THE NUKE HOAX

Global War deceptions & mass manipulation, fear-mongering terror schemes and propaganda in the Age of the Bomb

Re: THE NUKE HOAX

Postby ProperGander on April 22nd, 2015, 6:53 am

ProperGander wrote:After watching hours and hours of old newsreels and cable documentaries on weapons of war, I’ve come to the conclusion that allot of it is absolutely absurd.
All of the talking heads are obviously coached and performing for the cameras. We are so conditioned by television to think this normal, we forget its not.
I have sat through hours of corporate videos and people do not act like this on camera. Normal people everyday folk do not. Those trained in public speaking and actors who are coached do act like this. I know, someone will come up with some explanation to put one back to sleep- there's always a "Columbo-like" excuse.

The techniques they use when speaking, are designed to manipulate you into thinking they are experts- they are not- they are reading from a script. Heavily edited video is shown. A voice over and interview tells you what to think. Critical judgement goes out the window. And you do not see how fake the footage is. Or how stupid the logic behind the tactics and strategy.

If what was shown in theaters back in the 1940’s as news was real, they’d have shown you how to conduct war. Does that really make sense? Would the Department of War want to show you how its done?

Its all been filmed in a Hollywood back lot or at Pinewood Studios. IMDB “H.G. Wells -Things to Come” “2001” “Superman-The Motion Picture”. Same special effects guy Wally Veevers made you believe a man could fly. He is uncredited for "Things To Come".

They could have 'made you believe a man could fly" in 1902.

This is Veevers IMBD: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0891764/?ref_=ttfc_fc_cr32

Zoran Perisic also worked on both 2001 and Superman.

See how the magic trick has worked? Hollywood has been telling us the secret for years. A clue here and there. Civilization is The Matrix. Ironman 3, Watchmen And Birdman give one a sense of how it works- a blending of fact and fantasy, where does one begin and one end? Get the joke? Centuries of lies and deception. The work of the dark side of the force. Jedi mind tricks. you see the 'droids' Darth Vader wants, but are told they are the wrong ones. Realize too that the whole 'court' system is another 'game' and things like the Treaty of Paris and the U.S. Constitution are part of the illusion as well. Court indicates game and rules. Make your own rules. Declare yourself Independent. Take back your rights and your consent. ;) We are not party to contracts we didn't sign, last I checked. The world is really bound by contract, and yet we are told to think 'treaty' as if it was something different.


http://www.dga.org/Craft/DGAQ/All-Artic ... erman.aspx



Don't like self-quoting (or quoting at all) but I think it important to make sure the information was presented accurately. I had made mistakes with the earlier version of this post. What is above is correct and includes two important links.

Wally Veevers did work on the H.G. Wells film, but was not credited, as per his IMDB page, linked above. The H.G. Wells film shows us what is to come for London and Britain in general, just a few years later... as if he knew... or more likely as if someone 're-made' it and showed it on screens as reality. Well, someone might ask, what about 'so and so', who claimed that they were "there when the bombs fell"? 911 I say. It shows us the way. Always remember its BULL because its "Bull-oni". Watch some of that H.G.Wells film. Is it not a dress rehearsal for 'what was to come'? Seem familiar? "They" should not have done 911. And then Sandyhook and Boston and then they should not have shoved it in all of our faces. Someone clearly wants us awake. How could they not see we can see them now? Our eyes can see Saturn's single dumb eye. Its CBS. And all the rest. And its as plain as day. Big Brother is being (and has always been) watched by us literally and we did not know it. ;)

I want to clarify something as well.

The harness used to create the illusion of Superman flying might have been new. The way they made Christopher Reeve look flying was probably the achievement they claim. We really can't say. Surely models have been rigged with wires in some manner prior to this. And this is more a question of the kinds of maneuvers Superman needs to execute, rather than selling the illusion he is flying overhead like a bird or a plane. Planes and bombs and ships at sea do not need to look and move like a man in a cape does.

Front projection is one technique that can be used to composite an object or person into a scene. Another way it to matte the figure out of each frame of film. By hand one can paint out the foreground object or person from the background. This was shown to us in the 1902 in Le Voyage Dans la Lune or A Trip to the Moon. This person would be the 'matte painter'. In other words, its deceptive to say 'front screen projection' was the only way to achieve the effect. Children make instructional videos that they post online, showing how some of this is done with easily available software. The modern tools are nothing more than computer versions of things you could pretty much do over a hundred years ago in a dark room.

"Its only a model"
http://galeon.com/traditionalfx4/diamonds.html

http://stanley_kubrick.enacademic.com/2 ... ers,_Wally
(Keep in mind, rear projection was one choice. A more difficult one was matte painting. And they could have got the shot to look more realistic. That too is a choice. They didn't want the special effects in the fictional work to be as good as what was presented as NEWS)

I think this presents a pretty decent picture of how the media had been manipulated in the 20th Century. I think the shoddy and obvious Space-X and other poorly executed work a result of the proliferation of computer technology in this area. They still use models, (virtual or not) but the editing and compositing is done on computer. Everyone is a special effects person now and perhaps its easier and cheaper to use young military officer types, who lack the skill and are easily misled. Just some speculation. Or they want us to know. I think some of those 'behind the curtain' do.

Screens with the power of the 'cloud' are the proverbial Pandora's Box. The last thing to come out of it is happening NOW.

"Brothers and sisters, Children of the Sun, wake up. Spread the WORD." :) someone said something like this once


•as for one eye imagery: One eye is used to peer through the telescope used to navigate. One eye is closed when the artists draws a scene in perspective. A film makers uses one eye to peer through the camera. And of course the camera lens is one big dumb eye.
ProperGander
Member
 
Posts: 152
Joined: April 14th, 2015, 2:16 pm

Re: THE NUKE HOAX

Postby MsQ on April 24th, 2015, 10:43 am

With Calbuco volcano being in the news, I am reminded of some of these old nuclear testing clips. Especially my all time favourite clip which is the Soviet Hydrogen Bomb Test. I think they did a really good job at making something that would install fear in so many people. The grim voice, the bleak colours, the sound - especially at the end when the funnel shaped piece comes down out of the mushroom cloud, that's gold! What captured my attention though, was the never ending explosion. It's the explosion that keeps giving and giving. Stuff coming out of some endless source and continuing to move up and up into the mushroom cloud. Terrifying, but how is that possible from just an explosion? :huh:
Well it seems to me that some of the nuclear testing images and footage, part of what we're looking at is nothing more than clouds in fast motion. (I posted a couple of super cell pics earlier on in the thread as examples of stills, as well as my comments a couple of posts back.) I'd say other part's of the footage are made from volcano footage. The moving stem of the mushroom cloud looks just the same as well as volcanic eruptions. If I had time and unlimited internet, I would scour the web for mid 20th century volcano footage and try and find matches. But for now, all I can do is link to some Calbuco footage & images:

Footage:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/southamerica/11556923/Town-evacuated-in-Chile-as-volcano-erupts.html

Images:
http://www.theatlantic.com/photo/2015/04/the-eruption-of-chiles-calbuco-volcano/391305/

Soviet Hydrogen Bomb Test.


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r0dUIq8gHgc
MsQ
Member
 
Posts: 101
Joined: February 13th, 2012, 5:40 am

Re: THE NUKE HOAX

Postby ProperGander on April 24th, 2015, 12:36 pm

I like the model at :45 or so. The crafts men left clues. Ot they let an apprentice do the work of a journeyman. More multi media propaganda to tell you what to think and feel. We've all been programmed by the media- in all of its many many forms. We can either transcend it and see it for what it is (MAYA) or stay trapped in its maze. Nice find.

"Good night, sleep tight. The big bright sun has gone away. Done gone away Goodbye, don't cry. Tomorrow will bring us a brand new day. We can run and play. And they'll laugh up and down the hall.
Don't you go shout when you hear them fall. Let them fly across the wall. Let them cry - 'til the morning calls. Little two step angel dance" Angel Dance by Los Lobos as sung by Mr. Plant
ProperGander
Member
 
Posts: 152
Joined: April 14th, 2015, 2:16 pm

Re: THE NUKE HOAX

Postby anonjedi2 on April 30th, 2015, 3:17 pm

The following Disney propaganda video regarding ICBMs was posted by ab on fakeologist. It is an attempt to explain exactly how ICBMs work to the average American.


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mE-q1IaPIUk

Please note that beginning at approximately 2:25, the narrator says:

"This mechanical master of mathematics has to know the exact distance to a target that may be over 6,000 miles away. And to make the job more difficult, the rotation of the Earth keeps the distant target moving..."


Oh? Aren't we told that the atmosphere is moving right along with the Earth? If this is the case, it should have no effect whatsoever on the speed of the missile and should not add any complications at all in regards to the complication of hitting its target.

So which is it? Is the Earth moving at 1000mph below the missile? Or is the atmosphere moving with the Earth as claimed by NASA?

Can we conclude that ICBMs are fake as well? :lol:

h/t to user Alyeska over at fakeologist, great find!
Last edited by anonjedi2 on May 1st, 2015, 7:33 am, edited 1 time in total.
anonjedi2
Member
 
Posts: 687
Joined: December 31st, 2012, 6:50 am

Re: THE NUKE HOAX

Postby Critical Mass on May 1st, 2015, 1:26 am

Inevitably when looking into the 'Nuclear story' you will begin to bump into other topics.

I have looked into ICBM's and interested researchers can find some footage & photos (I'd advise googling 'Kwajalein Atoll' which allegedly was a target area) for example...


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PDL_pIPScSI


It would certainly appear that ICBM warheads are fake (seeing as the test explosions never seem to cast shadows and they only destroy 3ft scale models) however the rockets themselves are probably more appropriately discussed in the space sub-forum (they allegedly reach altitudes of 150km to 400km... essentially they are just big 'sounding rockets').

In terms of making a ballistic rocket an effective weapons system one really wonders how accurate 1960's radar would be at determining the exact speed & altitude of any rocket or how easy it would be to control rocket thrust precisely.

Even miniscule errors would lead to large targeting deviations.

Would this have been any easier in the 80's?
Critical Mass
Member
 
Posts: 544
Joined: July 8th, 2014, 11:33 pm

Re: THE NUKE HOAX

Postby smj on May 1st, 2015, 12:35 pm

I'm not entirely sure, but I don't think ballistic missiles are radio-controlled. We are told that Doc Draper decided that it would be easier to dead-reckon the missiles; you know, like he dead-reckoned the Apollo missions to the moon and back.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inertial ... ion_system
http://www.cambridgehistory.org/discove ... 0Labs.html
http://web.mit.edu/digitalapollo/Docume ... report.pdf

MIT started Draper Lab, the guidance control hustlers, and Lincoln Lab, the missile defense radar hustlers. Lincoln runs the radar at the Kwajalein Atoll.

http://www.draper.com/Documents/draperat25.pdf
https://www.ll.mit.edu/publications/jou ... eentry.pdf

By the way, Norbert Weiner wrote the cybernetics movement's sacred text while he was at MIT. The text was titled 'The Human Use of Human Beings'.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Huma ... man_Beings

MIT is really into control.
smj
Member
 
Posts: 65
Joined: September 10th, 2014, 11:29 pm

Re: THE NUKE HOAX

Postby smj on May 1st, 2015, 1:18 pm

James Fletcher, the only two-time Nasa administrator, was neck-deep in the ICBM scam. We are told knowledge lit his way.

https://www.lds.org/ensign/1984/04/jame ... y?lang=eng

http://history.nasa.gov/Biographies/fletcher.html

Image
smj
Member
 
Posts: 65
Joined: September 10th, 2014, 11:29 pm

Re: THE NUKE HOAX

Postby Critical Mass on May 2nd, 2015, 9:13 am

smj wrote:I'm not entirely sure, but I don't think ballistic missiles are radio-controlled. We are told that Doc Draper decided that it would be easier to dead-reckon the missiles

You are correct... the missiles were 'guided' via dead reckoning & an 'inertial guidance system'.

The Minuteman had a claimed 'probable error' of 1.1 nautical miles (which later fell to 1.1km).
Critical Mass
Member
 
Posts: 544
Joined: July 8th, 2014, 11:33 pm

Re: THE NUKE HOAX

Postby smj on May 4th, 2015, 3:34 am

I was going to make a clever post comparing the 'scanning girls' at CERN to the 'calutron girls' at Oak Ridge...

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=basLNz6frO8
http://fakeologist.com/forums/topic/the-nuclear-family/

... but I'm speechless after watching the last three and a half minutes of this video about 'Gargamelle'.

http://cds.cern.ch/record/43141

The main 'scanning girl' in the CERN propaganda video has a Poppy Northcutt thing going on, no?

Image
smj
Member
 
Posts: 65
Joined: September 10th, 2014, 11:29 pm

Re: THE NUKE HOAX

Postby smj on May 4th, 2015, 12:30 pm

Those lovely 'scanning girls' at CERN were assigned to the bubble chambers like Gargamelle...

Image

The bubble chamber was invented by a Berkeley man, Donald Glaser. He was inspired by David Anderson and his cosmic wave research at Cal Tech. Anderson confirmed Dirac's prediction of anti-matter with this irrefutable evidence we are told...

Image

Anderson's 'discovery' brought us into the age of the 'strange' particle and the even stranger Ψ-entists looking for them.

http://cerncourier.com/cws/article/cern/54390

Glaser learned what he could from Anderson, so he moved on. We are told he was eventually recruited to Berkeley by Luis 'feckin' Alvarez. Glaser would be given a Noble for his bubble chamber tomfoolery in 1960.

The narrative then tells us that Glaser got bored, so he studied molecular biology with Max Delbruck...

“The progress of science is tremendously disorderly, and the motivations that lead to this progress are tremendously varied, and the reasons why scientists go into science, the personal motivations, are tremendously varied. I have said … that science is a haven for freaks, that people go into science because they are misfits, and that it is a sheltered place where they can spin their own yarn and have recognition, be tolerated and happy, and have approval for it.” (Max Delbrück, 1978)
http://blog.yovisto.com/max-delbrueck-and-the-genes/

... so he could start the first biotech company. That company (and Berkeley of course) gave us 'Kary' Mullis, the PCR guy.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cetus_Corporation
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kary_Mullis
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/kary-

Delbruck was the hungry virus guru; he taught the world how to work with these curious inventions every summer at Cold Spring Harbor...

Image

He was promoted by the Ψ-function guy himself in 'What is Life'...

http://www.genetics.org/content/177/2/673.full

It appears that, besides DNA and eugenics, Cold Spring Harbor was once renowned for its whaling community...

Image
http://update.lioddities.com/around-tow ... ing-harbor.

Glaser named the first biotech company Cetus of course.
smj
Member
 
Posts: 65
Joined: September 10th, 2014, 11:29 pm

Re: THE NUKE HOAX

Postby smj on May 4th, 2015, 2:16 pm

Another Berkeley man used to chase strange particles at CERN back in the day. His name is Stanley. Perhaps you have heard of his daughters, Susan and Anne?

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanley_Wojcicki

Here's the happy family...

Image

http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/B ... 415518.php
smj
Member
 
Posts: 65
Joined: September 10th, 2014, 11:29 pm

Re: THE NUKE HOAX

Postby simonshack on May 6th, 2015, 9:38 pm

*
Dear smj,

Truly enjoying your diggings and your (for lack of better word) 'research-style', smj - but I've told you so before. Keep at it, please ! :)

Did you know that the Higgs bosomn was first discovered by Homer Simpson - 14 years before the wondrous CERN geniuses and their billion-dollar, gargantuan machines? (Btw, that old "Gargamelle" movie from the 70's really cracked me up!). You'd think cartoonists should be let teaching us about particle physics for a fraction of the price !


Homer Simpson 'discovered the Higgs boson'
"Homer Simpson predicted the mass of the Higgs boson particle 14 years before it was discovered, a writer claims"

Image
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science ... boson.html
simonshack
Administrator
 
Posts: 6330
Joined: October 18th, 2009, 9:09 pm
Location: italy

Re: THE NUKE HOAX

Postby ICfreely on May 7th, 2015, 3:40 am

The power of props is highly underrated my friends!

Take a chalkboard adorned with imaginary and irrational hieroglyphs to impress docious students and unwitting laymen. Add an ordained charismatic pro-fessor (preferably donning a neatly trimmed beard & a pair of studious glasses) with a piece of chalk in his hand. Top it off with a little senseless prof-talk and you could just about convince people of anything.


Ralph Alpher, who is now credited for developing the mathematical underpinnings for the Big Bang theory is often pictured in front of a chalkboard. Fred Hoyle’s favorite instrument is also a chalkboard. Although telescopes have been essential tools in the advance of cosmology, the power of chalkboards, pencils, and paper should not be underestimated. After World War II cosmology joined hands with high energy particle physics, and the world of the unimaginably large came to be understood through the mathematics of the vanishingly small.
http://cosmology.carnegiescience.edu/timeline/1949


P.S. smj, I’m in total agreement with Simon. Your unorthodox research style is refreshing & inspirational. Please do keep it up.
ICfreely
Member
 
Posts: 555
Joined: February 7th, 2015, 6:41 pm

Re: THE NUKE HOAX

Postby smj on May 7th, 2015, 10:39 pm

It appears Homer has a knack for particle physics; which makes sense, he did work at a nuclear plant. I reckon Homer could've been quite the rocket Ψ-entist or molecular biologist.

Here's a cartoonist who's into Ψ-ence...


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PfynbNw5ei4

... Ann Druyan was Carl Sagan's ole lady.



Image

The fraud that taught Ralph α to stand in front of the chalkboard, Geo γ, was also a cartoonist of sorts. We are told Geo wrote and illustrated the popular 'Mr. Tompkins' books that indoctrinated children and academics the world over. He claims that his good friend Charles Galton Darwin had to pull some strings to get him published.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mr_Tompkins
http://www.arvindguptatoys.com/arvindgupta/tompkins.pdf

Here's Geo talking nonsense in front of a chalkboard...


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y0RTa5mDsWk

Geo came up with some probabilistic bull-Ψ-ence about α decay. He tweaked Rutherford's accelerator at the Cavendish- on the Rockefeller's dime of course; and he then came up with a β decay rule with his pal Edward Teller.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamow_factor
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/do ... 1&type=pdf

But Geo is best known for the αβγ paper he did with Ralph Alpher that predicted the existence of the 'Ylem'- the high-energy photon producing primordial soup. We are told these same photons are detected today as cosmic background background radiation...

Image

... that's Ralph α on the right. ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ralph_Asher_Alpher )

Here's a child-like academic that would like to tell you all about the αβγ paper...


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A8RfvwwdPZQ

But the narrative says that Geo was also good friends with Max Delbruck, the bacteriophage guru. So when Luis 'feckin' Alvarez told him about Watson and Crick's famous paper he was able to lend his genius to the DNA hustle as well.

http://www.ias.ac.in/resonance/Volumes/ ... 4-0049.pdf

Emilio Segre's nephew wrote a book about Geo and Max. He was very impressed...

"George Gamow, usually called Geo (pronounced “Joe”), was Russian, and Max Delbrück, invariably known simply as Max, was German. Geo came to be seen as the father of Big Bang cosmology, the first to glimpse how the expanding hot cauldron of the universe’s first minutes could form the present world’s elements. Max became an iconic figure in the study of bacteriophages, the viruses that provide the simplest means of studying genetic replication. Focusing on these viruses was a key step in uncovering the structure of DNA. Geo and Max can rightly be viewed as founders of modern cosmology and genomics, the two groundbreaking fields I was advising my student to pursue"
http://www.scientificamerican.com/artic ... uses-book/

...Geo began the hustle for a formal genetic code; all the cool Ψ-entists were all the sudden working on his abstract 'coding' problem. So he started a club of course...

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/RNA_Tie_Club
http://www.webofstories.com/play/francis.crick/84


Geo had a strange son that he named Igor. Igor is a ballet-dancing cowboy that was trained by Delbruck at Cal Tech. Igor would go on to teach at Colorado-Boulder just like his ole man.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Igor_Gamow

Fortunately for the narrative, Igor got fired for 'moral turpitude' so he would have more time to put out some horrible 'Mr. Tompkins' cartoons of his own...

Image
Image


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=04wJd2ZncPs
smj
Member
 
Posts: 65
Joined: September 10th, 2014, 11:29 pm

Re: THE NUKE HOAX

Postby smj on May 11th, 2015, 4:22 am

Image
http://berkeleyplaques.org/e-plaque/luis-alvarez/

Apparently there were scanning girls at Berkeley. I suppose it makes sense seeing as Luis "feckin" Alvarez was the man that merged the Atom Smasher's hustle with Glaser's bubble chamber idea.

Madeleine Goldstein was one of Luis' scanning girls. Here she explains the hustle...

"The precious stack of IBM cards were passed to the physicists, who would then process the data in the existing IBM processors, using software that would calculate the best fit for these coordinates, and thereby mathematically simulate the curvature of the track. This collection of data for analyses is what led the physicists to prove the existence of new particles. Since I was only a scanner for one year, and a Math rather than a Physics major, the details and results are beyond my knowledge. Suffice it to say, from what I have described here, the data collection process was a demanding physical activity, relying on an individual’s coordination and eyesight to determine the “best” coordinate points to select. But we were working with the state of the art equipment of its time!"
http://www.physics.ucla.edu/marty/HighEnergyPhysics.pdf

... maybe it's sour grapes; it appears Luis had his favorites...

"In addition to my teachers and my colleagues, I would like to mention one other person who shares equally in the responsibility for my presence here tonight. Janet Landis came to work in my group in the summer of 1957 when our first bubble-chamber was churning out its earliest pictures. She scanned and measured the photographs, she operated the computer, and she later trained and supervised the people who did that work. Almost exactly ten years ago, she left the Laboratory to become my wife. Since then, she has rearranged our living room every Monday night to entertain forty of my young associates who arrive on schedule for our weekly seminar. She has provided the warmth and understanding that a scientist needs to tide him over the periods of frustration and despair that seem to be part of our way of life. I know it is an old Swedish custom that a man must Skål his wife at a banquet under penalty of dire consequences for failure. So with your permission, I will now Skål my Jan."
http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/ ... U_8UmK9KSM

... so did Donald we're told five and half minutes into this video by Jack Lloyd, Luis' go-to bullshit builder...


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E9NjjwD255I


"By 1967 the Alvarez group was analysing more than a million events a year. An army of scanners examined the films for events of interest and a battalion of computer programmers wrote code to analyse them. The bubble-chamber team was at that time the largest high-energy physics group in the world, totalling several hundred people. The development of the chamber and the analysis systems resulted in an explosion of new particle discoveries that helped to establish the quark model. It was this work that earned Alvarez the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1968."
http://cerncourier.com/cws/article/cern/48622

Luis was awarded a Nobel for his primary role in creating the particle zoo. Which says a lot because Luis "feckin" Alvarez was the consummate hustler and was credited with a shit-ton of bull-ψ-ence...

http://www.nasonline.org/publications/b ... luis-w.pdf
http://www.6911norfolk.com/d0lbln/105f0 ... lvarez.pdf
http://undsci.berkeley.edu/lessons/pdfs ... woflow.pdf

Here's Luis posing with a $5,000,000,000 box...

Image
http://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/2011/11/ ... plutonium/

Berkeley celebrated the 100th birthday of the consummate hustler a couple years ago. Susan and Anne's ole man was there; turns out he was in Luis' bubble chamber group back in the day...

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=wNrGSLqz8L4

...his crazy-ass son was there...

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=YR31ctMJM3c

...as was his protégé, Richard Muller...

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_5dDUjoZMe4

...even the dude that programmed the computers that analysed the nonsense sent to them by the scanning girls was there...

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=P2pBeBIH3pI
smj
Member
 
Posts: 65
Joined: September 10th, 2014, 11:29 pm

PreviousNext

Return to WWI - WWII, the Nuke Hoax, the Cold War and JFK

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests