Can't wait for it, Jumpy. As a firm believer that diversity is indeed the spice of life, I will be all ears.
Btw, I'm not someone you could really call "politically correct" - or someone who proffers platitudes. So, yes - I stand offended !
You know I meant no disrespect, Simon (and in fact you laugh about it). And I'm glad you've entered this debate, also because - no disrespect meant here either - I don't think you're immune to "political correctness" concerning this "multicultural psyop".
Yes, to me multiculturalism is a psyop
, Simon. And a very effective one apparently, if even a master (or actually The Master) at discovering and exposing psyops like yourself seems to be falling for it. It seems to me, of course. I may be wrong, but please let me make my points, will you?
simonshack wrote:Moreover - and just to make my position crystal clear - I don't think "Whites" (as you spell them, with an all-caps "W") are any better than any race roaming this world. So let's please stop that "White talk" on this forum of mine. Thanks.
Of course, the Coudenhove-Kalergi plan is an entirely different matter - and I do not support it in any way. It's a divide-and-conquer plan devised by a bunch of (mostly jewish) psychopaths who really think they are smart in making us all argue among ourselves. At this particular moment in time, they seem to be successful in their endeavors - what with their fake terror platitudes which, most unfortunately, MOST people buy into. Something needs to be done to wake up people (of ALL races) to their machinations. I think this is what we're trying to do here at Cluesforum - but we really don't need to use the "White race pride" card to get our message through.
I have already admitted that using the “White race pride” card, as I did at a certain point of the “Open Conspiracy” thread, was a failure. But I don’t think I’m doing it here. And anyway, I respect all cultures, and that’s why I’m calling them all with capital first letters (I don’t write only White, as you seem to point out, but also Black, Muslim, and even Jewish, unless I forget sometimes, of course).
So I don’t understand what you mean by “White talk”. Are you referring to the fact that I think that multiculturalism is a psyop aimed primarily against White people in White societies?
I stressed this point here after Apache pointed out facts based both on her research and on her direct experience. Her research pointed to sex gangs led by Pakistanis, Somalis, Iraqis and South Asians who exploited white women and children in a European state like England, and to state agencies taking no action against obvious abuse they were “terrified of accusation of racism” and “desperate not to undermine the official creed of cultural diversity”. The official creed
, man! Doesn’t this remind you of other official creed-based psyops like Islamic terror? How can you be so aware and radically critical of one official creed and apparently embrace this other one?
And anyway, you say you oppose the Coudenhove-Kalergi plan which, as you described it when you reopened the “Open Conspiracy” thread, “is about killing diversity (i.e. wiping out ALL existing 'colors' ... but one) and turn humanity into a grey, monolithic broth of 'human cattle' - more easily 'herdable' by the powers that be”. And you say it is not about “genociding the White race”, but I think you’re not considering the fact that killing people directly is not the only form of genocide.
As you can read at http://whitegenocideproject.com/about-white-genocide/
Moving millions of non-White immigrants into traditionally White countries over a period of years. This alone is not genocide, but the next step makes it a part of genocide.
▪ Legally chasing down and forcing White areas to accept “diversity“. This is known as “Forced Assimilation“.
A combination of mass immigration (of different groups of people) plus forced assimilation would qualify as genocide, as defined by Article II, part (C) of the United Nations Genocide Conventions:
“Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part.”
Anyway, you seem to be wanting to preserve “all existing colors”, but I don’t understand how you would go about doing that. It seems to me that the only way to preserve all colors is having different environments for different colors to thrive in. Don’t you realize that it’s really through “multiculturalism” as a form of “demographic engineering” (thanks again, Painterman), that the Coudenhove-Kalergi plan is being implemented? I’m not a painter, but isn’t grey the color you obtain when mixing all the colors together in the same palette?
By the same token, I defined your “diversity is the spice of life” motto a platitude when referred to a “multicultural” context. Because yes, diversity is the spice of life, and it’s important to preserve it. But how is it really preserved? Actually in the same way as different colors are preserved.
Why don’t we look at how Mother Nature does it? Not by throwing all the different existing plants and animal species in the same environment, I’m afraid, but on the contrary by having different groups of plants and animals live and thrive in different environments. Isn’t this a fact? And wouldn’t this be ideal for humans too? We can’t always have the ideal of course, especially at the point we are now, but why can’t we even strive for the best possible approximation to it? And why, on the contrary, are we being forced to go against Nature on such a massive scale?
Anyway, back to Apache’s direct experience (I keep quoting her because she’s the only one I’ve seen here sharing honestly the true details of her “multicultural” experience, and it seems to me that at least some people here, including you Simon, have not really listened to her) attests to all-White schools becoming all-Muslims, to White children who can’t play in off-limits local parks if they don’t want to be attacked by British Pakistani youths, to Whites driven out of property ownership in entire ghettoized areas with “No Whites Allowed” painted on the walls, and to local White girls raped by gangs of Asian men, while White British man who attempt to court British Pakistani girls get beaten up. All examples not of integration, I’m afraid, but of White genocide, in the above specified sense.
So Apache is talking from her own direct experience of a pretty advanced “multicultural” environment. Can you, Simon, and everybody else here respect that? I do. You and me, to be honest, we live in nearby areas and we certainly don’t have the same kind of experience (not yet, at least). My neighbors are all White people, and yours are too, as far as I know, but please correct me if I’m wrong.
I’ve been at a few of your parties in the last three years, and I’ve met a lot of nice and interesting people. Some of them were foreigners, but I don’t remember seeing other than white faces around you. Not even in your historical party for the tenth anniversary of 9/11 at your house: all Italian White guests, judging from what I remember of the pictures you posted on this site. The only exception I know of indirectly is Gopi, a fellow Indian member of this forum who lives in the U.S. and came to see you a while ago, and there may even be a few others I don’t know about, but that’s what they seem to be anyway: exceptions to the largely predominant “White rule”.
And then I know that you traveled, and even lived for a while, in different places, including Africa, but you’ve been living mostly in Italy, as far as I know, and not in a multicultural environment even remotely comparable to the one Apache is living in. And anyway, how many Islamic or Asian or African friends do you currently hang out with, for example?
I have none, and not because I don’t want to. The only sizeable foreign community around where I live is an Indian community. And why can I call it a community? Because most of these Indians have grouped together in the same area, as it’s the natural thing to do for everybody of any race. Contrary to what the “multicultural agents” would want us to believe, people are usually attracted to other similar people they consider as belonging to their own group. And this especially and demonstrably applies to people who belong to groups with a strongly rooted “ingroup-outgroup” mentality, as Arabs, Jews, Asians and other primarily non-Western groups.
So now this Indian community near where I live has all Indian shops in place of the ones originally owned by local people. I go there sometimes, and I’ve never seen Indians mix with Italians. They’re two totally separated groups. Actually, I’ve never even heard Indian people speak Italian, except one I saw working in an Italian store once, and he could communicate only on a very basic level.
And I don’t think this is Italians’ fault. Italians are amongst the nicest and best inclined toward foreigners people you could imagine. But this other people who came here don’t want to integrate. I suspect they don’t even know what “integration” means, and don’t even care. Most of them were forced to come here by worsening economic or living conditions, and so they just tried to recreate a “Little India” in Italy. And the same can be said of the Chinese and of other ethnic communities in my region and in others. It’s certainly not as bad as in the area where Apache lives, but I’m afraid we’re much more likely getting there than to the “multicultural Utopia” that our corrupt and treacherous rulers would want us to believe in.
One more thing: you rightly say that this forum is yours. You made it, it’s built mainly on your own groundbreaking research. You have every right to run it every way you want. But why can’t the same be said of European countries nowadays? Why are the people who built these countries not allowed not only to run them, but even to live in them without having to submit to "guests" who often disrespect and damage them and their environment?
But if multiculturalism is the way to go, as you seem to think, why don’t you, Simon, apply your multicultural views to your own “country”, i.e.your website? Diversity in Cluesforum can’t be represented by people of different skin colors and physical traits, because we don’t know or care what race different members belong to. Diversity here can only be represented by different points of view. And you’ve said that “white talk” (whatever that means, but I assume “White nationalist” talk is what you mean) is to be stopped here. I wonder why. This is something that seems to fit the typical multicultural propaganda of a society in which all religious and cultural points of view are allowed, but not those against multiculturalism, especially from a White perspective. Why is this form of lopsided diversity imposed on us?
Waiting for your answer, I’ll give you mine: because it suits the interests of the group of people who’s controlling us through various means, including, at this stage, this gigantic “multicultural” psyop.
simonshack wrote:The "Nutwork" itself, as I've coined the bunch of psychopaths 'running' this world, is multicultural. Just read our forum member ICfreely's recent posts, to understand that even 'elitist' Iranians are part of the ongoing, "dumbing-down-scheme" of this planet's population.
Having said that, it is clear as day that jewish moguls - what with their worldwide monopoly of fake news organizations - are at the very top of the aforementioned dumbing-down scheme. We (well, most people in this world that is) are currently all "mental slaves" of their propaganda power. However, I honestly don't think it will last for much longer - seeing how dumbly they are running it.
Well, it seems to me that, if the Jewish role is really “clear as day” here, as you say, it’s mainly thanks to the fact that I have drawn CF members’ attention to it with the “Open Conspiracy” thread. It didn’t seem as clear before…
I’m saying this not because I want some credit, but only to point out the fact that, as I saw the Jewish role before others here (or at least before others l found the courage to denounce it), maybe I’m also seeing and/or denouncing this multicultural psyop before others… I hope you will consider at least this possibility, however remote it may seem to you now.
And as I said, it could be really the most powerful psyop the “perps” have come up with so far, if even you, of all people, are falling for it…
Again, Simon, I mean no disrespect. You know how much I hold you in high esteem as one of the most important researchers of this Century, as I’ve told you personally more than once, and not to kiss your ass.
I only want to respectfully ask you to take off your “multicultural glasses”, if you please, and try and see this multicultural ruse for the demographic engineering psyop that I and hopefully others (like Apache and Painterman, it seems) are trying to expose with facts and sound reasoning. I even hope that, after doing this, you will find and demonstrate that things are not the way I’m seeing them. I’m not seeing a nice picture here, so I’d really love to be proven wrong. But proven with facts and/or sound reasoning, please, not with wishful thinking.