The Electricity supply.

Global War deceptions & mass manipulation, fear-mongering terror schemes and propaganda in the Age of the Bomb
ElSushi
Member
Posts: 145
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 8:53 am

Re: The Electricity supply.

Unread post by ElSushi »

scud » March 19th, 2017, 7:19 am wrote:Over on the Nuke Hoax thread, Simon recently posted this little jewel of a 1950‘s film by General Electric.


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gi-ItrJISQE

‘Nobody has ever seen an atom’...but they exist because we have experts that say they exist. Not only that, we can tell exactly their make up including numbers of protons, electrons, neutrons etc.

8.44 in caught my particular attention, a possible ‘wink, wink’ as to what this energy stuff is really all about?
A pile of ‘Uranium 238’ bearing an uncanny resemblance to the pyramids of Giza complete with a removed and glowing capstone depicted as ‘Uranium 235’?

Image

Image

HAHAHA, well, sorry for being a little sarcastic dear CF members, but that Uranium 2 + (3+8) i.e. 2 X 11 = 22 / 2 = 11 (or whatever our spooky masonic men really want us to read their fantastic masonic literature) Giza pyramid analogy is priceless. This is so obvious to me, I mean, it's as if I could almost see their cynical mind patterns coming off their tricky brains. PYRAMIDS !! Of course, what else ! :puke: :blink:
scud
Member
Posts: 127
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2011 5:56 pm

Re: The Electricity supply.

Unread post by scud »

Hello all.

I chanced upon something last night that I think should be of interest. I wrote in the opener..
As said, If this theory of AE (atmospheric electricity) is true then capacitance would be crucial to such a system because the primary source, nature, would unlikely to be a constant just as demand would never be constant which means batteries and the more the merrier.
Arron discusses on one of his talk shows (I’m afraid I can’t remember which) Battery park, just a couple of hundred meters south of where those twin electrical masts...sorry, I mean office blocks used to stand until they were knocked down by a couple of planes in 2001.
Officially, Battery park is so named after a ‘defensive battery of artillery’. Naturally, Arron thinks this little piece of history to be ‘bollocks’ and actually this area of reclaimed land provides cover to subterranean batteries of the kind that store static electricity which has been a known technology since 1745 in the form of ‘Leyden jars’ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leyden_jar

Considering this speculation I spent a little time attempting to find something that might possibly add a bit of credibility to the thought that innocuous buildings would have to be constructed or major excavation work carried out in order to conceal this capacitance and pretty quickly found ‘Tottenham substation’ by tracing overhead cables back from rural areas to north London.
Anyone heard of 33 Thomas street NYC? I hadn’t, yet from the appearance of this somewhat forbidding looking structure located at this address you’d think it’d be reasonably well known. Formally the ‘AT&T building’ but now apparently, at least part occupied by the NSA..
Image

More info’ on the structure can be found here..
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/33_Thomas_Street

From a cursory ‘images’ search I found this short article.. https://theintercept.com/2016/11/19/nsa ... os-inside/ which I think is worth a read.
So, a Mr. Stanley Greenberg sets out to gather a few pics for a book entitled ‘Invisible New York’ and was privileged enough to be granted access to ‘Two or three floors’ of ‘Longlines’ (the buildings nick name). Odd that the pictures weren’t published because I find this particular one to be very interesting..
Image

Due to the fact that there are no windows, I think it’s safe to say, that as with ‘Tottenham substation’ 33 Thomas street is not primarily designed as a place for work but rather as a very large storage facility, that just so happens to have (from the wiki link) unusually strong floors (I suppose because ‘telephone switching gear’ is real weighty stuff).

Remember, the grid doesn’t have any capacitance to speak of because it doesn’t need any. Supply and demand are all worked out at the power stations themselves, burning more / less coal or fissioning more / less Plutonium (or whatever) to raise / lower the pressure of steam to keep their turbines spinning at a constant rate, perfectly matching the electromagnetic load at any given time.

By the way, a few months ago I made good on my own promise to visit Drax power station. I didn’t write up about the trip because it just wasn’t particularly interesting and there was really nothing that struck me as glaring evidence that it was all just a smoldering prop and not producing anything of actual use.
For sure, we were tightly herded...no going off the beaten track. We were supplied with ear protection for the turbine hall but really non was needed.
Unlike the BBC doc that claimed ‘a fine coating of coal dust everywhere’ the place was clean as a whistle (though pretty dilapidated).
I suppose the strangest thing (that everyone in our small tour group picked up on) was the near total absence of personnel. I think I counted no more than ten, the majority of which seemed to be sub contractors of one sort or another, just sitting around or performing some non-essential looking task. Our guide said that total staff numbered about 1,000 full time with a further 500 dedicated ‘subbies’. Dunno, maybe everyone was just having a day off from supplying 7% of the nations electricity requirements that particular day.
patrix
Member
Posts: 712
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2016 10:24 am

Re: The Electricity supply.

Unread post by patrix »

This gentleman - Eric Dollard is interesting in terms of this and I perceive him as genuine. But I am aware this area is clouded in disinformation and organized opposition. I find sites like Electrical Universe or Thunderbolt suspicious since they like to confirm and talk about things like Nukes and NASA.


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cCJcU7INwnU


It's not very good in terms of presentation but the leads to past forgotten/hidden away electrical science is interesting.

I doubt for example that Nuclear Power plants do what they advertise. And Dollard talks about these spikes or build ups that can occur in high voltage power grids. Maybe Nuclear Power plants and the facilities mentioned in the previous post are giant capacitors with the purpose of dealing with this? I have no idea and just throwing this out there. I suspect how high voltage power works is something the Nutwork is keeping for themselves and that they use their usual modus operandi of manufactured conspiracies and disinformation. I think the key to this is to go back and look at what the science had to say in the late 19th and early 20th century, before it was murdered with Einstein et.al..

My hunch is that hydroelectricity is probably capable of feeding the entire world with cheap clean energy and that this is the case right now, but the Nutwork does of course not want us to figure this out. They want us to burn their oil and believe that solar and wind are viable solutions to create electricity and that Nuclear power is real.

My time is limited and I've got my hands full with Tychosium right now, but I hope this thing will be busted open in the future, just like 9/11, NASA, Nukes, Terrorism, AIDS, Vaccines, Nutrition, the Heliocentric model and theoretical physics. Just to mention a few. This site has accomplished a great deal. :)

Maybe someone with engineering background (and the needed perspective acquired from Cluesforum) will have time to look at this?
patrix
Member
Posts: 712
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2016 10:24 am

Re: The Electricity supply.

Unread post by patrix »

An interesting video about inventor Jim Murray that claims to have developed electric generators and motors that are up to 5000 percent more efficient than existing ones.


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HK3JOlY0V8Y
https://youtu.be/HK3JOlY0V8Y
kalliste
Member
Posts: 53
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2022 4:08 am

Re: The Electricity supply.

Unread post by kalliste »

I can't but think this is a big red flag:

https://www.rappler.com/business/france ... ooms-2022/
France's supply squeeze, caused by a wave of repairs at the country's nuclear power stations, couldn't have come at a worse time
It's happening all over to nuclear power stations, apparently. I toured Torness before it was activated for generation about 30 years or so ago when it was all shiny and new but now it's already supposedly ready for the boneyard

https://theferret.scot/first-cracks-fou ... r-reactor/
Anti-nuclear campaigners now argue that Torness may need to close “as soon as 2024” to avoid “taking any unnecessary risks as the cracking gets worse”.
Just when you need them most suddenly they're not working. Nothing to see here, move along.
BasedDept
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2022 11:55 pm

Re: The Electricity supply.

Unread post by BasedDept »

scud wrote: Sat Mar 18, 2017 9:19 pm
‘Nobody has ever seen an atom’...but they exist because we have experts that say they exist. Not only that, we can tell exactly their make up including numbers of protons, electrons, neutrons etc.
As it stands, more and more scientists and physicists are coming forward about accepted pseudo-science (photons, gravitons, etc...) but it seems like every time a nobel prize winner or highly respected physicist does so, there's a new convoluted theory that "proves" the previous theory, based on a theory that's never been proven. What a shit show...
Post Reply