUCH higher. Within our lifetimes, whites will be a minority in a significant number of formerly white countries, including the US, the UK, France, Germany, Australia, Canada, and New Zealand, to name just a few. To white supremacists yearning for the days when whites could rape and pillage the world with impunity, this is incredibly frightening. To people on the right side of history, however, this looks like progress. Whites are finally getting their just desserts – and it’s about time. I sincerely hope that, when the white power structure finally comes crashing down, whites will receive no mercy from the minority groups that whites have spent centuries oppressing. We certainly don’t deserve any mercy or kindness, as we have given nothing of the sort to others.

Whites should also know that, when they do become a minority in formerly white countries, they will NOT be receiving affirmative action or any of the other benefits meant to assist the minorities that whites have historically oppressed. Why? Because whites don’t deserve those benefits. It’s as simple as that. One can look to South Africa, where whites are only about 8.4% of the population, but blacks continue to receive affirmative action because blacks in South Africa have historically been disenfranchised by whites. The same thing will happen when whites become a minority in North America, Europe, and Oceania, because whites have historically oppressed minorities in all three of those continents. Not to mention, why should whites receive any kind of benefits when the ultimate goal is to get rid of whites altogether? Finally, laws against hate speech will serve to prevent whites from complaining about this, as any white person who complains will be arrested, given a long prison sentence, and made an example of for the rest of the remaining white population. Speech that attempts to justify the white power structure and perpetuate white oppression of minorities is not freedom of speech, and it has absolutely no place in modern society.

As white people, we all need to recognize that we no longer have a place in the world. This world now belongs to the minorities that us whites have spent centuries oppressing, and there is absolutely nothing that any pathetic white supremacists can do about it. In order for a better world to be created, white people need to be exterminated. Period. It’s as simple as that. We should simply be thankful that our death will be accomplished through mass immigration and declining birthrates. When whites have exterminated other races, it wasn’t nearly so peaceful – it was done through violent genocide. But other races are not as evil as whites are, and it’s important to remember that. The world belongs to minorities now, and they will make a much better, more peaceful world with what they’re given. Only when white people have ceased to exist will a peaceful and progressive society – free of racism and hatred – be possible. The only way to eliminate white privilege, white oppression, white racism, and the oppressive white power structure is to eliminate white people altogether.

So, yes, white supremacists: diversity is indeed white genocide. And white genocide is exactly what the world needs more than anything else.
jumpy64
Member
 
Posts: 288
Joined: June 27th, 2013, 1:44 pm

Re: "Hiding in Plain Sight: Reflections on an Open Conspirac

Postby arc300 on January 18th, 2016, 7:37 am

jumpy64 wrote:I just posted this article, with my comments, on the "Multicultural Agenda" thread, but it rightfully belongs here too.

You can find it at http://thoughtcatalog.com/emily-goldste ... te-people/, but I'll post it here without any comments. It can also speak for itself, I think.

As I said at the beginning of my thread, although I haven't always respected this principle, you just have to let the Jews talk to understand who they are and what they are about, even going as far as masking themselves as Whites. And I've never read anything more explicitely revolting than this. :puke:




My immediate impression is that this piece is a caricature, a literary version of modern "art" whose sole purpose is to offend as many people as possible in the cheapest way possible. It just comes across as "Too BAD to be true".

I found a couple of (jewish) bloggers who state the same thing:

Don’t fall for the “Emily Goldstein” diatribe
Posted on May 27, 2015 by jewamongyou

There are enough real instances of Jews publicly calling for the destruction of Western civilization, and the eradication of the white race, that we don’t need fake ones. This latest diatribe, attributed to a professor named “Emily Goldstein,” smacks of trolling or, at best, satire.


He continues:
There are no links, on the page, to any other articles by this author, nor does it state which institution she teaches at, or what her specialty is. So I’m calling this one a hoax, satire or trolling.

https://jewamongyou.wordpress.com/2015/05/27/dont-fall-for-the-emily-goldstein-diatribe/

Another blogger, "The Mad Jewess" wrote:

First of all, this psychosis induced Communist “Jew” is white. So, let’s us hope that she will commit suicide after we demand her firing, arrest and deportation to Gaza. Second of all: Why is a supposed “Jew” calling for a genocide/Holocaust of a whole people? She is a “JEW”, did she not learn anything? This proves my case in point-Communists are just the same as Nazi’s with their love of death. If people called her and told her that “Hitler should have finished the job”, she would scream anti-semitism. It’s sickening.

This is what this evil, ugly, frizzy-haired Bolshevik said before her post was removed: [...]


So far, so good. Even "the Jews" - or at least two of them - aren't impressed by her literary scatology. But then the above writer continues:

Of course, the Arabs, Asians and Africans suffer from none of the above (sarcasm). Arab Muslims hang gays, Arab countries are predominantly brown. African countries are black, Asians, are Asian. Most hate Jews. But, with the Emily’s of the world, who wouldn’t hate Jews?

http://themadjewess.net/2015/05/jewish-teacher-emily-goldstein-who-called-for-holocaust-against-white-people-her-post-has-been-removed/

I was wondering what the point of publishing such a stupid, peurile pile of shit would be, other than as an unfunny joke.

Is it a fake article posted as a joke?
Is it a fake-fake article, that is, an article expressing the true convictions of the writer but easily dismissed by the writer as being "just a joke"?
Is it a "Good Cop/ Bad Cop" type schtick giving a chance for all the "Good Cops" to be seen standing up for the non-Jewish targets of this text?
Is it simply designed to engender hatred and mistrust toward Jews, as the final sentence hints?
Is it designed to distract peoples' attention from other, more worthy topics?
Is it all of the above?

But I also wonder, how much coverage did this dross actually receive? Who was the target audience? Has it succeeded in any of its intended goals, whatever they are?
Could it ever hope to compete with the equally disgusting lies about the alleged holocaust, at least in terms of public dissemination and uncritical acceptance?

As you can see, I've nothing but questions about this article. It just seems so shoddy and stupid that I don't see too many people falling for it.
But then, some probably said that about the 9/11 movie, the Moon landings etc, etc.
arc300
Member
 
Posts: 167
Joined: April 27th, 2012, 11:13 pm

Re: "Hiding in Plain Sight: Reflections on an Open Conspirac

Postby Apache on January 18th, 2016, 9:54 am

It does appear that there is no such person as Professor Emily Goldstein. The 'diatribe' also appears on almost all white nationalist websites, where they have not undertaken any due diligence at all in sourcing the piece to an actual living person.
Apache
Member
 
Posts: 168
Joined: October 22nd, 2015, 12:02 pm

Re: "Hiding in Plain Sight: Reflections on an Open Conspirac

Postby jumpy64 on January 18th, 2016, 10:23 am

Apache wrote:It does appear that there is no such person as Professor Emily Goldstein. The 'diatribe' also appears on almost all white nationalist websites, where they have not undertaken any due diligence at all in sourcing the piece to an actual living person.


Actually, I think I've done my due diligence, because I I've found two professors Emily Goldstein, and I've emailed them both last night.

One is at the University College, Cork, Ireland (the less likely but still possible candidate) while the other is at Princeton University, Department of English.

I'm waiting for their answers, or lack thereof. Meanwhile, you can contact them yourself too, if you wish.

Here are their emai addresses:

e.goldstein@umail.ucc.ie

egoldst@princeton.edu

In a next post, I'll explain other reasons why I think the article I quoted is to be taken seriously anyway. I wouldn't have posted it otherwise, since I already knew about the "diatribe", and I was sure somebody here would have found it, because it's not difficult to find.
jumpy64
Member
 
Posts: 288
Joined: June 27th, 2013, 1:44 pm

Re: "Hiding in Plain Sight: Reflections on an Open Conspirac

Postby jumpy64 on January 18th, 2016, 9:40 pm

So here we are, guys, facing the fateful question: Is this Emily Goldstein’s revolting article I found and quoted a hoax?

Let’s address the pro-hoax arguments. Well, I think I’ve already dealt with the “there is no such person as Professor Emily Goldstein” claim by finding two professors with that name, both of whom I’ve sent emails to. I’m still waiting for their answers, but I’ve already demonstrated that at least two professors by that name exist, and one of them, whom I’d be inclined to suspect the most, works for the English Department at Princeton University.

Second argument: the content of the article is too obvious in its blatancy. Well, it is revoltingly blatant, I’ll give you that, but is it too blatant or too revolting? Well, my answer to this is that, compared to many other similar quotes by Jewish “intellectuals” and activists, it’s maybe more blatant than most, but totally in line with these other quotes.

There are so many of them that I had to make a selection. Here it is:

“My white skin disgusts me. If I could peel myself inside out I would be glad” – Robin Morgan (a key radical feminist and member of the American Women’s Movement, a self-described “European American of Ashkenazic – with a touch of Sephardic – Jewish ancestry).


Well, what can I say after such a nice appetizer? I can only hope she’ll find someone who can give her a hand in fulfilling her heartfelt desire. So that she can be happier, of course… :rolleyes:

But let's continue with the main courses. I hope you have a strong stomach...

It is in the Jewish interest, it is in humanity’s interest that whites experience a genocide. Until white children are burned alive, white women raped, mutilated, murdered and all white men who have not been slaughtered watch powerlessly as their people are terrorized, only then will mankind be on a more equal footing, ready to discuss white privilege and the apparent chip on the shoulder that minorities have”- Rabbi Ishmael Levitts


Those "pious" rabbis are always the... worst! :angry:

“The goal of the National Democratic Party (NPD) in Germany is to protect the existence of and secure the Biological German People. This goal is racist, Nazi are backwards. If the German people lives on it will only lead to more Fascism and racism. Therefore the goal of we, the SPD, CDU and all other democratic parties in Germany is to make the German people perish at any cost or method. The German people must be destroyed”. – Stephanie Drese, German Social Democrat


I couldn’t find any confirmation that this lady is Jewish, but she deserves to be a (dis)honorary one at least. And she’s rabidly genocidal anyway.

"Now how do I know that the white people know that we are going to come up with a solution to the problem. I know it because they have retina scans, racial profiling, DNA banks, and they're monitoring our people to try to prevent the ONE person from coming up with the ONE idea. And the one idea is, how we are going to exterminate white people because that in my estimation is the only conclusion I have come to. We have to exterminate white people off the face of the planet to solve the problem. *tepid applause* Now I don't care whether you clap or not, but I'm saying to you that we need to solve this problem because they are going to kill us. And I will leave on that. So we just have to set up our own system and stop playing and get very serious and not get diverted from coming up with a solution to the problem and the problem on the planet is white people." - Kamau Kambon, Black “American” college professor at North Caroline State University.


Now, this Kambon genocidal lunatic is not Jewish either, apparently, but that’s how Barbara Lerner Spectre, the Jewish head of Paideia (the often mentioned European Institute of Jewish Studies, funded in part by the Swedish government) who’s working in Sweden for the destruction of Europe via "multiculturalism", tweeted in response to Kamon’s genocidal rant:

“Every journey begins with a first step. We must end the so-called white race".


Another telling example, by the way, of the murderous alliance between Blacks and Jews to genocide Whites.

But there’s even an undoubtedly authentic article that’s much worse (as incredible as this may sound) than Goldstein’s!

It’s by professor Noel Ignatiev, Jewish co-founder and co-editor of the journal “Race Traitor”. It’s an excerpt from “When Race Becomes Real: Black and White Writers Confront Their Personal Histories", a book edited by Bernestine Singley that appeared in 2002 as part of Harvard Magazine’s coverage of recent books by Harvard affiliates (yes, they publish this stuff at Harvard!).

You can read it all, if you can stomach it, at https://books.google.it/books/about/Whe ... edir_esc=y

There’s also an excerpt at http://harvardmagazine.com/2002/09/abol ... -race.html, but my excerpts are not entirely contained there. You're not gonna believe what you're reading, but unfortunately this certainly isn't a hoax...

The goal of abolishing the white race is on its face so desirable that some may find it hard to believe that it could incur any opposition other than from committed white supremacists. Make no mistake about it, we intend to keep bashing the dead white males, and the live ones, and the females too, until the social construct known as the white race is destroyed - not deconstructed but destroyed. Treason to whiteness is loyalty to humanity.

The key to solving the social problems of our age is to abolish the white race. If you are a white male, you don’t deserve to live. You are a cancer, you’re a disease, white males have never contributed anything positive to the world! Those who object to my advice, knowingly or perhaps unknowingly, are themselves white supremacists. They wish to go on oppressing and exploiting other races and maintaining their own privileged positions of power. That is the conscious and sometimes subconscious motivation of all of my critics. That is why they object to destroying the cancer of humanity known as the white race. That ugly disease, which dares to call itself a people and a culture.

Christmas and white culture disgust me. I hate this time of year so much. I hate going outside and seeing Christmas trees or Christmas lights. They should be banned! A Christmas tree is just one notch above a burning cross in my opinion!

Obviously, all whites need to be destroyed, but why not start with white males? They are behind most of history’s greatest atrocities. Besides, some of the brothers like to bang white women.

Eventually white women can breed out, but my feeling is that if you are a white male, you should kill yourself now. If you are a thoughtful person, with a social consciousness who considers himself white, you will consider suicide.

Perhaps we are finally coming to an awareness in this country that the cancer known as the white race must be obliterated. Especially in the form of white males. White people are a disease, they are parasites!


This is particularly absurd. The parasite calling its hosts parasites!

They don’t deserve to live! I think we are witnessing the breaking of the back of the white male power structure. We will still have residual white males that must be dealt with, but I am confident that we’ve won.

Eventually, I would like to put white males in concentration camps and work them to death just like they’ve done to everyone else. When they are all dead we can throw a party and dance around their corpses!


Wow, I think these people should be in jail, and not in universities. But is it just me, I wonder?

So, even if Goldstein’s article is a hoax – and I don’t think it is, I repeat – there’s no shortage of even worse ones, as we’ve just seen.

And then, if it were a hoax, I think we should ask ourselves what its purpose would be. Would it be to make the Jews look worse than “white nationalists” already think they are? And why would the Jews fake something to look bad on the Internet? They already talk openly about the same subjects Goldstein’s article touches upon, as we have seen, so what would be the point of that?

Actually, Goldstein never says she’s Jewish. She says she’s white, and this is perfectly consistent with the MO of many other Jewish intellectuals (actually “agents” is a better term :ph34r: ) who, like her, try to pass off as whites, taking advantage of the paleness of their skin.

And lastly, who called out this alleged “hoax”? The individuals that opened the “Emily Goldstein diatribe”, and who have in fact been quoted by arc300 here, are in fact two other Jews. What a coincidence, eh?

The Jewish blogger jewamongyou, in particular, says some meaningful things that, while exposing the “hoax” on the surface, actually confirm its at least probable genuineness.

In fact, he opens the page arc300 linked to with the following statement:

There are enough real instances of Jews publicly calling for the destruction of Western civilization, and the eradication of the white race, that we don’t need fake ones.


Did you miss that? He’s saying that we don’t need fake instances of Jews publicly calling for the destruction of Western civilization and the eradication of the white race because there are enough real ones already! He’s admitting it openly!

And then he writes:

Of course, this piece does express what many leftists actually think. But, from my own personal experience with leftists, I don’t think most of them actually want the complete extermination of whites – though their policies obviously will lead to this, I guess it’s not obvious to them. Maybe I’m being too generous toward them.


Actually, jewamongyou is being deceptive (what a shocker! :rolleyes: ), because he surreptitiously shifts the blame from Jews to “leftists”. Nice try, buddy! :P

The other Jewish blogger who “exposed” the “hoax”, “The Mad Jewess”, tries a similar deflection by calling Goldstein an “evil, ugly, frizzy-haired Bolshevik”. A Bolshevik, not a Jew. Well, I know that’s pretty much the same thing, but this could distract some people.

But… wait! She’s giving a physical description of the “Bolshevik” professor, so maybe she knows her, or she has seen her at least, and this would actually attest to her existence, wouldn’t it? Or maybe she's just imagining her, who knows.

And then to illustrate the article there is a picture of Muslim anti-White activist Bahar Mustafa, and she doesn’t seem to have protested for her image being associated with a hoax. Well, she’s a joke, in a sense, but she does exist in the real world, apparently.

Anyway, back to the first agent, jewamongyou (what a sinister name…), he concludes:

Looking through the comments, it seems that most readers actually believe it’s authentic. Maybe it is, but my internet searches didn’t turn up any professors, by that name, who are likely authors of the article. There are no links, on the page, to any other articles by this author, nor does it state which institution she teaches at, or what her specialty is. So I’m calling this one a hoax, satire or trolling.


Oh, so he is calling this one a hoax (while also admitting that it might be authentic), because he couldn’t find any professors by that name on the Internet. I see… How could we doubt the word of a Jew, right? Only an evil White supremacist could, right? B) And in fact I did and, as I said, I found two “professors by that name”.

Looks like these useless white people are better at web searches, at least… :P

In conclusion, I don’t know about you, guys, but when Jews say something is true, I tend to believe it’s false, and when they say something is false, I’m more willing to believe it’s true.

But as you know, I’m a prejudiced guy, one of those who, when they see a tiger, run away from it instead than going towards it with open arms…
Last edited by jumpy64 on January 19th, 2016, 10:23 am, edited 1 time in total.
jumpy64
Member
 
Posts: 288
Joined: June 27th, 2013, 1:44 pm

Re: "Hiding in Plain Sight: Reflections on an Open Conspirac

Postby ICfreely on January 19th, 2016, 1:26 am

jumpy64 wrote:In conclusion, I don’t know about you, guys, but when Jews say something is true, I tend to believe it’s false, and when they say something is false, I’m more willing to believe it’s true.


Therein lies your mistake, Jumpy. And I say that with all due respect! You're in essence telling your 'enemy' that the best way to convince you of something is to claim the opposite. Anyhow, I don't mean to derail. Just something keep in mind.
ICfreely
Member
 
Posts: 555
Joined: February 7th, 2015, 6:41 pm

Re: "Hiding in Plain Sight: Reflections on an Open Conspirac

Postby ICfreely on January 19th, 2016, 1:41 am

jumpy64 wrote:But as you know, I’m a prejudiced guy, one of those who, when they see a tiger, run away from it instead than going towards it with open arms…


Then there are the guys who shoot it and mount its head to the study wall! B)
ICfreely
Member
 
Posts: 555
Joined: February 7th, 2015, 6:41 pm

Re: "Hiding in Plain Sight: Reflections on an Open Conspirac

Postby Apache on January 19th, 2016, 10:50 am

jumpy64 wrote:You're not gonna believe what you're reading, but unfortunately this certainly isn't a hoax...


Yes, it is.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/11 ... f-society/

A number of web outlets on Monday incorrectly reported that a Massachusetts professor used his final lecture to instruct his white male students to commit suicide.

The outlets based their claims on a website called “Diversity Chronicle” which published an “interview” with professor Noel Ignatiev of the Massachusetts College of Art where he supposedly stood by the shocking claims.


The only problem? While the professor is very real, the website is all satire.


The Diversity Chronicle’s disclaimer notes that “the original content on this blog is largely satirical.”


And here is a Daily Stormer confirming that it's a hoax:

http://www.dailystormer.com/return-of-t ... interview/

Shockingly, the fake interview with the White-hating Jew professor Noel Ignatiev has returned for a second round, being again covered by relatively mainstream sources.


What we do when we spread fake news like this is make ourselves look silly, and we discredit the actual facts which are documented. This is the same reason why I refuse to endorse various conspiracy theories – we have the facts, we do not need theories any more than we need the outright falsehoods of this fake interview.

In the case of Noel Ignatiev, this is especially damaging, as the man really has made insane statements, and by spreading these stupid fake quotes, we are actually hiding the real statements.


Why not quote a more academic and balanced view of what Ignatiev is really saying?

http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/20 ... -ignatiev/

What is so striking in the recent intellectual history of the West is that people like Ignatiev, who doubtless have a strong sense of their own ethnic identity and interests, have managed to pathologize any sense of ethnic identity and interests among Europeans and European-derived peoples — and no one else.
Apache
Member
 
Posts: 168
Joined: October 22nd, 2015, 12:02 pm

Re: "Hiding in Plain Sight: Reflections on an Open Conspirac

Postby jumpy64 on January 20th, 2016, 11:28 am

Apache wrote:
jumpy64 wrote:You're not gonna believe what you're reading, but unfortunately this certainly isn't a hoax...


Yes, it is.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/11 ... f-society/


That’s an interesting development, I think.

But first I'd like to clarify what happened regarding my previous post on this thread.

Since I quoted what I thought was entirely taken from what Ignatiev wrote in a book that you can find online, and I linked to it, when I saw Apache’s post, I asked myself: “Why is she defining it a hoax by referring to something different, i.e. a fake interview that I have never mentioned and didn't even know existed?"

I investigated further, and I've discovered what the problem is.

I found the quote on the page http://muslimghettos.blogspot.it/2014/1 ... -plot.html. To research where it was taken from, I googled the first paragraph, and it came out that it was taken from the Harvard book "When Race Becomes Real". The quote on the muslimghettos site was longer and made to look as if it was all taken from the same source, so I assumed the whole quote belonged to the book.

Now I realize that it was a mistake, because what they actually did is put together Ignatiev quotes from various sources, including the fake interview Apache refers to.

Anyway at least two parts of the quote

The goal of abolishing the white race is on its face so desirable that some may find it hard to believe that it could incur any opposition other than from committed white supremacists.


and

Make no mistake about it: we intend to keep bashing the dead white males, and the live ones, and the females too, until the social construct known as 'the white race' is destroyed—not 'deconstructed' but destroyed.


sound already hostile enough, and they are actually taken from the book I mentioned, and from the excerpt I linked to (http://harvardmagazine.com/2002/09/abol ... -race.html).

In addition to this, all the other quotes by Jewish supremacist agents are genuine as well, as far as I know.

And if you want to listen to the “professor” spew his anti-White racist hatred with total impunity, you can watch this short but hostility-packed video:


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q90kmUbEv7c

So I asked myself again what the purpose of the fake interview with Ignatiev and of other similar “hoaxes” could be. Evidently the Jews don’t consider them damaging for themselves, otherwise organizations like the JIDF (Jewish Internet Defence Force) would have taken them down already (the fake interview is dated 2013). So they must consider them beneficial to their cause. And why?

Well, first of all, the reason why Jew-wise people can fall for them (like I did) is because they may be exaggerated but generally plausible and in line with what Jewish agents like Ignatiev say for real. But since the majority of people have already a hard time accepting the truth of Jewish hostility towards the White race in particular, when they hear that some anti-White statements are fake, they tend to reassuringly conclude that Jewish hostility in general is a product of fakery.

This way, when they hear real, virulently hostile statements by some Jewish “intellectuals”, they can think that it's just a anti-semitic hoax like others that have been debunked as such.

A very sly employment of yet another form of media fakery. You never stop learning Jewish agents' tricks.

But now, at least, I’ve learnt one more.

Thanks to Apache, of course.
jumpy64
Member
 
Posts: 288
Joined: June 27th, 2013, 1:44 pm

Re: "Hiding in Plain Sight: Reflections on an Open Conspirac

Postby Apache on January 20th, 2016, 6:50 pm

jumpy64 wrote:In addition to this, all the other quotes by Jewish supremacist agents are genuine as well, as far as I know.


Yes, and I didn't make that clear. My apologies to you Jumpy.
Apache
Member
 
Posts: 168
Joined: October 22nd, 2015, 12:02 pm

PreviousNext

Return to THE LIVING ROOM

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests